| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
01-14-2011, 09:03 AM
|
#26 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 925
Thanked 43 Times in 23 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 7 Posts
|
Ass = FAIL
The car almost look like PS SLS front on a old SLK........  | 
|  | |
01-14-2011, 09:28 AM
|
#27 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 3,192
Thanked 152 Times in 44 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Looks like a pretty conservative design. Z4 looks better though.
| |
| | |
01-14-2011, 10:05 AM
|
#28 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
|
Like the refresh for the SL, the refresh for the SLK looks awkward. The original design was round and curvy, so the squared off front ends don't fit the overall look.
| |
| | |
01-14-2011, 10:06 AM
|
#29 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by q0192837465  I never really like how the SLS looks. Let's be honest, people like the SLS because of the heritage. If another manufacture came up with the same design, we'd all bah at how ugly it is. Posted via RS Mobile | x2 Completely agree. I wish they have gone retro and done something curvy with round lights similar to the original with an updated look. The only thing that ties the SLS to the original is the gull wing doors.
| |
| | |
01-14-2011, 05:43 PM
|
#30 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 745
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Doesn't look right. Front is too squared, and rear is too round. Mini SLS + C Class rear is FAIL.
I'd take Z4 anyday. Love that thing.
| |
| | |
01-14-2011, 06:12 PM
|
#31 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 933
Thanked 288 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 23 Posts
|
bad... looks like they just took parts from other models and plastered them together 
Z4 instead
| |
| | |
01-14-2011, 10:11 PM
|
#32 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 58 Posts
|
still a chick's car. that rear end fails
| |
| | |
01-15-2011, 09:30 AM
|
#33 | | I don't get it
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Parksville
Posts: 435
Thanked 169 Times in 26 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 4 Posts
|
Anybody else find these two quite similar?
SLK 
Lexus SC430 - design that is quite old now  | |
| | |
01-15-2011, 10:24 AM
|
#34 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 38 Posts
|
^ only similarity is color, nothing else is close., either way, the tail looks bad, front is nice
| |
| | |
01-15-2011, 11:53 AM
|
#35 | | #savethemanuals
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
|
I like the proportions of the SLK more than the SC. Long hood and short trunk = classic sports car. Now if only it performs as well as it looks.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
