REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-06-2011, 12:12 PM   #1
All Day, Err Day Mod
 
Nintensity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,999
Thanked 223 Times in 51 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
Smoked Taillights. Illegal?

Hey guys,

I was wondering if there are any rules/restrictions regarding using smoked Taillights.

My buddy told me that if, in such case, where a car rear-ends another car with smoked taillights, the car with the smoked taillights is 100% at fault. Usually the person who rear-ends is 100% at fault, but in this case, the driver wasn't able to see the 'red' in the taillights.

Is this true? Correct me if i'm wrong.
Advertisement
__________________

Feedback of 40-0-0

-kT: "No man get a ruler and look, 12cm is long!"
Nintensity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 12:20 PM   #2
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,109
Thanked 9,871 Times in 3,926 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
check the police forum
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 12:40 PM   #3
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 5,138
Thanked 2,216 Times in 510 Posts
Failed 852 Times in 132 Posts
smoked tail lights, as in the housing itself is smoked, is legal. They come stock in some cars, eg. TL type S

TINTED tail lights with overlay are illegal.
illicitstylz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 01:34 PM   #4
I am on the internets
 
maxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,991
Thanked 184 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 31 Posts
from what i saw, the smoked factory tail lights on Jetta GLI and BMWs, the only tinted parts were the turning signal and the reverse lights.
__________________
"As Sir Francis Bacon once said, 'There is no beauty which hath not some strangeness about its proportions'.
And he's right, who ever he is. I mean, look at Keira Knightley.
She's just an ironing board with a face. And she works." - JC on the Alfa 8C
maxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 01:53 PM   #5
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,798
Thanked 91 Times in 34 Posts
Failed 200 Times in 21 Posts
Tinted tail lights are illegal period.

but I would bet that ICBC will overlook tinted tail lights if the car get rear ended no?
the person who rear ended the car in front will still at fault.
valent|n0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 01:59 PM   #6
Media Officer / MOD
 
!Aznboi128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
^ not true. My buddy's car got rear ended icbc deemed it was 100% his fault cause he had tinted tails.
Posted via RS Mobile
!Aznboi128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 02:04 PM   #7
:inoutugh:
 
TOS'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ඞ
Posts: 9,985
Thanked 5,850 Times in 1,843 Posts
Failed 970 Times in 279 Posts
Tinted tails = harder to see light = guy rear ending car infront of him that has the tinted tails = car in front is at fault, lol
__________________
Posted from NE 1-J W Inglis Building
TOS'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 02:15 PM   #8
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
spyker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lake Of Fire
Posts: 1,166
Thanked 623 Times in 252 Posts
Failed 257 Times in 119 Posts
Tinted tails are not worth the hassle and BS with ICBC and the cops,unless the car came with them from the factory,just leave your oem ones alone.
spyker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 02:23 PM   #9
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
PiuYi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New West
Posts: 3,161
Thanked 1,341 Times in 557 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 108 Posts
so smoked tail lights are legal but tinted ones are illegal? or is there no difference?


then what of smoked non-DOT approved tail-lights? will icbc deem you at fault for those? it seems kinda hard to prove they were non-DOT approved after they've been smashed
PiuYi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 02:38 PM   #10
no
 
jpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: home
Posts: 5,374
Thanked 6,061 Times in 1,223 Posts
Failed 221 Times in 85 Posts
^idn if this will answer your question.. but pretty much anything you modify or add aftermarket parts to your tails... is illegal unless you buy a whole new assembly from a legit company that is dot approved... (if its available)

other than that ive been pulled over million times when i had tinted lights and they ALL told me ANY type of layer of film/paint is illegal even if its really really light, it doesnt matter

so either leave your lights alone or buy legit dot approved product ones or be a bauss and go through the hassle
jpark is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-06-2011, 02:49 PM   #11
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
BaoTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Neverland
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 641 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 191 Times in 65 Posts
Best leave lights OEM...?
BaoTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 03:45 PM   #12
No Duplicate Accounts Allowed
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 335
Thanked 88 Times in 50 Posts
Failed 118 Times in 28 Posts
I've had DEPO blacklines for quite some time now and have never had any trouble...

Whether they are legal or not, I don't know, but I certainly won't sit here pretending like I do know like more than half the people in this thread...
n0ob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 03:55 PM   #13
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by n0ob View Post
I've had DEPO blacklines for quite some time now and have never had any trouble...

Whether they are legal or not, I don't know, but I certainly won't sit here pretending like I do know like more than half the people in this thread...
:noob:
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 04:03 PM   #14
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
PiuYi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New West
Posts: 3,161
Thanked 1,341 Times in 557 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 108 Posts
be a bauss it is


just checked: the red brake areas have no tint/smoke on mine, only the signal/reverse lights are smoked.... prbly why i haven't been bothered about them yet
PiuYi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 04:55 PM   #15
racing & tech mod.
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,034
Thanked 507 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
The LAW says that your lights (any lights) may NOT be Obstructed in any way.

Aftermarket Tint or Smoke = Obstruction (because it reduces the light output)

FACTORY Tint or Smoke is OK because the factory makes the lights brighter to compensate for the tint/smoke, or leaves the lit area untinted or unsmoked.
Rich Sandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 05:20 PM   #16
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
What Rich says...illegal and unsafe...tinted or smoked...unless the vehicle came from the factory that way...and yours did not because you want to tint/smoke them.

General maintenance
4.04 (1) Lighting devices required by this Division must be maintained in good working order.

(2) Lamps and reflectors required by this Division

(a) must be securely mounted on the vehicle,

(b) must not have any cracked, broken, missing or incorrectly installed lenses, and a lamp must not have bent or broken rims that allow water to enter the lamp, and

(c) must not be shielded, covered or obscured by any part of the vehicle or load or by dirt or other material.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-06-2011, 05:33 PM   #17
racing & tech mod.
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,034
Thanked 507 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
What is the point of having brake lights if they are hard or impossible to see?



PS: Driving around with a thick layer of mud dried on your brake lights is just as illegal as having them tinted.
Rich Sandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 08:17 PM   #18
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 577
Thanked 266 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 5 Posts
I'm guessing this applies to headlights too?
dn53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 08:17 PM   #19
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
ninjatune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LMD
Posts: 3,149
Thanked 232 Times in 74 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 4 Posts
It's also deemed illegal by not only the fashion Police, but the good taste Police as well!
ninjatune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 09:06 PM   #20
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
FerrariEnzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
IF it doenst come it with from factory, you COULD get a ticket!

nuff said
__________________
My Buy&Sell Feedback, Thanx
FerrariEnzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 10:17 PM   #21
They let me be a moderator. LOL
 
SpuGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,219
Thanked 3,670 Times in 867 Posts
Failed 1,062 Times in 190 Posts
Why do we have a thread on this subject every 3 weeks?
SpuGen is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-06-2011, 10:37 PM   #22
My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
 
Culverin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
Almost makes me think we should start a FAQ section, so the first person to see it link to the faq, then the first mod to see it lock it down.

But i realized that would only be enabling non-searching behavior.
__________________
***Sarlo's Awesome Eatery ***
Facebook // Instagram
Culverin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 10:58 PM   #23
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
lgman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 990
Thanked 795 Times in 196 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 30 Posts
I just wanna say something related off topic to rear brake lights. Not everyone on the road has all of them working either. But you see more of those people than people tinted lenses? doesn't seem fair does it? I think those people should be punished with negligence on top of what perils they might cause in an accident. But hey! if RCMP wants to single out Johnny APC for his euro look that have all the lights in working order, truck on brother...



Anyways back on. If you get into an accident with those tinted after market lights and if you think you can get away after its been smashed, those highly paid adjusters will find out so don't worry about that.
__________________
My feedback
lgman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 11:14 PM   #24
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by !aznboi128 View Post
^ not true. My buddy's car got rear ended icbc deemed it was 100% his fault cause he had tinted tails.
Posted via RS Mobile
I'm sure there were other factors in it too, based on that logic what's stopping me from ramming my car into any ricer with some vht on his tails at night to get a new bumper?
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 11:17 PM   #25
My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
 
Fafine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,515
Thanked 1,431 Times in 486 Posts
Failed 243 Times in 94 Posts
^ the hassle, time wasted, and so on..
Fafine is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net