REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-17-2011, 12:33 PM   #1
Ready to be Man handled by RS!
 
TeriyakiSawce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 77
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 2 Posts
Turning Circle Comparison

Ive been having a debate with a friend about the turning circle of different drivetrains (FWD, RWD and AWD) Which has the largest turning circle and which has the smallest? If you could proved a brief why that would be great

My opinion:

1. RWD (smallest)
2. FWD
3. AWD (largest)
Advertisement
TeriyakiSawce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:07 PM   #2
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Qmx323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,878
Thanked 2,644 Times in 880 Posts
Failed 218 Times in 79 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automob..._drive_layouts

doesnt mention AWD turning circles but it does confirm that RWD has the smallest turning circle and FWD has the biggest
Qmx323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:14 PM   #3
Prince of the Apes
 
bloodmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,469
Thanked 3,046 Times in 672 Posts
Failed 1,163 Times in 238 Posts
i think it depends more on the wheel base more than the driveterrain.. EVO 94' wheel base VS Supra MK4 94' wheelbase for example..
__________________
There's times in life where I want a relationship, but then I cum.
Quote:
[23-08, 13:17] nabs i've gripped ice boy's shaft before
Quote:
[26-08, 13:50] Jesusjuice is this a sports car forum? why are there so many hondas?
bloodmack is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 03-17-2011, 01:22 PM   #4
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 74 Posts
You would need to get 2 cars that are the same but with the drivetrain changed to get a proper comparison.

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:23 PM   #5
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Nightwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
It would be pretty specific to X car vs X car. Some have rear wheel steering, some just have wildly different dimensions, etc.

I suppose not having driveshafts that need to reach the turning wheels would give RWD an advantage though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count.
Nightwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-17-2011, 01:25 PM   #6
YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
 
CP.AR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL400
Posts: 5,865
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
My aunt had a Volvo 740 way back when
holy shit that thing could turn on a DIME
__________________
Where the hell am I
CP.AR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:27 PM   #7
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 74 Posts
I would think that RWD having to push the car around would make the radius bigger than a FWD that pulls the car tight?

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:30 PM   #8
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: van
Posts: 781
Thanked 324 Times in 104 Posts
Failed 220 Times in 54 Posts
all depends on wheelbase, size of wheels etc theres too many variables, theoretically there is no difference between a fwd/awd/rwd this is basically an impossible question
eurochevy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 03-17-2011, 01:47 PM   #9
I don't like cheese but I love milk!
 
Ferra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 1,980
Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts
Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts
totally car dependent

The RSX has a short wheelbase but a horribly WIDE turn radius
My family had a sienna with much longer wheelbase but a smaller turn radius than a RWD e90


actually...to solve your question, just check whether a RWD e90 has better turn radius than a AWD e90
Ferra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:48 PM   #10
Guest
 
subwoffers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 164
Thanked 192 Times in 39 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 7 Posts
My car has a turning radius of 26.2 feet. You jelly?

A smart car has a TR of 28feet.
subwoffers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:49 PM   #11
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Doesn't really have much to do with the drivetrain as others have said.

The new subaru impreza in my experience has been very good, and my mom's W203 C class was pretty good for u-turns too, X3 was not as good and has similar wheelbase so yeah it's pretty specific to each car

Then again with some RWD you can do this kind of shit at a stand still
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 02:15 PM   #12
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker View Post
I would think that RWD having to push the car around would make the radius bigger than a FWD that pulls the car tight?

Berz out.
This.

I suspect a 4ws Prelude could defeat almost any competitor in a turning radius contest.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 02:25 PM   #13
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
It has nothing to do with FWD, RWD or AWD.. but everything to do with engine layout, *WD is just an after effect.

Assuming all cars' wheel base and track are the same:

Engine layout and engine configuration limit the the maximum angle the wheels can turn in, hence affecting the turning radius.

Rear engine layouts that have the smallest turning radii (because there is no engine up front to constrain the angle of turn) vs front wheel longitudinal then front wheel latitudinal.

You can have higher angle of turn on longitudinal front engine layouts. (eg Audi A6/ A4 FWD will have smaller turning radius than their A3 FWD). However Inline engines eg BMW or old Mercedes will have even smaller radius since the engine packaging is thinner... hence allowing the wheels to turn in even more.

Latitudinal layouts Honda / Volvos (especially their i6) etc have larger turning radius since their wheels cannot turn in as much. They try to compensate by making their cars much wider (so they also claim that they make it more roomier)

4WS / pushing or pulling theories have relatively small effect when compared with what different engine layouts can do.

To test this in daily life, take a 3 series RWD, C class V6 RWD and a TL/TSX on a 2 street 3 point turn. 3 series can usually do it in 2 while the rest have to do full 3.

Last edited by godwin; 03-17-2011 at 02:40 PM.
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 02:32 PM   #14
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindBomber View Post
This.

I suspect a 4ws Prelude could defeat almost any competitor in a turning radius contest.
4WS is hacks.

But despite that, I don't believe it has the tightest turning radius.
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 02:32 PM   #15
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Wikipedia says this about RWD:

Quote:
Steering radius — As no complicated drive shaft joints are required at the front wheels, it is possible to turn them further than would be possible using front-wheel drive, resulting in a smaller steering radius for a given wheelbase.
But at the end of the day, it still ultimately depends on each car model itself... how far they decided to lock the steering and such.
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 03:46 PM   #16
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
dark0821's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Van604
Posts: 2,921
Thanked 2,280 Times in 631 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 40 Posts
i rmbr clarkson comparing a SL65 Black to a normal SL350... =.=
the turning radius on the Black was far bigger than SL350...

so my friend tested a EVO VS lancer GTS for U Turns... Lancer made it with full lock on a normal residential street... EVO...not so much

which leads us to assume, higher performance cars probably have a diff geomentry that makes it having a bigger turning radius? LOL, no idea what i am talkin abt.. so just a hypothesis


skip to 6:02 to see what i am talking abt...

Last edited by dark0821; 03-17-2011 at 03:56 PM.
dark0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 04:07 PM   #17
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
It is called wider wheels, which reduces the turn in angle. Not to mention you need more force to turn in when you are going high speed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark0821 View Post
which leads us to assume, higher performance cars probably have a diff geomentry that makes it having a bigger turning radius? LOL, no idea what i am talkin abt.. so just a hypothesis
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 04:56 PM   #18
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,236
Thanked 934 Times in 374 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
Toyota Echo hatchback that I had as a courtesy car couldn't make a U turn in a 2 lane road without doing a 3 point. My wider, longer wheel base, RWD, fat tire'd MR2 Turbo does a U turn on the same road without problem
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:39 PM   #19
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Noizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,107
Thanked 261 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dark0821 View Post
so my friend tested a EVO VS lancer GTS for U Turns... Lancer made it with full lock on a normal residential street... EVO...not so much

which leads us to assume, higher performance cars probably have a diff geomentry that makes it having a bigger turning radius? LOL, no idea what i am talkin abt.. so just a hypothesis
You're on the right track, higher performance cars will have more components in the engine bay. Beefier engine and transmission will take up more space, and when you add the turbo into the lancer, it'll take up more space. As a result, the steering angle of the front wheels will be limited more so than a basic model.
__________________
If you always do what you've always done, you will always get what you've always got.

feedback
http://www.revscene.net/forums/showt...ighlight=noizz
Noizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:40 PM   #20
My homepage has been set to RS
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 2,402
Thanked 900 Times in 387 Posts
Failed 395 Times in 107 Posts
You guys are all morons. It has nothing to do with drivetrain and everything to do with how the knuckles are designed and how much "angle'' your front wheels can get when you are at full lock.
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-17-2011, 05:44 PM   #21
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 74 Posts
That's why I said you need 3 cars that are exactly the same only 1 being RWD 1 being FWD and 1 being AWD. Also speed is a huge factor.

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:46 PM   #22
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 64
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 21 Posts
we talking about turning radius? i noticed the 2 door coupes have a bigger turning radius then 4dr sedans...
shtone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 05:48 PM   #23
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,890
Thanked 5,175 Times in 1,555 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by falcon View Post
You guys are all morons. It has nothing to do with drivetrain and everything to do with how the knuckles are designed and how much "angle'' your front wheels can get when you are at full lock.
Yup. Something big, such as a Dodge Ram 1500, has a mid-20's turning radius, while a compact, like a Corolla, pulls a wide 36 footer.
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:12 PM   #24
My homepage has been set to RS
 
77civic1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,284
Thanked 1,275 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by falcon View Post
You guys are all morons. It has nothing to do with drivetrain and everything to do with how the knuckles are designed and how much "angle'' your front wheels can get when you are at full lock.
Mostly true. While it does completely depend on the max angle you are getting out of the front wheels, its also true that a fwd vehicle would have a lower max because of the limits of the driveshaft. A rwd vehicle has more potential to have a small turning radius, if the desire was there.
__________________
flickr
77civic1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 07:30 PM   #25
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,411
Thanked 9,486 Times in 2,441 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
My A5 has an much wider turning radius compared to my e92.
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net