| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
04-10-2011, 09:19 PM
|
#1 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,028
Thanked 436 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 292 Times in 68 Posts
| Why no Turbos in F1?
Hey guys I just watched a very interesting documentary on turbo cars in F1 dating back to the 80's.
During this time F1 cars could run a 1.5 liter turbo engine with upwards of 1000hp. Still to this day power has not matched the old cars.
Why did they get of the turbos and will they ever return?
| 
|  | |
04-10-2011, 09:23 PM
|
#2 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
|
From what I understand, just too fast and too dangerous.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane  who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count. | | |
| | |
04-10-2011, 09:25 PM
|
#3 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
|
Why did they get rid of forced induction? Largely safety (or "safety", depending on your point of view), probably aided by cost constraints.
Will they ever return? It looks like it, but not like in the guise of the 80s; in 2013 or 14, I think the FIA is recommending/mandating an overall engine spec of inline fours with turbochargers.
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 09:26 PM
|
#4 | | I am Hook'd on RS
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Edmonton/Abbey
Posts: 56
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Didn't they just confirm that forced induction I-4 motors will be used in 2013 or soon after that?
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 09:51 PM
|
#5 | | Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
|
Woudnt that result in a ton of lag, i mean a turbo that makes a 1.5l produce 1000hp+??? Daymm crazy shit
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 09:51 PM
|
#6 | | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Van
Posts: 1,664
Thanked 413 Times in 101 Posts
Failed 95 Times in 37 Posts
|
Yes, FIA is going to force F1 cars to use 1.6 liter 4 cylinders turbo engines by 2013. (If they wanted to be eco, why wouldn't they just decrease the number of laps for each race!!) I personally hate downsizing of formula one engines. 3.5L V12 -> 3.0L V10 -> 2.4L V8. F1 race is really boring after the first lap. Quote:
Formula One will switch to turbocharged four-cylinder engines from 2013, the FIA has revealed.
The new 1.6-litre engines will replace the current 2.4-litre V8s as part of F1’s drive to improve economy and lower emissions.
Alan Henry blog: F1 set for radical changes in 2013
The turbo units, which last appeared in F1 back in 1988, will be limited to 12,000rpm although an extended use of KERS systems should keep power at current levels. Economy should improve by around 35 per cent.
Teams will only be allowed five engines per season from 2013, and this will be reduced to four from 2014. Gearboxes will have to last five races, not the four at present.
The FIA has also removed the rule banning team orders from 2011, although teams can still be charged with bringing the sport intro disrepute.
| Source: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...llCars/254527/
Last edited by cococly; 04-10-2011 at 09:57 PM.
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 09:56 PM
|
#7 | | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Van
Posts: 1,664
Thanked 413 Times in 101 Posts
Failed 95 Times in 37 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LP670-4 SV Woudnt that result in a ton of lag, i mean a turbo that makes a 1.5l produce 1000hp+??? Daymm crazy shit | Professional rally cars are equipped with Turbo Anti-lag systems (ALS), I am pretty sure Formula one teams with their resources could eliminate much of the turbo lags.
MOre on ALS: http://www.rallycars.com/Cars/bangbang.html | |
| | |
04-10-2011, 10:03 PM
|
#8 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 5,324
Thanked 3,782 Times in 1,242 Posts
Failed 533 Times in 187 Posts
|
It's the same reason Group B doesn't "exist" anymore.
__________________
'16 Ram 1500
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 10:09 PM
|
#9 | | "Entertainment" mod.
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,121
Thanked 3,462 Times in 1,054 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
|
What others have said, too much power and too many accidents.
Another reason F1 is moving to the 1.6 turbo is that I heard the FIA is pushing for a "World Engine" that will be used in its various classes (ie. WTCC, WRC, etc.), just with different air restrictors and boost limits.
__________________
Green OJ Special
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 10:34 PM
|
#10 | | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,550
Thanked 3,067 Times in 1,226 Posts
Failed 154 Times in 77 Posts
|
technology in F1 advances so quickly, that if they didnt put major regulations on the cars, year after year they would shorten their laptimes by 3-4s... obviously this is a problem.
they can make much faster cars today then they did in the 80s, but if you look at the record of fatal f1 accidents, you'll see that after the 80s they really trailed off, and since 94 there hasnt been a single fatal accident. its all about saftey
| 
| | |
04-10-2011, 10:34 PM
|
#11 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,585
Thanked 4,578 Times in 934 Posts
Failed 554 Times in 127 Posts
|
1.6 I4 turbo has a lot more potential for trickle down technology as well. If the technology is more relevant to the street you might see more manufacturers building engines again.
It would be nice to see toyota, bmw and honda back making F1 engines
| |
| | |
04-10-2011, 10:44 PM
|
#12 | | "Entertainment" mod.
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,121
Thanked 3,462 Times in 1,054 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
|
^ 4A-G revival? LOL. It's somewhat possible for Toyota to come back, and I'd like to see that, especially because of their work with Formula Atlantic.
__________________
Green OJ Special
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 12:30 AM
|
#13 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
Bernie stated on the grid walk to Martin Brundle, that it's all about the noise. He said the v8's have the best noise and thus more attractive for the sport.
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 12:52 AM
|
#14 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by vitaminG 1.6 I4 turbo has a lot more potential for trickle down technology as well. If the technology is more relevant to the street you might see more manufacturers building engines again.
It would be nice to see toyota, bmw and honda back making F1 engines | the problem is, it will be limited to 12,000rpm.
it won't rev 20,000+rpm like some F1 engines.
my guess is it'll sound just like modded high revving B16 turbo.
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 01:04 AM
|
#15 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Lake Of Fire
Posts: 1,166
Thanked 623 Times in 252 Posts
Failed 257 Times in 119 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane Bernie stated on the grid walk to Martin Brundle, that it's all about the noise. He said the v8's have the best noise and thus more attractive for the sport. | I much prefered the sound of the v10's,they had a much more violent scream to them over the current V8's.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:53 AM
|
#16 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 1,017
Thanked 138 Times in 75 Posts
Failed 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
i wonder how many engines they'll get using forced induction
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:21 AM
|
#17 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: van
Posts: 781
Thanked 324 Times in 104 Posts
Failed 220 Times in 54 Posts
|
they used to have monsterous twin turbo engines in the 80's but just too fast / powerful for their lack of car structure safety and also their downforce..we should bring them back lol
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:40 AM
|
#18 | | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,355
Thanked 1,776 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 195 Times in 67 Posts
|
We need a season of unrestricted goodness. Sure, shitty teams would get their asses kicked, but who cares about Force India an ilk anyway?
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 05:19 AM
|
#19 | | The "You'd Know" Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Home
Posts: 20,931
Thanked 276 Times in 140 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
The new engine rules are crap. The big constructors (such as Ferrari and Mercedes) already voiced their opinion that turbo I4 will not do anything in marketing their brands.
In reality, if I want to see an engine last forever, I would go watch Le Mans. To have an F1 engine last for like 5 race weekends, you could already get a sense of how de-turned it is.
__________________
08 CBR600RR
03 IS300
Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you. | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 07:25 AM
|
#20 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 1,017
Thanked 138 Times in 75 Posts
Failed 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
the most recent reformation in rules has caused an earthquake in established manufacturers like ferrari and maclaren...it would be interesting to see the plethora of new technology developed by them for turbo engines
as for the idea that formula one is all about big engines...i think that formula one is about building a car as powerful as it can be under certain restrictions...as long as they dont put out the single engine supplier, formula one lives on with turbo  | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 08:08 AM
|
#21 | | Everyone wants a piece of R S...
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: BC/ON
Posts: 365
Thanked 332 Times in 43 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 12 Posts
|
was it just me or did everyone read 
in their mind?
was it just me? 
__________________
I'm 12 and what is this?
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 08:23 AM
|
#22 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,619
Thanked 5,083 Times in 1,875 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
|
I think F1 trying to "Reduce emissions" and "increase fuel economy" completely laughable.
These are RACE cars built to drive around in circles for no other useful purpose than to entertain spectators. The whole sport is fundamentally wasteful.
So they make all these rule changes and save 0.5 MPG, big fucking deal.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:49 PM
|
#23 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by impactX The new engine rules are crap. The big constructors (such as Ferrari and Mercedes) already voiced their opinion that turbo I4 will not do anything in marketing their brands. | True...because Ferrari or Mercedes...including Toyota (LFA for example) always like to say "This is basically a detuned F1 engine" sort of stuff.
I4 rule would be beneficial for Honda because they make a lot of I4s...but Ferraris are always V12-V8 so they can't really say "This V12 is full of F1's 4 cyl technology. "
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 08:28 PM
|
#24 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 1,017
Thanked 138 Times in 75 Posts
Failed 117 Times in 50 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo True...because Ferrari or Mercedes...including Toyota (LFA for example) always like to say "This is basically a detuned F1 engine" sort of stuff.
I4 rule would be beneficial for Honda because they make a lot of I4s...but Ferraris are always V12-V8 so they can't really say "This V12 is full of F1's 4 cyl technology. " | maybe it will lead to ferrari developing a 4 cyl super car | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 08:55 PM
|
#25 | | Wanna have a threesome?
Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by danizer | At first that sounds a bit ridiculous, but if you seriously consider the idea there's really no reason to not produce 4 cylinder turbo super cars.
600hp+ K20/24 engines are so well proven they can be built with daily driver reliability using off the shelf parts, and that's a Honda engine utilizing after-market engineering. Now, inject the developments passed down from F1 into those engines and I see no reason why they could not compete with a V8,V10 or V12. Superficially they may not be as cool as a V10, but in terms of performance there are potential significant weight savings.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
