Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
04-20-2011, 01:42 PM
|
#26 | ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tequilabomb actually i have been bullshitted by a pig 7 years ago, gave me a VI saying my car was lowered. Which in fact my suspension was absolutely STOCK | There is a difference between bullshitting and being mistaken. Just because he thought you lowered your car doesn't mean that he knew full well that you had stock suspension and wanted to give you a ticket just for the hell of it.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 01:48 PM
|
#27 | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dangonay So you sau you've had "less than 3 tickets" then you say you've had 2 "regulars" and 1 "excessive". What were the conditions of those previous tickets (how fast were you going, where were you driving).
They're saying you are "likely" to commit further offences in the future. That usually only comes from having a history, otherwise they can't claim you are "inclined" to repeat.
I'd really like to know your whole driving record. For example, on your previous tickets how fast were you going and where? Were you only 10 km/h over the limit or were you at 39 km/h, or just barely under the excessive speed? How many issues have you had involving drinking and driving, like roadside 24hr suspensions which aren't classified as impaired driving?
I don't think we're getting the whole story here. | To be more precise, the 2 regular tickets were dated in 2008. I was doing 80 in a 60 once. The other time the cop said I was following too close to the speeder up front but didn't actually get my speed. If you know the area just after you've got off the pattulo bridge in surrey, where the cops usually hide on the side, thats where I got it. Both happened during the day.
The excessive ticket was from last year. I hit 110 in an 70 on marine drive during the night.
And that's all the speeding tickets I've got for my whole driving record. I wouldn't say it is perfectly good, but definitely far from repeating.
Absolutely no drunk driving record prior to this incident.
Blowing a WARN means blood alcohol content (BAC) >= 0.05% and < 0.08%, which is another bs in itself. In my case, that meant couple beer. Put it simply, if the new drinking law didn't come in last year, I would have passed. 3 days prohibition to start for the first timer, which was what I got.
Blowing a FAIL means BAC >=0.08% and that is much more serious with a 30 days prohibition to start and a potential criminal record.
While I am not saying it is perfectly okay to drink and drive, taking my car away for the first offence is just ridiculous.
Last edited by sapere; 04-20-2011 at 02:07 PM.
Reason: typo
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:01 PM
|
#28 | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS Just something to note for the future:
1. If there is no one to pass, stay on the RIGHT lane
2. If you are passing someone, move to the LEFT lane
3. After you have passed, move BACK to the RIGHT lane
I'm assuming you were on the left lane before the truck started to "tailgate you" and then you moved to the right lane? Because it would be absurd to do that backwards. However, if I had changed lanes and the person still tailgated me, I would have simply pulled over instead of speeding up because that person has showed that he/she has no intention of just passing me. | I was on the HOV lane actually. I switched from HOV all the way to the right lane, one lane at a time. I didn't think it was a good idea to brake or slow down at that instance. He was following dangerously close.
Keep in mind that it was a black truck in the middle of the night. I wouldn't need to be afraid to pull over if it was clearly a cop.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:08 PM
|
#29 | NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
So how fast were you actually going? Why bother bitching if you're guilty?
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:19 PM
|
#30 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: B.C
Posts: 1,659
Thanked 2,532 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 358 Times in 70 Posts
|
most cops are ass hats. i was a passenger in my friends car, and he was pulled over cause his ep3 was lowered..
no joke. his ep3 only has tien suspension and work rims...
he GAVE ME a ticket for no seat belt when i clearly had it... he told me to come out of the car, then gave me a ticket afterwards... i had no way of proving i was wearing once i got out..
i ate that ticket like a dead cat..
since then i fucking hate rcmp/richmond police...
my friend felt so bad for me he offered to pay half of the ticket..
im not hiding anything in my story.. i had my seat belt. i got a ticket with no seatbelt.. cops are asshats.. end of story
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#31 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 142
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
2 words: "LAWYER UP"
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:28 PM
|
#32 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: B.C
Posts: 1,659
Thanked 2,532 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 358 Times in 70 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim most cops are ass hats. i was a passenger in my friends car, and he was pulled over cause his ep3 was lowered..
no joke. his ep3 only has tien suspension and work rims...
he GAVE ME a ticket for no seat belt when i clearly had it... he told me to come out of the car, then gave me a ticket afterwards... i had no way of proving i was wearing once i got out..
i ate that ticket like a dead cat..
since then i fucking hate rcmp/richmond police...
my friend felt so bad for me he offered to pay half of the ticket..
im not hiding anything in my story.. i had my seat belt. i got a ticket with no seatbelt.. cops are asshats.. end of story | with that being said,
if u were excessively speeding and drinking, u deserve it
GL
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:29 PM
|
#33 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,476
Thanked 522 Times in 263 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 40 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sapere Blowing a WARN means blood alcohol content (BAC) >= 0.05% and < 0.08%, which is another bs in itself. In my case, that meant couple beer. Put it simply, if the new drinking law didn't come in last year, I would have passed. 3 days prohibition to start for the first timer, which was what I got.
Blowing a FAIL means BAC >=0.08% and that is much more serious with a 30 days prohibition to start and a potential criminal record.
While I am not saying it is perfectly okay to drink and drive, taking my car away for the first offence is just ridiculous. | The LAW in BC is that if you blow above .05 you're impaired and get 1. a road side suspension and 2. your vehicle impounded.
You were impaired. You knew it, you had the empties IN YOUR CAR.
Because you were impaired your judgement of how things went down may not be entirely reliable. You MAY have been swerving a bit in the lane and that may have been why the officer was driving so close to you for example.
You broke the law. You knew the consequences and didn't care to heed them so now you have to face them.
Welcome to the grown up world.
__________________
~ Just another noob looking for a clue
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:34 PM
|
#34 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,569
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,216 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
|
Try getting accused of street racing when I was clearly cruising around 55km.
Yes I was aware that I was 5km above the speed limit, and ironicly other drivers around me were going faster.
Only in Richmond. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
04-20-2011, 02:36 PM
|
#35 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,569
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,216 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tequilabomb actually i have been bullshitted by a pig 7 years ago, gave me a VI saying my car was lowered. Which in fact my suspension was absolutely STOCK | That makes sense since it's around the fast and furious era when stock Subaru Sti's were getting shit for their stock muffler and the Honda s2000 for their stock projector headlights. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
04-20-2011, 02:37 PM
|
#36 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: https://t.me/pu
Posts: 453
Thanked 201 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
So how fast did he clock you going?
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:39 PM
|
#37 | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soltaaa 99.20% of the time cops dont bullshit, there not out in the world too fuck everyone over. if they say you were going fast then you were going fast and the alcohal thing made matters worse. | Sure, if the undercover didn't bs and I was indeed driving like a maniac on the highway, then pull me over on the highway.
Why the 20 mins of tailgating? Was he waiting for me to get into an accident first? If I really did get into an accident, would he not be liable for not taking reasonable preventive measures? He didn't pull me over because he knew I had total control of the car.
Then here I am, car taken away after being accused for driving like maniac, yet I still have my license. No license suspension or anything like that. Nothing is stopping me from getting another car to endanger the public again as they put it.
Suppose then, I did commit to all the accusations.
Did taking my car away without suspending my license solve the problem? No.
Are there incentives to them in taking away my car? Not in my case, but yes in general.
Will this make them look good to the public? Certainly.
Furthermore, if he had solid evidence of my crime, he wouldn't need to deter to using civil forfeiture to cheese his way out. He could and should have charged me criminally for dangerous driving, the car would be gone under criminal forfeiture instead and I would be ending up behind the bars. Problem solved.
Point being? He got nothing on me and that taking my car away does not solve anything. So yes, I am calling his bluff here because I wasn't driving like a maniac.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:42 PM
|
#38 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: PM
Posts: 4,477
Thanked 3,341 Times in 842 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
|
Answer everyones question. How fast were you going? Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
04-20-2011, 02:46 PM
|
#39 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Also on the notice of civil action, they are claiming I was and also is likely to repeat including but not limited to:
1. Excessive speeding
2. Driving without consideration
3. Driving without due care
4. Driving in a manner dangerous to public in light of all conditions
5. Impaired by alcohol contrary to criminal code 253(1)(a)
Which could potentially cause serious bodily harm.
While on the actual violation ticket, I only got excessive speeding so wtf was all those made up bs? Might as well throw the whole MVA book at me. I am also not being criminally charged by the police for impaired driving. |
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
04-20-2011, 02:47 PM
|
#40 | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNewGirl The LAW in BC is that if you blow above .05 you're impaired and get 1. a road side suspension and 2. your vehicle impounded.
You were impaired. You knew it, you had the empties IN YOUR CAR.
Because you were impaired your judgement of how things went down may not be entirely reliable. You MAY have been swerving a bit in the lane and that may have been why the officer was driving so close to you for example.
You broke the law. You knew the consequences and didn't care to heed them so now you have to face them.
Welcome to the grown up world. | You talk as if you've seen the whole situation and known everything. Did I say I drank the empties? Or drinking WHILE driving?
Answer is No to both.
I knew about tickets and prohibitions, but forfeiture? I didn't think this country has shifted to communism, or did it now?
All these hypothetical MAYs and IFs need to meet their ends.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:51 PM
|
#41 | #savethemanuals
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
|
How fast were you going!?!?!? Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
04-20-2011, 02:53 PM
|
#42 | RS.net Licensed Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 336
Thanked 68 Times in 30 Posts
Failed 14 Times in 4 Posts
|
faster than the speed of light
__________________ Drivehard Performance www.drivehard.ca
140/150 11351 Bridgeport Road
Richmond, BC
604-270-2494
Official dealers of : Volk Racing, Vossen wheels, Yokohama, Gram lights, KICS Project, Status Racing Seat, AMS tuning, KW Automotive, Work Wheel, VMR Wheel, Macht Schnell, Tein, Defi, Vishnu Tuning, HRE Wheel, MXP Exhaust, Vorsteiner, Varis, Arqray, Techart, Champion, Iforged, NEEZ Wheel
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:54 PM
|
#43 | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jgresch Answer everyones question. How fast were you going? Posted via RS Mobile | That is a rather meaningless question.
I drove at different speeds in different situations for different durations during the whole 20 mins incident.
He wasn't standing on the side to clock me with a radar, so there was no reading.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 02:56 PM
|
#44 | #savethemanuals
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
|
Did you reach a speed that was obviously way over the limit that you don't need any detector to tell that you over by a large amount? Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
04-20-2011, 03:00 PM
|
#45 | Welcome to Planet Power ///M
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,435
Thanked 2,979 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 59 Posts
|
he was obviously speeding, otherwise the cop wouldn't have even noticed him. way to own yourself, dumbass. and as for keeping a beer can in the car... bravo. |
| |
04-20-2011, 03:04 PM
|
#46 | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sapere Blowing a WARN means blood alcohol content (BAC) >= 0.05% and < 0.08%, which is another bs in itself. In my case, that meant couple beer. Put it simply, if the new drinking law didn't come in last year, I would have passed. 3 days prohibition to start for the first timer, which was what I got.
Blowing a FAIL means BAC >=0.08% and that is much more serious with a 30 days prohibition to start and a potential criminal record.
While I am not saying it is perfectly okay to drink and drive, taking my car away for the first offence is just ridiculous. | A year ago, you would have still been slapped with a 24hr prohibition from driving and had your car towed away. They just increased it to 3 days recently. They never changed the BAC%, they just increased the severity of the punishment.
Since you seemed to know so much about the law, why did you still drink?
__________________ Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts |
| |
04-20-2011, 03:07 PM
|
#47 | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sapere That is a rather meaningless question.
I drove at different speeds in different situations for different durations during the whole 20 mins incident. | how is that a meaningless question?
Are you afraid that everyone is going to shit on you if you posted a ridiculously high speed?
__________________ Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts |
| |
04-20-2011, 03:10 PM
|
#48 | "Entertainment" mod.
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,117
Thanked 3,432 Times in 1,051 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
|
I'll ask it too, and I'll type it in a way that it can be read slower and made easier to understand:
How. Fast. Were. You. GOING?
__________________
Borokusowagen.
|
| |
04-20-2011, 03:14 PM
|
#49 | Welcome to Planet Power ///M
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,435
Thanked 2,979 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 59 Posts
|
im gonna guess that the cop was pretty accurate with his "190km/h" reading. have fun paying off the lease with no car to drive bud (y)
|
| |
04-20-2011, 03:17 PM
|
#50 | I AM
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,466
Thanked 1,329 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 149 Times in 42 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sapere That is a rather meaningless question.
I drove at different speeds in different situations for different durations during the whole 20 mins incident.
He wasn't standing on the side to clock me with a radar, so there was no reading. | alright. what were the different speeds in the different situations for the different durations during the whole 20 mins? |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM. |