You have a good point, the fine print is there to protect the company, but it is not law. You can try with the Canadian BBB or even file a breach of contract in small claims court.
For small claims you are looking to avoid this $400 in cancellation fees by claiming Bell is in breach of contract by not offering the minimum service you require. You have proof from the CEO acknowledges there is a known issue and they are not willing to fix this problem. Yes, you might say the fine print might covers this, but you have to remember it will cost Bell more than $400 to have a lawyer spend time on such a small case. They might just settle outright and avoid the fuss.
You just need to spend a little more time in this, but if it's worth saving $400 or how many more dollars in wasted monthly cellphone fees, it might be worth your time.
If you still rather spend your money on buying a booster, maybe look at this unit:
http://paulstamatiou.com/review-wi-e...signal-booster
I don't know if it works with Bell.
Quote:
Originally Posted by camshaft  Thanks mrks
the problem is have you ever really looked at the fine print on the cell phone contract ?
Well Bell made it very clear they do not guarantee cell coverage and refereed to the fine print. No exceptions
As I even pulled the 911 card because I was involved in a vehicle theft and we managed to catch the guy. Tried to place a 911 call and it got dropped and still Bell wouldn't do anything.
And as well all know it costs HUGE dollars to get out of a 3 year contract. |
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
and still do nothing.