REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2011, 11:47 AM   #1
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
What would you rather have, more options or less KM?

I'm looking into buying a fuel friendly daily driver and have come across two acura TSXs for sale.

1. 2004 TSX, base model but only has 38,000 km on it
2. 2005 TSX fully loaded with navi, has just over 100,000 km on it.

both are the same price, which one would you rather have?
I looked on TSX club and retrofitting OEM navi or installing aftermarket navi into a TSX is a pain in the ass. I don't really care about navi, I do care about having bluetooth though.... so what do you think?
Advertisement
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.

Last edited by xpl0sive; 06-09-2011 at 11:57 AM.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:53 AM   #2
Female Driven
 
FI-Z33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,163
Thanked 489 Times in 166 Posts
Failed 99 Times in 29 Posts
I assume you meant 100,000km (100K km)...
38,000 is mighty low for an 04...personally I would choose low km but.....sth smells fishy :P

That's js me hah
Posted via RS Mobile
FI-Z33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:53 AM   #3
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Alby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,099
Thanked 2,114 Times in 482 Posts
Failed 261 Times in 79 Posts
i would lean towards option #1. less clicks on the car may mean a better condition of the car. it really depends on how the owner drove it/maintained it. also assuming here you are talking about 100,000km.
Alby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:53 AM   #4
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
dark0821's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Van604
Posts: 2,928
Thanked 2,283 Times in 632 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 40 Posts
i would go for 2004, since it is a big difference for the odo, but its up to you, if the owner of the 2005 model did proper maintanence, then it should be fine...

but ya, my vote still goes to the 2004
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts

AE101 Rolla 96' //Sold
RPS13 240SX 90' //STOLEN
RMS13 240SX 91' //Scrapped
RHS13 240SX 90' //Scrapped
S35 Rogue 12' //Gifted to Parents
GD 6MT Elantra 13' //Sold
CZ4A 5MT GSR Evo 08' // Totalled
Ioniq DCT 19' //Traded in
NA MX-5 5MT 97' // Sold
Prius Prime 21' //Traded in
Tesla Model 3 RWD DD
GSX-R 600 K5' Mental Therapy
Prius Prime 24' New Kids Carrier
dark0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 12:16 PM   #5
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,890
Thanked 5,175 Times in 1,555 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Isn't 2004 the first MY of a new generation? I'd go for the 2005. There's always issues from the 1st MY of a new gen that get patched and refined for subsequent MYs.
__________________
Romans 10:9
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 12:16 PM   #6
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,878
Thanked 15,606 Times in 4,325 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 130 Posts
I'd be more interested in how the car was maintained.

My uncle had a 14 year old car that never broke 50K but he only worked 5km from home and never really warmed the car up. The car never really got to operating temp before he shut it down for 9 hours and made the same commute home. Fluids/belts never got changed cause he went off his mileage and not age. There were times when he didn't have to fill his tank for 8+ weeks. My aunt started driving the car shortly after (longer commute) and within 6 months had to replace all the belts, waterpump, exhaust and the fuel tank and pump.

Extreme case but you get my drift.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 12:51 PM   #7
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 841
Thanked 810 Times in 179 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 14 Posts
if resale is important to you, get the lower km one.
toyota86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:06 PM   #8
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
jaemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ricemond
Posts: 1,423
Thanked 681 Times in 180 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
I would say go for the first one with lower km's as well.
jaemc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:24 PM   #9
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
but wouldn't resale hold better for a vehicle that is newer, with more options and has a normal amount of km? the average on the 2005 car is under 20,000 km per year...
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:37 PM   #10
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 3,558
Thanked 3,814 Times in 957 Posts
Failed 715 Times in 210 Posts
Def option 1, given that there's no other issues involved with it. There's no way I'd pick that 100k+ mileage car just because it's got bluetooth and navi.
flagella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:41 PM   #11
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
MWR34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,381
Thanked 1,958 Times in 287 Posts
Failed 630 Times in 86 Posts
are TSX's fuel friendly?
__________________
Out of all the things i've lost before, I miss my mind the most.


http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...a3fc/event.png
MWR34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:42 PM   #12
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWR34 View Post
are TSX's fuel friendly?
well it's a 4 banger that takes 87... how bad can it be?
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:50 PM   #13
MOD
 
Gh0stRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VANCOUVER
Posts: 26,849
Thanked 7,553 Times in 1,957 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 85 Posts
i'd say less Kms
__________________
M0D3RAT0R

Gh0stRider's Buy & Sell Feedback


Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieH View Post
whole time i thought gh0strider was white lol

Gh0stRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:52 PM   #14
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,878
Thanked 15,606 Times in 4,325 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 130 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
well it's a 4 banger that takes 87... how bad can it be?
I thought there was a debate on whether 87 was fine or midgrade was recommended.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:57 PM   #15
Get Money, Get Paid
 
Volvoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,285
Thanked 1,264 Times in 262 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 19 Posts
get the first one, and then get a BT headset
Volvoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 01:57 PM   #16
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
I have read that all honda engines take 87 unless they are the Type R/S models which require premium due to higher compression
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:07 PM   #17
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
TypeRNammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,568
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,216 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
well it's a 4 banger that takes 87... how bad can it be?


TSX's require premium

Therefor, a full tank of gas would cost about $85 bucks with the current prices.

You be lucky to hit 500km in city driving.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_AK View Post
Or you meet some girl at the club, cum inside of her, find out shes only in grade 12, so you buy a Prada bag for her to make things right, she finds out the bag is a fake and decides to have the kid
Quote:
Originally Posted by RX_Renesis View Post
wtf did she get some bolt-on titties or what?
they look sooooooooooo much bigger than they were 2ish years ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nns View Post
I can't stand the sound of Mandarin either. Boo yow nee bey nee shing bo now noong gey shee mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo.
TypeRNammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:13 PM   #18
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,878
Thanked 15,606 Times in 4,325 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 130 Posts
TSX engine will adjust to run on 87. Some people have reported better mileage with the lower octane and no ill effects over 120k miles.

BUT

Premium is recommended by the manufacturer and the engine has an 11:1 compression ratio.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:13 PM   #19
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
MWR34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: richmond
Posts: 1,381
Thanked 1,958 Times in 287 Posts
Failed 630 Times in 86 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
well it's a 4 banger that takes 87... how bad can it be?
2004 TSX, 20/29mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/19528.shtml

2005 TSX 20/28mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/20658.shtml


both require "premium dude.... PREMIUM"

17.1 Gallons to fill the tank 66.7 liters.

66.7 liters x $1.45 ( 91 octane) = $96.71 a tank.... for 354 miles... aka.. 566kms.

So $100 tank goes 575kms, with a light foot.
__________________
Out of all the things i've lost before, I miss my mind the most.


http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...a3fc/event.png
MWR34 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-09-2011, 02:17 PM   #20
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
TypeRNammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,568
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,216 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWR34 View Post
2004 TSX, 20/29mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/19528.shtml

2005 TSX 20/28mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/20658.shtml


both require "premium dude.... PREMIUM"

17.1 Gallons to fill the tank 66.7 liters.

66.7 liters x $1.45 ( 91 octane) = $96.71 a tank.... for 354 miles... aka.. 566kms.

So $100 tank goes 575kms, with a light foot.
Tank capacity is 65L, but the fuel light comes on when there's about 8L left, so actual fill up is rought around 55L to 60L.

So the cost is about under $85 bucks.

Still hella expensive.


EDIT: It's still not as bad as the G35 people who has to pay about 120 bucks to fill up their tank
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_AK View Post
Or you meet some girl at the club, cum inside of her, find out shes only in grade 12, so you buy a Prada bag for her to make things right, she finds out the bag is a fake and decides to have the kid
Quote:
Originally Posted by RX_Renesis View Post
wtf did she get some bolt-on titties or what?
they look sooooooooooo much bigger than they were 2ish years ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nns View Post
I can't stand the sound of Mandarin either. Boo yow nee bey nee shing bo now noong gey shee mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo.
TypeRNammer is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-09-2011, 02:20 PM   #21
It's like going crazy when you're already nuts
 
jing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,910
Thanked 3,068 Times in 795 Posts
Failed 90 Times in 38 Posts
I would keep looking. The TSX doesn't seem all too fuel efficient seeing those above numbers.
__________________
my feedback

Last edited by jing; 06-09-2011 at 02:26 PM.
jing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:28 PM   #22
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
ya maybe i should just keep my car haha... my V6 mercedes gets about 500km to a tank of 91 so i guess thats not that bad?
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:32 PM   #23
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,878
Thanked 15,606 Times in 4,325 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 130 Posts
IIRC most newer Acura's use premium (minus the RSX base and CSX).

Any interest in 4cyl Accords? They use 87.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 03:28 PM   #24
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
604nguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,247
Thanked 497 Times in 133 Posts
Failed 65 Times in 17 Posts
OP
regarding the low mileage TSX
Did u actually 'see' this car yet?
__________________
E70 4.8i
604nguyen is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-09-2011, 03:30 PM   #25
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
TypeRNammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,568
Thanked 3,604 Times in 1,216 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
A few rsers have trouble viewing the car according to the posts in the cars for sale.
Posted via RS Mobile
TypeRNammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net