Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
04-24-2012, 03:14 PM
|
#28401 | I'm better than you.
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: East Van
Posts: 8,480
Thanked 3,087 Times in 658 Posts
Failed 373 Times in 115 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c The Leafs have nothing to give up that we would want. | I would take Clarke Macarthur easily.
__________________
'14 Toyota Yaris [Work Daily]
'89 Toyota Cressida MX83 [Collector's status]
'15 Honda Ruckus [Summer cruiser]
'96 Toyota Hilux Surf KZN185 [Weekend Warrior] Buy & Sell Ratings! |
| |
04-24-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#28402 | ESKETIT
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,335
Thanked 9,689 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 997 Times in 240 Posts
|
luuuuuuuuuuuuuu
|
| |
04-24-2012, 03:51 PM
|
#28403 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,397
Thanked 1,715 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 101 Posts
|
Id take Kessel from Toronto. Not very realistic maybe, but he wants out of there. He'd probably take a hit on his salary to be with a team that doesnt suck.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 03:53 PM
|
#28404 | Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,854
Thanked 4,387 Times in 1,145 Posts
Failed 514 Times in 158 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kwy Id take Kessel from Toronto. Not very realistic maybe, but he wants out of there. He'd probably take a hit on his salary to be with a team that doesnt suck. | i would sooooooo hard if kessel gets moved. that means they traded away 2 1st rounders for nothing!
__________________ GO Canucks GO!
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) hi there
(づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。✧。*・゜゜・✧。・$$$$$゜゜・。*。・゜*✧ . xxx~*…like dis post if u cry evry time…~*xxx |
| |
04-24-2012, 03:56 PM
|
#28405 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
Im not even going to comment on Luongo's word
Because they are just WORDS until action is done.
When dealing a player of his calibre, there sometimes never really a "right" deal. especially with the team we have now.
The Canucks are also NOT in rebuilding mode
|
| |
04-24-2012, 03:57 PM
|
#28406 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,732
Thanked 17,627 Times in 4,328 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHibiki I think all the haters are now scared to lose Luongo because it was so much easier to cheer for Schneider knowing we still had Luongo as the safety net.
They are now realizing we might actually lose him and the possibility that Schneider might not turn into the goalie we all hope he is. There won't be no safety net this time. | But with Eddie Lack on the back burner we had least have something. All I know it that I'm excited for the summer because we will finally find out whats going to happen. Remember We lost 3 straight and didn't really have a chance, with tossing Corey in the fire it upped his trade value and shows he can play under the playoff pressure which he didn't really have before.
We can still say Lu played strong and for either goalie we have perfect trade bait which we will get a shit load for. I think it was a great move which will make this summer so exciting.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:06 PM
|
#28407 | ESKETIT
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,335
Thanked 9,689 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 997 Times in 240 Posts
|
quite excited for the off season
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:10 PM
|
#28408 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
oh media..
hahah |
| |
04-24-2012, 04:13 PM
|
#28409 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,397
Thanked 1,715 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 101 Posts
|
Ok pornmaster, my post was fail worthy because..?
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:15 PM
|
#28410 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,026
Thanked 2,538 Times in 1,155 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
|
The Lu haters on this board and on every other internet forum have remained silent because they've been at the bar celebrating since Dan Murphy's Tweet.
I will agree that Luongo has shown tremendous growth as a professional over this season. It'll bode well for the rest of his career wherever he plays.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:19 PM
|
#28411 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: home
Posts: 2,830
Thanked 3,845 Times in 881 Posts
Failed 1,600 Times in 375 Posts
|
LUUUUing at games is half the fun |
| |
04-24-2012, 04:22 PM
|
#28412 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 1,123 Times in 533 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 38 Posts
|
The problem with moving Luongo is will Schneider be able to play through the grind of the west? Or what happens if Schneider gets injured?
By Keeping Luongo and Schneider, we would have a 1A and 1B goalies who can provide the team with grade A goaltending. Remember the first few years when we got Luongo and everyone would be nervous when Sanford or Raycroft was playing?
And I don't think Eddie Lack can take up that challenge.
I personally is more interested in seeing what changes would be done to defence.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:26 PM
|
#28413 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,397
Thanked 1,715 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 101 Posts
|
1A and 1B isn't the issue, it's that no two No. 1 goalies don't want to share a job. Schneider doesn't want to be stuck in a backup position, and he doesn't deserve to be in a backup position. Lu is a competitor and it cant be easy to be on the bench after all he's done. 1A and 1B isn't fair to these two world-class goalies.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:29 PM
|
#28414 | ESKETIT
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,335
Thanked 9,689 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 997 Times in 240 Posts
|
schneider and lack
or luongo and lack
hmmmm both preety solid choice
would be better to move luu because of his salary cap and shizz
I love both goalies so dosent matter who we get rid of. just a shame we cant keep both
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:39 PM
|
#28415 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
|
After taking a few days to think back on the season and playoffs, I've come to some personal conclusions and opinions
I'll chime in about the goalie situation again. IMO it's not THAT far of a stretch for us to retain Schneider AND Lu for next season. It's a lot to spend on 2 goalies, but if you really believe in the current core, it can be done. With the cap expected to go up for next season and new CBA, there should be room assuming we don't go after any big contracts in the offseason. The majority of our players are signed for next season already, so the deciding factor is whether or not one thinks the current group of players is good enough to get the job done. Personally, I think they are but that doesn't mean improvements can't be made. When Edler and Burrows need new deals after the end of next year, then its a different game. But like I said before the playoffs started, once the playoffs begin all bets are off and a team can find a bunch of good bounces, ride a hot goalie, etc etc, especially with the parity in the league today. There is only so much that having the right group of players can do for a team, you need to look no further than the Pens for the best example. Which leads to my next point...
When the Canucks started slowing down and slumping in January, I'll be the first to admit that I truly thought they were taking a bit off their game to save some juice for the playoffs. I figured that after the all-star game they'd begin to ramp up the intensity and gear up. That never came. Then I figured that with 10-15 games left in the season, that would be the time to do it. That never came. Maybe it was the Lu and Cory stealing games, OT/SO wins, that gave them a false sense of confidence. The team and AV seemed to have full confidence in themselves, knowing they had more to give but just couldn't collectively find that next gear. The reply from AV every time was that he had faith in the group, they knew the process, they would figure it out themselves, etc etc, a much too laissez-faire attitude IMO. MG's attitude wasn't far off, and you can see this through the Coho trade. I have no problems with the trade itself, ASSUMING that your top 2 lines are playing to potential, and its apparent MG also thought the big guns would snap out of it on their own thus making Coho expendable and bringing in Kassian to be a physical body for the short term, and hoping for some offensive return in the future. So this goes back to why the top 2 lines weren't able to perform to potential consistently. Maybe they were on a leash that was too long? So who's responsible? Majority of that lies with AV IMO. He wasn't able to motivate our key players to the level they need to be at. He has shown that he would rather stick to his game plan than make adjustments and take advantage of the opponents' deficiencies. I don't doubt he's a good coach, but sometimes things can run stale. Some of the responsibility lies with MG as well. Maybe he gave AV too much autonomy, maybe he took AV's assessment of the team more than MG's own assessment, who knows.
I think our players are good enough, but its the process that needs some work now. We don't need to blow up the team, or make any huge personnel changes IMO. Our UFA's this summer are Salo, Pahlsson, Bitz, Volpatti, Ebbett, and Rome. Raymond may be able to be had for cheap next year, so I am willing to entertain that idea if its under 2M. I love Manny and what he can bring to the team, but unfortunately his hit at 2.5M is a bit heavy and I would prefer to see that being spent elsewhere. I don't foresee any big moves this year IF MG can get Lu and Cory on the same page of a true 1a/1b setup, hotter goalie plays no questions asked. Props to Lu for not pulling a Heatley/Nash with his NTC (at least not yet). Cory sounds like he just wants the chance to become a starting goalie, and I think Lu understands his role next year if Cory sticks around. I don't think either of them mind experimenting with a true 50/50 split for 1 year if they believe in the rest of the team.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 04:51 PM
|
#28416 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kwy 1A and 1B isn't the issue, it's that no two No. 1 goalies don't want to share a job. Schneider doesn't want to be stuck in a backup position, and he doesn't deserve to be in a backup position. Lu is a competitor and it cant be easy to be on the bench after all he's done. 1A and 1B isn't fair to these two world-class goalies. | You are making some fairly bold assumptions there. Does Schneider want to be the #1 goalie in Columbus who can't even win the draft lottery? Does Lu want to be a starter so bad that he's willing to play for the Leafs?
I think both of these guys, and Lu in particular, are willing to sit on the bench if it means a legit chance at winning the Cup. As long as both of these guys understand that there is no assigned #1 and backup, and no obligatory requirement to play one or the other in the game based on anything other than team performance, I don't see how that is not a fair situation.
I'm going to make my bold assumption and say that ANY two No.1 goalies in the league would be more than happy to share a job if it meant they have a very good chance of winning the cup.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:04 PM
|
#28417 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: burnaby
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 642 Times in 217 Posts
Failed 269 Times in 70 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kwy Ok pornmaster, my post was fail worthy because..? | You actually think the Laffs have any value for the canucks, esp Kessel
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:05 PM
|
#28418 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,665
Thanked 15,027 Times in 6,000 Posts
Failed 2,067 Times in 692 Posts
|
lol @ Luongo lovers coming out of the woodwork
fuck Luongo trade him he sucks
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:13 PM
|
#28419 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
|
theres too much pressure on Luongo now. I think he needs a time off.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:17 PM
|
#28420 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Recon604 theres too much pressure on Luongo now. I think he needs a time off. | The Canucks have stupid fans, I think they need a time off |
| |
04-24-2012, 05:17 PM
|
#28421 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Here! n There!
Posts: 4,149
Thanked 498 Times in 222 Posts
Failed 121 Times in 59 Posts
|
i hope the team remains as is for next season...who wouldnt want a team that always wins? granted they didnt win one round this year but daniel being knocked out by keith has something to do with the playoff loss...
and no to mac t and yes to AV fir me...i stll have his back...same with luongo...not with raymond though...sorry mase...
__________________ Go Canucks Go! |
| |
04-24-2012, 05:17 PM
|
#28422 | .
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,733
Thanked 5,474 Times in 2,095 Posts
Failed 418 Times in 188 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by highfive The problem with moving Luongo is will Schneider be able to play through the grind of the west? Or what happens if Schneider gets injured?
By Keeping Luongo and Schneider, we would have a 1A and 1B goalies who can provide the team with grade A goaltending. Remember the first few years when we got Luongo and everyone would be nervous when Sanford or Raycroft was playing?
And I don't think Eddie Lack can take up that challenge.
I personally is more interested in seeing what changes would be done to defence. | MG stated today at the press conference that Lack is "close to being NHL ready".
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:23 PM
|
#28423 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 1,666
Thanked 1,158 Times in 391 Posts
Failed 86 Times in 38 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO You are making some fairly bold assumptions there. Does Schneider want to be the #1 goalie in Columbus who can't even win the draft lottery? Does Lu want to be a starter so bad that he's willing to play for the Leafs?
I think both of these guys, and Lu in particular, are willing to sit on the bench if it means a legit chance at winning the Cup. As long as both of these guys understand that there is no assigned #1 and backup, and no obligatory requirement to play one or the other in the game based on anything other than team performance, I don't see how that is not a fair situation.
I'm going to make my bold assumption and say that ANY two No.1 goalies in the league would be more than happy to share a job if it meant they have a very good chance of winning the cup. | No. It is well known that both goalies want a starting position... if either of them didnt then luongo would have happily played back up... but oh wait he said he will get rid of his NTC if MG asks him to do so. i think both goalies know that only one is staying and to say otherwise is a Bold statment.
If i am wrong i will apologize for my assumptions..
Last edited by TjAlmeida; 04-24-2012 at 05:24 PM.
Reason: Spelling error
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:27 PM
|
#28424 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 1,057 Times in 429 Posts
Failed 178 Times in 73 Posts
|
I havent seen this being talked about but Lets say Luongo does leave or stay. How much is Schneider going to sign for? Im assuming hes gonna command atleast 3million+
IMO, if we dont get back an impact player for Luongo cause Luongo himself is a impact player, i say dont trade him until the right deal comes around.
|
| |
04-24-2012, 05:41 PM
|
#28425 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: ricemond
Posts: 682
Thanked 717 Times in 160 Posts
Failed 194 Times in 36 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseBlue i hope the team remains as is for next season...who wouldnt want a team that always wins? granted they didnt win one round this year but daniel being knocked out by keith has something to do with the playoff loss... | Teams have to learn how to play through injuries, canucks are of those teams that can't
they need another top 3/6 forward to play with the sedins
since 2005-2006 when Anson Carter played with the sedins, only 2 players scored more goals than him in a season. Kesler in 2010-11 and Burrows in 2009-2010. Anson Carter is a player no where near Burrows and Keslers' caliber but yet he put up a goal total that only 2 people have broken when playing with the sedins in like 6-7 years?
It's true that the goal tending isn't the problem. However canucks need to trade one of the goalies for a good goal scorer, one that will tally 30+ each year no problem. Playing with the sedins, that goal scorer could tally an easy 40 goals if Anson Carter could tally 33 lol. I think trading Luongo for a solid scorer would be the best choice.
Look what happened.. 1st round = Keslers playing like shit, D Sedin is injured. that's most of the teams goals right there, out in 5 games
last year game 7 = 0 goals for
__________________ '99 SH Prelude - Sold Nov 2009 '02 E46 M3 - Bought Feb 2011
'18 BLACK TLX A SPEC - Daily Driver |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM. |