You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
Originally posted by v.b. can we stop, my pussy hurts... Originally posted by asian_XL fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol Originally posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth Originally posted by FastAnna when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad
imo, if they want to take away embellishment, they should only give a penalty to the diver.
I mean, which one is it? Roughing or embellishment?
The ref's are pretty much saying that embellishments a win/win situation.
You either draw a penalty or you make it 4-on-4.
That's what I never understood. If you give a guy a small hook to the legs but he doesn't react, no call is made because it wasn't a trip. But if the same play is made and he flops like a fish as if a car smashed into his legs, the other person gets a tripping call??? Makes ZERO sense.
__________________
GO Canucks GO!
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) hi there
(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。✧。*・゜゜・✧。・$$$$$゜゜・。*。・゜*✧ .
Sutter did the exact same thing in the 2004 playoffs
Interesting... very similar, except the Flames were the 6th seed, so they beat #3, #1, #2 in that order. They also played #1 in the East, but lost, of course.
Interesting... very similar, except the Flames were the 6th seed, so they beat #3, #1, #2 in that order. They also played #1 in the East, but lost, of course.
I honestly don't see a trade happening with Loungo's huge contract. Even though the cap hit is low his years remaining is quite a bit. I personally don't mind having some goalie competition next year in our net.
I honestly don't see a trade happening with Loungo's huge contract. Even though the cap hit is low his years remaining is quite a bit. I personally don't mind having some goalie competition next year in our net.
if mike richards and jeff carter's contracts can be moved, any contract can be moved. having said that richards/carter are still coming up to or at the prime of their careers and lu is probably at the the beginning of a decline so that may be a difference. based on dollars alone i don't think it would be as hard as people think to move luongo.
correct me if i am wrong, but i remember the analysts were saying that the contract has an out-clause at the latter stages and/or roberto can just retire and the cap should not count against that team.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
![b0unce. [?]'s Avatar](customavatars/avatar28217_23.gif){kind=avatar}
