![]() | |
I took a nap and slept straight through the game :( watched the highlights. MAKAVELI719696's video's are pretty good. the fiddler bit after bieksa scored was hilarious :lol schneider played well. fucking alberts with probably zero communication with the goalies =/ burrows with the clutch block! |
^ at least post the video if you're gonna mention it :p |
Quote:
|
Here was another questionable hit by Keith: Good for Ott for going right after Keith, too bad we couldn't get him at the deadline. |
The reason why Kassian will do better than Cody under AV. http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1...cse2o1_400.gif |
^ cant really see whats going on? just see AV kinda restraining Kass |
Quote:
|
I thought you meant how AV's hugging Kassian like "I love you" |
Kassian grabbed the guys jersey apparently |
Keith hearing 2PM EST, should know soon what's up |
can't wait to see what Shanaban does with this one |
Apparently, it's been changed to a face to face meeting Also, AV calls out ref: Blackhawks' Duncan Keith gets NHL face-time suspension hearing over elbow to Canucks' Daniel Sedin Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
From reports I've read, things aren't looking good. Quote:
|
Since Shanny now wants F2F meeting, doesn't that mean it'll be late tonight or tomorrow? |
^ There is no face to face meeting. Keith waived his right to a face-to-face meeting. The meeting took place over the phone, but because of this he is able to receive 6+ games as if it were a face to face. |
My bad. I read the article wrong. I thought after Keith waived his right to F2F, NHL still wanted F2F cause they were going to lay the hammer down. |
I saw this retweeted by @ESPNChiHawks Quote:
|
Everyone really wants to know the result of the hit and see how many games he gets ><" |
5 games |
|
gay |
not good enough |
So, are we going to see another Bertuzzi incident where some Canuck is going to chop down Duncan Keith? Too bad the bastard can't be banned from playing the next 5 games with the Canucks. |
5 games, yeah ok, I can accept that (kinda) but it was ruled as elbowing (rule 45). Shouldn't it be ruled under rule 48 (illegal check to the head)? I mean most headshots come from elbows, so rule 48 should superceed rule 45. I'm sure if some plug did the same thing it'd be called a headshot for sure. http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?id=123676 |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net