Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |
View Poll Results: Are you in favour of extinguishing the HST in BC? |
Yes: Bring Back GST + PST @ 12%
| | 186 | 42.18% |
No: HST to decrease to 10% over 3 years (10% in 2014)
| | 255 | 57.82% | | |
08-26-2011, 01:31 PM
|
#226 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
|
18 months??? They'll skip the handouts they were using to buy votes, and ride it out to use the full extra amount that the HST brought in to pay it off.
Time for another recall campaign...I want that thing gone Dec.31.
I'm getting a lot of neg. vibes here regarding the education level of people that voted yes.
I voted yes.
I am educated. I understand the benefits of the HST. I voted yes because it didn't work for me. I decided not to think about the province, and the poor and everyone else out there that I'm sure I was supposed to think about.
I voted for me, and for my clients.
Reason 1:
I own a small business. I'm a contractor. I primarily renovate rental apartments these days.
I saw the huge jump in the tax amount on my invoices. As my clients are the primary users of what I do, they cannot write off the HST, even though they are a business, as there is no HST on rent.
Their income on a property is based on market conditions in the neighborhood at the initial setting of the rent, and then regulated by the province until they decide to move.
So, in short, its just a big increase in the expense of renovating and building improvements.
Even if I took every penny of PST savings that I obtain by being able to claim it under HST and handed it over on the bill, its still more expensive.
And I've said this many times in this thread...I look at sub-total and my clients look at total.
Reason 2:
The business benefits claims that would result in lower prices are hard to imagine.
In order for it to work, you would have to have multiple steps in the production chain, all canadian sources and all operating in an HST environment.
Then that cascade passing of taxes to the final consumer would result in a pool of savings that could be used to lower prices while maintaining profit.
Reason 3:
I'm not going to lie...it was a little about retribution for its introduction.
They hoped they could weather the storm. Turns out, they couldn't.
I have been a liberal supporter since 2000ish in this province(the election that brought campbell to power) and for more years on the east coast.
I still support the liberals over the NDP. Way more. I hate the NDP.
But, I can't support bad politics.
His people came to him and said the deficit is going to be far larger than originally planned. Campbell came to power by slamming the NDP's spending.
So, he didn't do what was right for the province. He took the federal money to close the hole and try to look clean.
They tried to sell it as being good for the province.
Reason 4:
Clark is even worse.
She tried to buy votes. She was prepared to hand out checks to certain groups(families and elderly) to transfer wealth.
And I hated it. I hated the idea of checks going out to groups of people. I pay in HST-I collect HST-I fill out HST paperwork.
Where's my cut?
I liked the idea of cutting the HST to 10%. I think it should have been introduced at 10%. I think they should have just said, vote no, and HST goes to 10% the next fucking day.
But they signed a paper that the HST % couldn't be changed for a certain time. I'm sorry, the Canadian gov't is now dictating what happens provincially? And you people signed it?
10% is fantastic....prepared food is a little more, cars and tv's are a little less.
Your poor? Cool. Eat at home, and you'll never notice. You're rich? Awesome. Buy that hot Mercedes...you'll love it. It's cheaper.
Reason 5-The random reasons
The liberals spent millions on their campaign. Millions of our dollars ps. Then their business friends spent even more.
Those stick men commercials drove me nuts.
I don't like Christy Clark's voice
Kevin Falcon is a putz.
They intentionally tried to make the question confusing to get some dumb people to vote the wrong way.
Conclusion:
I looked at the ballot, and thought about it.
In the end, I said fuck it. The mistake was already made. Time to cut and run.
And I voted to scrap the HST.
And next election, I'll vote to scrap Clark as well. That leaves me voting for the conservative party, so apparently I'm for that ultra right wing blow hard as oppsed to the wealth transferring liberals and NDP.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:33 PM
|
#227 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
Some Woman This move is going to cost the middle class more money...I'm middle class and I am NOT cheering. People don't understand that this will just end up causing our taxes to go up..(He finance minister just said they reserve the right to end pst exemptions so this just cost us a billion dollars for nothing. Smart move 'middle class'
24 minutes ago · Like · 1 person
MHTRP The middle class were not striking down HST lol. NDP areas are not middle class at all.
20 minutes ago · Like
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:38 PM
|
#228 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
|
funny how their stupid way of asking the question didnt confuse enough people... i actually had to explain to my buddies italian grandparents what the ballot was actually asking. they were initially going to vote No, thinking that voting No meant No HST. i explained that the way the question is posed, they need to vote YES if they don't want HST. they were really confused... now i'm wondering about how many other registered voters do not comprehend english well and voted No thinking they were voting against the HST?
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap
A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:40 PM
|
#229 | My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
|
Those who didn't vote don't get to complain.
I'm just saying.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:40 PM
|
#230 | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,866
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 The GST was brought in in much worse times. The difference was people were not given a choice, if they were the result would be much the same. | sorry didn't know about that
__________________
Where the hell am I
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:43 PM
|
#231 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TRDood Because implementation of the new tax cost money. Adminstration is not free, awareness campaigns are not free, information is not free.
Going back to the old tax will have the same costs.
The shifting of tax structure may be revenue neutral in the long run, not in the short run. | Not to burst your bubble cause I agree with all that.... yet the HST actually ended up being revenue generating, thus the shortfall.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:44 PM
|
#232 | reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
Failed 929 Times in 340 Posts
|
I work for a small business and this does not go well with us. I voted NO since well it affects my company but I also knew it will cost us millions if not billions to convert back to GST/PST and we have to pay back the fed govs.
HST is already here so why not accept it. I paid the household expenisve and I honestly don't see the issue with paying maybe an extra $200 to 300 per year but gets a way bigger bonus at work. As someone have said earlier it is a bad time to go back to GST/PST during economy downtimes. It will cost company more money to convert back and also all the potental sales or potental business that might operate in BC might no longer happen. So the cost will be pass down to us anyways.
Also people are under the assumption that PST will remain at 7% once it is coverted back. That's not 100% true. The gov will rasie the PST with some BS excuse so it will no longer be 7%. Remember the gov needs to find some ways to pay off the 3billion dollars. The only way to do is either increase tax or cut programs.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:47 PM
|
#233 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock I'm getting a lot of neg. vibes here regarding the education level of people that voted yes. | Look at some of the comments coming from those who voted yes and you'll see your educated comments stand out like a sore thumb.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:51 PM
|
#234 | I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,668
Thanked 10,388 Times in 3,914 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
| Quote:
BC Finance Minister Kevin Falcon says he is disappointed but not surprised voters decided to scrap the HST.
Falcon admits his government is to blame for the bungled roll-out of the tax in 2009, which, to many, appeared like a backdoor deal. He says the province is aiming to return to the PST/GST system by March 31st, 2013.
He also says BC will honour its deal with the federal government but will negotiate around paying back the $1.6 billion Ottawa gave BC in transition funding.
"That is going to be subject to negotiations and discussions. I'm not going to be having a public negotiation, but we will honour the commitment we made to keep up our end of the bargain. I intend to be meeting with [Federal Finance] Minister Flaherty in September to begin those discussions on how we are going to do that."
Falcon says it will be a challenge to manage what he pegs as a $3 billion budget hole, but he's confidentl they can do it.
| BC chooses to scrap the HST - News1130 Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 Look at some of the comments coming from those who voted yes and you'll see your educated comments stand out like a sore thumb. | typical douchebag sore loser comment by saying the winning side are idiots :
I voted to keep the HST but there's no reason to accuse the other side to be uneducated; morons; idiots that's not only ignorant but a reflection of yourself
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:52 PM
|
#235 | MiX iT Up!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,138
Thanked 2,069 Times in 867 Posts
Failed 642 Times in 183 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock 18 months??? They'll skip the handouts they were using to buy votes, and ride it out to use the full extra amount that the HST brought in to pay it off.
Time for another recall campaign...I want that thing gone Dec.31.
I'm getting a lot of neg. vibes here regarding the education level of people that voted yes.
I voted yes.
I am educated. I understand the benefits of the HST. I voted yes because it didn't work for me. I decided not to think about the province, and the poor and everyone else out there that I'm sure I was supposed to think about.
I voted for me, and for my clients.
Reason 1:
I own a small business. I'm a contractor. I primarily renovate rental apartments these days.
I saw the huge jump in the tax amount on my invoices. As my clients are the primary users of what I do, they cannot write off the HST, even though they are a business, as there is no HST on rent.
Their income on a property is based on market conditions in the neighborhood at the initial setting of the rent, and then regulated by the province until they decide to move.
So, in short, its just a big increase in the expense of renovating and building improvements.
Even if I took every penny of PST savings that I obtain by being able to claim it under HST and handed it over on the bill, its still more expensive.
And I've said this many times in this thread...I look at sub-total and my clients look at total.
Reason 2:
The business benefits claims that would result in lower prices are hard to imagine.
In order for it to work, you would have to have multiple steps in the production chain, all canadian sources and all operating in an HST environment.
Then that cascade passing of taxes to the final consumer would result in a pool of savings that could be used to lower prices while maintaining profit.
Reason 3:
I'm not going to lie...it was a little about retribution for its introduction.
They hoped they could weather the storm. Turns out, they couldn't.
I have been a liberal supporter since 2000ish in this province(the election that brought campbell to power) and for more years on the east coast.
I still support the liberals over the NDP. Way more. I hate the NDP.
But, I can't support bad politics.
His people came to him and said the deficit is going to be far larger than originally planned. Campbell came to power by slamming the NDP's spending.
So, he didn't do what was right for the province. He took the federal money to close the hole and try to look clean.
They tried to sell it as being good for the province.
Reason 4:
Clark is even worse.
She tried to buy votes. She was prepared to hand out checks to certain groups(families and elderly) to transfer wealth.
And I hated it. I hated the idea of checks going out to groups of people. I pay in HST-I collect HST-I fill out HST paperwork.
Where's my cut?
I liked the idea of cutting the HST to 10%. I think it should have been introduced at 10%. I think they should have just said, vote no, and HST goes to 10% the next fucking day.
But they signed a paper that the HST % couldn't be changed for a certain time. I'm sorry, the Canadian gov't is now dictating what happens provincially? And you people signed it?
10% is fantastic....prepared food is a little more, cars and tv's are a little less.
Your poor? Cool. Eat at home, and you'll never notice. You're rich? Awesome. Buy that hot Mercedes...you'll love it. It's cheaper.
Reason 5-The random reasons
The liberals spent millions on their campaign. Millions of our dollars ps. Then their business friends spent even more.
Those stick men commercials drove me nuts.
I don't like Christy Clark's voice
Kevin Falcon is a putz.
They intentionally tried to make the question confusing to get some dumb people to vote the wrong way.
Conclusion:
I looked at the ballot, and thought about it.
In the end, I said fuck it. The mistake was already made. Time to cut and run.
And I voted to scrap the HST.
And next election, I'll vote to scrap Clark as well. That leaves me voting for the conservative party, so apparently I'm for that ultra right wing blow hard as oppsed to the wealth transferring liberals and NDP. |
+1 for majority of reasons.
__________________ Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.
Make the effort and take the risk.. "Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt |
| |
08-26-2011, 01:56 PM
|
#236 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero | Since nothing was promised during campaigning of what would happen if HST was voted out, voters SHOULD have voted based on worse case scenario--that previous PST exemptions will not carry over to the current PST.
If voters choosing YES were assuming that everything return to the same as the good ol' days, that is simply foolish. That ANY of the PST exemptions are coming back is a surprise to me. If it was up to me I would have just said FU and kept exemptions the same as HST and blame that on Zalm and the Yes crowd for not telling voters what would happen if HST was gone.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 01:59 PM
|
#237 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed typical douchebag sore loser comment by saying the winning side are idiots :
I voted to keep the HST but there's no reason to accuse the other side to be uneducated; morons; idiots that's not only ignorant but a reflection of yourself | You're a tard and gladly not a reflection of myself as I am awesome.
This is a typical comment by a YES voter, and you're welcome to read this thread for more of them as there are LOTS of douchebags whining about paying more for eating out, a luxury that should be taxed. I'm willing to bet it'd be the #1 complaint about the HST if a poll was taken. |
| |
08-26-2011, 01:59 PM
|
#238 | Bieksa eats bears for breakfast...
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6,779
Thanked 117 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
|
Thanks to BC Voters for a 3 billion dollar bill...
__________________
Trinity: "DUDE WTF ARE YOU DOING?! ARE YOU INSANE?!?!?!?
Your balls are sensitive things!! They shouldn't be played around with, at least not like that, and you should NOT BE DIPPING THEM IN AFTERSHAVE! Oh my god, I feel sorry for your balls!"
ODC: "Wrong, a roots type blower will produce max boost from 0rpm to redline."
Iceman_19: "A roots makes zero boost at zero rpm, lol"
Ulic Qel-Droma: "haha go google image big black dick. or black cock. i forgot which term i used. it's one of the many." |
| |
08-26-2011, 01:59 PM
|
#239 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: richmond
Posts: 2,837
Thanked 1,490 Times in 570 Posts
Failed 172 Times in 64 Posts
|
Gridlock hit the nail on the head!
__________________ Rise Auto Salon
11938 95a Ave Delta
I can be reached VIA text @ 778-232-1465 Oil change special $70 5 liters synthetic oil including OEM filter Fender rolling from $45 per fender Car Audio:
Focal, Morel, Genesis, Clarion, Scosche, Escort, Compustar, GReddy, Blitz, Tomei, Motul, Endless, Defi, Cusco, Nismo + More
We specialize in:
Custom Car Audio
Race/4x4 Fabrication
Forced Induction
Engine Swaps
General Maintenance |
| |
08-26-2011, 02:05 PM
|
#240 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane also lol at idiots claiming at "education levels" of the citizens. | Why? I'm almost sure the majority of the people that voted were only thinking "WWHWHHAAAATT? 12% TAX ON MY BIG MAC!? FUCK YOU HST!". I'd bet money that quite a few people voted against it simply because they thought they were voting against higher taxes or because they could no longer buy adult size clothing and not pay PST by saying it's for their younger brother.
I guarantee you a lot of Richmond voted that way because of that second one. |
| |
08-26-2011, 02:08 PM
|
#241 | reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
Failed 929 Times in 340 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin Why? I'm almost sure the majority of the people that voted were only thinking "WWHWHHAAAATT? 12% TAX ON MY BIG MAC!? FUCK YOU HST!". I'd bet money that quite a few people voted against it simply because they thought they were voting against higher taxes or because they could no longer buy adult size clothing and not pay PST by saying it's for their younger brother.
I guarantee you a lot of Richmond voted that way because of that second one. | Or Fat C-lais buying a size 0 TNA pants and claiming is for her daughter |
| |
08-26-2011, 02:09 PM
|
#242 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
Actually, I take that back. Education has nothing to do with it.
Up top you'll see that 57% of REVscene voted to keep the HST and a lot of you are flat out fucking idiots.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:09 PM
|
#243 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 153
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock 18 months??? They'll skip the handouts they were using to buy votes, and ride it out to use the full extra amount that the HST brought in to pay it off.
Time for another recall campaign...I want that thing gone Dec.31.
I'm getting a lot of neg. vibes here regarding the education level of people that voted yes.
I voted yes.
I am educated. I understand the benefits of the HST. I voted yes because it didn't work for me. I decided not to think about the province, and the poor and everyone else out there that I'm sure I was supposed to think about.
I voted for me, and for my clients.
Reason 1:
I own a small business. I'm a contractor. I primarily renovate rental apartments these days.
I saw the huge jump in the tax amount on my invoices. As my clients are the primary users of what I do, they cannot write off the HST, even though they are a business, as there is no HST on rent.
Their income on a property is based on market conditions in the neighborhood at the initial setting of the rent, and then regulated by the province until they decide to move.
So, in short, its just a big increase in the expense of renovating and building improvements.
Even if I took every penny of PST savings that I obtain by being able to claim it under HST and handed it over on the bill, its still more expensive.
And I've said this many times in this thread...I look at sub-total and my clients look at total.
Reason 2:
The business benefits claims that would result in lower prices are hard to imagine.
In order for it to work, you would have to have multiple steps in the production chain, all canadian sources and all operating in an HST environment.
Then that cascade passing of taxes to the final consumer would result in a pool of savings that could be used to lower prices while maintaining profit.
| Your reasons 1 and 2 are flawed. Since the HST has started all raw materials have sky rocketed, your costs have gone up not due to HST; but due to the cost of raw materials. You're bills from your suppliers now include HST, which you should not be passing on to your customer. That HST is given back to you as a credit when you file your business taxes.
You don't need multiple steps in a production chain, you just need multiple times the product has been flipped. Any of the products you purchase and put into a home are bought and sold in Canada multiple times. Taking out a compounding PST should in effect lower your costs.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:09 PM
|
#244 | Fathered more RS members than anybody else. Who's your daddy?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 24,982
Thanked 11,678 Times in 4,992 Posts
Failed 316 Times in 202 Posts
|
History was made today.
The first time in Canadian history a tax has been voted down by the people.
I personally don't give a damn which way it went. One way or another, governments get their money. One group benefits, while another loses. I just don't like the way the HST was introduced.
Like Gridlock stated, if it were 10% HST and it started ASAP, it might have been OK.
Anyway, discussing it on RS is not going to change anything. Calling others uneducated for voting yes, is pretty dumb, too.
And, Culverin, I cannot complain - I didn't vote.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:10 PM
|
#245 | :inoutugh:
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: ඞ
Posts: 9,987
Thanked 5,851 Times in 1,843 Posts
Failed 970 Times in 279 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 You're a tard and gladly not a reflection of myself as I am awesome.
This is a typical comment by a YES voter, and you're welcome to read this thread for more of them as there are LOTS of douchebags whining about paying more for eating out, a luxury that should be taxed. I'm willing to bet it'd be the #1 complaint about the HST if a poll was taken. | ^ The owner of that comment drives a baby blue s2k........
__________________ Posted from NE 1-J W Inglis Building |
| |
08-26-2011, 02:15 PM
|
#246 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock I am educated. I understand the benefits of the HST. I voted yes because it didn't work for me. I decided not to think about the province, and the poor and everyone else out there that I'm sure I was supposed to think about. | Wouldn't a split GST/PST benefit the poor more than a 10% GST?
I don't quite agree with your reasoning but I do like the way you think. I'm also very ME FIRST when it comes to my vote.
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:19 PM
|
#247 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 Not so fast, no-one has announced what will happen now. We might not get the exemptions back.
Used cars were GST exempt, so the PST was raised from 7% to 12% to become the HST. Now that we're back to PST, the PST has to be lowered to 7%, and there's no indication yet that will happen. | Clark has said we WILL get the exemptions back.
So now the question is, how will a $3B budget hole get filled? Income tax? corporate tax? raise the PST? cuts? ...???
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:24 PM
|
#248 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
|
I'm ME FIRST too. I would rather pay lower income tax, and not have millions let alone billions wasted and have zero to show for it. Like MG1 I agree if the gov wants your money they will find a way to get it. I'd just rather to have something show for my $ at the end of the day.
Looking at this referendum from a political POV, because the Liberals/Clark didn't have to hold one to have HST stick around, does it change your views about the Liberals? Clark was in a tough spot having to clean up Gordo's mess with HST implementation and all of BC hating them for that. Clark wanted to play nice woman and give BC a choice. As I recall, Zalm was having difficulty with his recall campaign anyways, so the way I see it this referendum was really just an attempt for the Liberals to win back some public support. Sure is a hell of an expensive way to do it...
|
| |
08-26-2011, 02:34 PM
|
#249 | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Vancity
Posts: 467
Thanked 531 Times in 138 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 28 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by trig Your reasons 1 and 2 are flawed. Since the HST has started all raw materials have sky rocketed, your costs have gone up not due to HST; but due to the cost of raw materials. You're bills from your suppliers now include HST, which you should not be passing on to your customer. That HST is given back to you as a credit when you file your business taxes.
You don't need multiple steps in a production chain, you just need multiple times the product has been flipped. Any of the products you purchase and put into a home are bought and sold in Canada multiple times. Taking out a compounding PST should in effect lower your costs. | +1
reading reasons 1 and 2 |
| |
08-26-2011, 03:00 PM
|
#250 | Unofficial Tin Foil Hat Specialist.
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,150
Thanked 1,529 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 326 Times in 125 Posts
| ALRIGHT GUYS IT'S SUNNY! LET'S ENJOY THE SUN AND CHECK OUT CHICKS IN BIKINIS AND SHORT SHORTS CAUSE THAT SHIT WON'T LAST!!!! |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 AM. |