REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2011, 10:23 AM   #1
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
40 mpg camaro?

Is it just me or does the canadian ad laws allow companies to flat out lie about their products?
Advertisement
Death2Theft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 10:45 AM   #2
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
PuYang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 578
Thanked 254 Times in 101 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 4 Posts
^ source? explain?

my brother used to drive 2010 camaro v6. it got better highway gas mileage than my prelude. direct injection and 6 speeds > my 5 speed. my car cruises at ~2800-3000 rpm at 80-100kmh. his camaro cruised just below 2k i think. also took 87, while my prelude requires 91 >;C
__________________
<:D
PuYang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 11:15 AM   #3
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ♠
Posts: 4,847
Thanked 693 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 339 Times in 75 Posts
I doubt they are lying, or else they would get sued for false advertisement.

For example, all food sold in Canada must include ingredient labels in packaged food.

But it doesn't mean that they cant work around the system, lets say they put gas in the car and let it run til it dies , with no stops = better mileage.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outreach View Post
Fuck your Mother, chump.
6insomnia9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 11:19 AM   #4
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
source = gm canada website
US site says 29mpg 2011 Chevy Camaro Coupe Specs and Features | Chevrolet
which IMO is actually pretty realistic considering a few magazines have achieved that easily, but 40 is definitely optimistic, maybe someone goofed on the conversion from L/100km?

I thought EPA etc. do the testing for fuel economy not the manufacturers themselves
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 11:30 AM   #5
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
TRDeol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 394
Thanked 195 Times in 46 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 10 Posts
Could be true, somebody go test it out!
TRDeol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 12:11 PM   #6
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,890
Thanked 5,175 Times in 1,555 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Transport Canada has it's own testing procedures compared to the EPA, so fuel consumption figures will vary a bit. Also, when MPG is reported, they usually mean Imperial gallons, which is larger than a US gallon, so MPG numbers appear to be higher.
__________________
Romans 10:9
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 12:12 PM   #7
PJ
My name is PJ and I like dogs.
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancity/Toronto
Posts: 3,180
Thanked 1,683 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuYang View Post
^ source? explain?

my brother used to drive 2010 camaro v6. it got better highway gas mileage than my prelude. direct injection and 6 speeds > my 5 speed. my car cruises at ~2800-3000 rpm at 80-100kmh. his camaro cruised just below 2k i think. also took 87, while my prelude requires 91 >;C
Exactly.

I'm pretty sure my 350Z gets better mileage than my old Camry.

I'm usually not a fan of American cars, but I've been itching to get the new Camaro.. I fell in love with the new body style
__________________
Studies show 100% of people die.. Might as well have some fun.

Hello my name is PJ.


Buy/Sell Feedback 1-0-0
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 04:01 PM   #8
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Bahhbeehhaaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Van C
Posts: 1,319
Thanked 1,753 Times in 353 Posts
Failed 1,002 Times in 133 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuYang View Post
^ source? explain?

my brother used to drive 2010 camaro v6. it got better highway gas mileage than my prelude. direct injection and 6 speeds > my 5 speed. my car cruises at ~2800-3000 rpm at 80-100kmh. his camaro cruised just below 2k i think. also took 87, while my prelude requires 91 >;C
that's what i call engineering
Bahhbeehhaaaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 08:48 PM   #9
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 1,100 Times in 259 Posts
Failed 480 Times in 86 Posts
Wouldnt doubt it, My Firebird gets 23MPG
__________________
Current
2010 Mustang GT 4.6
1998 S10 2.2
Previous
1977 Firebird 5.7
1987 Iroc-Z 2.5
1998 Firebird 3.8
1992 BMW 325i 2.5
1994 Dodge Ram 5.2
1996 Dodge Ram 5.9
1996 Cavalier Z22 2.2
1997 Mustang Cobra 4.6
firebird79_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 09:29 PM   #10
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 671
Thanked 1,120 Times in 280 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bahhbeehhaaaa View Post
that's what i call engineering
thats gear ratios, if his car is hopping a bit under 2000 rpms on the highway then his engine isnt actually working that hard. i wouldnt call them liars but id like to see both city and highway mileage.

i also heard that manufacturers put tires on their cars that dont preform well but get greater mileage (not sure if this is a myth or is true)
duy- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 10:03 PM   #11
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Bahhbeehhaaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Van C
Posts: 1,319
Thanked 1,753 Times in 353 Posts
Failed 1,002 Times in 133 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by duy- View Post
thats gear ratios, if his car is hopping a bit under 2000 rpms on the highway then his engine isnt actually working that hard. i wouldnt call them liars but id like to see both city and highway mileage.

i also heard that manufacturers put tires on their cars that dont preform well but get greater mileage (not sure if this is a myth or is true)
yeahhh i know but still.. a V8? with 40mpg that's insane.
Bahhbeehhaaaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 12:00 AM   #12
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hk20000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by duy- View Post
thats gear ratios, if his car is hopping a bit under 2000 rpms on the highway then his engine isnt actually working that hard. i wouldnt call them liars but id like to see both city and highway mileage.

i also heard that manufacturers put tires on their cars that dont preform well but get greater mileage (not sure if this is a myth or is true)
^ true. Google low rolling resistance tires. Widely used in Prius and other small frugal vehicles.
__________________
⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.

  • 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
  • 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
  • 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
  • 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
  • 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
hk20000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 08:23 AM   #13
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Nightwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
Canadian MPG ratings are all higher because they're not in imperial MPG, they're in metric.

My Jeep is rated 39 MPG in Canada, in the USA it's rated at 28 MPG.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count.
Nightwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 09:44 AM   #14
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,890
Thanked 5,175 Times in 1,555 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightwalker View Post
Canadian MPG ratings are all higher because they're not in imperial MPG, they're in metric.

Canadian MPG is based off the imperial gallon, which is ~4.55L. The US Gallon is ~3.79L. A metric fuel economy, in the case of your Jeep, would be 8.4L/100km
__________________
Romans 10:9
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 06:47 PM   #15
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Nightwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto View Post
Canadian MPG is based off the imperial gallon, which is ~4.55L. The US Gallon is ~3.79L. A metric fuel economy, in the case of your Jeep, would be 8.4L/100km
My bad, I shouldn't post at 8am lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count.
Nightwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 07:59 PM   #16
MOD MOD MOD MOD MOD
 
nabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,869
Thanked 3,517 Times in 1,161 Posts
Failed 212 Times in 81 Posts
30MPG mixed highway/streets.. 36ish straight highway.. sucks on the streets, lol.
__________________
Quote:
[03-07, 03:26] Yodamaster - The feeling when you quickly insert without hitting the sides
nabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 04:50 PM   #17
Hex
Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the internet
Posts: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
40 MPG Doesn't sound realistic at all.. my 2010 v8 SS Camaro m6 only gets about 17.5 mpg.

or... 13.5L/100km. (mixed with mostly hwy) And the v8's require 91+

My friends with the v6's... Some were getting worse mileage than me, and some were getting barely better mileage... There really isn't a huge gap in mileage difference between the Auto's the Manual & the v6 vs v8.... Not as big as you'd expect anyways.

I never heard of anyone getting 40mpg in a Camaro.

Go read the camaro forum mileage threads.

Last edited by Hex; 07-30-2011 at 04:56 PM.
Hex is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 07-30-2011, 05:29 PM   #18
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bahhbeehhaaaa View Post
yeahhh i know but still.. a V8? with 40mpg that's insane.
It's a V6
still got over 300 hp though
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 09:36 PM   #19
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Bahhbeehhaaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Van C
Posts: 1,319
Thanked 1,753 Times in 353 Posts
Failed 1,002 Times in 133 Posts
OOps my bad =S.
Bahhbeehhaaaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net