Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
09-29-2011, 09:07 PM
|
#626 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: PM
Posts: 4,477
Thanked 3,341 Times in 842 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW M5 Pretty much a done deal. If the gov wants those cars, they will get it!
Canada now becomes guilty unless proven innocent. | what? y u thank my post but have opposite opinion...
|
| |
09-29-2011, 09:23 PM
|
#627 | I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 7,091
Thanked 2,112 Times in 264 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenDuang
The Province also reports that several of the defendants are now known to have previous driving records that include not having a valid licence, all the way up to, you guessed it, street racing. | Well if the owners of the 5 cars being seized have had prior records I don't feel bad for them one bit.
Serves them right.
Slow learners right there.
|
| |
09-29-2011, 10:10 PM
|
#628 | Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jgresch cuz matt told the police that it was only those 5 speeding | I dont think so cuz the blue lambo and the aston are his buddy's IIRC. Probably more cause they have a record or something??
I still think its lame especially if they do get the cars forfeited, because they didnt even have direct evidence.
|
| |
09-29-2011, 10:11 PM
|
#629 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: PM
Posts: 4,477
Thanked 3,341 Times in 842 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
|
lol yea i was being sarcastic :P
|
| |
09-30-2011, 12:11 AM
|
#630 | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,866
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
|
it could be that the popos do have solid evidence but at this moment is not releasing details... though I doubt it, just throwing the idea out there
__________________
Where the hell am I
|
| |
09-30-2011, 11:52 AM
|
#631 | The RS Freebie guru
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
|
So for those driving a $200k car... monetary punishment would be something as follows:
Speeding 1-20km over the limit: $138
Speeding 21-40km over the limit: $196
Speeding 41-60km over the limit: $368 + $960 DRP + Towing/Storage = $1500+?
Speeding 61+km over the limit: $483 + $960 DRP + Towing/Storage + Car = $200,000+
I want to know how this can make any rational sense.
So on a 110kmph highway, the difference between 165kmph and 175kmph can cost you a difference of $200,000? That's a load of crap.
|
| |
09-30-2011, 12:55 PM
|
#632 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul I want to know how this can make any rational sense. | You'd have to be open minded enough to realize they are only pursuing forfeiture against 5 of the 13, and those 5 have a colourful driving record.
|
| |
09-30-2011, 01:01 PM
|
#633 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
|
^ bottomline is if you choose to speed +40kms/hr, be prepared to have your car impounded. This is absolutely bullshit, but it is the risk you take if you speed.
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
|
| |
09-30-2011, 01:48 PM
|
#634 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 4,694
Thanked 239 Times in 94 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 10 Posts
|
So what happens if these were leased vehicles? They would still be auctioned off and the holder of the lease has to pay back the dealership?
|
| |
09-30-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#635 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Guadalajara
Posts: 4,763
Thanked 5,613 Times in 1,255 Posts
Failed 1,578 Times in 359 Posts
|
omg who careessssssssssss......i cant beleive this thread is still going on. let the police deal with it
|
| |
09-30-2011, 02:28 PM
|
#636 | Throw yo paws in da air!
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: State of Trance
Posts: 5,125
Thanked 2,779 Times in 957 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 61 Posts
|
^ inb4 thisisaforumtodiscuss
__________________ Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts 2008 Infiniti M45X - Y50 (Current) 2000 Honda Prelude SH (Sold) 1995 Dodge Spirit (Sold) 1998 Nissan Maxima SE (Sold) 1996 Honda Prelude SR-V (Sold) |
| |
09-30-2011, 03:01 PM
|
#637 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyzy So what happens if these were leased vehicles? They would still be auctioned off and the holder of the lease has to pay back the dealership? | One of the articles states all lien holders get paid first.
|
| |
10-12-2011, 01:46 PM
|
#638 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,102
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
thoughts? Quote:
A group of street racers in high-end cars who whipped along Highway 99 in August at speeds up to 200 kilometres an hour have had their licences suspended for up to 20 months.
The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles has ordered the suspension of the licences of five men, following a large street race involving 13 luxury vehicles, including Ferraris, Maseratis, Mercedes, an Aston Martin, Audis, and Nissan R series worth $2 million, on Aug 31.
A B.C. Supreme Court claim is also seeking the forfeiture of five of the 13 cars: the Aston Martin, Nissan GTR, Mercedes SLS and two Lamborghinis. The document identifies the defendants as Dan Na Zhu, Zhang Hong Ma, Ying Chun Wang, Xiu Bo Wang, Xiao Qiang Zhang, and John Doe 1 and 2, who are both minors. It also noted that the drivers are likely to use the cars again in the future to “engage in unlawful acts.”
Officers at the time noted that none of the drivers was much over 20. Only Wang holds a full licence, while Ma, Zhang and John Doe 2 had class “N” learning licences. Some also had previous driving infractions, including street racing.
“The Director [of Civil Forfeiture] says that the manner in which the high performance vehicles were operated by the drivers ... was likely to cause serious bodily harm to motorists using the highway and thus these vehicles they constitute instruments of unlawful activity as that term is defined in the [Motor Vehicle] Act,” the document said.
According to the claim, the drivers, most in their 20s, met at Lansdowne Centre in Richmond on Aug. 31 and planned to race to South Surrey by way of Highway 99. As they sped along the highway, they cut in and out of traffic, and blocked other traffic so other cars in the group could race each other down stretches of the highway. They were caught by police after racing through the Massey Tunnel at about 3:30 p.m.
Deas Island Freeway Patrol responded to emergency calls of dangerous driving and Surrey RCMP helped stop six of the vehicles as they left the highway. The other set of vehicles were stopped shortly after by White Rock RCMP.
At the time, the Mounties impounded the vehicles for seven days, charging racers with driving without due consideration and fining them $196 each.
Read more: Street racers lose licences | |
| |
10-12-2011, 01:54 PM
|
#639 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Van/Bur
Posts: 5,029
Thanked 1,563 Times in 515 Posts
Failed 60 Times in 33 Posts
|
They will probably just drive without a license.. If cars are powered by daddy. Cops would never know that the kid is driving unless they pull them over since insurance in under parents name. This is a risk that these kids would most likely take..
__________________
Cash Rules Everything Around Me!
Current:
2006 Honda Fourtrax Rancher 400cc ATV (Offroad trails + Winter Snow Plow)
1995 Toyota Tacoma (Toy Hauler)
2003 Honda Civic SIR (Daily Beater)
2018 KTM 390 Duke (Gas Saver)
2017 Subaru WRX Sport-Tech + STI 6MT (Weekend Track)
2022 Yamaha MT09(Faster Gas Saver)
Past:
2014 Honda Grom
1971 MG MGB Tourer
Kayo MR125 Race Bike
2001 Honda Odyssey
2009 Toyota Corolla CE
2007 Honda Ruckus
2007 Husqvarna SM610 SuperMoto
2001 Honda S2000
|
| |
10-12-2011, 03:20 PM
|
#640 | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: RevScene.net
Posts: 1,889
Thanked 1,284 Times in 420 Posts
Failed 238 Times in 105 Posts
|
Wonder what Matt Zhang has been driving lately |
| |
10-12-2011, 03:45 PM
|
#641 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,899
Thanked 2,649 Times in 884 Posts
Failed 218 Times in 79 Posts
|
the flying spur probably
|
| |
10-12-2011, 05:01 PM
|
#642 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon-88 They will probably just drive without a license.. If cars are powered by daddy. Cops would never know that the kid is driving unless they pull them over since insurance in under parents name. This is a risk that these kids would most likely take.. | If they do, and get caught, their cars will be impounded for a few months, and the judge can (yet often don't) give them jail time.
|
| |
10-12-2011, 05:05 PM
|
#643 | Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky_High Wonder what Matt Zhang has been driving lately | I think hes still rockin the R8, he posted a photoshoot couple days back on FB and saw him drive past on cambie the other day. |
| |
10-12-2011, 05:43 PM
|
#644 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 240
Thanked 33 Times in 18 Posts
Failed 69 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3guy A couple of friends and I were talking about these idiot kids this past weekend and I think the North American way of thinking about hitting these kids (or parents) where it hurts, the pocket book is just not going to work. Unfortunately, most rich mainlanders don't really care that much about money, because they can always make more. If you really want the parents to play a more active role in their kid's behaviour, hit asians were it hurts....."Face". Any person caught speeding +50kms or greater than posted speed limit, post there picture and name in the newspaper. I guarantee you, this will get a response from these kids parents.
Asians care more about "face" than money.
No asian parent wants to deal with the ridicule from other parents. "oh, I saw your son in the paper" | You got the point there. 120% agree. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
12-05-2011, 10:07 AM
|
#645 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: E. Vancouver
Posts: 1,939
Thanked 307 Times in 139 Posts
Failed 100 Times in 26 Posts
| |
| |
12-06-2011, 07:05 AM
|
#646 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 113 Posts
|
They'll just drive with a DL from another country/province. Nothing the Superintendant can do about that.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
12-13-2011, 10:06 AM
|
#647 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,780
Thanked 2,932 Times in 766 Posts
Failed 369 Times in 96 Posts
|
BACK in the news! Street racers seek to have driving bans overturned
Two people allegedly involved in a street-racing incident where high-end sports cars were travelling at up to 200 km/h are seeking to overturn their lengthy driving bans.
Dan Na Zhu, also known as Danna Zhu, 21, received a 20-month driving prohibition for her actions behind the wheel of an Aston Martin following the August incident.
Zhuo “Tony” Huang, a 28-year-old West Vancouver realtor and father of two, received a 16-month ban for his conduct behind the wheel of a Lamborghini.
The pair has filed a petition in B.C. Supreme Court seeking to quash the driving suspensions imposed by the superintendent of motor vehicles.
The petition says that the prohibitions are unreasonable and based on a “generic, hearsay” report by police.
Zhu says she and 13 other drivers of exotic vehicles gathered at the Landsdowne mall in Richmond to drive to a restaurant in White Rock to celebrate a friend leaving to attend university in California.
At the time of the incident, police received a number of 911 calls reporting that a group of high-end sports cars were being driven in a highly aggressive manner, weaving in and out of traffic.
The vehicles were said to be travelling at speeds of up to 200 km/h.
But in documents filed in court, Zhu, a student from China attending college in Coquitlam, says her speed was generally in the range of 115 km/h.
“At no time did I participate in holding up traffic from behind, nor did I participate in any racing with the group of exotic cars ahead of me, or with the group of cars that I was travelling with.”
Zhu sought a review of the suspension but an adjudicator found that while she had categorically denied involvement in street racing, it wasn’t likely that independent witnesses would provide information to police if there was no basis for their claims.
Huang also denied any involvement in street racing.
“I did not conspire or agree with anyone to travel to White Rock for the purpose of racing,” he said in court documents.
In a letter to the authorities, his lawyer, Russ Chamberlain, said the police had not provided “one scintilla” of evidence that his client was engaged in racing.
Chamberlain said that before taking any action against a driver in B.C., there must be evidence, whether it is direct, hearsay, double or triple hearsay.
“The superintendent should not act upon rumor, speculation or hysteria,” wrote Chamberlain.
The lawyer said Huang was a businessman with business and family responsibilities that depend upon his ability to drive.
But in rejecting Huang’s appeal, an adjudicator noted that Huang had two driving convictions -- for speeding and for an improperly equipped vehicle -- that resulted in driving suspensions.
The adjudicator found that it was improbable that the number of witnesses would provide information to police about the street racing incident if there was no basis for their claims.
Huang’s involvement posed a “high risk” to other users of the road, he said. kfraser@theprovince.com
twitter.com/keithrfraser
© Copyright (c) The Province
Read more: http://www.theprovince.com/news/Stre...#ixzz1gRIWbya8 |
| |
12-13-2011, 10:31 AM
|
#648 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
|
Good for those two. While i don't doubt there were people doing what the witnesses claimed, performing a group impoundment because they were there isn't right. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
12-13-2011, 10:54 AM
|
#649 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomac Good for those two. While i don't doubt there were people doing what the witnesses claimed, performing a group imprudent because they were there isn't right. Posted via RS Mobile | You have to remember they went after 5 of the 13, for good reason. Those 5 have previous convictions, and with multiple convictions are now eligible for the Driver Improvement Program where the superintendent hands out suspensions on an individual basis.
She just pleaded guilty to speeding (115 in a 80/90/100 depending on the location), so add another ticket to her record - and do the same to him. Then consider some of these drivers have Ns (we don't know these drivers specifically) and the superintendent has even more power to keep them off the road.
It is going to be interesting to see how the BC Supreme Court rules, as the superintendent has a lot of power to deal with repeat offenders which hasn't been successfully challenged previously.
|
| |
12-13-2011, 10:56 AM
|
#650 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 654
Thanked 279 Times in 95 Posts
Failed 47 Times in 13 Posts
|
I hate to say it, but good for them.
I don’t support the actions of people who drive like douche bags. I don’t support people with money that believe the law doesn’t apply to them. But the burden of proof has to lay with the arresting or charging officers and the courts. “He said she said” can’t be all this is based on when you have serious penalties and fines.
If the officers can’t prove they were breaking the law, and the witnesses can’t identify individuals (cars, license plates or faces), who’s to say they are not telling the truth? While I’m betting they were just and involved as the rest, they still have the right to have to have what amounts to charges with penalties proven against them before they are penalized for it don’t they? Good for them on fighting it. I know I wouldnt have the money to fight it, so Im glad they are.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 PM. |