![]() |
^ personally I think real world fuel economy has more to do with the weight of the vehicle than the size of the engine. For example, my RDX has a 2.3l 4 banger with a turbo, but weighs 4100lbs. RDX 4100lbs 2.3L turbo 60L fuel = 330kms M5 4100lbs 5.0L V10 60L fuel = 220kms Pcar GT3 3000lbs 3.6L flat6 60L fuel = 360kms. I drive this car the hardest and gets the best gas mileage!!! I never shift below 4k kms...... |
Quote:
Here's the segment, and it's actually a M3 vs a Toyota Prius |
z3guy, I have a 5.7L trans am with manual and had a 5.7L camaro with auto, and both of them were better on gas than my 2.5L turbo skyline, 2.5L turbo legacy, 3.0L v6 300zx, and pretty damn close to the 240sx. Both the camaro and the trans am gets driven not hard but not light either and both of them i average about 13L/100km give or take .5L city. on the highway the previous owner of the camaro drove it to calgary and average 650km to 55L on the highway. |
How did this turn into a discussion about fuel economy?! Don't the people who normally buy cars like these NOT care about the fuel economy and only care about the smiles per gallon? (Since they should have another car to DD) |
i love having a car with torque. engine dosent need to rev to 5k to make power. |
More available torque + less throttle input= Good MPG's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know it's not the same, but even my M5 4.9L V8 gets 4-415kms on 70L, normal daily driving. |
^ dude,go on M5 board to see if it is normal...... |
Quote:
Quote:
|
this car is stock. can be bought for ~90k. not saying it's the holy grail, but a good contender in a category of good bang for buck cars. 110 kph by end of first gear? yes please. |
Look at that oil pressure gauge. Damn. |
Quote:
Tired of playing around with 4cyl turbo's. |
Quote:
I just checked the e60s.. you're still getting horrible milage. Most people reported 2-250 Miles, with the lowest I found being 160 miles (250+ kms), and a few even reporting being in the 300s. |
^ dude get a life, you worry about your car, I will worry about mine. |
New Viper: Kind of looks like a Maserati G/T had a kid with a Fisker Karma http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17ik...jpg/xlarge.jpghttp://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17ik...jpg/xlarge.jpg I think the rear looks badass http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17ik...jpg/xlarge.jpghttp://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17ik...jpg/xlarge.jpg Here's the basics: SRT is working with the same interior suppliers from Ferrari and Maserati. The frame has been entirely redone. Hardened steel. 50% stiffer than 2010 Viper. An 8.4-liter V10 engine, 28 lbs. lighter than the 2010 Viper rated at 640 HP & 600lb ft torque - the most torque of any naturally aspirated sports car engine in the world More info available here: 2013 SRT Viper: The Snake Is Back! -Tremec TR6060 six-speed manual transmission has been improved with a shorter throw shifter, closer gear ratios -All 2013 Viper models will come with a steering-wheel-mounted launch control switch, allowing for optimal acceleration from standing starts. These wheel renders look nice https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net...52190623_n.jpghttps://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net...81877278_n.jpg |
front end looks too european...lost that muscular american look but this sounds really good...hope they'll release an ACR version eventually |
^It's because they got input from Ferrari/Maserati. ;) The Interior is killer! |
I wonder if a few Alfa Romeo designers were in on this. I see a small bit of influence from the 8C. |
Quote:
http://www.lincah.com/wp-content/upl...or-800x600.jpghttp://stwot.motortrend.com/files/20...e-1024x640.jpg http://stwot.motortrend.com/files/20...r-1024x640.jpghttp://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-520x318.jpg more pics here: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news |
Whenever I see a Viper, it reminds the face of a guy with a RT10 I met at Richmond gas station. Me: Nice car RT10 owner: Thx Another dude: nice, MPG must be *great* on that 8L engine :troll: RT10 owner: What's MPG? :fuckthatshit: Another dude: :okay: Me: :joy: |
looks badass |
Do want. :love: |
Quote:
|
New viper looks great. Front doesn't look as aggressive as before though. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net