REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2011, 08:56 PM   #1
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
can police speed without sirens/lights

i tried searching, found nothing.

just wondering, can a cop speed without their lights or sirens on?

I believe I heard that they could not, and as such if i were to get a speeding ticket and the only way to prove that I was speeding would be for the cop to admit to speeding without lights/sirens, what would happen? would a cop admit that? is it wrong that they did that?

just interested
Advertisement
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 09:02 PM   #2
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
corollagtSr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,179
Thanked 1,090 Times in 318 Posts
Failed 294 Times in 64 Posts
corollagtSr5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 09:37 PM   #3
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,450
Thanked 7,646 Times in 3,591 Posts
Failed 1,506 Times in 644 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
i tried searching, found nothing.

just wondering, can a cop speed without their lights or sirens on?

I believe I heard that they could not, and as such if i were to get a speeding ticket and the only way to prove that I was speeding would be for the cop to admit to speeding without lights/sirens, what would happen? would a cop admit that? is it wrong that they did that?

just interested
Yes they can. There are many situations a police officer would want to go to location with the people there no he is coming,
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:32 PM   #4
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
Yes they can. There are many situations a police officer would want to go to location with the people there no he is coming,
is there something in legal documentation that says they can? i've searched around and read 'many' opinions on both sides.

i'd imagine they couldn't speed without lights OR sirens on. i have been told by a friend who got into an accident with a cop car that they were at fault b/c the cop had just his lights on, and that's all the need (either or) - not sure its logical that a cop can speed without some kind of warning system, as other road users would never expect a car speeding like that - especialy an emergency vehicle (which is there to uphold the law)
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:33 PM   #5
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Jgresch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PM
Posts: 4,477
Thanked 3,341 Times in 842 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
did u get a ticket?
Jgresch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 11:18 PM   #6
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jgresch View Post
did u get a ticket?
no, just asking, but would love to know (one of those things you want to know)
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 12:00 AM   #7
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
GabAlmighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 5,324
Thanked 3,782 Times in 1,242 Posts
Failed 533 Times in 187 Posts
They don't need the lights, I've been told by a cop. But take that with a grain of salt.

Or you can just take first hand experience, when i tailed a cop doing 120+ down Shaughnessy.
__________________
'16 Ram 1500
GabAlmighty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 12:33 AM   #8
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: burnaby
Posts: 403
Thanked 236 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 70 Times in 20 Posts
They can do whatever tha fuckk they wantss


Skyline350gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 12:41 AM   #9
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
No, they do not need to use lights and sirens, which is logical since often times they would not want to alert the parties at the location they are proceeding too in advance of arrival.

Quote:
122 (1) Despite anything in this Part, but subject to subsections (2) and (4), a driver of an emergency vehicle may do the following:

(a) exceed the speed limit;
(b) proceed past a red traffic control signal or stop sign without stopping;
(c) disregard rules and traffic control devices governing direction of movement or turning in specified directions;
(d) stop or stand.
(2) The driver of an emergency vehicle must not exercise the privileges granted by subsection (1) except in accordance with the regulations.
(3) [Repealed 1997-30-2.]
(4) The driver of an emergency vehicle exercising a privilege granted by subsection (1) must drive with due regard for safety, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the following:
(a) the nature, condition and use of the highway;
(b) the amount of traffic that is on, or might reasonably be expected to be on, the highway;
(c) the nature of the use being made of the emergency vehicle at the time.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-21-2011, 06:56 AM   #10
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,408
Thanked 937 Times in 287 Posts
Failed 286 Times in 94 Posts
this is common in vancouver
danned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 01:39 PM   #11
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: PR
Posts: 1,140
Thanked 253 Times in 131 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
is there something in legal documentation that says they can? i've searched around and read 'many' opinions on both sides.
As posted above, Section 122 of the MVA gives Police, Fire and Ambulance the authority to "break the traffic laws", however sub-sections 2 and 4 regulate how/when/why. We (RCMP) have our own internal Emergency Vehicle Operation policy, which expands on sub-sections 2 and 4, as does every municipal police force, fire department and BC Ambulance Services.

Quote:
i'd imagine they couldn't speed without lights OR sirens on. i have been told by a friend who got into an accident with a cop car that they were at fault b/c the cop had just his lights on, and that's all the need (either or) - not sure its logical that a cop can speed without some kind of warning system, as other road users would never expect a car speeding like that - especialy an emergency vehicle (which is there to uphold the law)
Without knowing the details of your friend's collision, having emergency lights activated is having a "warning system" for other drivers.

I can't speak for other agencies, but if we get into a collision on the way to a call/going after someone and can't justify the driving behaviour every step of the way, we are held every bit as accountable in terms of civil and criminal liability as anyone else. Then we also have our internal investigation to deal with.
__________________
"Never give a match up halfway through. Never say that you do not feel up to it, that your condition is bad, and throw in the towel. Fight to the very end, always looking for your chance to break through." - Kazuzo Kudo
sho_bc is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-21-2011, 02:08 PM   #12
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sho_bc View Post
As posted above, Section 122 of the MVA gives Police, Fire and Ambulance the authority to "break the traffic laws", however sub-sections 2 and 4 regulate how/when/why. We (RCMP) have our own internal Emergency Vehicle Operation policy, which expands on sub-sections 2 and 4, as does every municipal police force, fire department and BC Ambulance Services.


Without knowing the details of your friend's collision, having emergency lights activated is having a "warning system" for other drivers.

I can't speak for other agencies, but if we get into a collision on the way to a call/going after someone and can't justify the driving behaviour every step of the way, we are held every bit as accountable in terms of civil and criminal liability as anyone else. Then we also have our internal investigation to deal with.
great response, thanks.

ya, my friends' accidents was an interesting one, she was driving through an intersection on a green, cop comes through the intersection on a red for him, but with lights or sirens (can't recall, it was just one of them, i think it was just lights), they collided, she was found 100% at fault, just good info to know that.

what i would find interesting would be if a cop is speeding for no real reason, what would happen to them, for example if they could just pull someone over, but instead they want to 'ghost' them for a while, is that justified?

just really interesting stuff, this
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 03:05 PM   #13
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Brianrietta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 49°06'N121°58'W
Posts: 1,106
Thanked 1,133 Times in 309 Posts
Failed 34 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
what i would find interesting would be if a cop is speeding for no real reason, what would happen to them, for example if they could just pull someone over, but instead they want to 'ghost' them for a while, is that justified?
I'm not entirely sure what you're asking here. If you're wondering whether a police officer is justified in trailing a vehicle that is speeding (thereby speeding themselves without lights or siren on) without immediately pulling them over - then yes. Officers will often wait to trigger lights and pull over someone until they're able to get a quick idenfication on the vehicle and it's registered owner. It's beneficial to know whether the registered owner of a vehicle has a suspended license, warrants etc before going to stop them (and especially in the case of driving an unmarked [not everyone is as observant about tinted dark coloured CV's/palas/chargers behind them], you don't want to identify yourself as an officer too soon - potentially spooking someone who may have an inclination to resist and run).

Another traffic enforcement example would be sitting on the side of a quiet road where a driver would have plenty of room to speed off, where if after being passed by a speeding vehicle and the road behind him is clear (minimal other traffic), you commonly wouldn't trigger lights until you'd caught up to the vehicle. Obviously this changes with more traffic around that would need to be alerted to your presence, but you can see that in any situation there are a number of factors that could lead to an officer using different combinations of lights/sirens.
__________________
nabs - Brianrietta are you trying to Mindbomber me? using big words to try to confuse me
jasonturbo - Threesomes: overrated - I didn't really think it was anything special, plus it was degrading, marching to the bathroom to fart all that semen out
Babykiller - And next to that, there's a little dot called a period. It's not the stuff you eat out of your sisters gash, it's a handy little tool for breaking up sentences so they don't look like nonsensical retard garbage.
Brianrietta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net