| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
02-20-2012, 01:50 AM
|
#26 | | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: RevScene.net
Posts: 1,889
Thanked 1,284 Times in 420 Posts
Failed 238 Times in 105 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by too_slow  8.0/6.4 for the CX5 AWD with the same engine +6spd Auto
7.1/4.9 for the Mazda 3 with the same engine + 6spd Auto
(Sauce: mazda.ca) | You're also missing the fact:
Curb Weight: 1340kg (Mazda 3 AT)
Curb Weight: 1555kg (Mazda CX5 AT)
The Mazda 3 is FWD, so a better comparison would be CX-5's 2WD model:
Mazda CX-5 2WD 6AT: 7.7/6.1
Mazda 3 6AT Sky: 7.1/4.9
or.....
Mazda CX-5 2WD 6MT: 7.8 / 5.7
Mazda 3 6MT Sky: 7.7 / 5.0
| 
|  | |
02-20-2012, 09:49 AM
|
#27 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 49 Posts
|
^I was on my mobile.. too lazy to copy and paste each model..
Either way, I actually wanted a CX5 FWD with the manual (the manual is surprisingly nice). The crappy thing is you can only get it in the GX model (In the US, you can get the 6spd FWD on the next model up with the sunroof and heated seats) 
__________________
2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada)
2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne) | |
| | |
02-20-2012, 09:58 AM
|
#28 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
|
How is this any different than what's on a lot?
PS if you want to take good pictures after a wax job to show off the shine, back lighting at night is not the way. An overcast day outside will show off your hard work the best.
| |
| | |
02-21-2012, 12:54 PM
|
#29 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
|
11L/100km isn't THAT good...
| |
| | |
02-21-2012, 10:21 PM
|
#30 | | Ready to be Man handled by RS!
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: ubc
Posts: 98
Thanked 57 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
that's actualy kind of meh ...
my 09 GTI running a tune gets me 480-520 a tank avg city/highway
it's also a 55 L tank ..
on my MFD i get city (10.5l/100km) or (8.2l/100km) mixed
my girlfriend did a cypress trip when i was on holiday and sent me a picture getting (5.9l/100km) doing 60km the whole way cuz of the bad rain and fog
that's in a 2.0T ... last i dyno-ed it measured 235whp/255wtq ...
not a bad trade off for an economy car : )
| |
| | |
02-21-2012, 11:37 PM
|
#31 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: LM
Posts: 350
Thanked 123 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 300 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo 11L/100km isn't THAT good... |
What the fuck have you been driving?
I get around 300-350KM's out of a 60L tank.
That's around 17L/100KM to 20L/100KM
Not too shabby.
| |
| | |
02-22-2012, 03:53 AM
|
#32 | | RabidMod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,374
Thanked 1,516 Times in 536 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Over9K What the fuck have you been driving?
I get around 300-350KM's out of a 60L tank.
That's around 17L/100KM to 20L/100KM
Not too shabby. | For a car with fuel savings technology so hyped up it has to have its own badge "SKY ACTIV", 11L/100km is pretty bad.
Hopefully OP will report better numbers once his car's broken in.
__________________
--- | |
| | |
02-22-2012, 09:51 AM
|
#33 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidRat For a car with fuel savings technology so hyped up it has to have its own badge "SKY ACTIV", 11L/100km is pretty bad.
Hopefully OP will report better numbers once his car's broken in. | Yep. I get 11L/100km in my 1.8L SC, heavy (3500 lb) C230 with heavy 19" wheels and my lead foot driving 90% city.
I expect a lighter car (~3000 lbs) with a non-FI 2.0L I4 to be MUCH better than that.
| |
| | |
02-22-2012, 11:08 AM
|
#34 | | "They call me Bowser...RawR!"
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,236
Thanked 934 Times in 374 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
|
Yeah, 11L/100km is pretty bad for a car that size. I'm currently getting about 10.2L/100km out of my Sonata Turbo with mixed city/hwy driving and it's a bigger, more powerful car. Pure hwy driving, I've been as low as 5.9L/100km on my gas runs down to Pt. Roberts.
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
| |
| | |
02-22-2012, 12:28 PM
|
#35 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,583
Thanked 5,020 Times in 1,854 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
|
Of the 38,000 kms I have on my MS3, my average has been 9.8L/100k. At least that's what the trip computer says, and I've never reset it since I've bought it. It also says my average speed has been 34km/h  Damn short victoria city blocks.
You should be getting way better in your Skyactiv.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
| |
| | |
02-22-2012, 12:28 PM
|
#36 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 49 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by wbean that's actualy kind of meh ...
my 09 GTI running a tune gets me 480-520 a tank avg city/highway
it's also a 55 L tank ..
on my MFD i get city (10.5l/100km) or (8.2l/100km) mixed
my girlfriend did a cypress trip when i was on holiday and sent me a picture getting (5.9l/100km) doing 60km the whole way cuz of the bad rain and fog
that's in a 2.0T ... last i dyno-ed it measured 235whp/255wtq ...
not a bad trade off for an economy car : ) | German electrics can never be trusted..
The MFD on my Mk4,5,6 cars were all overly optimistic by a solid 15-20% when compared to the pen and paper calculation
__________________
2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada)
2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne) | |
| | |
04-06-2012, 08:48 AM
|
#37 | | SiRVs up, dude
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Outerspace
Posts: 4,771
Thanked 345 Times in 178 Posts
Failed 31 Times in 17 Posts
|
bump.
any updates with the car? I've been looking at new car options and this one is currently at the top of my list. Just by reading the thread.. I'm guessing their fuel economy isn't near what is being advertised?
| |
| | |
04-06-2012, 10:03 AM
|
#38 | | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: burnaby
Posts: 179
Thanked 81 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 6 Posts
|
oh man only 11L/100KM? no offense but that is not the numbers I was expecting when Mazda advertises their Skyactive technology with great fuel consumption as the selling point :S
My 350's got 3.5L V6, and I'm doing around 12.7L/100KM in city and around 11L/100KM highway
570ish incity and 700ish all hwy on a 75L tank
maybe the car still needs more breaking in? How about the grade of gas you're putting it? I'm still pretty curious about the skyactive 3's (friend just got a plain mazda 3 5spd and I'm interested to see the difference in fuel consumption)
| |
| | |
04-06-2012, 10:18 AM
|
#39 | | 2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
|
Apparently Mazda3 is not a full Skyactiv implementation, that's why the CX5 has nearly the same fuel consumption figures (It is the first "Full" Skyactiv mazda product).. Honestly the technology boils down to a lot of production improvement on friction reduction technology on the drivetrain and more HSS in the body (Thanks China!).. hence that's why just a facelifted Mazda3 won't get the full benefit.
I think it is best to take a car for a test drive on your usual route.. and get the figures from there. Quote:
Originally Posted by mqin oh man only 11L/100KM? no offense but that is not the numbers I was expecting when Mazda advertises their Skyactive technology with great fuel consumption as the selling point :S
My 350's got 3.5L V6, and I'm doing around 12.7L/100KM in city and around 11L/100KM highway
570ish incity and 700ish all hwy on a 75L tank
maybe the car still needs more breaking in? How about the grade of gas you're putting it? I'm still pretty curious about the skyactive 3's (friend just got a plain mazda 3 5spd and I'm interested to see the difference in fuel consumption) | | |
| | |
04-06-2012, 10:59 AM
|
#40 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 38 Posts
|
skyactiv= vtec= hemi=FSI=ecoboost... all marketing terms i think.
Because it doesnt sound cool and new if you just call it= Super economical Gasoline saving Beasty engine.
Nice cars none the less.
| |
| | |
04-06-2012, 11:25 AM
|
#41 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,191
Thanked 274 Times in 135 Posts
Failed 110 Times in 43 Posts
|
What the, only 11L/100? My pig Evo is doing 14-15! Isn't this car supposed to be 4.5?
| |
| | |
04-06-2012, 11:53 AM
|
#42 | | 2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
|
Not quite, Skyactiv covers a lot more than just the valvetrain like the examples you pointed out.. Skyactiv covers things like exhaust, 4-2-1 instead of 4-1.. not to mention it addresses the transmission's parasitic losses.
That's one of the reason why the current 3 is not a full Skyactiv implementation is the 4-2-1 exhaust takes up too much space. Quote:
Originally Posted by wasabisashimi skyactiv= vtec= hemi=FSI=ecoboost... all marketing terms i think.
Because it doesnt sound cool and new if you just call it= Super economical Gasoline saving Beasty engine.
Nice cars none the less. | | |
| | |
04-11-2012, 03:57 PM
|
#43 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 4 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gachinto I drove like a mad man whenever I could once the engine warmed, trying to push the RPM to 4~5k for breaking in. It was sluggish at first but now the power responded much better; I guess the ECU learned my pattern and I learned its.
The first tank did around 500km over 90% city. Right now the 2nd fill up lasted around 1200km.
Google'd:
Gas tank size = 14.5 gallons = 54.89 litres
That's roughly 11L per 100km~
Not exactly impressive for fuel but to be fair I didn't try to save fuel either! I will try to drive to save after next fill up and calculate the consumption. | A Z4 does 11L/100Km too.
| |
| | |
04-11-2012, 04:05 PM
|
#44 | | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,287
Thanked 2,093 Times in 452 Posts
Failed 75 Times in 29 Posts
|
My STI did 18L/100....on stock  | |
| | |
04-11-2012, 09:54 PM
|
#45 | | SiRVs up, dude
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Outerspace
Posts: 4,771
Thanked 345 Times in 178 Posts
Failed 31 Times in 17 Posts
|
I'm averaging 7.7L/100km on hwy only right now on my civic.... if anyone cares
| |
| | |
04-11-2012, 11:07 PM
|
#46 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,295
Thanked 2,944 Times in 1,259 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SiRV I'm averaging 7.7L/100km on hwy only right now on my civic.... if anyone cares | Hell, I can manage ~6.5L/100KM on my GTI if I'm heading down to Seattle or thereabouts and cruise at the speed limit. 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | 
| | |
04-12-2012, 04:24 PM
|
#47 | | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Langley
Posts: 1,438
Thanked 116 Times in 39 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 9 Posts
|
Skyactiv...  | |
| | |
04-12-2012, 08:22 PM
|
#48 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,030
Thanked 1,382 Times in 416 Posts
Failed 73 Times in 29 Posts
|
i'm getting 9.5l/100km now
100%city
40% of it is on a cold start, my commute is 10min
| |
| | |
04-13-2012, 01:36 AM
|
#49 | | RabidMod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,374
Thanked 1,516 Times in 536 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bonestock i'm getting 9.5l/100km now
100%city
40% of it is on a cold start, my commute is 10min | That's still barely better than the 10L/100km I get with my s2k, keep us updated =p
__________________
--- | |
| | |
04-13-2012, 01:58 AM
|
#50 | | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,287
Thanked 2,093 Times in 452 Posts
Failed 75 Times in 29 Posts
|
Driving pure highway tonight, I hit a record 8.0L/100KM, IMPOSSIBRU!!!
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
