REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2012, 10:23 AM   #1
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Supafly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VanCity/HCMC/HK
Posts: 4,760
Thanked 694 Times in 235 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 48 Posts
Questionable Issue with ICBC.

So long story short I'm in a debate with ICBC, and the 3rd party and these are the notes;

Party A - them
Party B - me


Party A cuts Party B off and brake checks them.

Party B re-ends Party A.

Party B moves over and motions for Party A to pull over with witnesses.

Party A moves slowly over then decides to pin the gas and leave the scene despite making visual and verbal contact.

High speed chase across the alex fraser bridge while on the phone with deas island police...

Party A gets arrested, and charged with failure to stop at an MVA.

Party B seeks ICBC immediately and processes all the paperwork.

Party A does not respond to letters and phone calls from ICBC for 90+ days.

-----

Today I get a phonecall from ICBC stating that there isnt enough evidence to show that Party A cut me off which initiated an MVA; it was a catch 22, to stay with witnesses and get shafted cause of no info on Party A or chase the bitch and catch her.

So now Im getting stiffed with a deductable and an increase in insurance...stn like $350 over a 7 yr period.
Im choked atm, with just the fact of the principle driver and principle owner ( Party A, two different people) have failed to respond numerous times via phone/letters from ICBC....

I believe this shows their negilence to the entire MVA...shouldnt running away from a MVA enough evidence to state that she knew she was at fault?

Its not even about the deductible now (500)....its about the principle of doing a hit/run and getting away.

My file is currently under review again by a 2nd Manager at the Richmond Branch... I find this whole situation a little bit one sided.
I even brought up the fact of small claims court, and the manager stated that ICBC will represent Party A but not Party B when summoned to court before a judge...WTF.
Any one have their 2cents to chime in with?
Advertisement
__________________
"Just because any car nut can tell you every possible performance specification of a Ferrari doesn't mean he can drive. Most of these people live in places where they've never even seen a Ferrari, much less ever owned one themselves."
Supafly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:44 AM   #2
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
too_slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 49 Posts
Hate to be "that" guy, but it seems like a cheap dash cam could have saved you from all the hassle..

*goes and mounts one on all four corners of my car*
__________________
2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada)

2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne)
too_slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:45 AM   #3
Old School RS
 
lowside67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,598
Thanked 4,045 Times in 1,233 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
Without a witness, you are 100% screwed. You rear-ended somebody, you are automatically at fault unless you can prove a substantiating circumstance and without a witness you may as well quit fighting and get on with life.

Mark
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars.
lowside67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:53 AM   #4
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Supafly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VanCity/HCMC/HK
Posts: 4,760
Thanked 694 Times in 235 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 48 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowside67 View Post
Without a witness, you are 100% screwed. You rear-ended somebody, you are automatically at fault unless you can prove a substantiating circumstance and without a witness you may as well quit fighting and get on with life.

Mark
Yeah, this is what Im sure of as well. Its a terrible thought; but ultimately the truth....makes you want to start your own vigilanty justice sometimes...

sometimes I wonder that during the chase if I nudged her into the wall or ditch would the outcome be in my favor....
__________________
"Just because any car nut can tell you every possible performance specification of a Ferrari doesn't mean he can drive. Most of these people live in places where they've never even seen a Ferrari, much less ever owned one themselves."
Supafly is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2012, 10:59 AM   #5
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
mqin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: burnaby
Posts: 179
Thanked 81 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 6 Posts
ICBC will always be on the defendant's (person at fault) side. It's a business, that's how they could lose the least amount of money possible.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lowside67 View Post
Without a witness, you are 100% screwed. You rear-ended somebody, you are automatically at fault unless you can prove a substantiating circumstance and without a witness you may as well quit fighting and get on with life.

Mark
and true to that, the motor vehicle act states that in a collusion where one rear ends the other, the party in the rear will always be at fault. I'm sorry if I haven't comprehended your story well enough but it sounds like ICBC could just say that your at fault simply for following too close and not providing enough space between you and whatever vehicle was in front of you, provided you have no evidence other than your word of how Party A drove in front of you, and even then I have a feeling that ICBC will rule it 50-50 maybe 60-40? Who knows.




Goodluck!

Last edited by mqin; 03-06-2012 at 11:06 AM.
mqin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:06 AM   #6
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
well what you could do is go out and post up some signs around the area where it happened looking for witnesses. then a week later have someone you know contact ICBC and give a statement saying that they saw the whole thing validating your story. that should resolve your issues, just dont get caught
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:11 AM   #7
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Supafly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VanCity/HCMC/HK
Posts: 4,760
Thanked 694 Times in 235 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 48 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
well what you could do is go out and post up some signs around the area where it happened looking for witnesses. then a week later have someone you know contact ICBC and give a statement saying that they saw the whole thing validating your story. that should resolve your issues, just dont get caught
yikes, I dont think I can come to that kind of conclusion...That would seriously put me into a diff category....lol
__________________
"Just because any car nut can tell you every possible performance specification of a Ferrari doesn't mean he can drive. Most of these people live in places where they've never even seen a Ferrari, much less ever owned one themselves."
Supafly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:23 AM   #8
RabidMod
 
RabidRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,371
Thanked 1,511 Times in 535 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 32 Posts
Was this on your way to work? Post up some signs anyway. It'll be a long shot but maybe your witnesses will see it on their daily commute and get back to you.

Otherwise, you might just have to let this go. Next time just snap a picture of their plate asap so that if they run off you can just stay with your witnesses and not worry about it.
__________________
---
RabidRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net