You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Entertainment ForumTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE! Entertainment District
Members' movie reviews, Trailers, TV show post-discussions. Warning: Absolutely, do not post links to pirated or illegal download sites!
Originally posted by Girl ^ Yes it's sad when you stare at the shape of my penis through my overly skin tight jeans and not help but feel like a shameful little boy compared to me.
Originally posted by Girl ^ Yes it's sad when you stare at the shape of my penis through my overly skin tight jeans and not help but feel like a shameful little boy compared to me.
I wont lie; I like the original and this one looks like a decent remake. The issue I have is that Hollywood is basically recycling old movies (and tacking sequel upon sequel on others) simply because it's easier than coming up with something that's new.
Keep in mind that most of these "originals" people get so nostalgic about are already remakes/rehashes/reimaginings of existing books or short stories. The first Total Recall is based on (or at least "inspired by") a 1966 Philip K. Dick short story, so... not an original idea in and of itself.
A lot of times with these sorts of things, too, subsequent remakes turn out being closer to the original story they're based on, than the first version that everyone is comparing them to.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Supposedly, based on plot information the remake is a closer adaptation of the book. I'll probably still end up seeing just for the fight scene between Kate and Jessica.
I saw the new one on Saturday, then re-watched the old one on Sunday. Surprised at how many similarities and call-backs there were after watching them back to back. Especially the lingering camera on the lady at the metal detector.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold
I watched it a couple nights ago. It was pretty good other than the fact that they skipped a lot of backstory which is needed but can't fit it in I guess. The movie started out in the middle of a plot and I didn't really get it until after I started to realize that the start of the movie was actually going in progress. That's the only thing I didn't like about it
It wasn't a great movie. It wasn't an actionpacked thriller of mind boggling escapades. I gotta say, it had less plot holes and made more (and less) sense than the one with Arnie, and make sure you pay attention to the scene with the Passport section. It's a nice cameo homage.
All in all, it was a decent movie. I was entertained. It was worth the $8 to see it in the afternoon in a half empty theatre.
the 80's recall was much more satisfying IMO. They seem to throw in a ton of parts from it into the new one very randomly.. 3 tittie scene was totally confusing to me..
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,668
Thanked 10,388 Times in 3,914 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodmack
the 80's recall was much more satisfying IMO. They seem to throw in a ton of parts from it into the new one very randomly.. 3 tittie scene was totally confusing to me..
yeah that was really unnecessary and didn't really fit at all but it was something fans really wanted i'd rather have seen the exploding head
On the bright side, they didn't kill off the psycho "wife" nearly as soon
It was a well-done movie, but ultimately... it was just another movie. The 1990 version was a lot more fun (bad bloated-faces effect notwithstanding), and come on, Arnie's one-liners are what it's all about.
"Get your ass to Mars."
"See you at the party, Richter!"
"Consider dat a divorce."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Also the plot twist in the 90's one was much more satisfying than the new one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
