House and Home Renovations THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
Designing your new condo or townhouse? Renovating your kitchen? Share your photos and project ideas with other experts here! We're not just modifying our cars anymore.. | ![Reply](https://www.revscene.net/styles/darklight/images/buttons/reply.gif) |
08-20-2012, 06:34 AM
|
#1 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,770
Thanked 2,920 Times in 761 Posts
Failed 367 Times in 95 Posts
| Pets and Rentals - Tenants vs Landlords - tenant rights
This is such a touchy subject.. back in the day as a tenant, I had a cat and it was so tough finding a rental...now, as a landlord... i know what will happen if i rent to a pet owner i.e. damages, etc. Advocates want to make it easier for pet owners to rent - News1130
VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - If you have a dog or cat and are a renter, there is no law in BC preventing your landlord from kicking you out because of your pet.
However if you head out east, it's illegal in Toronto to discriminate against a renter because they have a pet and Sharon Isaak with Renters at Risk says we need to follow that lead.
She thinks the worst thing a landlord can do is make someone choose between their best friend and their home.
"Over 50 per cent of people in Vancouver are renters, and in some parts of the city 70 to 80 per cent of people rent. We need to stop treating renters as second class citizens and allow people to have pets in their homes," stresses Isaak.
In 2003, the Residential Tenancy Act was adjusted to help those with pets find a home.
"[The laws] were changed to allow landlords to ask for a pet deposit to encourage them to allow pets, but what we've seen over the years, there's been no more changes to encourage landlords to allow pets and that needs to change," believes Isaak.
She's seen seen several cases involving an elderly renter who has been forced to put their pet down in order to stay in their building, and wants to see the Residential Tenancy Act changed.
|
| |
08-20-2012, 06:41 AM
|
#2 | Hacked RS to become a mod
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,008
Thanked 24,165 Times in 8,366 Posts
Failed 1,530 Times in 678 Posts
|
I thnk that as long as it's made clear that the tenant is liable for ANY damage, no matter how minor (so it would include things like smell) anyone should eb allowed to rent with a pet. If you don't personally like pets, you shoul dstill accept that other people do. As long as they are responsible
|
| |
08-20-2012, 03:15 PM
|
#3 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
|
No, you can not be 'kicked out' for having a pet....but if you break the signed tenancy agreement that said 'NO PETS', you can be evicted. See the fine line?
If you move into a building where pets are cool, then a new owner comes along and says that the building is going 'no pet', the tenant can not be evicted....they are grandfathered in.
I love pets....grew up my entire life with cats, dogs, hamsters, birds, mice, etc....I would love nothing more than to have a dog right now, but I can't. I live in a no dog building (cats ok) and although I am the property manager, its the rule.
The problem with pet is obvious...mess, damage, smell, noise. We can deal with the noise situation easily (complaint, complaint, warning, warning, warning, eviction)....mess, damage, smell is a little harder. Yes, we collect a pet damage deposit (can not exceed 50% of the original rent) but often the damage exceeds that. Here is the MAJOR issue....collecting. Its all fine and dandy to have a piece of paper saying that the tenant is obligated to pay for any damage that their animal has cause to the rental property, but when that damage exceeds the pet deposit, it can be very hard to recoup.
Also, a lot of the times, animals can do permanent damage. For example:
When Grid and I took over one of the buildings, the owner had mention that they had evicted some crazy lady a few months prior. Subsequent to that they have been having problems renting that apt as it smelled like cat piss. After re-finishing the floors several times, they had not been able to solve the problem. Grid took a look at it a couple of days later and had decided they the only way to fix the problem was to replace part of the floor....the smell was out of this world! Upon cutting he discovered that the piss had soaked not only the hardwood floors, but the sub floors, and the structural beams/supports of the building (thankfully there was not a unit below it). Then he realized that the drywall had soaked up the piss as well...he had to about 2 feet up and about 12 feet across...remove the drywall only to find that all the studs were damaged too.
In the end, he cleaned what he could, painted everything with killz, replaced the subflooring, covered everything again with killz...replaced the drywall...and then had to install laminate flooring over the beautiful original hardwood. It no longer smells, but whenever the temp outside gets super hot, we are expecting a complaint.
The cost of the loss in rental revenue, refinishing the floors twice, then finally having to remove and cover with new flooring was in the thousands. All for 1 cat and 1 crazy tenant.
And really....if the tenant is cool with a cat pissing in the corner...what makes you think she is going to have the money to pay for the damage. You can have every court in canada rule in your favor...you are never going to see that money.
Yes, I really understand how much it sucks to not have a pet and I totally realize that for every shitty pet owner, there are hundreds of great ones....unfortunately, sometimes it is not worth the risk. As someone who rents out these places, I can tell you it is a pain in the ass to turn down a great person b/c he/she has a dog. I get tired of saying no...but it is what it is. There are 3 buildings that surround me and all allow cats and dogs...they are out there, the tenant just needs to look.
|
| |
08-20-2012, 10:17 PM
|
#4 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
|
You know, I get sick and tired of this bullshit. Oh blah blah blah..tenants rights...bad landlords...ever popular, the "renovictions".
I'm a renter myself. So I get the deal.
But fuck off.
If you want protections, go and buy an apartment. You can do whatever the fuck you want to it, and as long as you pay strata and mortgage, no one gives a hoot(I'm over-simplifying, I know)
People have to stop thinking they can tell owners what they can do with their apartment.
It's discriminating against pet owners? Eat cat shit. I'm with dino..I love pets, but its not a 'right' to have one. If you are going to rent, and you don't want problems with pets, then don't have a cat.
Then you get some left-wing dipshit that gets on the news talking about dealing with bad landlords. Great...there are some out there. Can we deal with bad tenants? We are restricted from having a database of bad tenants, meaning you can trash my place, and move on to the next.
Sure, you want to open up the laws, but are unwilling to consider anything that might be a loss to your side.
So. Aggravating.
|
| |
08-21-2012, 04:52 AM
|
#5 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,076
Thanked 359 Times in 162 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
i love pets and all, and have two of my own. although it is harder to find homes that allow pets, these people need to realize that they are the RENTers, meaning that they don't own that home. if the landlord doesn't like pets for whatever reason, i do support them because in the end, its still their property.
|
| |
08-21-2012, 03:30 PM
|
#6 | I told him no, what y'all do?
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,019
Thanked 5,927 Times in 2,565 Posts
Failed 101 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock If you want protections, go and buy an apartment. You can do whatever the fuck you want to it, and as long as you pay strata and mortgage, no one gives a hoot(I'm over-simplifying, I know)
People have to stop thinking they can tell owners what they can do with their apartment.
It's discriminating against pet owners? Eat cat shit. I'm with dino..I love pets, but its not a 'right' to have one. If you are going to rent, and you don't want problems with pets, then don't have a cat. | Quote:
Originally Posted by impulseX these people need to realize that they are the RENTers, meaning that they don't own that home. if the landlord doesn't like pets for whatever reason, i do support them because in the end, its still their property. | +1
__________________ Feedback http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711 Quote: Greenstoner 1 rat shit ruins the whole congee originalhypa You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity | Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat
| |
| |
08-26-2012, 10:41 AM
|
#7 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Acura604 This is such a touchy subject.. back in the day as a tenant, I had a cat and it was so tough finding a rental...now, as a landlord... i know what will happen if i rent to a pet owner i.e. damages, etc. Advocates want to make it easier for pet owners to rent - News1130
VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - If you have a dog or cat and are a renter, there is no law in BC preventing your landlord from kicking you out because of your pet.
However if you head out east, it's illegal in Toronto to discriminate against a renter because they have a pet and Sharon Isaak with Renters at Risk says we need to follow that lead. | Yeah, and here's the problem with that: if you force landlords to accept renters with pets, maybe they decide just not to rent at all. Then you have a shrinking rental market for EVERYONE, pets or not... and the people with pets find it harder to find a place AT ALL, let alone one that allows their pets. Quote:
"Over 50 per cent of people in Vancouver are renters, and in some parts of the city 70 to 80 per cent of people rent. We need to stop treating renters as second class citizens and allow people to have pets in their homes," stresses Isaak.
| "Second class citizens"? Please. What about people who buy into condos or townhouses that don't allow pets - does that make them second-class citizens as well? Quote:
She's seen seen several cases involving an elderly renter who has been forced to put their pet down in order to stay in their building, and wants to see the Residential Tenancy Act changed.
| That doesn't make sense. If the person had a pet before they moved in, they shouldn't have been allowed to move in with it; if they GOT the pet AFTER moving in, they broke their tenancy agreement and should simply be evicted, or have ZERO excuse for having to get rid of the pet; and if the rules changed AFTER they moved in, they should be grandfathered anyway. And ultimately, nobody is FORCED to put a pet down in a situation like this - that's why shelters and BCSPCA exist.
Fucking wingnut bitch, crybaby stories like this only serve to make all pet owners look bad.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
08-27-2012, 07:07 AM
|
#8 | I told him no, what y'all do?
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,019
Thanked 5,927 Times in 2,565 Posts
Failed 101 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
She's seen seen several cases involving an elderly renter who has been forced to put their pet down in order to stay in their building, and wants to see the Residential Tenancy Act changed.
| that kind of erked me. it's not the pet's fault their owner can't give them a proper home, now it has to die cuz of that?
but IMO if you can't afford to properly own & take care of a pet then don't have one maybe? i've never owned more than fish so maybe i'm talking out of my ass... but i know i can't properly take care of a cat/dog due to my situation and that's why i don't have one.
__________________ Feedback http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711 Quote: Greenstoner 1 rat shit ruins the whole congee originalhypa You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity | Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat
| |
| |
08-27-2012, 10:52 AM
|
#9 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
|
You can just add this story to the thousand others out there where the landlord/owner looks like the big bad wolf.
Once a week or so you see a news story about a tenant being evicted for some problem that they claim isn't their fault or being evicted for uncontrollable reasons. Its all bull shit.
There are very few reasons a tenant can be evicted and it is VERY hard to do....especially if they want to fight it and take it to arbitration. The Tenancy Branch does not take eviction lightly at all...in fact, the ONLY way the a case is open/close is failure to pay rent. All other reasons (pets, damage, messy, loud music, health and safety, drunks...and even drugs use) it can be nearly impossible.
Yes, it can be frustrating to have a guy sitting in an apartment smoking a joint next to a hole he punched in the wall listening to Megadeath on full volume. The landlord can fight and fight and fight and STILL not be able to have him evicted. But it is what it is.
All these stories about tenants being kicked out for various, seemingly minor reason, are all bullshit.
My fav was a couple months ago...tenant in kamloops being evicted b/c he son has anger issues or some shit like that....she was having problems finding a place on her limited social assistance. She let it slip that she hadn't been able to afford to pay her rent for that place for the last few months!! WELL NO SHIT YOU ARE GETTING EVICTED! Really? B/c of the anger issue?! NOT b/c you haven't paid your FUCKING rent?!
Some tenants seem to forget that landlords/owners are not pocketing their money....they use that money to pay the mortgage on the property to which they live in.
|
| |
08-27-2012, 11:32 AM
|
#10 | I told him no, what y'all do?
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,019
Thanked 5,927 Times in 2,565 Posts
Failed 101 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dinosaur Some tenants seem to forget that landlords/owners are not pocketing their money....they use that money to pay the mortgage on the property to which they live in. | i like to think it's not so much forgetting that some use the rent to pay the mortgage but rather they don't give a flying fuck as it's "not their problem"
__________________ Feedback http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711 Quote: Greenstoner 1 rat shit ruins the whole congee originalhypa You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity | Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat
| |
| |
08-27-2012, 11:36 AM
|
#11 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
|
I think in the 3 years that we've been doing this, the worst thing you can come across is entitlement.
I say that understanding that there IS a certain level of entitlement required within the laws of what we do. You are entitled to an apartment that works, is free from disruption and neighbors and so on. I get that.
Then entitlement goes too far. There are people that we've had to deal with that felt very entitled to a lot of things. My time was to work like an all-request line.
"Hey! EVERYONE else is getting new blinds...I have old curtains...I'm ENTITLED to new blinds." No. The new apartments paying more money get new everything. If you want to renegotiate your rent, I'd be happy to give you new everything too. Nope. Didn't think that would work for you.
You want people to be entitled to a cat-its just one little cat, right? Well, what about those with two? Two little cats. At that point, a third cat is only 33% more cat. Maybe one little dog. Then, what counts as a little dog?
I have a suspicion that soon the Residential Tenancy Act will be in for an overhaul. They'll go for closing the renoviction loophole for sure, which will have a negative impact on the quality of available rentals.
|
| |
08-27-2012, 11:55 AM
|
#12 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,270
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
I think it should come down to what the Wants not the tenant, if you want to have pets but aren't willing to agree to the terms in the contract I wrote up then find a different place to live simple as that. I have a dog and love it but if I were to rent from some one who doesn't allow pets then you have to get rid of the pet or keep looking there shouldn't really be any argument because the tenant can't have it their way. try to come to an agreement with damage deposit or whatever but its more of a hassle to repair if you pet likes to piss, shit, or puke all over my carpet
just how I see it
|
| |
08-29-2012, 06:19 AM
|
#13 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
06-05-2013, 01:48 PM
|
#14 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,770
Thanked 2,920 Times in 761 Posts
Failed 367 Times in 95 Posts
|
... an update is better than no update lol... thread resurrection possible! Should landlords be able to deny renters with pets? | News1130
VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) – If Vancouver city council has its way, landlords will no longer be able to demand “no pets allowed.”
Not everyone is in favour of this motion.
The Rental Housing Council of BC doesn’t agree with the idea, President and CEO Amy Spencer says it should remain based on choice.
“Ten per cent of irresponsible pet owners do cause damage, so back in 2004 when the province did look at this, they provided landlords with the ability to charge a pet damage deposit.”
“We’ve actually had cases where people have been sued in the past where they’ve had new tenants come in and there has been some pet dander left over. Their children had an allergic reaction. It is a very individual choice. I’m a renter and I have a pet, and pets to me are a privilege and not a right.”
Councillor Tim Stevenson disagrees, “So why should people, just because they can’t afford to have a house or a big backyard, not be able to have a pet?”
He says over half of Vancouver households are renters, and the City of Vancouver is home to more than a quarter of the rental housing for the entire province.
A final decision would be up to the province of BC.
Ontario does not allow landlords to ban pets in rental housing agreements.
|
| |
06-05-2013, 02:02 PM
|
#15 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
Maybe a "You break it, you bought it" policy should apply here...
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
06-24-2013, 10:24 AM
|
#16 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,407
Thanked 31,856 Times in 7,375 Posts
Failed 209 Times in 157 Posts
|
I think owners of a building should be allowed to make the decision to allow pets or no pets, or cats only or whatever, but these size restraints are bullshit. A 130lb mastiff can live in a condo and be less of a disturbance, and be more comfortable than a 6lb yappy untrained pomeranian. These 30lb restrictions are fucking retarded.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5 Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever Westopher is correct. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked | Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct. | |
| |
06-24-2013, 10:57 AM
|
#17 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy Maybe a "You break it, you bought it" policy should apply here... | The problem with this policy is that pets can cause significant damage and this damage can far exceed the pet damage deposit.
When you take a deposit(s) for a rental unit, 50% is tenant damage\cleaning and 50% is for pet. From what I have been told from the RTB if the pet damage exceeds the pet damage deposit, you can not collect it from the "human" damage deposit.
Furthermore, if the pet (or tenant for that matter) causes damage in an amount the exceeds either or both deposits, you will need to go to court and collect...which can be very difficult (albeit, entertaining).
Although we have discussed this above a lot, I can not reiterate enough how damaging a pet (especially a cat) can be to a rental property. Unlike human, it isn't just patching and painting....it can be removing walls and flooring. Its just fucking nasty. The attitude of "you break it, you buy it" is great....but if I have a tenant with a floor pissing cat, what makes me think they have any integrity to pay for the damage. Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher I think owners of a building should be allowed to make the decision to allow pets or no pets, or cats only or whatever, but these size restraints are bullshit. A 130lb mastiff can live in a condo and be less of a disturbance, and be more comfortable than a 6lb yappy untrained pomeranian. These 30lb restrictions are fucking retarded. | Yes, I do agree that the owners should be able to make the decision. I don't think I would ever buy a place where someone else can make that decision for me. I allow tenants to have pets on my property....a little of it is because it is easier to rent, but mostly because the rent is substantial and therefore the deposit is, and because it is a townhouse in a family complex with an off-leash dog park.
I also agree that size restrictions are fucking ridiculous!
|
| |
06-24-2013, 02:02 PM
|
#18 | Director of RS Cares
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Crayon Box
Posts: 5,175
Thanked 605 Times in 282 Posts
Failed 107 Times in 22 Posts
|
Goodness, I hope this new rule doesn't pass.
I love pets, have 2 cats myself but I could never allow pets in any of our rentals. Not saying all, but there are a lot of people who do not give a shit when it comes to the rental property let alone their pets making a mess. I see it in the properties we list, I hear about it from my office's property managers. There are a lot of people who simply do not care!
I think of all the years I've been in the business..I've only met 1 couple (tenants) who had 1 dog and 1 cat that kept their 700sqft 1 bedroom apt SPOTLESS when I was listing the property. It was so well kept--you wouldn't even have known they had animals running around. But on the other end of the spectrum...you won't believe what some people will let their pets do. Pee on the carpets/hardwood, muddy paws all over the floor, ripped up carpets from cats clawing at it etc etc.
A couple months ago, we found out a tenant of ours had a cat even though the contract strictly states NO PETS (And which he understood and signed). He got evicted but not after threatening us that he would leave (as if we would have problems find a new tenant) if he couldn't keep the cat.
__________________ ![joy](http://www.revscene.net/forums/images/smilies/more/joyman.gif) tiptronic: getting cut off by bicycles since 2007
|
| |
06-28-2013, 08:31 AM
|
#19 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
|
So I get a call yesterday about one of my rentals I have been advertising on CL. Conversation is going alright until she asks me about pets:
Lady: "Oh, I see on the ad is says 'no pets', what about a dog...I really want a dog"
Me: "It is a no-pet buildings, so no"
Lady: "Well, you know that soon your not going to be allowed to say 'no' and I'll be able to get a dog"
Me: *stifle my sarcastic laughter* "Yeah, if you read that article is it was in regards to the city of Vancouver and the likelihood of that ACTUALLY happening is slim to none"
Lady: "Oh"
So, just a heads-up to those of us who deal with rentals....wait for more of these conversations to increase |
| |
06-28-2013, 09:01 AM
|
#20 | Old School RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,592
Thanked 4,034 Times in 1,228 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
|
Personally, I believe that the most reasonable answer is to remove the ability to specify no pets but SIGNIFICANTLY raise the pet deposit that can legally be collected. You should be able to collect a 1/2 month rent for standard damage deposit and 1 1/2 months rent for a pet deposit. That way you have a reasonable chance of actually being able to repair the place for the amount of the pet deposit. A half month's rent doesn't do crap - good luck repairing all the floors in an apartment if a dog has scratched the crap out of them for $750...
__________________ I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars. |
| |
06-28-2013, 09:17 AM
|
#21 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
|
One more thing...do we really want a large population of the renting public going out en masse and suddenly getting dogs and cats because they can?
I can name a large amount of tenants that I would not want owning pets of any kind. Hell, I can name a few that currently have pets that I wish, for the sake of the pets that they didn't.
|
| |
06-28-2013, 09:43 AM
|
#22 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lowside67 Personally, I believe that the most reasonable answer is to remove the ability to specify no pets but SIGNIFICANTLY raise the pet deposit that can legally be collected. You should be able to collect a 1/2 month rent for standard damage deposit and 1 1/2 months rent for a pet deposit. That way you have a reasonable chance of actually being able to repair the place for the amount of the pet deposit. A half month's rent doesn't do crap - good luck repairing all the floors in an apartment if a dog has scratched the crap out of them for $750... | Some times it is not just the damage, unfortunately.
Dogs bark...some dogs bark A LOT. There is a building across the street that allows dogs and at any given time, you can hear dogs barking. Imagine living next to that shit. Imagine the constant complaints. Trying to evict someone for a barking dog would be a nightmare.
There are a TON of dogs in that building because dog owners have few places to go...I can just imagine what the halls smell like. What happens when a dog pisses or shits in the hall? How do you prove whose dog it was? What do you do about the lawn that is covered in piss stains?
We had a tenant who would never clean the cat litter box....stunk up the hallway like you wouldn't believe!
No amount of damage deposit will solve those issues.
|
| |
06-28-2013, 10:51 AM
|
#23 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridlock One more thing...do we really want a large population of the renting public going out en masse and suddenly getting dogs and cats because they can?
I can name a large amount of tenants that I would not want owning pets of any kind. Hell, I can name a few that currently have pets that I wish, for the sake of the pets that they didn't. | Funny, I had that exact same though about the lady Dino mentioned a couple posts north of here.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
06-28-2013, 02:11 PM
|
#24 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,407
Thanked 31,856 Times in 7,375 Posts
Failed 209 Times in 157 Posts
|
I wish there weren't so many pets out there with shitty owners. It makes life a lot tougher for those of us that treat our pets like part of the family. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
06-28-2013, 03:53 PM
|
#25 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
|
^^ I couldn't agree more. I have grown up with dogs and cats and currently have a bunny (who does not live in a cage) and it is sad that people in general are not more responsible.
The other downside to such legislation being introduced is that I think a lot more people will go out and purchase and adopt animals without considering the responsibility. There are many people out there who want pets, but don't have them because of living situations. It would break my heart to have tenants who neglect their animals or leave their dogs inside 24/7. I fear that if something like this ever passes you will see droves of people acquiring animals....and then 6 months down the line, you will see droves of animal being carted off to the SPCA.
|
| | ![Reply](https://www.revscene.net/styles/darklight/images/buttons/reply.gif) |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM. |