REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-19-2013, 11:40 PM   #1751
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
sonick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,598
Thanked 7,615 Times in 2,551 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
The fields in yellow are all editable, which means I can input the different scenarios on a case-by-case basis in the yellow fields for comparison and the non-highlighted fields are automatically calculated.

I can easily punch in the numbers and run the scenario as you posted below (higher ROR on investment, rent increases, etc.) tomorrow, just about to log off for the night.

Quick answers below in red...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferra View Post
didn't really look at the numbers in detail...but I think even a 1% increase in house value will skew the numbers to the other side...(tho many will argue housing price won't be going up)

Yes it will definitely skew, but even with this scenario even at 0% growth you might just barely better off buying vs renting if you manage to sell in 5 years.

- I would probably use a higher investment return than a 2.3% GIC....
Of course, these can be altered as well. I chose GIC just for more conservative figures.

- strata fees is probably going to cost you more than $300/month?
Strata fees were taken from MLS listing posted above

- doubt your rent will stay the same for 5-10years...
Valid point, and again, can be altered on my spreadsheet. In my experience, my rent has been stable for the past 3 years, the owners tried to sell to no avail and plenty of similar units for me to move into nearby if they do ask to raise the rents.

in the end..i think these make-up scenarios are kinda pointless...
you can always make one better than the other by changing the parameters to your liking...(e.g. your investment return %, expected changes in home value, the unit price-to-rent ratio...etc)

I would do these analysis on a case by case basis using actual numbers you are faced with....but you really can't prove renting or owning is better than the other in general using some make-up scenario..
This is the reason I took the time to create this spreadsheet for myself, so I could easily get a rough idea on a case-by-case basis of what the turn out will be in the long run for various 'made up' scenarios.
Advertisement
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx View Post
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold

100% Buy and Sell Feedback
sonick is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-19-2013, 11:49 PM   #1752
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,227
Thanked 919 Times in 369 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
I personally wouldn't invest in GIC's but it's what most people know. I like my PGP, PHK, NCZ, NCV. That 125k downpayment = roughly $1200 extra monthly income... My principal can go up, down, left, right in value and I'd still get the same dividend. Average about 10% yield over the years I've owned them. Keep reinvesting every month and you get more the following month or use it for rent and live for free!
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-20-2013, 12:27 AM   #1753
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 103
Thanked 80 Times in 31 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
1. strata fees are more than you think. $300 (for condo) is cheap if you can believe it or not. Townhouses, you are looking to start at about $200. As I said a few posts above, for the average condo, you are looking at $400+. And don't forget, like rental increases, strata fees increase yearly as well. I have owned for 5 years...and every damn year I get that letter.

2. In the last 5 years, my property has gone down in value....great for property tax, not so much if I wanted to re-sell. So, a yearly increase to property value may be a bit generous in some situation.

3. Rental increases. They do happen. They are based on inflation plus 2%. Here is a small history of increases: http://www.rto.gov.bc.ca/documents/GEN-01.pdf. Based on those numbers, if you had rented an apt in 2004 for $2000 and you received a maximum annual, in 2014 your rent would be $2837.

Is that REALLY possible? Probably not....I rented a condo in 2005 for $1000...as a coincidence, I saw an ad on CL for the same condo the other day...they are renting it for $1150.

As for those numbers being "real". They were based on 2 apartments in the same building...one for rent, one for sale. Try it...look on CL for an apt to rent then go find the same one on mls.
MasonJar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 09:11 AM   #1754
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
sonick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,598
Thanked 7,615 Times in 2,551 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferra View Post
didn't really look at the numbers in detail...but I think even a 1% increase in house value will skew the numbers to the other side...(tho many will argue housing price won't be going up)
- I would probably use a higher investment return than a 2.3% GIC....
- strata fees is probably going to cost you more than $300/month?
- doubt your rent will stay the same for 5-10years...

in the end..i think these make-up scenarios are kinda pointless...
you can always make one better than the other by changing the parameters to your liking...(e.g. your investment return %, expected changes in home value, the unit price-to-rent ratio...etc)

I would do these analysis on a case by case basis using actual numbers you are faced with....but you really can't prove renting or owning is better than the other in general using some make-up scenario...
If anybody's interested, here's a 5-year breakdown with the following as suggested:
  • higher investment returns over 5 years
  • 3% rent increase per year
  • higher strata fees
  • monthly contribution of the difference in rent to mortgage payments with compounding interest at 3%

At 20% down and 3% rates, your home value would have to increase approx 2.5% to break even with renting that same period.

For First-Time Home Buyers with less than 20%, mortgage rates will be higher requiring either a fixed rate or variable rate with the benchmark rate minimum (5.34% last I saw), plus CMHC insurance. With all that, the difference between buying and renting is much greater.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx View Post
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold

100% Buy and Sell Feedback

Last edited by sonick; 12-20-2013 at 09:22 AM.
sonick is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-20-2013, 09:30 AM   #1755
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonick View Post
If anybody's interested, here's a 5-year breakdown with the following as suggested:
  • higher investment returns over 5 years
  • 3% rent increase per year
  • higher strata fees
  • monthly contribution of the difference in rent to mortgage payments with compounding interest at 3%

At 20% down and 3% rates, your home value would have to increase approx 2.5% to break even with renting that same period.

For First-Time Home Buyers with less than 20%, mortgage rates will be higher requiring either a fixed rate or variable rate with the benchmark rate minimum (5.34% last I saw), plus CMHC insurance. With all that, the difference between buying and renting is much greater.


So what can we conclude about this?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 09:32 AM   #1756
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
So what can we conclude about this?
Only poor people rent.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-20-2013, 12:24 PM   #1757
I subscribe to Revscene
 
dat_steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,909
Thanked 843 Times in 365 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 9 Posts
but sonick you're forgetting dat dere intrinsic value of owning....such pride. much equity. wow.

easily worth $60k over five years...amirite
dat_steve is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-30-2013, 06:00 PM   #1758
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
I thought I'd share a pretty interesting article on the media and how it affects property prices. Really good read imo.



you can read it here:

Spoiler!


Can the media predict a housing bubble? - Business Blog, Econowatch - Macleans.ca

coles notes: nobel prize winner has argued that media is an important player when it comes to spreading "stories" that explain or justify certain property or asset price increases. "In other words, the kind of narratives we tell each other and ourselves about why the latest craze is somehow fundamentally different from — and better than — the previous craze."

I find it really relevant to Vancouver because developers are one of the biggest purchasers of advertisements and providers of news source for newspapers and media.

It also relates to what I recently read in a RE blog about how the media is just regurgitating stories that they get from their sources, and it's funny because they don't even fact check (MAC marketing) or change up the stories to make it unique. It literally is copied word for word.

check out this Conan O'Brien segment to see how the media reacts.


I do agree that the media coverage is a huge factor to the housing craze or "house hornyness" we have here in Van.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-30-2013, 08:49 PM   #1759
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,650
Thanked 348 Times in 165 Posts
Failed 127 Times in 56 Posts
i doubt media coverage of real estate has any meaningful impact on real estate whatsoever. canada's RE price went up because of low interest rate and how much money BoC pumped into mortgage back securities.

i think you give the media way too much credit if you actually believe just because they got some talking heads talking up or down on RE and it might actually move sales and price the coming month you got another thing coming. Interest rate and general state of the economy dictate RE trends. anything else is just noise.
Carl Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 10:23 PM   #1760
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
^ I think it plays a factor, I'm not saying it's THE FACTOR. Look at how many real estate advertisements you see on your local papers, province, sun, 24Hours, Metro.

there's lots of reasons that others and I have already discussed as to why RE has gone up in this thread if you scroll through the many pages. I just brought up this point as it's something else that hasn't really been mentioned/discussed.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-31-2013, 02:59 AM   #1761
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Marshall Placid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,295
Thanked 1,934 Times in 494 Posts
Failed 31 Times in 15 Posts
Came across this interesting article with a lot of photos on rental lane-way houses in Vancouver.

Good rental prices? Looking Good? What do you guys think?

Photos: Vancouver laneway home rentals ? for a price







Marshall Placid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 09:10 AM   #1762
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,825
Thanked 1,538 Times in 495 Posts
Failed 73 Times in 28 Posts
Rent may be cheaper now, but when you're 65 making $1000/month from your old age pension how are you going to afford your $2200/month rent?
cdizzle_996 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-31-2013, 10:35 AM   #1763
I told him no, what y'all do?
 
GLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,103
Thanked 5,989 Times in 2,595 Posts
Failed 104 Times in 66 Posts
$1k-1.3k wouldn't be too bad for your own private entrance home vs renting a basement. But if the owners come & go at odd hours i would think the sound of a garage door opening/closing would make me go nuts. not sure if there's enough sound proofing to make it unnoticeable.
__________________
Feedback
http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711

Quote:
Greenstoner
1 rat shit ruins the whole congee
originalhypa
You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity
Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat

GLOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 10:53 AM   #1764
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Failed 1,536 Times in 385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdizzle_996 View Post
Rent may be cheaper now, but when you're 65 making $1000/month from your old age pension how are you going to afford your $2200/month rent?

Still selling porn, still writing books is my plan!


A lot of old people will be homeless in our generation. It is up to the individual to be responsible for themselves. Do whatever you can do to keep a roof above your head. You are ultimately responsible for your own place in life.
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-31-2013, 11:53 AM   #1765
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,649 Times in 2,678 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by multicartual View Post
A lot of old people will be homeless in our generation. It is up to the individual to be responsible for themselves. Do whatever you can do to keep a roof above your head. You are ultimately responsible for your own place in life.
I totally agree with what you're saying, but from my own experience, the vast majority of people either underestimate how much money they need to set aside for retirement, or are simply unable to contribute enough to their retirement planning. The group that I dislike the most are the ones that refuse to give up a little (or a lot) in the present to save/plan for the future. At the end of the day, all of these under-savers / under-planners are going to put tremendous pressure on the social welfare system. And that goes directly against my belief of taking reasonable measures of being responsible for yourself.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 12:02 PM   #1766
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,825
Thanked 1,538 Times in 495 Posts
Failed 73 Times in 28 Posts
This is why I've invested in cheaper condos in the valley that pay completely for themselves (Mortgage, strata, property tax). They're all paying me more return yearly than my RRSP's were and some one else is paying the mortgage.
cdizzle_996 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-31-2013, 12:09 PM   #1767
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Failed 1,536 Times in 385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
I totally agree with what you're saying, but from my own experience, the vast majority of people either underestimate how much money they need to set aside for retirement, or are simply unable to contribute enough to their retirement planning. The group that I dislike the most are the ones that refuse to give up a little (or a lot) in the present to save/plan for the future. At the end of the day, all of these under-savers / under-planners are going to put tremendous pressure on the social welfare system. And that goes directly against my belief of taking reasonable measures of being responsible for yourself.

I don't really ever plan to "retire" I don't think. Working on the internet is kind of enjoyable, and writing is very fulfilling. There are some careers for sure that people need to retire from, a guy I know has been a miner for like 10 years and his body is fucked already!
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 02:41 PM   #1768
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonick View Post
If anybody's interested, here's a 5-year breakdown with the following as suggested:
  • higher investment returns over 5 years
  • 3% rent increase per year
  • higher strata fees
  • monthly contribution of the difference in rent to mortgage payments with compounding interest at 3%

At 20% down and 3% rates, your home value would have to increase approx 2.5% to break even with renting that same period.

For First-Time Home Buyers with less than 20%, mortgage rates will be higher requiring either a fixed rate or variable rate with the benchmark rate minimum (5.34% last I saw), plus CMHC insurance. With all that, the difference between buying and renting is much greater.

I am sure the numbers are correct, but buying a house is also an investment. Vancouver has been a crazy real estate market for the past 30yrs. Every 10yrs there seems to be a major spike in prices, Just when people say it can't going higher, it does. If you bought before 2008, you are happy you bought vs renting
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
Z3guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 02:47 PM   #1769
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
I think 5 years is probably too short of a horizon to really realise gains. However I can see how a newly college grad see as the window to get his life started.

eg when I bought my townhouse in Coal Harbour in 03.. it didn't get until 09-10 to get the buyers in a frenzy.

In the end, it is location, location, location and don't overextend. There are other investments which makes you higher return that real estate right now, use that to build up your principle. My longest mortgage is 10 years and my shortest one has been 3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3guy View Post
I am sure the numbers are correct, but buying a house is also an investment. Vancouver has been a crazy real estate market for the past 30yrs. Every 10yrs there seems to be a major spike in prices, Just when people say it can't going higher, it does. If you bought before 2008, you are happy you bought vs renting

Last edited by godwin; 12-31-2013 at 02:56 PM.
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 03:00 PM   #1770
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,549
Thanked 32,163 Times in 7,478 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin View Post
My longest mortgage is 10 years and my shortest one has been 3.
Thats incredibly impressive. To be honest after looking at the numbers, the only way I will likely buy something in Vancouver after I sell my condo in Edmonton is if I can pay off the mortgage in 10-15 years. If that isn't realistic, I will continue to rent.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 03:18 PM   #1771
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
I notice on this forum, people seem to expect to get their property right out of college and right in Vancouver. I think with the increasing house prices, people should invest in something else or somewhere else for that matter, before settling down in Vancouver. It gives a broader view of life outside the BC bubble.

Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
Thats incredibly impressive. To be honest after looking at the numbers, the only way I will likely buy something in Vancouver after I sell my condo in Edmonton is if I can pay off the mortgage in 10-15 years. If that isn't realistic, I will continue to rent.
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2014, 04:05 PM   #1772
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
sonick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,598
Thanked 7,615 Times in 2,551 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
What correction?

RBC mortgage rate cut unlikely to spur price war among major lenders, expert says | Financial Post
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx View Post
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold

100% Buy and Sell Feedback
sonick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 09:22 AM   #1773
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Wheels are falling off in Canada. Jobs growth is non existent, if not negative, the cdn dollar is dying, making cdn real estate less attractive (in falling environment, yes I know it makes it cheaper, but I'd be waiting for more weakness if I were going to invest)

I tend to find, outside of monetary stimulus, a currency says so much about an economy.

I got out perfectly, earn an appreciating currency, not a depreciating currency - this is it, boys and girls, the next 5 years will smell like shit for real estate
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 09:47 AM   #1774
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
sonick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,598
Thanked 7,615 Times in 2,551 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
Bombardier cutting 1700 jobs. Seemingly so many mass layoffs out east in recent months.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx View Post
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold

100% Buy and Sell Feedback
sonick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 10:42 AM   #1775
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonick View Post
Bombardier cutting 1700 jobs. Seemingly so many mass layoffs out east in recent months.
And job cuts are just one part of it, I had out grown my job, spent a year looking for a good move, found none, got offered what I refer to as a joke locally.

Move abroad, earn 50% more! and pay less tax, work for a huge multinational, have endless career growth opportunities.. wtf Vancouver, wtf indeed, not a place to work, but a place to be rich in
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net