REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-09-2022, 01:01 PM   #19976
My homepage has been set to RS
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,431
Thanked 2,912 Times in 772 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 108 Posts
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/cana...over-1-million

Umm. this is the most crazy thing i've seen in a long time.

Majority of these people can barely afford their property tax, how will they afford this surtax???
Advertisement
PeanutButter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 01-09-2022, 01:04 PM   #19977
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Van
Posts: 1,041
Thanked 539 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 27 Times in 15 Posts
There's too much propaganda & misinformation out there. Here's the reply from our housing minister:

https://twitter.com/HonAhmedHussen/s...662345218?s=20
Alpine is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 01:07 PM   #19978
My homepage has been set to RS
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,431
Thanked 2,912 Times in 772 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 108 Posts
Man, why is there so much politics going on? I hate it.
PeanutButter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 01:56 PM   #19979
in the butt
 
donk.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,840
Thanked 3,568 Times in 1,305 Posts
Failed 169 Times in 92 Posts
It sure is hard making 100-300k a year in appreciation, and then god forbid, paying 7-12k regular tax, and then another 2-5k in surtax

What will these poor homeowners ever do!?!?!?!

Ps, if you read dailyhive, you might as well read theonion & watch American "news"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Money
i hate people who sound like they smoke meth then pretend like they matter.

Originally Posted by ilovebacon
Does anyone have a pair of 25 pounds one-inch hole for sale at a reasonable price?


Originally Posted by mikemhg
Clothes come off and my car is permeated with the smell of fillet-o-fish and canned tuna.

donk. is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 01-09-2022, 02:19 PM   #19980
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,549
Thanked 32,163 Times in 7,478 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter View Post
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/cana...over-1-million

Umm. this is the most crazy thing i've seen in a long time.

Majority of these people can barely afford their property tax, how will they afford this surtax???
I don’t know maybe they can dip into the free 1 million dollar retirement fund they have acquired through appreciation in the last 5 years? The one that all the poors are expected to save via their 60k a year? Only need to put away your entire after tax salary for 3/4 of your career to get there.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 03:45 PM   #19981
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donk. View Post
It sure is hard making 100-300k a year in appreciation, and then god forbid, paying 7-12k regular tax, and then another 2-5k in surtax

What will these poor homeowners ever do!?!?!?!

Ps, if you read dailyhive, you might as well read theonion & watch American "news"
Find me a townhouse in Metro Vancouver that isn't worth over $1M. Chances are, the home owner is just a regular working class Joe family trying to keep it together. All of those gains that you speak of are only happening on paper, so how do we expect the home owner to magically come up with the extra dough to pay for this surtax?

So this so-called UBC prof -- the founder of this Generation Squeeze -- says the surtax can be deferred until the property is sold. What if the market (somehow) tanks as a result of the City / Province / national policy for affordable housing works? A bunch of that so-called paper gain has evaporated, but the taxes owed won't. Does that sound nice and dandy to you?

FWIW, the news was also reported by City News 1130:

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2022/0...rdable-report/

This is the founder dude from Generation Squeeze:

https://www.spph.ubc.ca/person/paul-kershaw/



With him teaching at UBC and being based in Vancouver, I honestly don't know how he can ever think the $1M threshold that he suggested is a reasonable number. It might be reasonable for other parts of the country, but for the 2 most expensive RE markets in Canada -- Toronto and Vancouver -- they almost definitely do not make any sense.

In Vancouver, the high prices is primarily a major disconnect between demand and supply. People continue to think Vancouver is a desirable place to live, so the demand is huge. Meanwhile, CoV, in particular, takes forever to approve new building permits, while other municipalities are nowhere close to being fast either. The building code, esp CoV's ultra leftard green initiatives, make building costs expensive. Quite a number of RS-ers have work related to the construction business one way or another. I'm sure they can tell you what can be done on the supply side to improve things so that costs savings can come down from there, and these are far better suggestions than to "just tax the current home owners".
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 04:35 PM   #19982
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,549
Thanked 32,163 Times in 7,478 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
The choices here are
“Pull up your bootstraps and save 300k for a down payment”
“Pull up your bootstraps and pay 60k in taxes over the next 30 years”
Both suck but one is a lot more sensible ask.
That said I’m sure the people that should actually be paying the tax (rich people) have accountants that will get them out of paying it.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 04:52 PM   #19983
in the butt
 
donk.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,840
Thanked 3,568 Times in 1,305 Posts
Failed 169 Times in 92 Posts
If you can't afford to pay tax on your million dollar condo, house, townhouse, that means you are financially irresponsible and are living above your means
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Money
i hate people who sound like they smoke meth then pretend like they matter.

Originally Posted by ilovebacon
Does anyone have a pair of 25 pounds one-inch hole for sale at a reasonable price?


Originally Posted by mikemhg
Clothes come off and my car is permeated with the smell of fillet-o-fish and canned tuna.

donk. is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 01-09-2022, 05:30 PM   #19984
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,977
Thanked 2,804 Times in 1,206 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
With him teaching at UBC and being based in Vancouver, I honestly don't know how he can ever think the $1M threshold that he suggested is a reasonable number. It might be reasonable for other parts of the country, but for the 2 most expensive RE markets in Canada -- Toronto and Vancouver -- they almost definitely do not make any sense.

In Vancouver, the high prices is primarily a major disconnect between demand and supply. People continue to think Vancouver is a desirable place to live, so the demand is huge. Meanwhile, CoV, in particular, takes forever to approve new building permits, while other municipalities are nowhere close to being fast either. The building code, esp CoV's ultra leftard green initiatives, make building costs expensive. Quite a number of RS-ers have work related to the construction business one way or another. I'm sure they can tell you what can be done on the supply side to improve things so that costs savings can come down from there, and these are far better suggestions than to "just tax the current home owners".
This tax suggestion is one of the dumber ideas to come out - every form of tax that we have thrown on top of housing has largely failed because, ultimately as you said, this is a supply problem. We don't have enough housing so people are forced to spend like crazy to get something - when the average detached home in Chilliwack and Hope cost $1m I think we've gone well past the theory that it's just foreign investment (BTW: You can get a fantastic detached house in central Calgary for $1m). Detached homes in Hope are being built with suites so people can afford to buy them. It's completely nuts.

This tax would just be more theatre - by allowing deferral it'll never have the effect he suggests in terms of slowing down home purchases and it disproportionately affects the different types of people who own these homes. Some lucked into them by having lived in them for ages, others actually put all their money into one just so they could have it etc. Taxes should be relatively equitable and this one wouldn't be.

There's a small myth that we're out of land to build on in the lower mainland - the myth exists because technically we don't have any more SFH lots available but that's strictly a zoning problem. There are tonnes of massive lots in the lower mainland that the cities won't allow subdivision on so they artificially inflate housing costs. Allow smaller lots and you've got lower costs right away. Then allow more units of housing on these lots and more square feet. I noticed Calgary has much more flexibility in lot sizes and housing types than we do and they've got tonnes of land to build on.

Our politicians are bunch of cowards.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 05:47 PM   #19985
Survivor MOD
 
T4RAWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,138
Thanked 1,623 Times in 577 Posts
Failed 37 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donk. View Post
If you can't afford to pay tax on your million dollar condo, house, townhouse, that means you are financially irresponsible and are living above your means
Does this apply to seniors who bought their home for cheap in the 90s and through no fault of their own their houses have sky rocketed in value?

Or just for new people trying to squeeze into thr market?
T4RAWR is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 06:14 PM   #19986
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Van
Posts: 1,041
Thanked 539 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 27 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter View Post
Man, why is there so much politics going on? I hate it.
Sadly, that's how it works. Just a whole bunch of people jocking for power, position, and $. It's hard to find an actual neutral take or position.
Alpine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 06:21 PM   #19987
I have named my kids VIC and VLS
 
Hondaracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,574
Thanked 14,966 Times in 5,970 Posts
Failed 2,061 Times in 690 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by T4RAWR View Post
Does this apply to seniors who bought their home for cheap in the 90s and through no fault of their own their houses have sky rocketed in value?

Or just for new people trying to squeeze into thr market?
Both?
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
Hondaracer is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 06:33 PM   #19988
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donk. View Post
If you can't afford to pay tax on your million dollar condo, house, townhouse, that means you are financially irresponsible and are living above your means
Let's look at a hypothetical but mostly realistic situation to see how accurate your suggestion here is.

Let's say a working class family needs more room for their growing kids 10 years ago, and they plunged their savings down to purchase a fairly typical townhouse in Metro Vancouver for $600k. Salaries tend to peak for someone in their 40's - 50's, but it is also fairly common for it to more or less plateau when you aren't moving up the cooperate ladder. You still get your annual 1 - 3% salary increase. But essentially, your salary is not giving you any additional buying power.

For a family like this, they are not budgeting for a million dollar townhouse. They are budgeting for a $600k one. But now that $600k townhouse of theirs has doubled in value over the past 10 yrs to $1.2M now, so they get hit with this surtax. Are they being financially irresponsible and living above their means?

Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
The choices here are
“Pull up your bootstraps and save 300k for a down payment”
“Pull up your bootstraps and pay 60k in taxes over the next 30 years”
Both suck but one is a lot more sensible ask.
That said I’m sure the people that should actually be paying the tax (rich people) have accountants that will get them out of paying it.
I'd like to think / find a choice or solution that can avoid both of the options you mention here, and I'm saying there has to be some room -- potentially a lot of room -- in the supply side of the equation to make housing more affordable for everybody involved. And as supafamous has suggested, I'd hardly think this surtax proposal on the $1M+ homes can be effective in reining in home prices for the Vancouver and Toronto market at all. The only thing it'll do is to add yet another cost to working class families like the ones I've described above. To a large extent, I also see myself as someone in that situation, even though I live in an old detached shack in the 604.

I really don't have any creative solutions to address our housing affordability problem, but I like Supafamous' suggestion of opening up more buildable space through zoning conversions. Also, borrowing some tried and true ideas from the likes of old Hong Kong and Singapore, perhaps it is time for the BC and Ontario governments to start considering large scale public housing. The old Hong Kong would be a better example here because it had a long period of time when its public housing program and its private housing market were able to thrive side by side. As I understand it, the Singaporean housing market is mostly dominated by the public sector program. But the BC provincial government would never have the guts to take on something as big as large scale organized public housing...
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 07:32 PM   #19989
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,549
Thanked 32,163 Times in 7,478 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
I agree with the zoning, but there’s is myriad of other things to address.
What about the infrastructure that Vancouver has basically left unchanged for the influx of housing.
What about the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of undeveloped lands that are already owned by developers? They aren’t going to do anything to risk putting too much supply on the market. Onni, pinnacle, amacon. It’s all the same family. Then there’s Bosa or Westbank. None of these developers are going to do anything that would risk making housing more affordable. It’s not permits preventing them from making more housing, it’s strategy.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 08:16 PM   #19990
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
In the example that you mention where developers are withholding undeveloped but available land, that would be a perfect place for the provincial / federal government to step in and legislate something along the lines of the developer not being able to hold on to the land for X number of years if they are not going to start development on it. I dunno what a good figure that X number of years may be -- it would be for the gov focus group researching on that policy to determine an appropriate number. If the developer does not start developing the land within that X number of years, they will be forced to sell the plot at the government assessed value. In this situation, we know the gov assessed value would be noticeably less than the market value, so the developers would have an incentive to avoid that forced sale.

I don't think this is infringing on private property ownership rights because there'll be that X number of years duration for the developer to capitalize on their profit. If they take on a bite too big for them to chew, that's their problem.

It won't make housing affordable right away. But over that X number of years term, there will be more supply on the market from this undeveloped land.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 08:33 PM   #19991
rb
Network Admin Team
 
rb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,514
Thanked 1,535 Times in 536 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
They aren’t going to do anything to risk putting too much supply on the market. Onni, pinnacle, amacon. It’s all the same family. Then there’s Bosa or Westbank. None of these developers are going to do anything that would risk making housing more affordable. It’s not permits preventing them from making more housing, it’s strategy.
I worked for one the companies mentioned and reported directly to the owner who's batshit insane and greedy. You're not wrong. When they buy land, it's also sometimes subject to zoning prior to payment in full. Being the way that they are in not paying right away or in full, they sometimes make the tiniest changes to their development or zoning application to buy some time as they have many other projects on the go. That's atleast what the dev manager told me. And sold out projects are never sold. The owner had so many penthouses that he ended up just keeping that he forgot how many he actually owned
rb is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 09:31 PM   #19992
in the butt
 
donk.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,840
Thanked 3,568 Times in 1,305 Posts
Failed 169 Times in 92 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
For a family like this, they are not budgeting for a million dollar townhouse. They are budgeting for a $600k one. But now that $600k townhouse of theirs has doubled in value over the past 10 yrs to $1.2M now, so they get hit with this surtax. Are they being financially irresponsible and living above their means?
Yes

Can't budget for the future? Don't complain when extra costs pop up

Or better yet, sell the property, buy a 1mil one, and have 100k after expenses to pay 10 years worth of surtax, a new car, several family vacations, and even have a savings for once in their lives
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Money
i hate people who sound like they smoke meth then pretend like they matter.

Originally Posted by ilovebacon
Does anyone have a pair of 25 pounds one-inch hole for sale at a reasonable price?


Originally Posted by mikemhg
Clothes come off and my car is permeated with the smell of fillet-o-fish and canned tuna.

donk. is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 01-09-2022, 09:36 PM   #19993
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,977
Thanked 2,804 Times in 1,206 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
I agree with the zoning, but there’s is myriad of other things to address.
What about the infrastructure that Vancouver has basically left unchanged for the influx of housing.
What about the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of undeveloped lands that are already owned by developers? They aren’t going to do anything to risk putting too much supply on the market. Onni, pinnacle, amacon. It’s all the same family. Then there’s Bosa or Westbank. None of these developers are going to do anything that would risk making housing more affordable. It’s not permits preventing them from making more housing, it’s strategy.
Yeah, there are a large number of things that need to be fixed if we're ever going to make the big cities even remotely affordable again - the reality is that whatever the price is today (and going forward) is basically the floor price for housing b/c there's no way govt's intervene in a way that lowers prices unless it's out of their control (major economic collapse). All we can really do now is do things to keep prices from increasing which is really sad.

I'm amazed that there's not even a fringe political candidate that's giving the straight talk to people about what needs to change - massive zoning that drives density, reduce car dependency (to reduce living costs), increased property taxes (to moderate price increases and get fairer value out of land, forcing developers to develop untouched land, etc etc.

All we get are politicians either saying something needs to be done about housing prices and then they try to find a few pennies for social housing or we get the closet racists who say they want to protect neighbourhood character (I'm looking at you Colleen Hardwick).
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5

Last edited by supafamous; 01-09-2022 at 10:13 PM.
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 09:39 PM   #19994
My homepage has been set to RS
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,431
Thanked 2,912 Times in 772 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 108 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donk. View Post
Yes

Can't budget for the future? Don't complain when extra costs pop up

Or better yet, sell the property, buy a 1mil one, and have 100k after expenses to pay 10 years worth of surtax, a new car, several family vacations, and even have a savings for once in their lives
I can't tell if you're just trolling or actually being serious?

Also curious. What's your living situation and your family's situation. Do you or your parents own real estate?
PeanutButter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 09:57 PM   #19995
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,219
Thanked 3,236 Times in 1,263 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter View Post
I can't tell if you're just trolling or actually being serious?

Also curious. What's your living situation and your family's situation. Do you or your parents own real estate?
I just get the sense that donk has something against homeowners…
__________________
Do Not Put Aftershave on Your Balls. -604CEFIRO
Looks like I'm gonna have some hot sex again tonight...OOPS i got the 6 pack. that wont last me the night, I better go back and get the 24 pack! -Turbo E
kinda off topic but obama is a dilf - miss_crayon
Honest to fucking Christ the easiest way to get a married woman in the mood is clean the house and do the laundry.....I've been with the same girl almost 17 years, ask me how I know. - quasi
Gumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 09:59 PM   #19996
in the butt
 
donk.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,840
Thanked 3,568 Times in 1,305 Posts
Failed 169 Times in 92 Posts
Not trolling, serious

I have two condos, both rented out, I rent a condo for myself
Dad owns two condos
Mom owns a house with stepdad
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Money
i hate people who sound like they smoke meth then pretend like they matter.

Originally Posted by ilovebacon
Does anyone have a pair of 25 pounds one-inch hole for sale at a reasonable price?


Originally Posted by mikemhg
Clothes come off and my car is permeated with the smell of fillet-o-fish and canned tuna.

donk. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2022, 10:04 PM   #19997
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,549
Thanked 32,163 Times in 7,478 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Donk is just regurgitating what homeowners have said to people complaining about house prices.
Seriously though, if someone has 3 million in equity in their home is it that absurd for them to use 2% of that equity over the span of 30 years to pay for some tax? We aren’t talking about making people homeless here.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-09-2022, 11:15 PM   #19998
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,672
Thanked 9,365 Times in 4,073 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
2% doesn't sound like much, but that adds up over time. Say you buy a place for $1M right when the tax starts, you live there for 30 years and now it's worth $3M and you sell. Assuming it's all linear equity gain, no interest, etc etc you're paying $1.2M just for this tax on the $3M sale. That's absurd.

I feel like this sort of tax would be one of those things that screws over middle class people and the richer people it's supposed to effect won't even blink at it. It may have other unintended consequences as well when it's giving people an incentive to never move.

Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
What about the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of undeveloped lands that are already owned by developers?
So tax the fuck out of undeveloped land owned by development companies. Have the rate increase the longer they sit on it or something.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2022, 07:04 AM   #19999
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,977
Thanked 2,804 Times in 1,206 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore View Post
2% doesn't sound like much, but that adds up over time. Say you buy a place for $1M right when the tax starts, you live there for 30 years and now it's worth $3M and you sell. Assuming it's all linear equity gain, no interest, etc etc you're paying $1.2M just for this tax on the $3M sale. That's absurd.

I feel like this sort of tax would be one of those things that screws over middle class people and the richer people it's supposed to effect won't even blink at it. It may have other unintended consequences as well when it's giving people an incentive to never move.

So tax the fuck out of undeveloped land owned by development companies. Have the rate increase the longer they sit on it or something.
These taxes basically treat homes as investments and if it's your primary home then it's hugely unfair to do it. Homes are NOT investments, they only became treated as such because of a lack of housing. Fix the housing, not the tax policy on them!

I've heard suggestions about taxing the gains like they're capital gains (50% of the gain would be taxable) which would be a huge penalty against people who are moving for legit reasons (for work or growing families).

These taxes would penalize working and middle class folks who are new to the housing market the most while the rich and the long time owners will barely feel the pain (long time owners never expected these gains, they won the lottery).

OTOH, I'm a big fan of higher property taxes. If you're using the land it's fair to tax it more. This hurts more evenly and would push land to be used more appropriately - zoning would be changed when the property taxes on a detached lot got into 5 figures. You bet those long time owners would scream bloody murder.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-10-2022, 07:25 AM   #20000
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
quasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cloverdale
Posts: 11,573
Thanked 3,775 Times in 1,344 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by supafamous View Post
These taxes basically treat homes as investments and if it's your primary home then it's hugely unfair to do it. Homes are NOT investments, they only became treated as such because of a lack of housing. Fix the housing, not the tax policy on them!

I've heard suggestions about taxing the gains like they're capital gains (50% of the gain would be taxable) which would be a huge penalty against people who are moving for legit reasons (for work or growing families).

These taxes would penalize working and middle class folks who are new to the housing market the most while the rich and the long time owners will barely feel the pain (long time owners never expected these gains, they won the lottery).

OTOH, I'm a big fan of higher property taxes. If you're using the land it's fair to tax it more. This hurts more evenly and would push land to be used more appropriately - zoning would be changed when the property taxes on a detached lot got into 5 figures. You bet those long time owners would scream bloody murder.
I agree, ridiculous to go after people living in their primary residence who own one home, they are not the problem. If you want to add any more taxes or penalties to home ownership do it in the form similar of the speculation and vacancy tax and change it to target those who own multiple properties lived in or not. I mean there really isn't any fair solution to this problem but if you're going to target anyone it has to be the ones that own multiple properties since any additional properties in most cases are for investment purposes.
__________________



“The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place... and I don´t care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently, if you let it. You, me or nobody, is gonna hit as hard as life. But ain't about how hard you hit... It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward... how much you can take, and keep moving forward. That´s how winning is done. Now, if you know what you worth, go out and get what you worth.” - Rocky Balboa
quasi is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net