Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
Yesterday, 09:58 AM
|
#33651 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,756
Thanked 15,072 Times in 6,030 Posts
Failed 2,068 Times in 693 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz | This is actually a great video and once again, underlined in typical Canadian fashion we enact pointless legislation with no forethought or plan to make is successful.
I’m actually (kind of) directly involved in CoVs multiplex plan and funny enough I just got an update this morning from one of the CoV planners I work with
Any guesses how many multiplexes have been approved since this rezoning took place more than a year ago?.. wait for it… 14.
14, almost predominately 4 plexes built by who else, but buddy guy builders. I have not met one builder of any of these multiplexes who isn’t a brown guy with a family of labour behind him. They are -the only- ones who can make these builds viable financially.
Let’s do some math, turn 1 single lot into 4 units. 14 x 4 - the original single unit (which is being generous as most had at least a basement suite before)
In a years time, with god knows how many people are involved in this from the city side, CoV has added… 42 additional units. Wonderful.
Btw, so each one of these are subject to the development fees mentioned in this video PLUS hydro forcing them to go underground and have a transformer on their property.
Well say $65,000 per unit = $195,000
Plus, again being generous with the hydro service, $80,000 for an LPT on your
Property
$275,000 in development fees and hydro before you even put a shovel in the ground.
GG Vancouver, can’t wait for the homeless count to triple.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
Yesterday, 10:16 AM
|
#33652 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,919
Thanked 1,300 Times in 538 Posts
Failed 28 Times in 12 Posts
|
Since you have an "in" with cov planners, wtf is up with the delays with reviewing change of use applications? No physical changes to the space, just reviewing of drawings needed. Send some inspector to verify the next day and be done with it. Shits been like 3 months. Ppl have a business to run, rent ain't free. Oh am why the eff does the city require you to know the hours of operation as part of this change of use process? They plan to strictly hold the applicant to those hours?
|
| |
Yesterday, 10:19 AM
|
#33653 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Ricemond
Posts: 9,209
Thanked 10,723 Times in 3,850 Posts
Failed 480 Times in 243 Posts
|
so the video says that if you work it out, at 1.9 mil for the land, and development costs, it'll roughly equal 1 million dollars for a ~500 sqft 1/4 piece of these multiplexes.
who in their right minds would pay 1 mil for 500ish sqft when apartments are on a downward trend? You can easily buy a 2 bedroom 800ish sqft apartment for 800k almost anywhere in the city right now.
and WTF with the parking requirements? makes total sense to me that they need to supply parking as otherwise you'll have a constant street battle for parking, but holy shit can you imagine digging up a 4000sqft lot to put in underground parking?!?!?! WTF
|
| |
Yesterday, 10:46 AM
|
#33654 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,011
Thanked 2,851 Times in 1,225 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz so the video says that if you work it out, at 1.9 mil for the land, and development costs, it'll roughly equal 1 million dollars for a ~500 sqft 1/4 piece of these multiplexes.
who in their right minds would pay 1 mil for 500ish sqft when apartments are on a downward trend? You can easily buy a 2 bedroom 800ish sqft apartment for 800k almost anywhere in the city right now.
and WTF with the parking requirements? makes total sense to me that they need to supply parking as otherwise you'll have a constant street battle for parking, but holy shit can you imagine digging up a 4000sqft lot to put in underground parking?!?!?! WTF | Well, he does conflate a few different zoning rules together to make that example so it's not entirely accurate - the parking requirement is Coquitlam's, the density requirement is California's and the land cost and development fees are Vancouver's so the example is the worst case scenario.
The reality isn't that far though and the worst part right now are the development fees. The fees eat up 10-20% of the total cost of development which is a killer for making a project profitable. The parking regs are less restrictive in places like Vancouver or Burnaby - usually .5-1.0 spots per unit.
It's still really shitty though - from what I can tell most multiplex projects in Burnaby do not pencil out as profitable right now, same with low rises b/c of the development fees so even though Burnaby has relatively permissive zoning rules no one is building anything.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
|
| |
Yesterday, 10:51 AM
|
#33655 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,756
Thanked 15,072 Times in 6,030 Posts
Failed 2,068 Times in 693 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz so the video says that if you work it out, at 1.9 mil for the land, and development costs, it'll roughly equal 1 million dollars for a ~500 sqft 1/4 piece of these multiplexes.
who in their right minds would pay 1 mil for 500ish sqft when apartments are on a downward trend? You can easily buy a 2 bedroom 800ish sqft apartment for 800k almost anywhere in the city right now.
and WTF with the parking requirements? makes total sense to me that they need to supply parking as otherwise you'll have a constant street battle for parking, but holy shit can you imagine digging up a 4000sqft lot to put in underground parking?!?!?! WTF | The parking requirements aren’t the worst part, the EV charging requirement is.
In Vancouver each one of those spots has to have an EV charger. EV loads are calculated separately from your units, the second you have 4 EV chargers on your property you almost always need a transformer on your property.
So now, on top of the physical space needed for your parking requirements, you also need to make provisions to install a transformer, and everything that entails, the bonding and grounding, access, right of ways, etc.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
Yesterday, 10:54 AM
|
#33656 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,756
Thanked 15,072 Times in 6,030 Posts
Failed 2,068 Times in 693 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SSM_DC5 Since you have an "in" with cov planners, wtf is up with the delays with reviewing change of use applications? No physical changes to the space, just reviewing of drawings needed. Send some inspector to verify the next day and be done with it. Shits been like 3 months. Ppl have a business to run, rent ain't free. Oh am why the eff does the city require you to know the hours of operation as part of this change of use process? They plan to strictly hold the applicant to those hours? | From my point of view it seems like they have very few plan checkers. It’s almost always the same 2-3 people I deal with.
In comparison to your example, underground civil work for Hydro or Telus, the review and acceptance timeline is 4-8 months depending on complexity. So take into consideration how long it takes a utility to scope a project, draft revision after revision of their plan THEN submit to CoV for approval, and THEN wait for acceptance.
Underground civil work for BC hydro or Telus is taking 8-24 months from intake to construction.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
Yesterday, 11:13 AM
|
#33657 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: May 2005 Location: 604
Posts: 4,510
Thanked 1,730 Times in 549 Posts
Failed 335 Times in 77 Posts
|
The province's SSMUH plan is putting lipstick on a pig. The amount of resource (staff time, money spent on 'consultants' to provide the guidelines and marketing) probably could have been better spent to focus on 1 or 2 provincial lands and construct a high rise tower.
I'm anticipating a lot of cookie cutter EI builder fourplex (cctv monitor in the kitchen, veiny fake marble tiles, glass stair railing homes, etc) that will go for 1.3 to 1.5) million each in 2 years time.
|
| |
Yesterday, 11:42 AM
|
#33658 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Ricemond
Posts: 9,209
Thanked 10,723 Times in 3,850 Posts
Failed 480 Times in 243 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk I'm anticipating a lot of cookie cutter EI builder fourplex (cctv monitor in the kitchen, veiny fake marble tiles, glass stair railing homes, etc) |
thanks for describing my mcmansion
|
| |
Yesterday, 11:44 AM
|
#33659 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,011
Thanked 2,851 Times in 1,225 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk The province's SSMUH plan is putting lipstick on a pig. The amount of resource (staff time, money spent on 'consultants' to provide the guidelines and marketing) probably could have been better spent to focus on 1 or 2 provincial lands and construct a high rise tower. | This isn't an OR problem, this is an AND problem. We have to do both (and we have to do all the other options too including more social housing for example). As the video notes we're short 5.8m houses for 2030 (right now we have about 15m houses in Canada) and in 2023 Canada built 240,000 new units. Back of napkin math says we need to increase the number of houses we build by 300% to 1m a year.
As might seem obvious it'd be impossible to increase our rate of construction by that much right away (or even over a few years time) but at least we should make it easier to close the gap which includes making it possible to build all kinds of housing - not just concrete high rises but cheaper wood structure buildings (concrete costs a lot more to build - I've heard 20-30% more).
In addition, high rises don't serve the biggest gap in the market which is family sized housing (3 bedroom, 1000-1500sf units). Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk I'm anticipating a lot of cookie cutter EI builder fourplex (cctv monitor in the kitchen, veiny fake marble tiles, glass stair railing homes, etc) that will go for 1.3 to 1.5) million each in 2 years time. | So basically like things are today? I hate those homes but I'll take just having more homes over saying they have to be nice homes right now.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
|
| |
Yesterday, 12:06 PM
|
#33660 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,756
Thanked 15,072 Times in 6,030 Posts
Failed 2,068 Times in 693 Posts
|
Poorly built homes are a detriment to all involved though. Everything from insurance to maintenance etc. becomes increasingly unaffordable if you have poorly built homes.
A huge issue on the west coast here is how you have to build given the weather. Building science for pacific north west wooden structures is actually fairly complex and if not done properly can be catastrophic (see leaky condos) so if no one but the cheapest builders can build homes, it has a cascading effect on the industry.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
Yesterday, 12:10 PM
|
#33661 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: May 2005 Location: 604
Posts: 4,510
Thanked 1,730 Times in 549 Posts
Failed 335 Times in 77 Posts
|
My point is that most cities already have a multiplex zoning in place before SSMUH. It has clearly been proven to be a failed housing choice option, which lead to SF owners holding onto their property or trying to sell them at inflated prices, to which most developers see no value in given mounting high risk and interest rate.
There's plenty of 3 bedroom units for sale in the high rise market. People are being picky and not willing to spend 1 to 1.3 million on those units because they all want ground-oriented THs or duplexes.
Last edited by bcedhk; Yesterday at 12:18 PM.
|
| |
Yesterday, 12:11 PM
|
#33662 | I told him no, what y'all do?
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,140
Thanked 6,013 Times in 2,610 Posts
Failed 104 Times in 66 Posts
|
i've always enjoyed Uytae's videos, they're always well put together and articulated.
__________________ Feedback http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711 Quote: Greenstoner 1 rat shit ruins the whole congee originalhypa You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity | Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat
| |
| |
Yesterday, 12:40 PM
|
#33663 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,577
Thanked 5,016 Times in 1,852 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer
In a years time, with god knows how many people are involved in this from the city side, CoV has added… 42 additional units. Wonderful.
Btw, so each one of these are subject to the development fees mentioned in this video PLUS hydro forcing them to go underground and have a transformer on their property.
Well say $65,000 per unit = $195,000
Plus, again being generous with the hydro service, $80,000 for an LPT on your
Property
$275,000 in development fees and hydro before you even put a shovel in the ground. | The development fees and timeframes will be massively lower when the province adopts its standardized designs, which you can see here: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/fa...talogue_v1.pdf
If someone works to one of these designs on the standard lot, the city will be forced to auto-approve it.
This is basically Vancouver special all over again.
That being said, what individual homeowner would want to do this? The whole reason I bought a property with a yard was so that I didn't have to share it with three other families, I'm sure many others feel the same way.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
|
| |
Yesterday, 12:42 PM
|
#33664 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Van
Posts: 4,660
Thanked 1,974 Times in 1,043 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 126 Posts
|
Is it even worth it to build your own house now, or just buy something a few years old used. Everyone I've spoken to about building their own is always over budget and pain in the ass with the city
|
| |
Yesterday, 12:51 PM
|
#33665 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,756
Thanked 15,072 Times in 6,030 Posts
Failed 2,068 Times in 693 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 The development fees and timeframes will be massively lower when the province adopts its standardized designs, which you can see here: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/fa...talogue_v1.pdf
If someone works to one of these designs on the standard lot, the city will be forced to auto-approve it.
This is basically Vancouver special all over again.
That being said, what individual homeowner would want to do this? The whole reason I bought a property with a yard was so that I didn't have to share it with three other families, I'm sure many others feel the same way. | Yea that home owner/builder mentioned in the video is a bit of a misnomer, I’m sure it almost never happens in CoV unless the intention is to build and sell the whole thing
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
Yesterday, 01:56 PM
|
#33666 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: May 2005 Location: 604
Posts: 4,510
Thanked 1,730 Times in 549 Posts
Failed 335 Times in 77 Posts
|
If I am optimistic, the multiplex will probably see it's uptake in the next 5-10 years when the boomers die off and the homes are inherited by their kids who have 250k+ net incomes.
|
| |
Yesterday, 02:12 PM
|
#33667 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,345
Thanked 3,986 Times in 1,538 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Decent duplexes on the west side are selling 5mil (for bith). An extra 800-1000sq/f to build, way more complex electrical, and the need to ask 1.5m+ for a 1/4 parcel? Doesn’t seem too appetizing.
__________________
Crush - 1971 Datsun 240z - Build Thread
The Daily - Rav4 V6 - “Goldilocks”
|
| |
Yesterday, 08:48 PM
|
#33668 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 2,998
Thanked 1,684 Times in 583 Posts
Failed 50 Times in 22 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk If I am optimistic, the multiplex will probably see it's uptake in the next 5-10 years when the boomers die off and the homes are inherited by their kids who have 250k+ net incomes. | I need more multiplexes built around me ASAP. Call me a NIMBY but I'd rather take a bunch of multiplexes/townhomes than the zoned for 6-storey buildings surrounding my house.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM. |