You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Entertainment ForumTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE! Entertainment District
Members' movie reviews, Trailers, TV show post-discussions. Warning: Absolutely, do not post links to pirated or illegal download sites!
I love Star Trek, especially TNG. What I don't like about the movies is that they are always about war and conflict. Some of the best TNG episodes had no war or conflict at all. I wish they would make a drama starring the TNG crew, before they get way too old
As far as the villain in this one, this trailer suggests mostly Gary Mitchell to me... I've heard of some other slips that lean in this direction as well. But as is usually pointed out in these articles, Abrams is famous for misdirection, so pretty much anything you THINK he's "letting slip", you can probably assume the opposite is true.
The next mystery is, who is the hot blonde in the trailers?? She's Alice Eve, but IMDB doesn't list a character name for her. Is it Rand? Or is it Dr. Elizabeth Dehner? The latter would confirm that the villain is Mitchell, which would definitely be why her character isn't listed, along with Cumberbatch... there wasn't really a woman of the same significance in the Khan storyline, not one whose character name would give away the secret. Well, there was Lt. Marla McGivers, but then they'd have to be going all the way back to the original Space Seed story...
Either way... would smash.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
__________________ nabs -Brianrietta are you trying to Mindbomber me? using big words to try to confuse me jasonturbo -Threesomes: overrated - I didn't really think it was anything special, plus it was degrading, marching to the bathroom to fart all that semen out Babykiller -And next to that, there's a little dot called a period. It's not the stuff you eat out of your sisters gash, it's a handy little tool for breaking up sentences so they don't look like nonsensical retard garbage.
The ship lifting out of the water appears to be the NCC-1701 (2009 ver.), the nacelles are almost identical. Therefore, it would appear as though the earlier scene comes after the later crash landing scene. Strange, because the later crash happens in a populated area, yet the earlier one looks to be out at sea.
So unless the Enterprise can maneuver under water, there is some strange shit going down. My theory is that the later crash is not the NCC-1701 (2009 film), but one of the other versions of the Enterprise from another dimension, that came through a wormhole and crash landed on earth. Perhaps it's just another federation ship?
Notice that the nacelles do not look the same as the 2009 rendition, and that the supports are bent in the middle. The nacelles are also further spread apart, and the saucer looks to be much lower than the nacelles.
Last edited by Yodamaster; 12-08-2012 at 01:18 AM.
John Harrison (24 March 1693 – 24 March 1776) was a self-educated English carpenter and later a clockmaker. He invented the marine chronometer, a long-sought device in solving the problem of establishing the East-West position or longitude of a ship at sea, thus revolutionising and extending the possibility of safe long distance sea travel in the Age of Sail. The problem was considered so intractable that the British Parliament offered a prize of £20,000 (comparable to £2.87 million in modern currency) for the solution.[1][2]
Now, we have been given some additional information over the last week. After the incredible teaser trailer dropped last week, the Bad Robot website revealed the names of two new characters for this movie. Alice Eve, who some have suggested was either Nurse Chapel or Dr. Elizabeth Dehner. Now we have learned that she will be playing the character of Dr. Carol Marcus, who in the other timeline was Captain Kirk’s former flame and mother of his son, David.
Benedict Cumberbatch’s character has been under much tighter scrutiny. First people believed him to be a new take on Khan, who many would argue to be the most infamous villain in the Trek universe. Then people (including myself) believed that he could be a new take on Gary Mitchell, another villain from the original series. Now we know that Cumberbatch will be playing John Harrison.
Co-writer/producer Roberto Orci initially got those rumors going by saying that the films villain would be a character from the original series. What none of us ever expected was that it would be someone who was a very small part of the original series.
In the original timeline, John Harrison was a "redshirt." In this one, he’s a one-man weapon of self-destruction. How’s that for a butterfly effect? We should all give it up to J.J. Abrams and crew for keeping us guessing and stringing us along. The man is a master.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
With all this talk about alternate timelines and dimensions...I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing a Spock do a Jedi mind-meld. Lets see what J.J. Abrams can do...