| Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |
 | | 
01-28-2013, 04:54 PM
|
#151 | | RS Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,778
Thanked 1,265 Times in 618 Posts
Failed 421 Times in 103 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason00S2000  There's always an element of risk in life. I know a guy who was nearly killed when his girlfriend's ex got out of prison and found him. The ex had been broken up with the convict for like 10 years before he stalked dude and kicked his ass.
I have some level of guard up, always! | No one said that there wasn't any risk in life, but to be assaulted/caused bodily harm on 2 occasions (death on the second), is not common, at all. It isn't healthy, nor is it necessary for regular, honest people, to live their lives in paranoia, thinking everyone around them has the capacity to "throw a sword at their neck".
| 
|  | |
01-28-2013, 05:05 PM
|
#152 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,111
Thanked 9,871 Times in 3,926 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by -vancityguy- These days everyone has their guard up to a certain extent. Women walking alone at night, night out at the bar, sketchy areas - normal people exercise caution.
If the victim had his guard up this would not have happened, if anything his guard was down.
The thing is there are way too many psychos out there these days. Step on someones toes even slightly and you can't predict what is going to happen. It is better to avoid it if you can.
Posted via RS Mobile | Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueG2 No one said that there wasn't any risk in life, but to be assaulted/caused bodily harm on 2 occasions (death on the second), is not common, at all. It isn't healthy, nor is it necessary for regular, honest people, to live their lives in paranoia, thinking everyone around them has the capacity to "throw a sword at their neck". | agreed with Blue. Obviously women have to keep an eye out for sex offenders when they are out and about.
why would anyone without gang affiliation need to worry about getting whacked? Even if you live an honest legitmate life ...don't step on people's toes in the first place. Being cautious about someone robbing your valuables is different than stressing out about getting gunned down.
| |
| | |
01-28-2013, 05:11 PM
|
#153 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,124
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
/////
Last edited by -vancityguy-; 08-03-2017 at 03:37 PM.
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 12:03 PM
|
#154 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 483
Thanked 186 Times in 56 Posts
Failed 19 Times in 6 Posts
|
Doesnt matter if we think the guy put himself at risk or not, through snitching or just hanging with the wrong crew at the wrong place/time. Dude didn't deserve to die... RIP
__________________
1992 Civic DX Hatch [daily]
1997 Integra Type-R [track] | |
| | |
01-29-2013, 01:20 PM
|
#155 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: BC
Posts: 965
Thanked 239 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 79 Times in 20 Posts
|
too many kids these days think they are untouchable. If this kid survived this attack i could imagine him braggin to his friends about how untouchable is after surviving two attacks.
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 03:55 PM
|
#156 | | Everyone wants a piece of R S...
Join Date: May 2009 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 381
Thanked 271 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 109 Times in 15 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by toyobaru too many kids these days think they are untouchable. If this kid survived this attack i could imagine him braggin to his friends about how untouchable is after surviving two attacks. | I've actually met/know quite a few people who are like this. Now, you'd think that most of these kids would have some senses in them to realize they shouldn't be doing what they're doing, or else it'll lead to situations like this.. Unfortunately, not. Majority of them just stay the same, or even worst.
__________________
SE-R | |
| | |
01-29-2013, 04:30 PM
|
#157 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,124
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
[///
Last edited by -vancityguy-; 08-03-2017 at 03:36 PM.
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 04:45 PM
|
#158 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: BC
Posts: 965
Thanked 239 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 79 Times in 20 Posts
|
With all due respect though, its bad when parents lose their child, but lets face it. There are a lot of kids in high school who try to act tough and act like their built to run in the black market and dont know what their getting into. Then when its too late where someone decided they are next on the food chain it was all "he was such a good kid I cant think of anyone that would want to do this". Too many parents don't know what their kids are getting into until its too late. If you screwed up you gotta face someone down the line isnt going to be happy.
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 05:55 PM
|
#159 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,124
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
/////
Last edited by -vancityguy-; 08-03-2017 at 03:35 PM.
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 06:18 PM
|
#160 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Lollipop Lane
Posts: 8,529
Thanked 194 Times in 97 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
play with fire, your gonna get burned
knew someone that was has known this guy since elementary school, told him he was lucky they aren't friends anymore cause it could have been him that was killed
__________________
Its Klobbering Time!
| |
| | |
01-29-2013, 11:26 PM
|
#161 | | Not a mod
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,314
Thanked 476 Times in 122 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 14 Posts
|
^ lol.
Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
01-30-2013, 12:15 AM
|
#162 | | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: May 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,179
Thanked 1,090 Times in 318 Posts
Failed 294 Times in 64 Posts
|
good one
| |
| | |
01-30-2013, 12:32 AM
|
#163 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: vancouver
Posts: 46
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
sad to hear, but at the same time very shocking. very shocking cuz these people are around my age group and its honestly fukked that this type of stuff happens, especially in my neighbourhood
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 02:49 PM
|
#164 | | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
so i have a question... it's to do with the law...
if i am a gun owner, and i happen to live nearby or be coming home from the range....
and i see a bunch of people chasing someone with deadly weapons (swords knives etc).
i am allowed to defend the victim right? if they are about to cause harm to him that could be potentially life threatening... I am allowed to shoot... am i not?
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 02:56 PM
|
#165 | | McFogg The Dawg is my homeboy
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,007
Thanked 1,130 Times in 286 Posts
Failed 183 Times in 55 Posts
|
I wouldn't do it
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 03:18 PM
|
#166 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,149
Thanked 457 Times in 190 Posts
Failed 397 Times in 91 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma so i have a question... it's to do with the law...
if i am a gun owner, and i happen to live nearby or be coming home from the range....
and i see a bunch of people chasing someone with deadly weapons (swords knives etc).
i am allowed to defend the victim right? if they are about to cause harm to him that could be potentially life threatening... I am allowed to shoot... am i not? | i bet ur not allowed. its canada; u get in shit for harming a home invader -.-
if incidents like it was allowed it would promote gun ownership on a street level and such. also if u held an attacker at gunpoint, when the police comes, they'll probably shoot u down. lol
(this is all speculation)
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:04 PM
|
#167 | | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
you get hammered for harming a home invader.
but you wouldn't get hammered if he had a gun and had intent to shoot you, or he had a knife and was coming at you with it.
same goes for if he was pointing a gun at someone else or charging someone else with a knife. you can shoot them.
so why not on the streets? im sure the same law applies.
u can do it if life is in IMMEDIATE danger.. they have to have a deadly weapon as well.
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:05 PM
|
#168 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: NA
Posts: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 3 Posts
|
you cant do shit cause its not your life in danger. Plus the weapon of the other party must be the same force as you.
It's not like the US where the castle law is much more generous.
you'll probably get attempted murder and firearm charges.
Sad as it may be, I've read too many reports of good samaritans getting sued/charged for helping. Best you can do is call 911, not worth the liability
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:07 PM
|
#169 | | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
someone else's life is in immediate danger.
as long as a life is in danger, you have the right to stop it with equal force i believe.
it has to be immediate. like the guy cant be standing 20 feet away with a knife. he has to be within swinging range.
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:14 PM
|
#170 | | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,090
Thanked 4,367 Times in 1,137 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
|
No, with reasonable force.
I'm 6' tall, about 165lbs (very little of it muscle), and have had no self defence training previously. If someone is coming at me and is 6'4 and 240lbs my natural tendency would be to grab a bat or a bar or something and hit him as he approached me.
Now, if I were to hit him once, I would then have to give him the opportunity to stop/retreat. This is typically what the court would consider 'reasonable'. Hit someone, show them you can defend yourself, and expect them to back off because of that. But let's be honest: adrenaline is pumping, I'm freaked the fuck out, I hit him once and then again and again until he's moaning and the next step above a pulp on the ground. Then I call the cops and an ambulance.
And then I get arrested for assault. Because I was being threatened and ensured that he couldn't hurt me. Which is more than what the courts would consider reasonable force.
You are not allowed to reply with 'equal' force. The courts don't follow the golden rule (do unto him before he can do unto you), they follow the rule of "do the absolute least you can to hurt the guy who's trying to fuck you up".
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:15 PM
|
#171 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: NA
Posts: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 3 Posts
|
theres too many variables which don't go in your favour. Also Depends a lot on the cop/jury/judge
Evil but remember, shoot to kill. No contradicting witness, no lawsuit.
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:48 PM
|
#172 | | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
so if i see someone that is being charged with a knife... and he's swinging but missing, i am not allowed to shoot him once to stop him?
what if he's stabbed the guy once, and he keeps going at it. and u know he's going to end up killing him...
reasonable force... its reasonable. he has a knife, and is going to KILL the guy.
i have a gun. i don't have a knife. or anything else. i think it's justified that i can shoot the attacker ONCE. or at least fire a warning shot, and if he doesnt stop, then i can shoot him.. until he stops trying to stab the guy/drops the knife...
that's reasonable is it not?
it's the same as if someone had a gun, and was POINTING it at someone... that's enough to justify someone else shooting him.
the logic is... once they have a deadly weapon (deadly as in they can use it, ie. within range). it doesn't matter how big they are. it is deadly.
| |
| | |
01-31-2013, 04:52 PM
|
#173 | | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,090
Thanked 4,367 Times in 1,137 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
|
You're not defending yourself. You may (MAY) get away with firing a warning shot or something similar, but you're also setting yourself up for careless discharge of a firearm (where were you aiming? How could you be sure that you wouldn't hit something?) But the laws for defending other people are not the same as those for defending yourself. IANAL but as far as I know, you would essentially be charged with assault stemming from an initial incident. If a person is aiming a gun at you and you have a reasonable belief that they are going to shoot you, then you have a right to defend yourself. You do not get a double-0 license for that individual. You get to defend yourself. Which means (according to Canadian Law), 'reasonable force' which would mean wounding the dude.
If he died and you were defending yourself, you could claim self-defence. If he died and he was chasing some other dude, you would be charged with murder.
| |
| | |
02-01-2013, 12:31 AM
|
#174 | | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
whatttt does someone who actually knows reply?
I remember taking criminal justice and they taught us defending someone else who is defenceless would be the same thing as defending yourself.
reasonable force is until the guy stops. if you only have a gun, reasonable force is just shooting. it doesn't matter the aftermath if he dies or if he's wounded. u cannot control that.
lol for all those little things like careless discharge.. etc. that's easy to avoid. just shoot into the grass ground. etc. those are little things that you can easily get away with.
| |
| | |
02-01-2013, 12:59 AM
|
#175 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: May 2002 Location: vancity
Posts: 5,734
Thanked 722 Times in 364 Posts
Failed 40 Times in 26 Posts
|
This is my speculation. I'm not a lawyer.
If you think you'll die, you can use whatever force is required to defend yourself.
If you think you won't die, you can use as much force as they have.
So let's say you went to defend him, but the crowd started targeting you, you pull the gun, I doubt they'll keep running at you.
Let's say that they've got a gun too and it escalates, you panick and fire first, and kill. I have no idea what would happen. Maybe 2nd degree? That's probably what you'd end up with.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
