REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > The Business and Financial Forum

The Business and Financial Forum THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
Revscene Wall Street.
Consolidating debt? Good business tips? Buying stock? How's our economy doing? Discuss and share advice and tools on everyday banking, investing, wealth management and insurance.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2013, 01:06 AM   #1
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,620
Thanked 218 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 43 Times in 16 Posts
Registering a commercial lease

Were negotiating on a large production space for a 5 year lease plus an option to renew for another 5. Our lawyer recommended we register the lease, but most landlords, including this one do not want to do this. Our obvious fear is that if the landlord decides to sell the property, can the new owner kick us out.

Our lawyer is saying this:

Any lease over 3 years is not valid against 3rd parties unless registered.The law is that if it is not registered a new owner could say he is not bound by it. Registration is deemed notice to the world of your 5 year lease plus option. It is common for a landlord to say you are responsible for any costs to register the lease.

The agent of the property is saying this

Landlord will not agree to register any leases in their portfolio. I have not seen this before, other than maybe a 10 year lease. Once you have an executed lease, this lease is valid for the agreed upon terms and conditions, even if the building changes hands.

We truly want the space is the issue. It's hard to gauge if the landlord would even want to sell ever.

Any insights besides our lawyers?
Advertisement
rslater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 01:27 AM   #2
#savethemanuals
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
Ooh property law my favorite class.

In general leases under three years total including options to renew do not need to be registered on the title.

The lawyer is right (he should be more knowledgeable than me at least), if you want a lease of five years with an option to renew and you DO NOT register that on the title then the owner can sell the property to another person. This is why long term commercial leases are sometimes not registered as it allows the property owner to sell without the consent of the tenants.

In this case, you can give notice to a prospective purchaser that you have an unregistered long term lease but then if you do not know that there are negotiations going on and the registered owner sells the property and the buyer has NO KNOWLEDGE of the lease when he bought the property then he can kick you out. If the buyer has knowledge of the unregistered lease then it is fraud to evict a tenant.

Always in your best interest to register your interest.

Last edited by Energy; 02-05-2013 at 01:32 AM.
Energy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 09:42 AM   #3
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,620
Thanked 218 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 43 Times in 16 Posts
If all the tenants in the building, 4 of them, all have non registered leases exceeding 3 years, then who whomever purchases the property lets say would have to know that their are tenants renting? Naturally when purchasing a building that is divided into units is obviously for rental space, how could someone buying the property not know.
rslater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 10:53 AM   #4
#savethemanuals
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
Yes, the buyer would need to know. I don't know how they would not know but if it is true that they don't and their conscience is clear when they purchased the property then the tenants are SOL.
Energy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 10:25 PM   #5
Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
re

I think if you have a lease contract with any landlord and he sell the property to another landlord than you don't effected with that because you have a contract with the them and until the contract end no one can force you for leaving the property.

Last edited by Morkal; 07-22-2014 at 03:02 AM.
Morkal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net