REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Road Debris - Hit a City Pylon, Cracked my Bumper. What can I do? (https://www.revscene.net/forums/684454-road-debris-hit-city-pylon-cracked-my-bumper-what-can-i-do.html)

r2edline 05-23-2013 11:26 PM

Road Debris - Hit a City Pylon, Cracked my Bumper. What can I do?
 
Just the worst luck, I'm driving home on SW Marine UBC Highway at midnight (pitch black out) and all of a sudden I run over a pylon. No way I could've avoided it, I barely saw it. Cracks my bumper, gets stuck under my car. Brutal.

Has anyone been through anything like this? Where city equipment/debris caused damage to their vehicle?

Any idea who/what/where to contact?

godwin 05-23-2013 11:31 PM

I hope you stopped and document everything... ie the exact stop, drag marks if any etc.

I think the procedure is now:
1. Contact ICBC, state where you had the accident.
2. They will contact the jurisdiction on behalf for you.

Soundy 05-23-2013 11:32 PM

You could contact ICBC about a repair under your comprehensive coverage. Good luck getting the city to repay - even if it says "COV" on the cone, there's no way to prove city crews left it there - anyone could have lifted a cone from elsewhere and dropped it in the road.

jackp0t 05-24-2013 12:13 AM

You can claim with ICBC and just pay deductable

BUT if the object is stationary (it doesnt matter if it was not orignally there)
it will be under collision claim meaning on top of your deductable your insurance rate will go up.

Both of this situation happened to me
Hit a broken piece of a curve in the middle of the street. It scratches the front lip , cracked the radiator and tweak the rad support (falls under collision claim)

I was driving behind a big truck on the highway and suddenly a "flying object" hit and damage my front bumper and carbon hood. (falls under comprehensive claim)

Guess which one i chose to claim with ICBC. lol

Splinter 05-24-2013 05:07 AM

How the heck did it crack your bumper? You hit pylons all day long in autocross and they don't leave anything that doesn't wax off.

CP.AR 05-24-2013 05:11 AM

^ AutoX you barely exceed 60km/h, and the cones in AutoX are smaller, softer cones usually worn out by others already
hitting a full sized city construction cone at 100+km/h (let's be honest, who does 80 on that UBC stretch of road), results will vary

r2edline 05-24-2013 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackp0t (Post 8244753)
BUT if the object is stationary (it doesnt matter if it was not orignally there)
it will be under collision claim meaning on top of your deductable your insurance rate will go up.

Does ICBC not differentiate these between at fault & not-at fault collision claims? At 80km in the pitch black coming around a bend there is no way I could've avoided it without swerving into the other lane or off the road.

punkwax 05-24-2013 06:41 AM

Who's at fault then, the pylon? ICBC ain't getting money from a pylon.

If it fell out a vehicle and you managed to get that person to admit fault, then you'd be fine.

Since there is no one ICBC can collect from, you pay.

Dems da breaks.

Ferra 05-24-2013 07:17 AM

not sure about plyon
but i've claimed money from city and the road construction company for wheels & tires damage. (once for running over a giant pothole, and the other time a raised manhole cover)
lol..the reason I was able to claim money for running over the manhole cover was because they didn't have any plyon

Quote:

Originally Posted by r2edline (Post 8244824)
Does ICBC not differentiate these between at fault & not-at fault collision claims? At 80km in the pitch black coming around a bend there is no way I could've avoided it without swerving into the other lane or off the road.

If you go thru ICBC..i am pretty sure it will come out of your collision. (e.g. think about people who hit a deer)

and really it is still your fault....being the driver, you should always make sure you can stop in time to avoid a collision (especially with a stationary object). If you are driving in pitch black and can't see behind a bend...you should've slowed down.

sdubfid 05-24-2013 07:18 AM

Suck it up and be glad it wasn't a raccoon
Posted via RS Mobile

r2edline 05-24-2013 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodnarb (Post 8244830)
Who's at fault then, the pylon? ICBC ain't getting money from a pylon.

If it fell out a vehicle and you managed to get that person to admit fault, then you'd be fine.

Since there is no one ICBC can collect from, you pay.

Dems da breaks.

No one is at fault, obviously, but that's not the point.

I'm not worried about paying the deductible, but there is concerns about my insurance premiums going up, which is why I asked about at fault vs not-at fault accidents.

Has anyone filed a collision claim similar to this before? Any results?

extracrunchie 05-24-2013 08:12 AM

^^ You premium will go up regardless if you claim.

mqin 05-24-2013 08:27 AM

best bet is to just give icbc a call and ask about this specific situation and whether if it will affect your insurance premiums if you make a claim or not.

jackp0t 05-24-2013 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r2edline (Post 8244824)
Does ICBC not differentiate these between at fault & not-at fault collision claims? At 80km in the pitch black coming around a bend there is no way I could've avoided it without swerving into the other lane or off the road.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodnarb (Post 8244830)
Who's at fault then, the pylon? ICBC ain't getting money from a pylon.

If it fell out a vehicle and you managed to get that person to admit fault, then you'd be fine.

Since there is no one ICBC can collect from, you pay.

Dems da breaks.

this....
And it's because it was just sitting there not moving so its under collision


Quote:

Originally Posted by r2edline (Post 8244862)
No one is at fault, obviously, but that's not the point.

I'm not worried about paying the deductible, but there is concerns about my insurance premiums going up, which is why I asked about at fault vs not-at fault accidents.

Has anyone filed a collision claim similar to this before? Any results?

Claim it man
It actually depends on the damage really, obviously if the damage is small your rate is not going to be as high as an at fault collision with another motorist

I claimed mine and when they told me its collision i didnt go through with it.

PS
The final decision is yours ICBC is more than welcome, you don't go through with it . lol

320icar 05-24-2013 08:39 AM

All these people are right. I hit a piece of cement from a construction site hidden by snow (in the left lane too, a huge ass chunk). No way I could ever see it. Completely blew away wheel. Icbc sections it as a "single car collision" and if there is damage that needs fixing, you pay your deductible, it then gets fixed but under a collusion, and your rates will go up. They class it the same as if you backed into a pole in a parking lot. Even though one is your fault, and one isn't.

They will tell you to go ask for damages from the company/business that left the object there. But 9 times out of 10 you'll get shafted. That's what happened to me
Posted via RS Mobile

jackp0t 05-24-2013 08:45 AM

Also nothing is going to happen when you claim and in the middle of it you decided to back out they will just cancel the claim

I backed out while I was talking to the adjuster

Phil@rise 05-24-2013 09:22 AM

Youre screwed. It coulda been a skunk.

skiiipi 05-24-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferra (Post 8244840)

If you go thru ICBC..i am pretty sure it will come out of your collision. (e.g. think about people who hit a deer)

Hitting a deer actually falls under comprehensive
just make sure that if you hit an animal, dont wash the car, the more blood/fur the better

dared3vil0 05-24-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r2edline (Post 8244824)
At 80km in the pitch black

Headlights work wonders in the dark.




:troll:

jlenko 05-24-2013 11:33 AM

Hitting a pot hole, or an un-marked raised manhole cover is one thing...

But a pylon? C'mon man... maybe you shouldn't be going 80 if you can't see at night ;)

duy- 05-24-2013 11:55 AM

Icbc will most likely claim driver error, it's hard to win a case when you hit a stationary object. you're free to do your best and give them as much information you can and wait for the results. if it was me, I'd blame myself before blaming a cone that came out of no where
Posted via RS Mobile

dared3vil0 05-24-2013 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duy- (Post 8244985)
Icbc will most likely claim driver error,

...and in this case i kinda have to agree. If one can't avoid a bright orange, stationary traffic cone that is SPECIFICALLY designed for visibility i'd hate to see the chances of OP avoiding a child that ran onto the road...

?uestlove 05-24-2013 08:12 PM

that bright orange cone mustve come out of nowhere! just jumped out of the bushes

dared3vil0 05-24-2013 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ?uestlove (Post 8245259)
that bright orange cone mustve come out of nowhere! just jumped out of the bushes

The bright orange cone hit and run i swear. :whistle:

shauna434 01-03-2016 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackp0t (Post 8244753)
You can claim with ICBC and just pay deductable

BUT if the object is stationary (it doesnt matter if it was not orignally there)
it will be under collision claim meaning on top of your deductable your insurance rate will go up.

Both of this situation happened to me
Hit a broken piece of a curve in the middle of the street. It scratches the front lip , cracked the radiator and tweak the rad support (falls under collision claim)

I was driving behind a big truck on the highway and suddenly a "flying object" hit and damage my front bumper and carbon hood. (falls under comprehensive claim)

Guess which one i chose to claim with ICBC. lol

what were you required to know when you have the debris from the truck hit you? Or better yet what were you asked when you went that route with ICBC?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net