Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
07-01-2013, 06:19 PM
|
#751 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: May 2007 Location: Van
Posts: 102
Thanked 168 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
| |
07-01-2013, 06:51 PM
|
#752 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,674
Thanked 599 Times in 232 Posts
Failed 1,191 Times in 212 Posts
|
Devils fucking fleeced us. Fuck mike gillis. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-01-2013, 06:53 PM
|
#753 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,231
Thanked 142 Times in 79 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 17 Posts
|
So here's my take on the whole "could Vancouver have gotten more for Schneider" thing. Lets say the Canucks never wanted a roster player cuz afterall, aren't they trying to get under the salary cap? And MG did say the team had to get younger which I totally agree. So the first 4 picks, lets face it, Schneider alone wasn't gonna fetch us one of those. It would have to be something like Schneider, our 2013 and 2014 first rounders and that wouldn't make sense for the Canucks. 5th pick was Carolina's. They have Cam Ward, no need for Schneider. 6 and 7 were the Alberta teams, being in the same division, they weren't willing to overpay for Schneider, fair enough. That leaves the 8th pick which belongs to Buffalo and they already have Miller and are going thru a rebuild so they probably rather keep their draft pick. So long story short, I do believe MG got the best trade possible.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 07:10 PM
|
#754 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: somewhere in bc
Posts: 2,125
Thanked 825 Times in 330 Posts
Failed 263 Times in 78 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dinamix Devils fucking fleeced us. Fuck mike gillis. Posted via RS Mobile | Only idiots think the Devils fleeced us. Goalies don't go for much in today's NHL. Any top ten draft pick is highly rated in the current NHL landscape.
Just look at the Halak trade to St. Louis, he was even rated higher then Schneider during that off-season due to his crazy playoff performance and all Montreal got in return was Lars Eller and Ian Schultz. Two prospects, and only one of them was considered blue-chip. Don't forget that was a goalie who was already play-off proven, Schneids doesn't have any playoff success.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 07:16 PM
|
#755 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,738
Thanked 17,635 Times in 4,330 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Teggie So here's my take on the whole "could Vancouver have gotten more for Schneider" thing. Lets say the Canucks never wanted a roster player cuz afterall, aren't they trying to get under the salary cap? And MG did say the team had to get younger which I totally agree. So the first 4 picks, lets face it, Schneider alone wasn't gonna fetch us one of those. It would have to be something like Schneider, our 2013 and 2014 first rounders and that wouldn't make sense for the Canucks. 5th pick was Carolina's. They have Cam Ward, no need for Schneider. 6 and 7 were the Alberta teams, being in the same division, they weren't willing to overpay for Schneider, fair enough. That leaves the 8th pick which belongs to Buffalo and they already have Miller and are going thru a rebuild so they probably rather keep their draft pick. So long story short, I do believe MG got the best trade possible. | Buffalo is rebuilding the team and is shopping Miller as we speak. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-01-2013, 07:37 PM
|
#756 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,231
Thanked 142 Times in 79 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 17 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c Buffalo is rebuilding the team and is shopping Miller as we speak. Posted via RS Mobile | So are you implying the Canucks could've gotten the 8th pick instead? Cuz in the end, it doesn't matter, the 8th pick was Ristolainen a Dman, something MG wasn't gonna draft anyways. He wanted his centerman and he got what he wanted. It's easy to criticize MG and say he traded Schneider for a 9th overall pick. Even if he traded him for the 7th overall pick, he still would've taken Horvat.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 07:58 PM
|
#757 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,738
Thanked 17,635 Times in 4,330 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Teggie So are you implying the Canucks could've gotten the 8th pick instead? Cuz in the end, it doesn't matter, the 8th pick was Ristolainen a Dman, something MG wasn't gonna draft anyways. He wanted his centerman and he got what he wanted. It's easy to criticize MG and say he traded Schneider for a 9th overall pick. Even if he traded him for the 7th overall pick, he still would've taken Horvat. | I'm just sayin thats all |
| |
07-01-2013, 08:15 PM
|
#758 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,323
Thanked 2,558 Times in 925 Posts
Failed 655 Times in 195 Posts
|
You guys talk like Schneider is already the proven #1 goalie for us in the playoffs. It's cup or bust in Vancouver.
I believe Schneider fetched the most out of all the recent goalie transactions. It's pretty amazing to get a top 10 pick for Schneider in a deep draft. Whether it's worth it or not.
Picking Shinkaruk and Subban just put the dirt on top of the coffin of the goalie saga. |
| |
07-01-2013, 09:25 PM
|
#759 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: y
Posts: 1,331
Thanked 4,841 Times in 632 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dinamix Devils fucking fleeced us. Fuck mike gillis. Posted via RS Mobile | Quote:
Originally Posted by iwantaskyline Only idiots think the Devils fleeced us. Goalies don't go for much in today's NHL. Any top ten draft pick is highly rated in the current NHL landscape.
Just look at the Halak trade to St. Louis, he was even rated higher then Schneider during that off-season due to his crazy playoff performance and all Montreal got in return was Lars Eller and Ian Schultz. Two prospects, and only one of them was considered blue-chip. Don't forget that was a goalie who was already play-off proven, Schneids doesn't have any playoff success. | |
| |
07-01-2013, 09:27 PM
|
#760 | .
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,733
Thanked 5,474 Times in 2,095 Posts
Failed 418 Times in 188 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Earl You guys talk like Schneider is already the proven #1 goalie for us in the playoffs. It's cup or bust in Vancouver.
I believe Schneider fetched the most out of all the recent goalie transactions. It's pretty amazing to get a top 10 pick for Schneider in a deep draft. Whether it's worth it or not.
Picking Shinkaruk and Subban just put the dirt on top of the coffin of the goalie saga. | Wow, great post (srs) ...for once Big Earl |
| |
07-01-2013, 09:28 PM
|
#761 | Big Drama Show
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,714
Thanked 3,080 Times in 1,195 Posts
Failed 410 Times in 209 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by H.Specter | lel that gif was my first reaction when I heard about the trade
|
| |
07-01-2013, 09:44 PM
|
#762 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,994
Thanked 15,174 Times in 6,083 Posts
Failed 2,081 Times in 701 Posts
|
all good points on this page regarding the trade.. I was at my cabin so only real feed i took the time to check out was Twitter
it does suck that a asset like schneider who you spent so much time to groom and develop and even tell him he's the man is traded for a player who seemingly wont be stepping into an NHL lineup anytime soon and thats the return? hmm.. but as has been said the goalie market is seemingly dry
What i have a hard time believing, and i guess it must be true as everyone reported is that there truly was absolutely no takers for Lu? As ive said before Lu brings alot more than just a goaltender who can take a non-playoff team into the playoffs, he's a single handed marketing chip. You're telling me that none of these bottom feeders would take Luongo with a nice cap hit to maintain their spot at the cap floor?
Luongo is amazingly consistent and relatively healthy, those like 3-4 years on top of what an equivalent or even below Lu goalie is getting is THAT much of a deterant from taking him on? That blows my fucking mind...
Anyways, imo MG is at least TRYING to do somthing and this move isnt like a status quo move, this is a fucking earthquake of a shake up, dump Schneids, dump Ballard, cast off from FA's, sign some depth and grit and make MAYBE 1-2 more pushes at a cup, in three years if we havent built a team like a chicago where your young players are constant contributors and vets can slowly fall back into roles or even be traded because the depth has taken their place, thats the only way this will go anywhere or else in three years fans should be praying for a rebuild from top to bottom and no more dwelling in mediocrity
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
07-01-2013, 10:06 PM
|
#763 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,529
Thanked 665 Times in 273 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Teggie So here's my take on the whole "could Vancouver have gotten more for Schneider" thing. Lets say the Canucks never wanted a roster player cuz afterall, aren't they trying to get under the salary cap? And MG did say the team had to get younger which I totally agree. So the first 4 picks, lets face it, Schneider alone wasn't gonna fetch us one of those. It would have to be something like Schneider, our 2013 and 2014 first rounders and that wouldn't make sense for the Canucks. 5th pick was Carolina's. They have Cam Ward, no need for Schneider. 6 and 7 were the Alberta teams, being in the same division, they weren't willing to overpay for Schneider, fair enough. That leaves the 8th pick which belongs to Buffalo and they already have Miller and are going thru a rebuild so they probably rather keep their draft pick. So long story short, I do believe MG got the best trade possible. | Quote:
Originally Posted by iwantaskyline Only idiots think the Devils fleeced us. Goalies don't go for much in today's NHL. Any top ten draft pick is highly rated in the current NHL landscape.
Just look at the Halak trade to St. Louis, he was even rated higher then Schneider during that off-season due to his crazy playoff performance and all Montreal got in return was Lars Eller and Ian Schultz. Two prospects, and only one of them was considered blue-chip. Don't forget that was a goalie who was already play-off proven, Schneids doesn't have any playoff success. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Teggie So are you implying the Canucks could've gotten the 8th pick instead? Cuz in the end, it doesn't matter, the 8th pick was Ristolainen a Dman, something MG wasn't gonna draft anyways. He wanted his centerman and he got what he wanted. It's easy to criticize MG and say he traded Schneider for a 9th overall pick. Even if he traded him for the 7th overall pick, he still would've taken Horvat. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Earl You guys talk like Schneider is already the proven #1 goalie for us in the playoffs. It's cup or bust in Vancouver.
I believe Schneider fetched the most out of all the recent goalie transactions. It's pretty amazing to get a top 10 pick for Schneider in a deep draft. Whether it's worth it or not.
Picking Shinkaruk and Subban just put the dirt on top of the coffin of the goalie saga. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer all good points on this page regarding the trade.. I was at my cabin so only real feed i took the time to check out was Twitter
it does suck that a asset like schneider who you spent so much time to groom and develop and even tell him he's the man is traded for a player who seemingly wont be stepping into an NHL lineup anytime soon and thats the return? hmm.. but as has been said the goalie market is seemingly dry
What i have a hard time believing, and i guess it must be true as everyone reported is that there truly was absolutely no takers for Lu? As ive said before Lu brings alot more than just a goaltender who can take a non-playoff team into the playoffs, he's a single handed marketing chip. You're telling me that none of these bottom feeders would take Luongo with a nice cap hit to maintain their spot at the cap floor?
Luongo is amazingly consistent and relatively healthy, those like 3-4 years on top of what an equivalent or even below Lu goalie is getting is THAT much of a deterant from taking him on? That blows my fucking mind...
Anyways, imo MG is at least TRYING to do somthing and this move isnt like a status quo move, this is a fucking earthquake of a shake up, dump Schneids, dump Ballard, cast off from FA's, sign some depth and grit and make MAYBE 1-2 more pushes at a cup, in three years if we havent built a team like a chicago where your young players are constant contributors and vets can slowly fall back into roles or even be traded because the depth has taken their place, thats the only way this will go anywhere or else in three years fans should be praying for a rebuild from top to bottom and no more dwelling in mediocrity | Some very logical posts from people.
The biggest criticism for me was how long Gillis took to move a goalie.
__________________
"A chicken crossing the street is poultry in motion"
Last edited by MR_BIGGS; 07-01-2013 at 10:13 PM.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 10:07 PM
|
#764 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
I think this is as good as the trade was going to get for the Canucks and it wasn't enough.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 10:51 PM
|
#765 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,828
Thanked 17,623 Times in 5,902 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer What i have a hard time believing, and i guess it must be true as everyone reported is that there truly was absolutely no takers for Lu? As ive said before Lu brings alot more than just a goaltender who can take a non-playoff team into the playoffs, he's a single handed marketing chip. You're telling me that none of these bottom feeders would take Luongo with a nice cap hit to maintain their spot at the cap floor?
Luongo is amazingly consistent and relatively healthy, those like 3-4 years on top of what an equivalent or even below Lu goalie is getting is THAT much of a deterant from taking him on? That blows my fucking mind... | I agree completely, BUT, you cannot discount Lu's no trade clause. I bet that, despite the fact he obviously wanted out, I have a hard time believing he would have waived his no trade cause for just any bottom feeder team looking to sell jerseys with his name on it. I would imagine the list of teams that GMMG had to deal with was pretty damn short.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 10:54 PM
|
#766 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,994
Thanked 15,174 Times in 6,083 Posts
Failed 2,081 Times in 701 Posts
|
That's the only thing...and it kinda seemed like that was the case with his tweet
The way I read the "NOtradeclause" tweet seemed to me almost like a "yea..I got this NTC for a reason and I'm sure as hell not going where I don't want to be"
And if that's the case then that opens up sooo many more questions.. Like was MG just forcing any trade he could get on Lu? Was Lu just being stubborn and turning down anything but Florida? It's completely in Lu's right to turn down trades but when you come out and essentially say your time in Van is over and it's time to move on..
So Who's to blame? Was it a lack of communication with everyone involved? Posted via RS Mobile
Last edited by Hondaracer; 07-01-2013 at 11:00 PM.
|
| |
07-01-2013, 11:08 PM
|
#767 | Lomac owned my ass at least once
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,259
Thanked 3,463 Times in 820 Posts
Failed 444 Times in 144 Posts
|
Blame lies on Gillis for the handling of the entire situation. If he didn't say Schneider is our #1, then the trade would've been less controversial.
Either way, hope the drafts develop into good players. We needed the depth.
|
| |
07-02-2013, 01:05 AM
|
#768 | Lomac owned my ass at least once
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,259
Thanked 3,463 Times in 820 Posts
Failed 444 Times in 144 Posts
|
Should get Benoit. He didn't get qualified.
|
| |
07-02-2013, 01:08 AM
|
#769 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 1,123 Times in 533 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 38 Posts
|
Only issue I have with the trade is could we have gotten more? 1st + 2nd? or prospect? roster player? someone who can help now?
Aside from that, the team hasn't gotten any weaker in goal. Schneider is still under contract for the next two years, I believe Lu can provide us with similar quality goaltending over the next two years. So our window to win now is still there with Lu and the Sedins. Now, we have a young upcoming centre to take over in a few years. (depending if we develop him correctly).
|
| |
07-02-2013, 05:48 AM
|
#770 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: .
Posts: 1,497
Thanked 285 Times in 93 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 45 Posts
|
Lu is happy now he knows hes the bona fide #1 and will probly play like 99% of the games
|
| |
07-02-2013, 06:25 AM
|
#771 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Cloverdale
Posts: 11,580
Thanked 3,789 Times in 1,349 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 42 Posts
|
Torts likes to play the young guys, Bo will be thrown into the fire sooner rather then later.
__________________
The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place... and I donīt care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently, if you let it. You, me or nobody, is gonna hit as hard as life. But ain't about how hard you hit... It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward... how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Thatīs how winning is done. Now, if you know what you worth, go out and get what you worth. - Rocky Balboa |
| |
07-02-2013, 07:40 AM
|
#772 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,738
Thanked 17,635 Times in 4,330 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
|
I don't know much about Bo (hes a goalie right? )
could he crack the line up this year at all or is it really up in the air until training camp?
|
| |
07-02-2013, 07:58 AM
|
#773 | Hacked RS to become a mod
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,528
Thanked 24,527 Times in 8,534 Posts
Failed 1,537 Times in 685 Posts
|
If they have to play Bo things are worse than I even would have thought
|
| |
07-02-2013, 08:30 AM
|
#774 | .
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,733
Thanked 5,474 Times in 2,095 Posts
Failed 418 Times in 188 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp If they have to play Bo things are worse than I even would have thought | What do you mean "have to"?
If he does well in camp, sure.
If not, back to juniors/AHL.
For all we know he could thrive right into the NHL, we just have to wait and see.
The Canucks don't HAVE to put into BoHo into the lineup if he's not ready, just to prove a point |
| |
07-02-2013, 08:34 AM
|
#775 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rsx Blame lies on Gillis for the handling of the entire situation. If he didn't say Schneider is our #1, then the trade would've been less controversial. | My 'blame' on Gillis lies with him not willing to consider a Schneider trade earlier. You want to keep all your options open to improve your team in anyway possible. Telling Lu that he's the one to be moved for the past year and not keeping the other option open was a mistake IMO, a calculated risk which fell through on MG for a variety of reasons.
On the other end of that, Luongo pretty much declared Schneider the #1 as well and volunteered himself to move, so it did handcuff the team from that perspective.
You can look at how the MAF situation was handled after the Pens got knocked out. MAF has been fairly silent overall. The team has backed MAF 100% going into next season, but that doesn't mean he won't get traded and everybody including MAF knows that's the reality of the business.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 AM. |