REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2013, 11:03 AM   #1
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
Exhaust Back Pressure

I'm looking to replace my resonator with a aluminized steel X pipe, stock exhaust pipe is 2-3/8" OD, with 1/8" steel wall, I can get 2-1/2" X pipe (with 2-3/8" ID) outlets. Now, with the pipes sitting inside the x pipe (see pic, similar theory), would it create lots of back pressure or turbulence? X pipe sits 6 ft away from the engine. Should it be connected with "step up" pipes to create a smooth transition ( stock pipe goes into a bigger pipe)?

My dilemma:

OEM X pipe $800
Aftermarket X pipe with welding job under $300

Advertisement

Last edited by BEEB; 07-08-2013 at 11:13 AM.
BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 12:44 PM   #2
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,454
Thanked 14,908 Times in 3,893 Posts
Failed 471 Times in 216 Posts
What kind of vehicle is this? Unless you have a completely built fully ported and polished, race prepped car I wouldn't worry about how the exhaust piping overlaps. Just my .02
Posted via RS Mobile
320icar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 01:17 PM   #3
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
I'm doing this on a twin turbo 335i. Stock pipe OD is 2-3/8"

I'd many experience with my previous cars, and the most problem I had noticed was on my B16 engine where a 2.5" pipe meets a 2.25" hole into the muffler. Power was dramatically lower in the higher rpm range.
BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 01:50 PM   #4
They let me be a moderator. LOL
 
SpuGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,219
Thanked 3,670 Times in 867 Posts
Failed 1,062 Times in 190 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEB View Post
I'm looking to replace my resonator with a aluminized steel X pipe, stock exhaust pipe is 2-3/8" OD, with 1/8" steel wall, I can get 2-1/2" X pipe (with 2-3/8" ID) outlets. Now, with the pipes sitting inside the x pipe (see pic, similar theory), would it create lots of back pressure or turbulence? X pipe sits 6 ft away from the engine. Should it be connected with "step up" pipes to create a smooth transition ( stock pipe goes into a bigger pipe)?
So you're going from a 2 1/4" to a 2 3/8"?

1/8th inch step shouldn't make that big of a difference. In your previous car, you had a 1/4 Inch step. Huge difference, even if it's just 1/8th more.

Assuming that pic you posted is the step in question, and you really wanted to create a smooth transition, you could just get somebody to run a weld bead along the step. Then bevel down the flange to match the 1/8" step for the larger pipe's flange.
SpuGen is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 07-08-2013, 03:38 PM   #5
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
that's not my picture, but similar theory.
If anyone had the same experience, I would like to hear if there's any power loss especially on a higher power turbo car at higher rpm range

This is the similar thing I'm looking to do, but shops around town aren't quite friendly for normal work force. Needa take a day off to do so.


BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 05:08 PM   #6
My homepage has been set to RS
 
sdubfid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: AB/BC
Posts: 2,223
Thanked 1,207 Times in 386 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 10 Posts
I am not quite sure what you are trying to say, but your stock exhaust is not 1/8" wall thickness unless bmw is preparing for the apocalypse.

FWIW- My old civic made around 215whp through a stock oem midpipe (no muffler) which necks down to 2". It made 160whp with stock oem muffler in place at the same boost. 55whp gain just by removing stock muffler.

Your stock exhaust is 2 3/8" od as you said which leaves the ID at 2 1/4" if it is not a double walled tube. So in theory your stock piping should support at least 430whp. Which makes sense as turbo s2000s with stock exhaust have made 400-420whp. Efficient-->No
Possible-->Yes

are there any other mods to it?
sdubfid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 09:24 PM   #7
They let me be a moderator. LOL
 
SpuGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,219
Thanked 3,670 Times in 867 Posts
Failed 1,062 Times in 190 Posts
Oh.....

Get the exhaust guy to flare-end the existing exhaust pipes. Then get them to Butt-Weld it, instead of just slip fit + weld.

You only need to do the rear section. So:
- Existing pipe
- Slip fit into X pipe
- Flare Rear section of existing pipe.
- Butt-Weld Xpipe to Rear section.

It really shouldn't matter, but if you want the cheapest smooth transition, with the least amount of work, this would be the way.

Did you check the X-Pipe?
It should've been designed as a slip fit, so you're getting worried over nothing.
Check the inside to see if it flares down in size.
SpuGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 09:41 PM   #8
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Failed 331 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdubfid View Post
I am not quite sure what you are trying to say, but your stock exhaust is not 1/8" wall thickness unless bmw is preparing for the apocalypse.

FWIW- My old civic made around 215whp through a stock oem midpipe (no muffler) which necks down to 2". It made 160whp with stock oem muffler in place at the same boost. 55whp gain just by removing stock muffler.

Your stock exhaust is 2 3/8" od as you said which leaves the ID at 2 1/4" if it is not a double walled tube. So in theory your stock piping should support at least 430whp. Which makes sense as turbo s2000s with stock exhaust have made 400-420whp. Efficient-->No
Possible-->Yes

are there any other mods to it?
Do you have dyno charts of the 55 whp? Would like to see them... (I'm NOT doubting you, i just wanna see it lmao)
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4

2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 09:43 PM   #9
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
It's only JB'd. Not looking for crazy mods as its a xDrive. I am happy if it can reach 400hp.

I guess spugen gave me the answer, slip on the front end and butt weld the rear end. Now I gotta find a shop that would take my car !
BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 05:58 PM   #10
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
I thought only 2 stroke engines need exhaust back pressure.
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 12:28 PM   #11
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
BEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bc
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 119 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 167 Times in 28 Posts
Everyone thinks that their cars don't need back pressure. But I don't know how these people come up with that general idea...
BEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net