REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2013, 04:46 AM   #26
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,411
Thanked 9,486 Times in 2,441 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
I've never been a fan of the styling of the GTR but it is one amazing car.
Advertisement
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 10:58 AM   #27
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
I just don't get how its possible. Why do cars of a similar weight all need 1000hp to do it? I don't understand how gearing, traction, and aero can mathematically make it happen. 570hp moving a 3800 lb car to 60mph in 2 seconds just doesn't seem possible, even with all the robot driving double clutch transmission tech in the world.
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 10:59 AM   #28
:: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
 
tofu1413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,755
Thanked 11,826 Times in 3,334 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 89 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Placid View Post
Not an expert myself, but I think you are referring to the AWD's torque differential that transfers power between the front and rear and vice versa.

Making AWD vehicles fun to drive (in a sense anyway) in a straight line AND when cornering.
Power transfer is quick!
__________________
13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"

90' Honda EF Civic HB // 04' Honda Pilot Granite

- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
tofu1413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:04 PM   #29
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
true, if you ever see a slow camera on how high performance cars launch, there actually is a lot more wheel spin and power loss than you think.
sophisticated launch control will hopefully fix this problem.
Mizuno san also said how efficient GT-R's drive trains are...thus, less power loss.

on a side note...I'm not a physics guy and didn't understand your formula at all
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:10 PM   #30
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,634
Thanked 32,366 Times in 7,535 Posts
Failed 213 Times in 161 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
I'm a chef, so I have the math skills of a 4 year old, so I'm just gonna nod my head and thank you, assuming it makes sense.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-28-2013, 03:01 PM   #31
Old School RS
 
lowside67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,598
Thanked 4,045 Times in 1,233 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
I don't really understand why this is a thread. This isn't an announcement, a review, or anything other than some random person speculating/dreaming that the 2015 GTR will achieve this. Who the fuck is Viknesh Vijayenthiran?

I realize this is a Timpo thread but this thread has less content than even the average fucking Timpo thread.

Might as well have started this thread:

"2018 Porsche 992 to have 5 wheels"
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars.
lowside67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 03:16 PM   #32
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowside67 View Post
Who the fuck is Viknesh Vijayenthiran?
Our Writers | High Gear Media
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 03:20 PM   #33
Old School RS
 
lowside67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,598
Thanked 4,045 Times in 1,233 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
Yeah I can Google too. He also comes up for Fox News... super trustworthy! I guess a better question is who is High Gear Media and what does Viknesh know that the rest of the world doesn't about the new GTR?
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars.
lowside67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 11:50 PM   #34
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Marshall Placid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,295
Thanked 1,934 Times in 494 Posts
Failed 31 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 View Post
Power transfer is quick!
I double checked some facts about Nissan's AWD system and how the heck it could be faster than cars with the same HP that costs twice as much:

Nissan GT-R's Secret - ATTESA E-TS AWD System Explained

Interesting read.

AWD, at least during the initial short-distance drag racing, for Nissan, makes it quicker than many, many cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
Interesting take.

Just want to add the following:

Only 415hp required?

Did you factor in the power loss from crank to wheels?

And... head-wind speed?

I think it is around 15% to 25% for AWD.

So, 415hp, assuming 25% power loss is:

553hp.

The current GT-R, 2012 model, produces 542hp (crank).

So, the newest rendition proposed by the article's writer should be around 553hp and should be doable, with a little tweak here and there.
Marshall Placid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 11:57 PM   #35
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Failed 331 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
Little thing called traction/ Not always being at your exact perfect powerband spot/ time it takes to shift etc etc etc.
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4

2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 09:09 AM   #36
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dared3vil0 View Post
Little thing called traction/ Not always being at your exact perfect powerband spot/ time it takes to shift etc etc etc.
That's why I specified to the ground, and average
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 09:15 AM   #37
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 360
Thanked 654 Times in 148 Posts
Failed 52 Times in 17 Posts
Very interesting. There's already a lot of respect for this car and if the GTR can actually hit 60 in 2 then wow, it'll be on a whole new level. I really don't care how they do it, as long as they claim they would then I'm sure they will. Now let's wait and see.
NKC ONE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 09:18 AM   #38
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
All that being said, I really, really doubt it will. As others have posted, there is almost no room for losses with those numbers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:03 AM   #39
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Placid View Post
I double checked some facts about Nissan's AWD system and how the heck it could be faster than cars with the same HP that costs twice as much:

Nissan GT-R's Secret - ATTESA E-TS AWD System Explained

Interesting read.

AWD, at least during the initial short-distance drag racing, for Nissan, makes it quicker than many, many cars.



Interesting take.

Just want to add the following:

Only 415hp required?

Did you factor in the power loss from crank to wheels?

And... head-wind speed?

I think it is around 15% to 25% for AWD.

So, 415hp, assuming 25% power loss is:

553hp.

The current GT-R, 2012 model, produces 542hp (crank).

So, the newest rendition proposed by the article's writer should be around 553hp and should be doable, with a little tweak here and there.
No, it's 10% for GT-R...I've seen Mizuno san (GT-R chief engineer) saying the same thing as well

What % Drivetrain Loss? - R35 GT-R - GT-R Life
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:07 AM   #40
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
e = 1/2mV^2
e = 1/2(3800lb)*(60mph)^2
e = 620kJ
620kJ / 2 seconds = 415hp

Average horsepower to the ground of 415 over 2 seconds. Doable.

Science!
my friend, you are simply calculating the kinetic energy of a 3800 lbs object traveling at a constant 60 mph.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 08-29-2013, 10:17 AM   #41
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar View Post
my friend, you are simply calculating the kinetic energy of a 3800 lbs object traveling at a constant 60 mph.
Yes, yes I am.

And energy is conserved, so the energy required to accelerate an object to that constant speed is equal to the kinetic energy at that speed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:18 AM   #42
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Yes, yes I am.

And energy is conserved, so the energy required to accelerate an object to that constant speed is equal to the kinetic energy at that speed.
in a physics utopia on a frictionless road and in vacuum (no air resistance).
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:23 AM   #43
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar View Post
in a physics utopia on a frictionless road and in vacuum (no air resistance).
On a frictionless road you wouldn't move. So. No, not that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-29-2013, 10:29 AM   #44
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Air resistance on a GTR at 60mph:
D = 1/2pV^2*C*A
D = 1/2 * (1.204kg/m^3) * (60mph)^2 * .32 * 6.08ft^2
D = 17.5 pounds

Negligible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:44 AM   #45
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
On a frictionless road you wouldn't move. So. No, not that.
notice I didn't use the term "car". I used the term "object". How it started to move to a constant velocity on a frictionless surface is beyond me. But somehow it did, and your formula is calculating the KE of that object.

I'm not going to go any further into this kinematics debate. This is about the GTR after all. My only point is that you are neglecting a lot of variables (thermodynamics for example) which plays a crucial point. Have you even considered the horsepower wasted in form of heat due to the inefficiency of the engine? For you to say that the GTR has more power than your theoretical 415 hp and claim that it is "doable" for it to achieve 0-60 in 2.0 s is flawed.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:48 AM   #46
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar View Post
(have you even considered the horsepower wasted in form of heat due to the inefficiency of the engine?)
Yes, I have considered that. And so do the manufacturers of cars when they release horsepower numbers. Horsepower numbers don't include waste heat.

You need to stop having this conversation, you look foolish. I was very specific. Horsepower applied to the road, and average horsepower. Yes, you obviously need higher than 415hp peak to hit that time, that's what average means. All I said is that it was physically possible, not that it was likely or has happened.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:57 AM   #47
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Yes, I have considered that. And so do the manufacturers of cars when they release horsepower numbers. Horsepower numbers don't include waste heat.

You need to stop having this conversation, you look foolish. I was very specific. Horsepower applied to the road, and average horsepower. Yes, you obviously need higher than 415hp peak to hit that time, that's what average means. All I said is that it was physically possible, not that it was likely or has happened.
Well that just solves everything.
__________________
2014 Honda Civic Si
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-29-2013, 11:36 AM   #48
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
FerrariEnzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
so does this mean that we will start seeing this Nismo GTR here once its released driving by mainlanders thinking they are race car drivers who in fact cant drive and drive like shit then goes to MM design to make it look the part???


back on topic,
cant wait til Top Gear does a review and stig ripping it around their track.. will it beat the Pagani Huayra
__________________
My Buy&Sell Feedback, Thanx
FerrariEnzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 03:00 AM   #49
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
As we know Honda engineers announced that NSX will be faster than the GT-R...they probably were aiming for 2.5 seconds or so but now need to aim for 1.9 seconds LOL
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-30-2013, 08:23 AM   #50
Zionism gets my shell hard and slimy
 
snails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: in a shell
Posts: 2,598
Thanked 6,021 Times in 1,129 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 80 Posts
^ vtec>physics

snails is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net