![]() |
Lamborghini Veneno Roadster Engine: 6.5-litre V12 developing 750bhp 0-62mph (100kph): 2.9 seconds Top speed: 221mph Weight: 1,490kg Number built: nine Cost: £3.36 million http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615857.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615858.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615859.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615860.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615861.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615862.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615863.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/615864.jpg |
There is a lot going on there... |
yeah it's gonna be hard to wash it too |
I love the non-circular fenders and wheel wells. Makes it look that much more nuts. |
Quote:
|
Too slow, too heavy, too expensive, too ugly..... watch all 9 be sold out by the end of the year |
Quote:
I'm gonna guess 7 in the middle east and 2 in China. 3 of the buyers in the middle east probably already have the hard-top versions. :okay: |
being able to buy one of these is like winning the lotto and when one of the cars gets totaled cha-ching!!! |
0 to 100..... 2.9.... wtf Posted via RS Mobile |
For an over the top Lambo, I really like it. That's some poster shit right there. |
Do they have one that's a little "busier?" It's a little plain, and the wind still has some choice on where to go. |
Is than an Autobot or a Decepticon? Oh shit this is real?!? |
Looks like I may have to take down my Countach poster |
Quote:
Come on Timpo back me up here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
people who buy Ferrari and Lambo are usually motorsport enthusiasts. they don't like it when their cars get smoked by GT-R, Corvette ZR1, etc...cars that are significantly cheaper. |
Quote:
http://craigscarculture.com/wp-conte...ach-12sdfs.jpg |
Quote:
Definitely overdoing it as far as design goes... |
$4.5 million Lamborghini Veneno Roadster can hit 221 mph - NY Daily News A 4.5 million dollar Lambo that can go 221 mph (about 354 km/h). The front of the car still looks like Megatron of the Decepticons. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think supercars nowadays aren't that super anymore. Back in 1980s or 1990s, there were quite distinctive difference between so called sportscars and supercars. Porsche 911 GT1, McLaren F1, Lamborghini Diablo, Jaguar XJ220, Ferrari F40, Ferrari F50, Bugatti EB110, etc.. were significantly faster than Toyota Supra, Nissan Skyline GTR, Chevrolet Corvette, Ford Mustang, Pontiac Firebird, Mazda RX-7, Mitsubishi 3000GT, etc. Sure, supercars could show off how wealthy you were back in the day too, but they were so much faster, more powerful, any everything. Nowadays GT-Rs and ZR1s putting Ferraris and Lambos in shame, even Mustangs going 200mpg with 662hp, Camaro going faster on Nurburgring than Ferraris and Lambos for much less price. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's the difference between R32 GT-R V Spec and Lamborghini Diablo SE30 Jota? 2.6L Inline-6 276bhp 0-60mph 5.6 sec Topspeed: 255km/h (governed to 180km/h) http://s1.cdn.autoevolution.com/imag...32--4037_1.jpg 5.7L V12 595bhp 0-60mph: 3.7 sec Topspeed: 340km/h http://www.mycarheaven.com/wp-conten...e-1024x575.jpg As you can see, the difference was quite significant back in the day..and now, R35 can beat Lambo in both acceleration and cornering. Which one would I rather have? sure Lambo because it looks better. But being slower than the GT-R does NOT help. I'm not saying average joe is going to hit 300+km/h, but people would still buy it for braggin rights, like Veyron. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net