REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2013, 04:03 PM   #26
GS8
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
GS8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Fruit Loops
Posts: 3,642
Thanked 7,546 Times in 2,048 Posts
Failed 173 Times in 83 Posts
I was expecting old people when I clicked the link.

Advertisement
GS8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 04:08 PM   #27
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Xu.Vi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: vancouver
Posts: 643
Thanked 842 Times in 203 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 12 Posts
My GM consumes 15.2L/100KM on a 2.4L. So much for that 9.2L/100KM i'm suppose to be seeing
Xu.Vi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 04:09 PM   #28
I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 7,051
Thanked 6,796 Times in 2,751 Posts
Failed 255 Times in 141 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Cold weather gives you better fuel economy. The recent change in temperature would explain them getting better fuel economy than they had over the summer.
You've got that backwards, dude. Gas mileage in the winter should almost always be worse compared to the summer.
Traum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 04:39 PM   #29
GS8
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
GS8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Fruit Loops
Posts: 3,642
Thanked 7,546 Times in 2,048 Posts
Failed 173 Times in 83 Posts
My Buick's fuel economy is 1.5L worse than advertised. I'm actually impressed because I lead foot the fuck out of it.

Blower whine
GS8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 04:49 PM   #30
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Jmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
While colder air increases combustion efficiency and reduces the rolling resistance of your tires, it's more than offset due to the higher concentrations of ethanol mixed into your fuel during the winter months.

Most vehicles will have worse fuel economy during the winter, although there are so many variables to take into account that it's possible to get better fuel economy (e.g. if you drive in a town that has heavy traffic during the summer, the decrease in traffic during the winter can lead to better fuel economy).
Jmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 04:51 PM   #31
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
You've got that backwards, dude. Gas mileage in the winter should almost always be worse compared to the summer.
Can you explain that? It goes against everything I know about engines.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 05:27 PM   #32
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 561
Thanked 250 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 24 Times in 7 Posts
suddenly the s2000 doesn't seem all that bad at approx 11/100km mixed city and highway.
i always thought you would get worst mileage in the winter because of the extra fuel used during start up and time it takes to get up to optimum engine temperature.
46_valentinor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 09:21 PM   #33
Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
 
Zedbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Can you explain that? It goes against everything I know about engines.


You should learn about Google. Type in: better gas mileage in winter? And the responses are: Better Gas Mileage in Summer than Winter, 9 reasons why your winter mileage sucks, etc.
Zedbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 10:28 PM   #34
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
gas has different mixtures in the summer and winter. winter gas contains more butane which contains less energy so you burn more

engines are made to run best at normal operating temp and burn more fuel when cold

even things as simple as oils are significantly thicker when they are cold (engine, tranny, difs, grease in bearings)

AC running when your windshield defroster is on

Simply having to push thru slush and snow


plus all the way smaller reasons like colder air being denser, dirty car having more air drag, etc
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics

Last edited by RRxtar; 11-25-2013 at 10:39 PM.
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-25-2013, 11:50 PM   #35
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
this is exactly why we need kei cars here.
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-26-2013, 12:40 AM   #36
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: -
Posts: 1,593
Thanked 370 Times in 178 Posts
Failed 27 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Cold weather gives you better fuel economy. The recent change in temperature would explain them getting better fuel economy than they had over the summer.
??????????
Purely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 06:30 AM   #37
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Double posted
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 06:30 AM   #38
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedbra View Post


You should learn about Google. Type in: better gas mileage in winter? And the responses are: Better Gas Mileage in Summer than Winter, 9 reasons why your winter mileage sucks, etc.
Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.

So you can stick your facepalm up your ass.

Also, google isn't 'ask jeeves'. You don't ask it questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gYU View Post
??????????
Modern fuel injected cars measure ambient air temperature. When temperature goes up, they increase the amount of fuel injected to richen the mixture and prevent detonation. So your car can run leaner in the cold.

That was my understanding, but I'm definitely open to hearing an explanation of why that might not be true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
gas has different mixtures in the summer and winter. winter gas contains more butane which contains less energy so you burn more

engines are made to run best at normal operating temp and burn more fuel when cold

even things as simple as oils are significantly thicker when they are cold (engine, tranny, difs, grease in bearings)

AC running when your windshield defroster is on

Simply having to push thru slush and snow


plus all the way smaller reasons like colder air being denser, dirty car having more air drag, etc
They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!)

So except for the very short period of initial warmup, I still don't understand. Maybe if your average journey is only 10 minutes or something.

I think a more likely explanation is that people drive more slowly in the winter. It has nothing to do with the car at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill

Last edited by Splinter; 11-26-2013 at 06:39 AM.
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-26-2013, 08:08 AM   #39
Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
 
Zedbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
Zedbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 09:53 AM   #40
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Failed 1,536 Times in 385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss6o4 View Post
My GM consumes 15.2L/100KM on a 2.4L. So much for that 9.2L/100KM i'm suppose to be seeing
I floored it everywhere in my 135i and I still managed 13.5L/100KM
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 09:54 AM   #41
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Failed 1,536 Times in 385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
gas has different mixtures in the summer and winter. winter gas contains more butane which contains less energy so you burn more

engines are made to run best at normal operating temp and burn more fuel when cold

even things as simple as oils are significantly thicker when they are cold (engine, tranny, difs, grease in bearings)

AC running when your windshield defroster is on

Simply having to push thru slush and snow


plus all the way smaller reasons like colder air being denser, dirty car having more air drag, etc

Anyone who owns a road bike can feel how much slower they ride when their tires are slightly deflated
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 11:20 AM   #42
I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 7,051
Thanked 6,796 Times in 2,751 Posts
Failed 255 Times in 141 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.
The common sense factors (as to why winter gas mileage is worse) would include:

- Longer idling during start up (to warm up the car)
- Engine oil is more viscous on cold starts in the winter months, takes longer to return to its standard operating viscosity, and cools off faster after engine shut downs. Thicker oil = higher engine internal resistance = burns more fuel
- greater electrical loads in the winter
- different summer vs winter gas formulations

I've been tracking my gas usage on the few different cars I've had for the better part of 10 years, and the winter fuel economy is always worse than the summer months. With my current DD beater, I typically get a low 7.x litres/100km, doing close to 600km per tank in the summer months. In the winter, that number jumps up to a high 7.x litres/100km, with the per tank distance going just over 500km per tank, so that's a good 10-13% difference. For what it is worth, I only minimally idle my car regardless of the time of the year as I prefer to just drive conservatively until the engine warms up.

I'm sure there are other more sophisticated explanations to the worse winter gas mileage mystery. But I'm just an average Joe with an average intelligence, so unfortunately I can't tell you what those sophisticated reasons might be.
Traum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 11:25 AM   #43
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Gucci Mane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SRY
Posts: 2,632
Thanked 2,595 Times in 922 Posts
Failed 504 Times in 165 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by multicartual View Post
I floored it everywhere in my 135i and I still managed 13.5L/100KM
thats pretty shitty for a little car. i can get that mileage from my big heavy v8 f150 if i drive like an old man. with my driving style i get 16L/100km.
Gucci Mane is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-26-2013, 04:14 PM   #44
UFO
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmac View Post
My dad was considering a Dodge Dart as a commuter up until I showed him the EPA numbers (41 mpg highway) relative to Transport Canada (59 mpg highway).

It's fucking ridiculous how they can advertise these blatantly unrealistic numbers.
You also have to factor in imperial gallons vs. metric gallons. Imperial gallon is 3.8L, metric gallon is 4.5L.

Things are usually advertised in imperial gallons, but I've seen cases where metric gallon was used to get over the magical 50mpg
UFO is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-26-2013, 04:42 PM   #45
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 561
Thanked 250 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 24 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post

They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!)

So except for the very short period of initial warmup, I still don't understand. Maybe if your average journey is only 10 minutes or something.

I think a more likely explanation is that people drive more slowly in the winter. It has nothing to do with the car at all.
dirty cars don't have less drag. myth busters found out that a GOLF ball car with dimples have less drag than a car with a conventional smooth surface.

oil temperature doesn't rapidly get up to normal temperature in the winter, especially when its really cold. it takes my car about 10 minutes for my temperature gauge to reach normal in the winter vs maybe 5 minutes in the summer and that is only my water/coolant not my oil temperature; for oil temperature you're looking at an additional 10-15 more minutes! so essentially, assuming its cold and around 0 degrees, you're taking about 20-30 minutes to get your car up to optimum running standard in the winter! plus, don't forget your transmission fluid, differential fluid, grease...etc all adds up to making the car less efficient as there are more drag until it gets warmed up as well.

Last edited by 46_valentinor; 11-26-2013 at 04:53 PM.
46_valentinor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 04:47 PM   #46
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Jmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
You also have to factor in imperial gallons vs. metric gallons. Imperial gallon is 3.8L, metric gallon is 4.5L.

Things are usually advertised in imperial gallons, but I've seen cases where metric gallon was used to get over the magical 50mpg
The Metric measurements of volume are litres or cubic ____meters.

There is an imperial gallon, which is 4.546 litres and the US gallon, which is 3.785 litres.

That's also only a 20% difference, not a 44% difference.
Jmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 04:56 PM   #47
I don't get it
 
a00755836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Richmond
Posts: 417
Thanked 182 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 5 Posts
im not sure about now, but fuel consumption ratings get measured on a rolling road. so theres no wind resistance, or any traffic. if manufacturers do tests themselves, i bet they accelerate slower than james may.
a00755836 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 04:59 PM   #48
UFO
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmac View Post
The Metric measurements of volume are litres or cubic ____meters.

There is an imperial gallon, which is 4.546 litres and the US gallon, which is 3.785 litres.

That's also only a 20% difference, not a 44% difference.
Got my imperial/US/metric gallons mixed up, but you got my gist kind of.

I wasn't saying your Dart numbers were due to imperial vs. US gallon especially since fuel economy in Canada is officially reported in US gallons. But for marketing material, important to read the fine print.
UFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 05:27 PM   #49
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,542
Thanked 24,532 Times in 8,537 Posts
Failed 1,537 Times in 685 Posts
Assuming they work 9-5

Have to leave for work by 6:30.. that means wake up at 6:00 at the latest (if you skip breakfast and shower at night).. So if you want 8 hours of sleep, go to bed at 10:00

Get home at 7:30-8:00pm.. have dinner, take a shower, time for bed at 10:00

What a life!
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-26-2013, 05:36 PM   #50
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
Anyone wanting to know how the Canadian tests are run, this is a good read:

http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/oee.nrc...guide-2011.pdf

I'll highlight a couple important parts, though:

Quote:
The FTP is a standardized laboratory test method used in Canada that includes the use of standardized fuels, laboratories and testing equipment, test cycles and calculations. Selected test vehicles are “run in” for about 6000 km before testing.

A vehicle being tested is mounted on a two-wheel laboratory chassis dynamometer programmed to take into account the aerodynamic efficiency, weight and rolling resistance of the vehicle. A trained driver then runs it through simulated city and highway driving cycles.

All vehicles, including those with four-wheel (4X4) or all-wheel drive (AWD), are tested in two-wheel drive mode. However, tests are adjusted to reflect the increased weight and engine load using 4X4 and AWD systems.
Quote:
The city test simulates a 12-km, stop-and-go trip with an average speed of 32 km/hour (km/h) and a top speed of 91 km/h. The test runs for 23 minutes and includes 18 stops. About four minutes of test time are spent idling, to represent waiting at traffic lights. The test begins from a cold engine start, which is similar to starting a vehicle after it has been parked overnight during the summer. When the test is completed, the test cycle starts again with a hot engine start, and the first eight minutes of the test are repeated. This simulates restarting a vehicle after it has been warmed up, driven and then stopped for a short time.
Quote:
The highway test simulates a 16-km trip with an average speed of 77 km/h and a top speed of 97 km/h. The test runs for 13 minutes and does not include any stops. However, the speed varies to simulate different kinds of highway and rural roads. The test begins from a hot engine start


Yup. Sounds like real world tests to me.

Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net