REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2013, 06:22 PM   #51
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
^im actually amazed the test is that thorough. regardless of being on a dyno or real life.

i assumed they did something like put it on a dyno with no resistance and cruised at 60km/h and recorded the number. lol
Advertisement
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-26-2013, 06:48 PM   #52
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Fastam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.

So you can stick your facepalm up your ass.

Also, google isn't 'ask jeeves'. You don't ask it questions.



Modern fuel injected cars measure ambient air temperature. When temperature goes up, they increase the amount of fuel injected to richen the mixture and prevent detonation. So your car can run leaner in the cold.

That was my understanding, but I'm definitely open to hearing an explanation of why that might not be true.



They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!)

So except for the very short period of initial warmup, I still don't understand. Maybe if your average journey is only 10 minutes or something.

I think a more likely explanation is that people drive more slowly in the winter. It has nothing to do with the car at all.

Most new cars have the A/C compressor on when your defrost is on, which also turns on the rad fan, making it the warm up cycle a lot longer in winter.

My wifes versa gets 500km to a tank in summer and 400km in winter. We've had the car for 3 years and its the same every year.

As to the article 7.9l/per 100km is actually pretty good. As mentioned elsewhere the rating system is set by transport Canada, you can't blame the manufacturers for useing goverment tests. BTW my wifes versa doesn't get anywhere near the Canadian rating, but bang on the US rating.
Fastam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 11:21 PM   #53
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
GotRice?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 604 area
Posts: 1,016
Thanked 250 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 15 Posts
stupid people... calgary is around 1,084 m (3,557 ft) above sea level so less air... and its really cold in winter, and really hot in the summer... plus fuel economy also depends on the driving style, and how well you maintain your car... maybe they drive like a douchebag... i don't get y they are b!tching anyways, since their gas is so much cheaper...
__________________
------------------------------------
06 GSE21
03 B15U Spec V -sold-
95 AE101L -sold-
GotRice? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 03:48 AM   #54
Banned By Establishment
 
Iceman-19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
I still don't get why Splinter is adamant that multiple people are wrong on the same subject. Unless you are trolling. Otherwise, stahp.
Iceman-19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 02:39 PM   #55
straight from the fields of squamton
 
1990TSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 11,286
Thanked 576 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 305 Times in 63 Posts
I had a cruze with a 1.4l. it even had the eco package with the crazy transmission. it was rated at 4.5l/100

Best I ever saw, which was fuel computer reset at the midpoint of the ironworkers bridge, out to hope, at the speed limit was 5.2l/100. That car was so unrealistic it wasn't funny. I'd be lucky to get 7l/100 on the sea to sky! While i honestly wasn't expecting to get 4.5 on the sea to sky, it was upsetting

then the engine blew up at 24k kms and i traded it in for a speed 3

The speed3 is rated at 8l/100 highway, and I can consistanly get lower numbers than that. I can get better numbers than the cruze did on the sea to sky!!


so why was the cruze rated soooo far under my normal average, and the speed 3 is almost always better than rated????
__________________
2013 Mazdaspeed 3
1990TSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 03:47 PM   #56
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman-19 View Post
I still don't get why Splinter is adamant that multiple people are wrong on the same subject. Unless you are trolling. Otherwise, stahp.
Because no one has actually explained it yet.

It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.

I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 05:51 PM   #57
Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
 
Zedbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
That Google thing - CRAZY. I didn't even type in a question **mind blown**....is the US Department of Energy credible enough, or is this another "incorrect source" for you?

Many Factors Affect MPG
Zedbra is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 06:10 PM   #58
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Fastam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1990TSI View Post
I had a cruze with a 1.4l. it even had the eco package with the crazy transmission. it was rated at 4.5l/100

Best I ever saw, which was fuel computer reset at the midpoint of the ironworkers bridge, out to hope, at the speed limit was 5.2l/100. That car was so unrealistic it wasn't funny. I'd be lucky to get 7l/100 on the sea to sky! While i honestly wasn't expecting to get 4.5 on the sea to sky, it was upsetting

then the engine blew up at 24k kms and i traded it in for a speed 3

The speed3 is rated at 8l/100 highway, and I can consistanly get lower numbers than that. I can get better numbers than the cruze did on the sea to sky!!


so why was the cruze rated soooo far under my normal average, and the speed 3 is almost always better than rated????

The us gov data, which is bang on accurate for all 3 of my cars, dissagrees with you. So does the consumer reported data.
Compare Side-by-Side
Fastam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 06:13 PM   #59
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedbra View Post
That Google thing - CRAZY. I didn't even type in a question **mind blown**....is the US Department of Energy credible enough, or is this another "incorrect source" for you?

Many Factors Affect MPG
Is it really necessary to be such a sarcastic piece of shit or can you converse like a normal human being?

I don't get why you're 'coming at me'. I said something which may have been incorrect, people offered different opinions, I asked for something to back it up so I could understand it.

No need to act the way you are.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 06:34 PM   #60
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Fastam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Because no one has actually explained it yet.

It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.

I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious.


I can elaborate on my above post.Even the owners manual on my versa says it will get worse millage in winter time. This is because of several factors, when the defrost is on the A/C compressor is always on. As the A/C dries the air while heating it, creating parastitic loss. In order to run the A/C the rad fan comes on, so its always pulling extremely cool air (compared to summer) it takes far longer to reach operating temp, up to 5-6 min of driving. ECUs add fuel to bring a car up to operating temp. If you've ever had a car with a bad coolant temp sensor you'd get horrible fuel millage all the time as the ECU defauts into warm up mode if the temp reads to low or not at all.

I have a data logger on my BMW that shows the exact coolant temp in winter its always 15-20 degrees colder. My IATs are are 20-30 degrees cooler in winter. The logger shows the ECU adding fuel and timming, consequently the car makes more power in winter , but its worse on fuel, to the tune of about 3 mpgs on average.

Gasoline engines have poor thermal efficiency, much of the heat they produce is lost and not used to produce work, the colder it is, the less efficient they are.

If my explanstions aren't enough. Read this.
Why is the fuel economy of an automobile worse in the winter than in the summer?: Scientific American

Last edited by Fastam; 11-27-2013 at 06:52 PM.
Fastam is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-27-2013, 06:42 PM   #61
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Intelligent, insightful, well written and polite.

Thank you, sir.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 06:46 PM   #62
#deephouse
 
knight604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,194
Thanked 4,704 Times in 1,243 Posts
Failed 469 Times in 123 Posts
"You SPEND $7,250 more in fuel costs over 5 years compared to the average new vehicle"

fuck hah.....
__________________
/// x AMG
knight604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 06:48 PM   #63
Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
 
Zedbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Is it really necessary to be such a sarcastic piece of shit or can you converse like a normal human being?

I don't get why you're 'coming at me'. I said something which may have been incorrect, people offered different opinions, I asked for something to back it up so I could understand it.

No need to act the way you are.
I suggest Google - hundreds of links to answer your exact question, you swear at me in two different posts, and I'm not conversing like a human in your eyes. Sorry you took a simple post the wrong way.

Not coming at you, I just don't act like you.
Zedbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 06:51 PM   #64
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedbra View Post
I suggest Google - hundreds of links to answer your exact question, you swear at me in two different posts, and I'm not conversing like a human in your eyes. Sorry you took a simple post the wrong way.

Not coming at you, I just don't act like you.
You suggested it in an extremely rude fashion.

Anyway, whatever it doesn't matter.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill

Last edited by Splinter; 11-27-2013 at 06:57 PM.
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 07:34 PM   #65
Banned By Establishment
 
Iceman-19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Because no one has actually explained it yet.

It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.

I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious.
3 different people explained it. You claim they are all wrong. That is quite possibly the stupidest reasoning for not accepting you are wrong, that I have ever heard, and I have read a lot of Timpo posts.
Iceman-19 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 07:37 PM   #66
Banned By Establishment
 
Iceman-19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
You suggested it in an extremely rude fashion.

Anyway, whatever it doesn't matter.
HAHAHAHAHAHA. Pull your wet fucking panties out of your goddamn back pussy. Jesus fuck woman.
Iceman-19 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 08:25 PM   #67
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Splinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman-19 View Post
3 different people explained it. You claim they are all wrong. That is quite possibly the stupidest reasoning for not accepting you are wrong, that I have ever heard, and I have read a lot of Timpo posts.
I did accept that I was wrong, when someone explained it properly with a credible source.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by DLC
Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill
Splinter is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 11-27-2013, 09:30 PM   #68
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Because no one has actually explained it yet.

I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious.
so you say no one has explained anything.

i posted this a page back:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
gas has different mixtures in the summer and winter. winter gas contains more butane which contains less energy so you burn more

engines are made to run best at normal operating temp and burn more fuel when cold

even things as simple as oils are significantly thicker when they are cold (engine, tranny, difs, grease in bearings)

AC running when your windshield defroster is on

Simply having to push thru slush and snow


plus all the way smaller reasons like colder air being denser, dirty car having more air drag, etc
you refuted or simply argued (incorrectly or otherwise) all of my points except the first one which you apparently didn't look on google

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.

They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!)
You say everyone's opinion is invalid because it it just their opinion, then you turn around and say things like

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter View Post
Can you explain that? It goes against everything I know about engines.
and
Quote:
That was my understanding,
So maybe your 'understanding and 'everything [you] know about engines', was, infact, incorrect.
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net