Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
11-26-2013, 06:22 PM
|
#51 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
|
^im actually amazed the test is that thorough. regardless of being on a dyno or real life.
i assumed they did something like put it on a dyno with no resistance and cruised at 60km/h and recorded the number. lol
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| |
11-26-2013, 06:48 PM
|
#52 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.
So you can stick your facepalm up your ass.
Also, google isn't 'ask jeeves'. You don't ask it questions.
Modern fuel injected cars measure ambient air temperature. When temperature goes up, they increase the amount of fuel injected to richen the mixture and prevent detonation. So your car can run leaner in the cold.
That was my understanding, but I'm definitely open to hearing an explanation of why that might not be true.
They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!)
So except for the very short period of initial warmup, I still don't understand. Maybe if your average journey is only 10 minutes or something.
I think a more likely explanation is that people drive more slowly in the winter. It has nothing to do with the car at all. |
Most new cars have the A/C compressor on when your defrost is on, which also turns on the rad fan, making it the warm up cycle a lot longer in winter.
My wifes versa gets 500km to a tank in summer and 400km in winter. We've had the car for 3 years and its the same every year.
As to the article 7.9l/per 100km is actually pretty good. As mentioned elsewhere the rating system is set by transport Canada, you can't blame the manufacturers for useing goverment tests. BTW my wifes versa doesn't get anywhere near the Canadian rating, but bang on the US rating.
|
| |
11-26-2013, 11:21 PM
|
#53 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: 604 area
Posts: 1,016
Thanked 250 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 15 Posts
|
stupid people... calgary is around 1,084 m (3,557 ft) above sea level so less air... and its really cold in winter, and really hot in the summer... plus fuel economy also depends on the driving style, and how well you maintain your car... maybe they drive like a douchebag... i don't get y they are b!tching anyways, since their gas is so much cheaper...
__________________
------------------------------------
06 GSE21
03 B15U Spec V -sold-
95 AE101L -sold-
|
| |
11-27-2013, 03:48 AM
|
#54 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
|
I still don't get why Splinter is adamant that multiple people are wrong on the same subject. Unless you are trolling. Otherwise, stahp.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 02:39 PM
|
#55 | straight from the fields of squamton
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 11,286
Thanked 576 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 305 Times in 63 Posts
|
I had a cruze with a 1.4l. it even had the eco package with the crazy transmission. it was rated at 4.5l/100
Best I ever saw, which was fuel computer reset at the midpoint of the ironworkers bridge, out to hope, at the speed limit was 5.2l/100. That car was so unrealistic it wasn't funny. I'd be lucky to get 7l/100 on the sea to sky! While i honestly wasn't expecting to get 4.5 on the sea to sky, it was upsetting
then the engine blew up at 24k kms and i traded it in for a speed 3
The speed3 is rated at 8l/100 highway, and I can consistanly get lower numbers than that. I can get better numbers than the cruze did on the sea to sky!!
so why was the cruze rated soooo far under my normal average, and the speed 3 is almost always better than rated????
__________________
2013 Mazdaspeed 3
|
| |
11-27-2013, 03:47 PM
|
#56 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman-19 I still don't get why Splinter is adamant that multiple people are wrong on the same subject. Unless you are trolling. Otherwise, stahp. | Because no one has actually explained it yet.
It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.
I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | |
| |
11-27-2013, 05:51 PM
|
#57 | Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
|
That Google thing - CRAZY. I didn't even type in a question **mind blown**....is the US Department of Energy credible enough, or is this another "incorrect source" for you? Many Factors Affect MPG |
| |
11-27-2013, 06:10 PM
|
#58 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 1990TSI I had a cruze with a 1.4l. it even had the eco package with the crazy transmission. it was rated at 4.5l/100
Best I ever saw, which was fuel computer reset at the midpoint of the ironworkers bridge, out to hope, at the speed limit was 5.2l/100. That car was so unrealistic it wasn't funny. I'd be lucky to get 7l/100 on the sea to sky! While i honestly wasn't expecting to get 4.5 on the sea to sky, it was upsetting
then the engine blew up at 24k kms and i traded it in for a speed 3
The speed3 is rated at 8l/100 highway, and I can consistanly get lower numbers than that. I can get better numbers than the cruze did on the sea to sky!!
so why was the cruze rated soooo far under my normal average, and the speed 3 is almost always better than rated???? |
The us gov data, which is bang on accurate for all 3 of my cars, dissagrees with you. So does the consumer reported data. Compare Side-by-Side |
| |
11-27-2013, 06:13 PM
|
#59 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedbra That Google thing - CRAZY. I didn't even type in a question **mind blown**....is the US Department of Energy credible enough, or is this another "incorrect source" for you? Many Factors Affect MPG | Is it really necessary to be such a sarcastic piece of shit or can you converse like a normal human being?
I don't get why you're 'coming at me'. I said something which may have been incorrect, people offered different opinions, I asked for something to back it up so I could understand it.
No need to act the way you are.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | |
| |
11-27-2013, 06:34 PM
|
#60 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dumbmestic vile
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Because no one has actually explained it yet.
It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.
I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious. |
I can elaborate on my above post.Even the owners manual on my versa says it will get worse millage in winter time. This is because of several factors, when the defrost is on the A/C compressor is always on. As the A/C dries the air while heating it, creating parastitic loss. In order to run the A/C the rad fan comes on, so its always pulling extremely cool air (compared to summer) it takes far longer to reach operating temp, up to 5-6 min of driving. ECUs add fuel to bring a car up to operating temp. If you've ever had a car with a bad coolant temp sensor you'd get horrible fuel millage all the time as the ECU defauts into warm up mode if the temp reads to low or not at all.
I have a data logger on my BMW that shows the exact coolant temp in winter its always 15-20 degrees colder. My IATs are are 20-30 degrees cooler in winter. The logger shows the ECU adding fuel and timming, consequently the car makes more power in winter , but its worse on fuel, to the tune of about 3 mpgs on average.
Gasoline engines have poor thermal efficiency, much of the heat they produce is lost and not used to produce work, the colder it is, the less efficient they are.
If my explanstions aren't enough. Read this. Why is the fuel economy of an automobile worse in the winter than in the summer?: Scientific American
Last edited by Fastam; 11-27-2013 at 06:52 PM.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 06:42 PM
|
#61 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
|
Intelligent, insightful, well written and polite.
Thank you, sir.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | |
| |
11-27-2013, 06:46 PM
|
#62 | #deephouse
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,194
Thanked 4,704 Times in 1,243 Posts
Failed 469 Times in 123 Posts
|
"You SPEND $7,250 more in fuel costs over 5 years compared to the average new vehicle"
fuck hah.....
__________________ /// x AMG |
| |
11-27-2013, 06:48 PM
|
#63 | Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Is it really necessary to be such a sarcastic piece of shit or can you converse like a normal human being?
I don't get why you're 'coming at me'. I said something which may have been incorrect, people offered different opinions, I asked for something to back it up so I could understand it.
No need to act the way you are. | I suggest Google - hundreds of links to answer your exact question, you swear at me in two different posts, and I'm not conversing like a human in your eyes. Sorry you took a simple post the wrong way.
Not coming at you, I just don't act like you.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 06:51 PM
|
#64 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedbra I suggest Google - hundreds of links to answer your exact question, you swear at me in two different posts, and I'm not conversing like a human in your eyes. Sorry you took a simple post the wrong way.
Not coming at you, I just don't act like you. | You suggested it in an extremely rude fashion.
Anyway, whatever it doesn't matter.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill |
Last edited by Splinter; 11-27-2013 at 06:57 PM.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 07:34 PM
|
#65 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Because no one has actually explained it yet.
It doesn't matter if 50 people say the same thing, if they all heard it from the same incorrect source.
I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious. | 3 different people explained it. You claim they are all wrong. That is quite possibly the stupidest reasoning for not accepting you are wrong, that I have ever heard, and I have read a lot of Timpo posts.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 07:37 PM
|
#66 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter You suggested it in an extremely rude fashion.
Anyway, whatever it doesn't matter. | HAHAHAHAHAHA. Pull your wet fucking panties out of your goddamn back pussy. Jesus fuck woman.
|
| |
11-27-2013, 08:25 PM
|
#67 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 2,863
Thanked 208 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman-19 3 different people explained it. You claim they are all wrong. That is quite possibly the stupidest reasoning for not accepting you are wrong, that I have ever heard, and I have read a lot of Timpo posts. | I did accept that I was wrong, when someone explained it properly with a credible source.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DLC Subarus sound like a 50-gallon drum full of rubber balls, rolling down a hill | |
| |
11-27-2013, 09:30 PM
|
#68 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Because no one has actually explained it yet.
I'm not saying they're wrong, I just want to hear an explanation. I'm genuinely curious. | so you say no one has explained anything.
i posted this a page back: Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar gas has different mixtures in the summer and winter. winter gas contains more butane which contains less energy so you burn more
engines are made to run best at normal operating temp and burn more fuel when cold
even things as simple as oils are significantly thicker when they are cold (engine, tranny, difs, grease in bearings)
AC running when your windshield defroster is on
Simply having to push thru slush and snow
plus all the way smaller reasons like colder air being denser, dirty car having more air drag, etc | you refuted or simply argued (incorrectly or otherwise) all of my points except the first one which you apparently didn't look on google Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Great, a bunch of people repeating stuff they heard from each other, same as what I'm seeing on here. That's why I asked, because I DID look on google and I couldn't find anything credible.
They use less fuel when cold (after the initial startup)
Oil temperature rapidly gets up to normal temperature
AC runs in the summer too
It's not always snowing when its cold
Dirty cars have less drag (mythbusters!) | You say everyone's opinion is invalid because it it just their opinion, then you turn around and say things like Quote:
Originally Posted by Splinter Can you explain that? It goes against everything I know about engines. | and Quote:
That was my understanding,
| So maybe your 'understanding and 'everything [you] know about engines', was, infact, incorrect.
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 AM. |