You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
oh what the shit Boxster is just an entry level Porsche, or poor man's 911, no matter how you wanna look at it.
I'd rather have a Lotus Elise for much less money.
If you want to go that route, the GTR is an overpriced Datsun.
Just depends how you look at it.
Don't get me wrong, the R35 is an immensely well designed vehicle and it is fast as hell. But after driving two different ones, I still have to say that it's not exciting to drive in the slightest. There's no sensation of speed or drama or anything that would give it some sort of character. At least in a Boxster or most other sports cars, you get something to make you feel like you're actually driving the car, instead of you being driven by it.
I am actually with Timpo on this, if you want to play that "I want to FEEL the car" game, or you want to give me the "I want a manual, I want to DRIVE the car" story.
Then I say thats cool, but if you still say you are going to pick a Cockster after that I will laugh you into next year. There are countless better cars within the same bracket, and even in a much lower bracket (here's looking at you FR-S).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomac
the GTR is an overpriced Datsun.
Don't get started there... Because we all know the GTR, is not a nissan or a Datsun. ITS A GTR.
And furthur to that point, there is not one among us who wouldn't own a nice 510 or 240z.
Whereas I don't know how many of us would willingly own this:
I am actually with Timpo on this, if you want to play that "I want to FEEL the car" game, or you want to give me the "I want a manual, I want to DRIVE the car" story.
Then I say thats cool, but if you still say you are going to pick a Cockster after that I will laugh you into next year. There are countless better cars within the same bracket, and even in a much lower bracket (here's looking at you FR-S).
Don't get started there... Because we all know the GTR, is not a nissan or a Datsun. ITS A GTR.
And furthur to that point, there is not one among us who wouldn't own a nice 510 or 240z.
Whereas I don't know how many of us would willingly own this:
Boxster and Audi TT will both depreciate so hard every year, even worse when the new models come out because they'll be outdated.
Whereas 240Z and 510 you wouldn't have to worry about that.
Also 240Z and 510 are a lot lighter, more simple, there are more fun factors, moreover you can do your own maintenance and upgrades.
it's funny how people disregard some cars just because how they might be associated with blonde trophy wives or cocky people driving them.
Boxster is a very pleasant car to drive on twisty roads. it's mid engine therefore it's better balanced than a 911, yes it doesn't have a lot of power, but the amazing handling makes up for that.
There's a reason Porsche is not giving Cayman and Boxster bigger engines/more power than 911. they will outperform the 911s.
GTR is stupid fast. I have driven them. They will get you in trouble quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meme405
I
Whereas I don't know how many of us would willingly own this:
the new Boxster was in debate, I don't know why you're bringing a picture from a 10 year old Boxster. Those go for much less now, around 20K for a clean car. great fun car for that amount of money.
Boxster and Audi TT will both depreciate so hard every year, even worse when the new models come out because they'll be outdated.
Whereas 240Z and 510 you wouldn't have to worry about that.
Also 240Z and 510 are a lot lighter, more simple, there are more fun factors, moreover you can do your own maintenance and upgrades.
great job comparing Japanese classics from 70's to modern German sportscar. you're lost my friend.
But there needs to be some standard. It that screen breaks in 10 years what are you going to do? My dads 03 ML 500 had to have the head unit replaced and that was a pain in the ass and that was a standard double din. This is going to zero after market support so you are going to have to get a replacement from the wrecker or pay an arm and a leg at the dealer. I'm thinking 2 to 3k or more pluce the install.
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
But there needs to be some standard. It that screen breaks in 10 years what are you going to do? My dads 03 ML 500 had to have the head unit replaced and that was a pain in the ass and that was a standard double din. This is going to zero after market support so you are going to have to get a replacement from the wrecker or pay an arm and a leg at the dealer. I'm thinking 2 to 3k or more pluce the install.
I am sure engineers and executives have discussed about that prior to the debt of new TT and figured out that the screen will be fine within warranty period.
I don't know how reliable or unreliable screens can be.
Just think about your TV, cell phone, computer, ipod, ipad, GPS, screens are everywhere and I don't have a problem with them unless they're 20+ years old.
Heck, even fighter jets and commercial aircrafts have glass cockpit, which presumably need a lot more reliable equipment than cars.
(Yes, I know they tend to put analogue altimeter and ASI as well just incase, but still...)
I've had some issues before when I bought some shady eBay products from China but that was that.
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,764
Thanked 32,647 Times in 7,618 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 162 Posts
I'd prefer a cayman, but still dig the boxster as far as soft tops go. On topic of the new TT though, it seems like the only forward movement they made was on the interior. The exterior already looks dated before its even released. Also there aren't many cars that have aged as terribly as the mk1 TT so this is pretty expected I guess.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 163
Thanked 117 Times in 46 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo
oh fuck who cares it's just another Audi TT...just like Porsche Boxster, it'll always be a nice little sporty German car but nothing overly exciting.
It seems that as of fiscal year 2013, well over half a million people care.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo
oh what the shit Boxster is just an entry level Porsche, or poor man's 911, no matter how you wanna look at it.
I'd rather have a Lotus Elise for much less money
What an idiotic statement and comparison. That's like saying the gold is the poor man's platinum, and that you'd rather have man-made diamonds for less money.
The reason any type of car (continues to) exists is because market behaviour has determined that it fulfills particular consumer needs. We're all free to like/dislike any car, yet it seems reason is a saviour you've yet to find.
Others wonder if you're trolling us, but I think you're just an ignorant buffoon who doesn't think through his statements properly before making them.
For what it's worth, I'd take a 4C over all of the comparable cars mentioned in this thread.
__________________
2007 Dodge Charger
1981 Pontiac Trans Am
----
1989 BMW 525i
2004 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
2006 Mazda 3
2008 Jeep Liberty
2003 Infiniti G35
1995 Eagle Talon
1984 Chevrolet Corvette
1981 Pontiac Trans Am
1992 BMW 535i
Then I say thats cool, but if you still say you are going to pick a Cockster after that I will laugh you into next year. There are countless better cars within the same bracket, and even in a much lower bracket (here's looking at you FR-S).
Whereas I don't know how many of us would willingly own this:
The FRS is a great car, and so are the other ones I listed. Put it this way. You could buy a condo in Yaletown or Gas town. Both are cool in their own ways. One is generally owned by an older crowd, maybe a little stuck up, and plenty of blonde headed bimbo's have them. The other is still cool, it's new (In regards to being transitionary), lots of young people own them. They both accomplish the same thing, one area is just a bit nicer then the other. There lies the price difference. Whats your point?
Different strokes for different folks. I was commenting on Timpo's post, and he automatically throws out the Boxster as a decent car and probably it's manlier more athletic twin brother the Cayman too because it's not the highest end sports car they make. You might as well never own a car if you go by his theory. There is always going to be something better.
The new Boxster is gorgeous. I never liked the old one. Love the new Cayman even more. The TT has it's role too. So what if it's basically an A3 quattro with a cool body. It's still a decent car.
I went up to a cute chick and asked her if she'd let me take a photo of her for $30 she slapped me, she said to me that "I AIN'T A WHORE!"
But other than that I have seen every car on display in DTP just by cruising about in Richmond, thank you very much for collecting them together and get someone to sing a cover for "fuck you".
OH FUCK YOU OH OH OOOOH~
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neva
wtf man? what the hell kind of women do you go for? spca is for animals not dates...