Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
03-17-2014, 11:22 PM
|
#651 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Surrey budz
Posts: 193
Thanked 318 Times in 78 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 22 Posts
|
This whole situation is a good example of conspiracy theorist logic.
The Indian Ocean is thousands of square km big and happens to have an island with a US airbase on it with 100's of natives and im assuming dozens of regular military guys with the basic security clearance(cooks, maintenance, etc.).
Conclusion: The evil US took the plane there for no reason.
|
| |
03-18-2014, 11:36 AM
|
#652 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,556
Thanked 541 Times in 301 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 23 Posts
| |
| |
03-18-2014, 11:42 AM
|
#653 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ntran604 | Was just about to post that myself. Scary thing about it is, it actually makes about 1000 times more sense than anything else we've heard so far.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
03-18-2014, 01:15 PM
|
#654 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,556
Thanked 541 Times in 301 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 23 Posts
|
from a pilots point of view.. since they actually know what to do in that kind of situation\
why didnt anybody think of that since day 1?!?!?!
CNN brainwashed me into thinking it was hijacked
|
| |
03-18-2014, 01:19 PM
|
#655 | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: None
Posts: 3,135
Thanked 667 Times in 265 Posts
Failed 86 Times in 39 Posts
|
^Might have missed it but have they checked that place yet?
|
| |
03-18-2014, 01:49 PM
|
#657 | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,719
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
|
for those of you hating on the theorists...
you guys do know that theories are what people have to come up with so they can start looking in some direction.
|
| |
03-18-2014, 01:53 PM
|
#658 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Surrey budz
Posts: 193
Thanked 318 Times in 78 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 22 Posts
|
True, those are theoriest. Conspiracy Theories are what people with no expertise or knowledge come up with so they can fulfill their juvenile fantasies of feeling like knowing more than the general population, they can always be debunked but conspiracy theorist have alot of time on their hands and can quickly point something else out and pull random shit out of their ass..
|
| |
03-18-2014, 03:17 PM
|
#659 | y'all better put some respeck on my name
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,394
Thanked 9,449 Times in 2,432 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
|
Not sure what to think of this; Quote:
The global hunt for the missing Malaysia Airlines flight has shifted to a tiny island in the Maldives, where residents spotted a “low flying jumbo jet” hours after the aircraft disappeared.
Several witnesses in Dhaalu Atoll saw a plane heading south that bore the red stripe and white background of Malaysia Airlines planes.
The sightings, reported by a local news outlet, would have occurred more than seven hours after the plane, carrying 12 crew and 227 mainly Chinese passengers, lost contact with air traffic control and took its sudden westward turn during a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in the early hours of Saturday March 8.
“I’ve never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We’ve seen seaplanes, but I’m sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly,” said an witness.
“It’s not just me either, several other residents have reported seeing the exact same thing. Some people got out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise too.” The chances of another aircraft of that size flying over the island at the time were, according to Maldives sources, very low.
Though authorities are yet to confirm the sighting, the plane’s pilot, Captain Zaharie Shah, is believed to have practised landing at Male International Airport in the Maldives on a three-screen flight simulator at his home. The machine has been seized by police.
A report in a Malay language newspaper, Berita Harian, claimed Capt Zaharie also practised at three airports in India and Sri Lanka and a runway at the US military base on Diego Garcia.
Police would not confirm the details about the flight simulator.
However, Peter Chong, a friend of the pilot, insisted that there was nothing suspicious about the simulator and that Capt Zaharie invited many of his friends to use it. “He was not hiding it, he was open about it,” Mr Chong said. “He loves flying. He wanted to share the joy of flying with his friends.”
Capt Zaharie, a 53-year-old father of three, and his co-pilot, Fariq Abdul Hamid, a 27-year-old who was planning to marry his 26-year-old pilot girlfriend, Nadira Ramli, have been described by friends and family as flying enthusiasts who had no known links to extremism or psychological problems.
Authorities in Malaysia have confirmed that they believe the flight was deliberately interfered with and that its communications system intentionally disabled before the plane flew “invisible” for a further seven to eight hours.
They believe the plane’s sharp turn 40 minutes into the flight and the disabling of the communications system suggest an experienced pilot was in control. But the lack of any motive — and the disappearance of the plane — has left authorities increasingly mystified during a search that has lasted more than 11 days. As Malaysia appealed to countries in the two major search areas to share surveillance data, vital information emerged from Thai air force radars yesterday that revealed clues about the aircraft’s wayward path.
In what was a further example of the secrecy surrounding the investigation, Thailand’s air force said it detected a plane believed to be the missing MH370 flight, seven minutes after the plane’s transponder was turned off at 1.21am.
In a series of inexplicable movements, the flight reportedly headed back towards Kuala Lumpur, then turned right towards the Strait of Malacca — a sequence that corresponds with data captured by the Malaysian military.
Thailand’s Air Vice Marshal Montol Suchookorn said the plane did not enter Thai airspace, and that the data was not released until now because “we did not pay any attention to it”.
China has increased its involvement and yesterday revealed that the 154 Chinese passengers aboard the flight had been cleared of “destructive behaviour”.
Huang Huikang, China’s ambassador to Malaysia, also told a briefing of the Chinese media that Interpol had cleared two Iranians aboard the flight who were travelling on false passports. This left 83 passengers as feasible suspects, including 10 crew members plus two pilots.
A further complication in the search for the plane is that the signals or “pings” from the black box – sent at a certain frequency, and only traceable within a certain distance – will only be sent for a month.
The Daily Telegraph learnt yesterday that the aircraft could have been located if Malaysia Airlines had paid just $10 (£6) for additional satellite information.
The airline, along with several international carriers, opted to transmit only minimal information rather than pay an additional small fee to transmit detailed flight data. “For 10 dollars, you could have told within half an hour’s flying time where the plane would have gone,” a source said. MH370: Maldives Islanders claim to have spotted 'low flying jet? - Telegraph | |
| |
03-18-2014, 03:29 PM
|
#660 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Y
Posts: 1,604
Thanked 1,399 Times in 396 Posts
Failed 147 Times in 59 Posts
|
^ take it with a HUGEEE gain of salt.
At this rate, sooner or later...someone from Vancouver Island going to chime in and say they spotted a low flying jet too |
| |
03-18-2014, 03:42 PM
|
#661 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,489
Thanked 1,458 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 9 Posts
|
NBC News: Flight 370 was programmed to turn away from flight to Beijing at least 12 minutes before co-pilot signed off, sources say
|
| |
03-18-2014, 03:54 PM
|
#662 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by G ^Might have missed it but have they checked that place yet? | Did you not read this pilot's actual theory?
He figures that the pilots probably set the plane on a course for Palau Langkawi airport before being disabled by a fire... if that happened, the plane wouldn't have landed, but kept on going until ran out of fuel and ditched. If that's the case, "that place" is still a wedge of mostly ocean several thousand kilometers long and expanding to dozens if not hundreds of kilometers wide - it's still a MASSIVE area to search.
And, if you follow a line from approximately where last contact was, past Langkawi, and keep going for, say, 7 hours' flying time, you end up in the general vicinity of: Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Disick Not sure what to think of this; | Right. Dhaalu Atoll. Not PRECISELY... but if you figure the plane wasn't on autopilot, and wasn't under anyone's control, but just kept flying straight ahead in the general direction it was pointed... then it's not inconceivable.
The only thing that doesn't track with me on this theory (I didn't read the Reddit thread, I don't know if they mentioned it), is that the plane would have probably passed pretty close to Langkawi's air corridor, and over the tip of North Sumatra, and would have HAD to be picked up on SOMEONE'S RADAR along the way as a large unidentified blip. It couldn't have been under the RADAR, because at that low altitude, it wouldn't have had anywhere near the range it would at normal cruise.
Anyway, that aside, it sounds like a logical, reasonable explanation of what could have happened... which is more than one can say about most other theories.
Occam's Razor cuts deep...
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" |
Last edited by Soundy; 03-18-2014 at 03:59 PM.
|
| |
03-18-2014, 03:58 PM
|
#663 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
Never mind, guys... mystery solved.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
03-18-2014, 04:14 PM
|
#664 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 62 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Disick Not sure what to think of this; |
Interesting piece of reporting right there...
“I’ve never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We’ve seen seaplanes, but I’m sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly,” said a witness.
one of the residents claims that the plane was so low they could make out the doors... wouldn't the next logical question be "Did you see any writing on the side of the plane?"
I mean if they could see the plane was very low, they could see if it said "Malaysian Airlines" on it... instead the reporter chooses to move on to the next topic... if the witness confirmed they saw "Malaysian Airlines" on the side of the plane, it would make the story a lot more believable.
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap
A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
|
| |
03-18-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#665 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,798
Thanked 91 Times in 34 Posts
Failed 200 Times in 21 Posts
|
off topic. but
any one know what car is behind the first officer's home? https://www.scmp.com/sites/default/f...4/03/16/31.jpg
edit: one is maybe Nissan Qashqai
whats the other one?
|
| |
03-18-2014, 04:47 PM
|
#666 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,524
Thanked 1,469 Times in 516 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by valent|n0 | Looks like a Subaru Legacy
|
| |
03-18-2014, 05:18 PM
|
#667 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive Interesting piece of reporting right there...
“I’ve never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We’ve seen seaplanes, but I’m sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly,” said a witness.
one of the residents claims that the plane was so low they could make out the doors... wouldn't the next logical question be "Did you see any writing on the side of the plane?"
I mean if they could see the plane was very low, they could see if it said "Malaysian Airlines" on it... instead the reporter chooses to move on to the next topic... if the witness confirmed they saw "Malaysian Airlines" on the side of the plane, it would make the story a lot more believable. | Airline names tend to be well above the window line on the fuselage.
If you're more-or-less under a plane, you won't see the name. You'll see the logo on the tail, maybe call letters on the belly, but not the name.
Yes, I realize this is a distant high-altitude shot and you can't make out the doors... from this ANGLE, you also can't see the name of the airline.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
03-18-2014, 10:48 PM
|
#668 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
03-18-2014, 11:13 PM
|
#669 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,697
Thanked 9,388 Times in 4,088 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
|
Considering we know that India doesn't always have its radar on, and Malaysia barely pay attention to theirs, I don't think we can safely say " someone should have seen it on radar if..." for any scenario. Quote:
Originally Posted by ntran604 | Except they last tracked it flying north-ish, off the west coast. And if it's on fire, it can't fly for hours and hours. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Disick According to US officials the Malaysians haven't been handy over critical data which can assist in the search for the plane. One theory is the Malaysians are worried about jeopardizing their own national security which I guess is a valid concern because I can't see the US handing over data if it could jeopardized their national security. Also the US navy has pulled out one of their ships and put it back into normal service. | The funny thing is they said they would put national security second to find the plane. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Disick Not sure what to think of this; | Article sounds about as flakey as the oil rig worker. In neither case did anyone bother to mention what time this happened at.
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: | |
| |
03-18-2014, 11:50 PM
|
#670 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
|
The sad thing is, plane will probably never be found unless it comes back for a terrorist attack (I hope not)
If it were hijacked for the engineers / valuable cargo, the plane will never be found as the peepz prob completely incinerated every part of the jet by now
|
| |
03-19-2014, 01:24 AM
|
#671 | y'all better put some respeck on my name
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,394
Thanked 9,449 Times in 2,432 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
|
I was watching CNN and it sounds like they're FINALLY shifting their stories from the conspiracy nonsense they've been spewing for the past few days and focusing more on scenarios that make more logical sense like a possible fire or some sort of other emergency which took down this plane.
They also spoke with a former TWA pilot who said he's pretty certain that it was a fire that took the plane down and said from what he's read the pilots seem like stand up guys and he suspects the pilots (if proven) will be hero's because in his eyes they were attempting to turn back and find a airport to land at due to a serious emergency on board.
I hope for the sake of the families they find this plane.
|
| |
03-19-2014, 09:25 AM
|
#672 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,697
Thanked 9,388 Times in 4,088 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
|
I'll say it again. Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore If it's on fire, it can't fly for hours and hours. | If they had a fire severe enough to shut down these systems then the plane couldn't have flown off until it ran out of gas.
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: | |
| |
03-19-2014, 10:40 AM
|
#673 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore I'll say it again.
If they had a fire severe enough to shut down these systems then the plane couldn't have flown off until it ran out of gas. | They could if the climb to thin air extinguished it.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
03-19-2014, 10:47 AM
|
#674 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,398
Thanked 235 Times in 78 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 10 Posts
|
I read somewhere that the pilots may have tried to fly up to 45,000 feet for thin air to try to extinguish the fire which didn't work so subsequently they tried to do a dive to take out the fire if there was indeed a fire? Also, the plane may have been set on autopilot before the pilots were rendered unconscious therefore the plane just kept flying until fuel ran out
__________________
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Miss_Girly
Bring some RS people with you to help u GANG BANG the guy!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |
03-19-2014, 11:00 AM
|
#675 | Zionism gets my shell hard and slimy
Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: in a shell
Posts: 2,598
Thanked 6,021 Times in 1,129 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 80 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Selanne_200 I read somewhere that the pilots may have tried to fly up to 45,000 feet for thin air to try to extinguish the fire which didn't work so subsequently they tried to do a dive to take out the fire if there was indeed a fire? Also, the plane may have been set on autopilot before the pilots were rendered unconscious therefore the plane just kept flying until fuel ran out | and how can anyone know any of this if they dont even know where the plane is ? |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:52 PM. |