REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   The Official 2014/2015 Canucks & NHL Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/696001-official-2014-2015-canucks-nhl-thread.html)

spoon.ek9 05-30-2015 10:12 PM

maybe one day kes :Petting

UFO 05-30-2015 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 8642673)
They have 4 forwards who would probably be the best forward on at least 1/3 of the teams in the league and 2 defensemen who would probably be the best defenseman on at least half the teams in the league.

Then they still have guys like Saad, Richards, Hjalmarsson, etc. as depth players.

Not doubting that at all. But they have had a long hard series against a very big and physical team. It's only a matter of time imo before their top end players start burning out. Those guys have played big minutes and been clutch performers without a doubt.

But with a quicker and less predictable team in Tampa, it will be an interesting finals. I totally respect the blackhawks as an organization, but I'm pulling for Tampa for the style of hockey they play. I'm not convinced Chicago can keep up with Tampa's speed

Props to Tampa as well for completely rebuilding and turning over their roster in just 4 years, going from a win to make the finals to playing for the cup this year.

AzNightmare 05-30-2015 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UFO (Post 8642692)
Props to Tampa as well for completely rebuilding and turning over their roster in just 4 years, going from a win to make the finals to playing for the cup this year.

Oh yeah! That was the year canucks made it to the finals. Now all they've been doing is retooling. Still waiting to be significant again...

:okay:

Gumby 05-30-2015 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 8642673)
They have 4 forwards who would probably be the best forward on at least 1/3 of the teams in the league and 2 defensemen who would probably be the best defenseman on at least half the teams in the league.

Then they still have guys like Saad, Richards, Hjalmarsson, etc. as depth players.

I look at the Chicago core, and then I look at the Vancouver core. :okay:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not really racist! (Post 8642679)

After Kesler gets over the game 7 loss in 2011? :troll:

Quote:

Originally Posted by UFO (Post 8642692)
Not doubting that at all. But they have had a long hard series against a very big and physical team. It's only a matter of time imo before their top end players start burning out. Those guys have played big minutes and been clutch performers without a doubt.

But with a quicker and less predictable team in Tampa, it will be an interesting finals. I totally respect the blackhawks as an organization, but I'm pulling for Tampa for the style of hockey they play. I'm not convinced Chicago can keep up with Tampa's speed

Props to Tampa as well for completely rebuilding and turning over their roster in just 4 years, going from a win to make the finals to playing for the cup this year.

Yes, the series against Anaheim was no walk in the park with several multi-OT games. No doubt their top 4 D are super exhausted. But don't forget Kane was fresh for the playoffs after coming back from his injury. And Tampa also just completed a 7-game series.

I can't believe cities like Carolina (1 for 1) and Tampa Bay (1 for 1) have won in the highest level of hockey, whereas Vancouver has not (0 for 3). :okay:

Jmac 05-30-2015 11:15 PM

Carolina and Tampa Bay played "Cinderella" teams that had no real business being in the finals.

The Canucks played powerhouse teams all 3 times (dynasty Islanders, multiple HOFer-led Rangers, and the 2011 Bruins).

The '04 Flames and especially the '06 Oilers couldn't hold a candle to any of those teams.

Mike Oxbig 05-30-2015 11:36 PM

2011 bruins werent good until the horton hit, admit it canucks fan...that was the turning point

tim thomas won them the cup

Jmac 05-30-2015 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Oxbig (Post 8642718)
2011 bruins werent good until the horton hit, admit it canucks fan...that was the turning point

tim thomas won them the cup

The Bruins were good for years before the Horton hit.

The Bruins won their conference in '08-'09, struggled in '09-'10 only because of injuries to key players (Tim Thomas missed most of the season, leading scorer Marc Savard had his career ended halfway through the season, lost Kessel to general douchiness in the offseason, etc.) but still made the playoffs. Had a +51 goal differential (2nd only to the Canucks) in '10-'11 to go with a Vezina- and Calder-winning year from Tim Thomas (93.8 Sv%) en route to the Cup. Won their division in '11-'12, went to the Stanley Cup Finals again in '12-'13, and won the Presidents' Trophy last season.

How the hell do you compare a team that was dominant for 6 years with a pair of flash-in-the-pan teams like the '04 Flames and the '06 Oilers?

jeedee 05-31-2015 12:12 AM

Can we stop talking about the 2011 finals? :okay:

#StillNotOverItlikeKesler :cry:

AzNightmare 05-31-2015 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 8642723)
The Bruins were good for years before the Horton hit.

The Bruins won their conference in '08-'09, struggled in '09-'10 only because of injuries to key players (Tim Thomas missed most of the season, leading scorer Marc Savard had his career ended halfway through the season, lost Kessel to general douchiness in the offseason, etc.) but still made the playoffs. Had a +51 goal differential (2nd only to the Canucks) in '10-'11 to go with a Vezina- and Calder-winning year from Tim Thomas (93.8 Sv%) en route to the Cup. Won their division in '11-'12, went to the Stanley Cup Finals again in '12-'13, and won the Presidents' Trophy last season.

How the hell do you compare a team that was dominant for 6 years with a pair of flash-in-the-pan teams like the '04 Flames and the '06 Oilers?

I think he was referring to just the 2011 Bruins, or specifically, that specific round vs the Canucks.

But none the less, I find his statement still wrong. The first 2 games were close. In fact, all of Canucks wins were very close. Take a step back and review the scores and it looks like Canucks had no business even being in that series. They got lucky 3 times.

tonyzoomzoom 05-31-2015 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 8642708)
I look at the Chicago core, and then I look at the Vancouver core. :okay:

Yeah. It's quite sad. I don't think we have anything at the moment that bears resemblance to a core. What we have is a "void" that's pretending it's still relevant :(

MR_BIGGS 05-31-2015 11:42 AM

Fuck Kesler.
Will he pull a Hossa and move to the Hawks now?

Mike Oxbig 05-31-2015 12:31 PM

What was the return hawks offered for kesler?

spideyv2 05-31-2015 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 8642708)
I look at the Chicago core, and then I look at the Vancouver core. :okay:


After Kesler gets over the game 7 loss in 2011? :troll:


Yes, the series against Anaheim was no walk in the park with several multi-OT games. No doubt their top 4 D are super exhausted. But don't forget Kane was fresh for the playoffs after coming back from his injury. And Tampa also just completed a 7-game series.

I can't believe cities like Carolina (1 for 1) and Tampa Bay (1 for 1) have won in the highest level of hockey, whereas Vancouver has not (0 for 3). :okay:

Carolina is 1 for 2. They got steamrolled by a HOF stacked Detroit Red Wings in 2002.

jeedee 05-31-2015 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Oxbig (Post 8642855)
What was the return hawks offered for kesler?

"Reports suggest that the Blackhawks offered Teuvo Teravainen and Andrew Shaw for Kesler, with the Canucks declining and proposing a counteroffer with Brandon Saad in Shaw’s place"

Mike Oxbig 05-31-2015 02:04 PM

^ wtf FailFish

atleast we got jarred mccan kesler lite :troll:

EDIT: UTI VS Grand rapids playoff looks pretty good right now

Jmac 05-31-2015 02:19 PM

It should also be noted that Chicago wanted Vancouver to eat half of Kesler's salary.

AzNightmare 05-31-2015 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR_BIGGS (Post 8642837)
Fuck Kesler.
Will he pull a Hossa and move to the Hawks now?

:lawl:
Hossa went to SCF back-to-back-to-back.
Took 3 tries before he got it right.

fsy82 05-31-2015 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzNightmare (Post 8642914)
:lawl:
Hossa went to SCF back-to-back-to-back.
Took 3 tries before he got it right.

gotta give him credit. he has two cups and is going for a third

punkwax 05-31-2015 05:16 PM

Hossa was also in a place where any team would move mountains for his services.. not sure Kes has the same street cred. :lol

LUUUUUUUU 05-31-2015 05:52 PM

Rockets 1 Generals 1
heading into OT

calling a OT winner by Cole Cassels

Jmac 05-31-2015 05:54 PM

Utica won today, series 3-2 UTI heading back home for games 6 and 7.

Gaunce had a big game, Markstrom solid again.

Ottawa Sun reported that Benning is shopping Lack for a 2nd round pick.

Mike Oxbig 05-31-2015 06:08 PM

Cole Cassel a memorial cup champ

Jmac 05-31-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUUUUUUUU (Post 8642944)
Rockets 1 Generals 1
heading into OT

calling a OT winner by Cole Cassels

Cassels gets to hoist the Memorial Cup at least

LUUUUUUUU 05-31-2015 06:09 PM

wow that was quick
Generals win the Memorial Cup in OT!

spoon.ek9 05-31-2015 06:27 PM

Don't wanna see Lack traded but he nets us the highest offer of our current 3 :/


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net