Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
05-31-2015, 07:28 PM
|
#11126 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,824
Thanked 7,318 Times in 647 Posts
Failed 502 Times in 112 Posts
| |
| |
05-31-2015, 07:33 PM
|
#11127 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by spoon.ek9 Don't wanna see Lack traded but he nets us the highest offer of our current 3 :/ | Most likely.
Miller's cap hit hurts his value. Markstrom hasn't proven anything at the NHL level to warrant that kind of return.
|
| |
05-31-2015, 07:38 PM
|
#11128 | ninja edits your posts without your knowledge
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,997
Thanked 6,370 Times in 1,795 Posts
Failed 114 Times in 70 Posts
|
No way Lack is being traded for a second rounder.
|
| |
05-31-2015, 07:39 PM
|
#11129 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,824
Thanked 7,318 Times in 647 Posts
Failed 502 Times in 112 Posts
| |
| |
05-31-2015, 07:41 PM
|
#11130 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS No way Lack is being traded for a second rounder. | Goaltenders don't fetch much on the trade market.
If we can get Buffalo's 2nd for Lack (31st overall), I wouldn't be too disappointed. If it's a mid-to-late 2nd, |
| |
05-31-2015, 10:27 PM
|
#11131 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,323
Thanked 2,558 Times in 925 Posts
Failed 655 Times in 195 Posts
|
Do it for buffalo's 2nd if Markstrom wins the calder cup
|
| |
05-31-2015, 10:44 PM
|
#11132 | i like gifs
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: imgur
Posts: 27,179
Thanked 7,785 Times in 2,695 Posts
Failed 4,294,967,295 Times in 169 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CRS No way Lack is being traded for a second rounder. | Look at what Luongo got us
Look at what Schneider got us
Goalies have no trade value, especially when the team is being forced to make a trade.
|
| |
05-31-2015, 10:52 PM
|
#11133 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,623
Thanked 17,307 Times in 5,784 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
|
Schneider got a 9th overall pick? Is he a better goalie than Lack? I personally don't think so.
|
| | This post FAILED by: | AzNightmare, fsy82, invader, jack3d, jeedee, lacubrious1, LUUUUUUUU, murd0c, Nabatron, ree666, spoon.ek9, Sw0op, van19, XplicitLuder |
05-31-2015, 11:05 PM
|
#11134 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,732
Thanked 17,627 Times in 4,328 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
|
no question Schneider is a better goalie then lack and he was more experienced as well
|
| |
06-01-2015, 09:21 AM
|
#11135 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,224
Thanked 827 Times in 290 Posts
Failed 282 Times in 75 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style Schneider got a 9th overall pick? Is he a better goalie than Lack? I personally don't think so. |
wow..just wow..wow..one of the most stupidest post ive seen so far in this thread..lol
|
| |
06-01-2015, 10:16 AM
|
#11136 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
lawlzzzzzz
Lack is a better option than Miller simply cuz of what this team is. I wouldn't really look further than that because as much compete either goalie gives us, this team's real issue isn't goaltending.
|
| |
06-01-2015, 11:06 AM
|
#11137 | RS.net PIMP
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vancouver/LA
Posts: 4,898
Thanked 3,057 Times in 824 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
Turns out Zuccarello's injury was a brain contusion and he lost his ability to talk temporarily. That's crazy. Quote:
"I don't know what you guys know, but there was a small fracture in my head. I lost my (ability to) talk and some feeling in my arm and stuff. I was in the hospital for three days," Zuccarello said. "I couldn't talk for a while. I had a contusion, some blood in my brain. That affects a lot. I went to speech therapy. I'm getting much better. I couldn't say a word for four days... I feel much better and I'm getting better and better." | Mats Zuccarello lost ability to speak after head injury - NY Daily News |
| |
06-01-2015, 11:08 AM
|
#11138 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,646
Thanked 15,024 Times in 5,999 Posts
Failed 2,067 Times in 692 Posts
|
By the time this team is ready to compete again thatcher demco will be between the pipes
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
06-01-2015, 11:28 AM
|
#11139 | Banned (ABWS)?
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,290
Thanked 4,050 Times in 1,728 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 211 Posts
|
I'm trying to find this hockey columnist that predicts the stanley cup finals winner.
I think he got it right in the exact number of games 5 years in a row (but got last year wrong). Anyone know who (or what article) I'm talking about??
Never can remember his name...
|
| |
06-01-2015, 03:14 PM
|
#11140 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,608
Thanked 7,628 Times in 2,559 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
|
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good! | 2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold 100% Buy and Sell Feedback |
| |
06-01-2015, 03:49 PM
|
#11141 | manage the cap you say????
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,184
Thanked 3,613 Times in 1,181 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 86 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style Schneider got a 9th overall pick? Is he a better goalie than Lack? I personally don't think so. |
__________________
⌒
\\ ______
\(ಠ益ಠ)
> ヽ
/ へ\
/ / \\
レ ノ ヽ_つ ayyy lmao
/ /
/ /|
( (ヽ
| |、\
| 丿 \ ⌒)
| | ) /
`ノ ) Lノ
|
| |
06-01-2015, 04:04 PM
|
#11142 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,623
Thanked 17,307 Times in 5,784 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 wow..just wow..wow..one of the most stupidest post ive seen so far in this thread..lol | I was just stating my opinion from watching all these years, if you don't agree that's fine, but why turn it into a personal insult? And if you're going to do that, at least have the balls to back it up with something, where's your evidence of how "stupid" it is? Here I'll help you out with some actual numbers:
Schneider w/Canucks: 55wins/26losses GAA 2.69 Save% 0.917
Lack w/Canucks: 34wins/30losses GAA 2.43 Save% 0.917
Be honest, how is he any worse? Especially considering he's played 2 years on marginal Canucks teams?
Both had great regular season performances and won over the loyalty of the fans. Both shit the bed at various points in the playoffs and neither one of them seemed like a long-term solution. I'm just being realistic with what we saw here. Schneider was 1-4 in playoff games here you might remember.
You guys are delusional living in the past if you think Schneider was any more of an answer to anything than Lack is. As far as the Canucks go, I think they both are the same answer to a question nobody wants to ask. Spelling it out -- neither one of them is a Stanley Cup goalie.
|
| |
06-01-2015, 05:09 PM
|
#11143 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
|
You're not calculating GAA and Sv% properly. You can't just add them up and divide by the number of seasons. The 8 games in '08-'09 and 2 games in '09-'10 don't have the same weight as the 25+ games he played in the following 3 seasons.
Schneider was 55-26-8 w/ a 2.20 GAA, a 92.7 Sv%, and 9 SO while he was in Vancouver. 56-30-8 w/ a 2.23 GAA, a 92.7 Sv%, and 9 SO if you include the playoffs.
Lack is 34-30-9 w/ a 2.43 GAA, a 91.7 Sv%, and 6 SO. 35-33-9 w/ a 2.45 GAA, a 91.5 Sv%, and 6 SO if you include the playoffs.
Pretty big difference between a 92.7 Sv% goaltender and a 91.7 Sv% goaltender.
Schneider didn't shit the bed in the playoffs; he had a 92.2 Sv% overall, brought down by the 2 games against San Jose in which AV played him over Luongo despite Schneider being injured. We lost the games he played against the Kings (96.0 Sv%, 1.31 GAA) because we couldn't score goals. We lost the games Lack played against the Flames because Lack couldn't come up w/ saves.
Last edited by Jmac; 06-01-2015 at 05:14 PM.
|
| |
06-01-2015, 07:30 PM
|
#11144 | RS.net PIMP
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vancouver/LA
Posts: 4,898
Thanked 3,057 Times in 824 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
Don't see this too often, teams that just finished battling each other in a series making a trade with each other, TB gets Daniel Walcott from Rangers for a 7th rd pick, lol maybe Sather lost a bet to Yzerman
|
| |
06-01-2015, 08:03 PM
|
#11145 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2007 Location: New West
Posts: 3,161
Thanked 1,341 Times in 557 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 108 Posts
|
Honestly I don't think the difference between Lack and Schneider is as great as you guys make it out to be either. Schneids is obvs the better goalie, but Lack isn't too far behind... look at the teams they had in front of them, Schneids played behind president trophy winning teams his first 2 seasons... Lack only really started playing last year and look at the cluster fuck he had in front of him
No doubt Lack is behind in development age-wise (Schneider was a fully developed #1 in the league by age 27), but if Schneider was worth a 9th overall, I wouldn't bite on a second rounder for Lack
One thing I think hurting Lacks value is an increase in capable #1's this year. With dubnyk, hammond bursting on to the scene, GM's are more willing to gamble on goalies than couple years ago
Personally, I'd rather get nothing but capspace back for Miller than trade Lack away at this point
|
| |
06-01-2015, 08:11 PM
|
#11146 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Duncan, BC
Posts: 10,127
Thanked 5,568 Times in 2,107 Posts
Failed 231 Times in 90 Posts
|
Did you see the shitstorm Schneider put up a 92.5 Sv% behind this season?
I, too,would prefer to dump Miller for nothing. But, then again, if management believes Markstrom is "the guy" in the next year or two, it makes some sense to get a top 35 pick now rather than let Lack walk for nothing next offseason.
|
| |
06-01-2015, 08:13 PM
|
#11147 | (╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PiuYi One thing I think hurting Lacks value is an increase in capable #1's this year. With dubnyk, hammond bursting on to the scene, GM's are more willing to gamble on goalies than couple years ago
| 100% truth
more GMs are probably willing to give goalies within their system a shot as you have a few good stories here and there. This is especially true for the shittier teams who can showcase a few of their goalies and attempt to move pieces.
|
| |
06-02-2015, 05:29 AM
|
#11148 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 16,623
Thanked 17,307 Times in 5,784 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 187 Posts
|
Oh well I guess I like Lack's solid games better, just my opinion... My main pint was someone said we got nothing for our goalies before and thats not true -- 9th overall was a pretty decent return although we did get lucky with Horvat and obviously a 9th overall in this draft is worth a lot more than the one Horvat was in.
|
| |
06-02-2015, 06:11 AM
|
#11149 |
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Kansai/Van
Posts: 2,459
Thanked 934 Times in 451 Posts
Failed 79 Times in 52 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style Oh well I guess I like Lack's solid games better, just my opinion... My main pint was someone said we got nothing for our goalies before and thats not true -- 9th overall was a pretty decent return although we did get lucky with Horvat and obviously a 9th overall in this draft is worth a lot more than the one Horvat was in. |
lack, isnt as solid. he still has too much movement, and overplays at times. and people thought we should of got more for schnieder.
do you even know who was in the 2013 draft? mackinnon, barkov, drouin, jones, lindholm, monahan, nurse, ritsolainen, horvat, and nichuskin were the first 10 picks. outside of the top 2 this year, i wouldnt say the picks are worth a lot more, or more at all. we didnt get lucky at all with horvat.everyone knew he was gonna be a good nhler, they just didnt know, and still dont know if he can produce at a top line rate. come on guy.
__________________
meow meow meow meow meow. CATS!!!
Last edited by dbaz; 06-02-2015 at 06:17 AM.
|
| |
06-02-2015, 09:07 AM
|
#11150 | i like gifs
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: imgur
Posts: 27,179
Thanked 7,785 Times in 2,695 Posts
Failed 4,294,967,295 Times in 169 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PiuYi Personally, I'd rather get nothing but capspace back for Miller than trade Lack away at this point | Especially with news coming out today that the cap for next season could be 70 million and below. Canucks are already at 66 mill with 10 forwards and 5 defensemen signed.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM. |