Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
10-01-2014, 06:56 PM
|
#26 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,348
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,539 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Every year they are doing something great! FUCKING AMAZING.
Who cares if they offer a paddle shift. It's to keep up with the competition. They still offer a manual.
__________________
Crush - 1971 Datsun 240z - Build Thread
The Daily - Rav4 V6 - “Goldilocks”
|
| |
10-01-2014, 07:15 PM
|
#27 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,497
Thanked 293 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
While manual is undoubtedly fun, having spent a few years in a car with a reasonably good dual clutch box, and now going back to daily driving a manual car.. I have to say.. I kind of miss the dual clutch. It gives perfect, infinitely repeatable shifts every time, and when you're (often) feeling lazy it lets you slam it into auto mode and enjoy the scenery... er... traffic
__________________ Some say I never blink, and that I roam around the woods at night foraging for wolves.
All we know is, I'm called The Stig |
| |
10-01-2014, 10:20 PM
|
#28 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Richmond
Posts: 861
Thanked 790 Times in 291 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by slowguy i'm starting to hear some enthusiasts preferring a paddle shift over manual as it lets them focus on their actual driving.. thoughts? | Those aren't ethusiasts. Nope. They just think they are.
Real enthusiasts, will ALWAYS praise a manual, no matter if it's faster or slower, because it's the shit. It's fun.
|
| |
10-01-2014, 10:48 PM
|
#29 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by nsx042003 Those aren't ethusiasts. Nope. They just think they are.
Real enthusiasts, will ALWAYS praise a manual, no matter if it's faster or slower, because it's the shit. It's fun. | No. A REAL enthusiast doesn't care if they're rowing their own gears or using a slushbox, so long as they're enjoying themselves. I enjoy a good manual as much as the next person on here, but it's honestly not the be-all, end-all of transmissions.
How many people knocking on paddle shifting have actually driven one setup with a single or dual clutch? Let me tell you, I have and it's not the end of the world. Sure, the system used in the original AM DB9 that I drove was absolutely complete shit. Good on the open highway, but everywhere else it was a disaster. But that seemed to be the exception to the rule. I've also driven VW/Audi's DSG, along with Porsche's PDK, and they're both pretty damn good. Yes, I did initially miss the whole clutch in, throw a gear action, but I soon forgot about it. On the open highway, you're rarely changing gears anyway. Once on a track or a mountain road, it showed it's advantage. You can hit a faster lap time, both your hands are on the wheel at all time, and you don't run the risk of firing off a bad shift.
Only one car in the past ten I've owned has been an automatic (and that's because it was a winter beater SUV), but I don't doubt that at some point in the future, I'll actually end up buying a car with paddle shifting.
|
| |
10-01-2014, 11:05 PM
|
#30 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: AB/BC
Posts: 2,223
Thanked 1,207 Times in 386 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 10 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by nsx042003 Those aren't ethusiasts. Nope. They just think they are.
Real enthusiasts, will ALWAYS praise a manual, no matter if it's faster or slower, because it's the shit. It's fun. | Does your nsx have abs and fuel injection?
|
| |
10-01-2014, 11:18 PM
|
#31 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Richmond
Posts: 861
Thanked 790 Times in 291 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomac No. A REAL enthusiast doesn't care if they're rowing their own gears or using a slushbox, so long as they're enjoying themselves. I enjoy a good manual as much as the next person on here, but it's honestly not the be-all, end-all of transmissions.
How many people knocking on paddle shifting have actually driven one setup with a single or dual clutch? Let me tell you, I have and it's not the end of the world. Sure, the system used in the original AM DB9 that I drove was absolutely complete shit. Good on the open highway, but everywhere else it was a disaster. But that seemed to be the exception to the rule. I've also driven VW/Audi's DSG, along with Porsche's PDK, and they're both pretty damn good. Yes, I did initially miss the whole clutch in, throw a gear action, but I soon forgot about it. On the open highway, you're rarely changing gears anyway. Once on a track or a mountain road, it showed it's advantage. You can hit a faster lap time, both your hands are on the wheel at all time, and you don't run the risk of firing off a bad shift.
Only one car in the past ten I've owned has been an automatic (and that's because it was a winter beater SUV), but I don't doubt that at some point in the future, I'll actually end up buying a car with paddle shifting. |
I might sound like i'm bashing DSG or automated manuals, I don't, I just plain prefer manual over them. But man, do I ever enjoy tracking/autocrossing with my manual cars.
I'm just saying one can get more fun out of driving a car with a stick than automatic, there's a learning curve to everything, it's just the majority of the people dont track their car. All this talk of what's faster...I could care less, it's all about how much fun you can have with a car. I can enjoy steering and rowing the stick while tracking and I just find automatics are boring for that reason.
No. I don't own a NSX but I have tracked manuals and automatics. I drive an ISF so i know the cool stuff excellent automatics can do. Blistering fast upshifts, rev matching and all that, it's cool, but tracking wise....I found it to be less involved. Sticks provided a more fun experience. Hence my strong statement about REAL ethusiast. My ideal scenario would be some automatics for cruising/relaxing drives, and a stick for the fun stuff in between.
|
| |
10-01-2014, 11:58 PM
|
#32 | RS Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: GTA
Posts: 29,866
Thanked 11,544 Times in 4,721 Posts
Failed 440 Times in 282 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomac Only one car in the past ten I've owned has been an automatic (and that's because it was a winter beater SUV), but I don't doubt that at some point in the future, I'll actually end up buying a car with paddle shifting. | Didn't most of your cars burn to a crisp?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by BIC_BAWS I literally do not plan on buying another vehicle in my lifetime, assuming it doesn't get written off. | |
| |
10-02-2014, 02:16 AM
|
#33 | The Speed Syndicate
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,116
Thanked 3,077 Times in 522 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by flagella lmao... focus on their actual driving? like on a fucking street?
Most of these so called enthusiasts barely hit the track, and I have not met any real enthusiasts who say they find paddle shift more fun to drive than rowing gears and heal-toeing on a track. | i'd consider myself an enthusiast and use my car for whats it is intended for
and yea i would dare to say paddle shift would be more fun - id be able to tackle the track a lot harder - hence why at the end of the day people in the lotus community (which i would also assume are enthusiasts) change over to dogbox transmission Quote:
Originally Posted by nsx042003 Those aren't ethusiasts. Nope. They just think they are.
Real enthusiasts, will ALWAYS praise a manual, no matter if it's faster or slower, because it's the shit. It's fun. | true enthusiast wouldn't care too much if manual or auto - grass is greener on the other side
if i had manual id want the dual clutch - and if i had the dual clutch id want the manual
__________________
TSS x Revscene Track Day Organizer
1991 Formula Red NSX - 3.2L ITB
|
| |
10-02-2014, 02:17 AM
|
#34 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bcrdukes Didn't most of your cars burn to a crisp? | Technically only three. And just one actually burnt to a crisp. |
| |
10-02-2014, 08:36 AM
|
#35 | I am Hook'd on RS
Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 70
Thanked 58 Times in 25 Posts
Failed 14 Times in 3 Posts
|
.
Last edited by cheeky_scrub; 10-02-2014 at 02:53 PM.
|
| |
10-02-2014, 09:21 AM
|
#36 | I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 40 Posts
|
YES ! MY THREAD REACHED TWO PAGES!
I CAN REST HAPPY NOW
phew
|
| |
10-02-2014, 09:24 AM
|
#37 | I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 40 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by cheeky_scrub Back on topic...has anyone used the Pilot Sport 2 tires? How do they compare to the regular Vette's tires? | sorry- were you referring to the 2015 z06 tires? if so, they're actually the PSC2. The C for cup which makes them an r-comp tire. the PS2 on the other hand is a pure street tire!
and i havent been fortunate enough to even try a set of regular PSCs. too poor for michelin so i buy Federal tires. :
|
| |
10-02-2014, 09:30 AM
|
#38 | RS Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: GTA
Posts: 29,866
Thanked 11,544 Times in 4,721 Posts
Failed 440 Times in 282 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by cheeky_scrub Back on topic...has anyone used the Pilot Sport 2 tires? How do they compare to the regular Vette's tires? | You aren't cool and accepted here on Revscene if you don't run the Michelin PSS. Clearly another flaw with the new Corvette.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by BIC_BAWS I literally do not plan on buying another vehicle in my lifetime, assuming it doesn't get written off. | |
| |
10-02-2014, 09:34 AM
|
#39 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 1,370
Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 15 Posts
|
I can't wait for reviews
__________________
Team BlackBerry
AmeX Platinum members since
|
| |
10-02-2014, 09:35 AM
|
#40 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: 3rdrckfrmthesn
Posts: 3,701
Thanked 3,899 Times in 1,380 Posts
Failed 42 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by slowguy YES ! MY THREAD REACHED TWO PAGES! | haha, I chuckled. LOL at the peeps getting rustled about paddle vs. manual. When speaking in terms of on-track usage it's really the driving that gets the focus so if you eliminate the manual shifting aspect then you can concentrate more on the driving lines. I have a manual vehicle and enjoy it on-track but I can also relate to the desire for paddle shift. With the milli-second shifting and throttle blip down shift it's hard to compete. Even straight up racers will have tons of respect for the paddle shift. To say that a true enthusiast will always favor a manual gearbox just isn't true.
|
| |
10-02-2014, 09:54 AM
|
#41 | The Brown Reason
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Whalley
Posts: 4,607
Thanked 5,863 Times in 1,525 Posts
Failed 221 Times in 97 Posts
|
so is it faster than the GTR yet?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by bcrdukes fuck this shit, i'm out | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM. |