![]() |
You guys should have a read: Windshield mounts illegal in 28 states? - GPS Tracklog It would probably piss you off even more, if officers started enforcing the "No GPS on Windshield" Law we have in BC. :lawl: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't stick municipal parking decals on your windshield, it may obstruct your view. Don't stick commercial vehicle decals on your windshield, it may obstruct your view. Quote:
It is also not securely fastened because it can flip up and down while driving. Only voice activated turn signals are allowed. Don't operate the horn. It allows communication with other drivers after you operate the device with your hand. It is also not securely fastened because it can turn around while driving. Only voice activated horns are allowed. Interpretations can get ridiculous. |
Quote:
The reason the electronic device law came into effect is because it has become an issue. Just like drinking and driving, not every who commits the offence causes an accident or injury to themselves or other people, but the risk is definitely there. Like I said before, would you guys rather be dinged 368 dollars for a Driving without due care and attention fine, or 167 for using an electronic device while driving? For those complaining about the latter please PM me your licence plate so if I ever pull you over for using your cell phone, I will be sure to give you a ticket for section 144. Sure blame the police again for these laws being in place. Maybe if you 5% of the things first responders did, your tune would be slightly different. Brain splatter from the result of a collision due to a drunk driver. A fatal T bone at an intersection because the driver was talking on his cell phone (but of course they were not distracted.. it was another uncontrolled factor that caused the accident). |
Quote:
This would avoid the bogus tickets that are handed out for moving your phone while stopped at a light or punching an address into the GPS. I don't think for one moment that it's acceptable for drivers to be yapping on the phone, typing an email, etc... while *operating a moving vehicle*. But right on cue you bring up extreme cases like brain splatter to justify enforcement action against trivial acts such as moving a phone off a pile of coins or keys in the cup holder because it's rattling and making noise. People getting warnings and fines because they're trying to recover their wallet before it disappears out of reach between the seat and console or changing the station on an aftermarket head unit are just a couple of perfect examples of how the police are taking the spirit of these regs too far. Futzing around with stuff while operating a moving vehicle = dangerous. Moving something (Christ, not even USING it, just moving it) while stopped =/= dangerous. Oh, the next time I see something that is worthy of calling the police I'll just ignore it. After all, the police say I should leave my phone out of reach in the trunk because I'm somehow incapable of making appropriate judgement calls regarding its use. You know how when a police officer does something highly questionable in the public's eyes and you say that we shouldn't paint all cops with the same brush, that there are many good, honest officers, etc...? Well, do us a favor.. don't paint all drivers with the same brush. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not really relevant, I agree, butI figured that if you can drag that in to try and make you point, why shouldn't I use it also? |
Quote:
Bringing arguments like brain splatter into the argument makes it pretty clear that you're grouping me with the same sort of people who have no control over their impulses to pick up a phone and text about dinner plans while navigating their car through traffic. As written, the law is a knee-jerk attempt to deal with the very real problem of cell phone use while driving. It needs simplification and re-focus. |
Dear God, this forum REALLY needs a FAIL button... Quote:
Now who's grouping whom? |
Quote:
(Start at 5:21) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's "seen more brain splatter" |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I mentioned, I see the logic in the law, and I admit I was in the wrong. Not sure how I can state this more clearly, and it seems obvious that it doesn't matter, since it won't stop some of the people here from making their silly remarks that they cannot hold in. For those who simply answered and gave information, my thanks. For those that cannot resist and have to act like immature children, no problem, I have kids, so this is nothing new. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if you don't mind making a fool of yourself, why should I care? |
Quote:
Can I have some money? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This thread is really going downhill, isn't it? It started with me asking clarification about things I was not aware of (which obviously does not excuse breaking the law), and as many such forums, quickly escalated to personal attacks and sarcasm. Oh joy. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net