REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-12-2014, 10:48 PM   #51
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
DragonChi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: vancity
Posts: 5,734
Thanked 722 Times in 364 Posts
Failed 40 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
Is that worse than releasing tons of carbon into the air?

It's a scaling issue, as I see it, if we replaced our energy needs with solar, it would be an incredible amount of panels we would need. When they become useless, what do we do with them. Releasing tons of carbon into the air might not seem so bad after that.

What kind of health issues? Source for temperature changes? (and not from a whackjob source please) Are these issues worse than releasing tons of carbon into the air?

Imagine not being able to sleep for hours on end, it's like a slow death. I would take tons of carbon into the air if it meant a release from suffering.

As for the temperature changes, i've heard that there was a wind farm around the gulf of mexico or southern US that raised the oceans temp by a couple degrees. It was in another thread.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...wind-farm.html
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/30/s...-temperature-/

They can be issues if the wind farms scale up to the space we need them to. Which would probably disrupt wildlife and nearing human population. I don't know if it's worse because it's comparing apples to oranges. Mass of carbon vs disruption/health issue.

Wind turbine noise not linked to health problems, Health Canada finds - Technology & Science - CBC News


Is killing a bunch of birds worse than releasing tons of carbon into the air?

Same thing with solar, scaling up to produce more energy from this method takes up more habitat/land.

These are genuine questions... If these are the biggest issues people come up with, it's not a very good argument against alternative energy.
Maybe if I'm bored enough, I'll do a calculation of how much land we need to replace our energy needs with solar fields. But i'm kinda tired right now.

You're right, those are weak ass reasons against alternative energy. The real reason is money.
Advertisement
__________________
DragonChi's BuySell rating

Last edited by DragonChi; 12-12-2014 at 11:26 PM.
DragonChi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 11:08 PM   #52
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,797
Thanked 9,482 Times in 4,138 Posts
Failed 429 Times in 227 Posts
Solar/wind aren't practical on a large enough scale to be significant, solar panels are very dirty to make and aren't very efficient once they are made. For cars, anything with battery systems are nasty to make because of all the shit in the batteries that has to be shipped all over the place and then dealt with when the battery is fried 5 years later. Cargo ships are notoriously nasty things compared to cars, so the ship used to transport all the batteries will likely offset any gains from running on electrics anyways.

The move to actually cleaner energy I understand from a pollution perspective, the whole climate change schmozzle is a different story since the last I checked nobody could conclusively prove that climate change was actually human caused.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 12-12-2014, 11:58 PM   #53
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,528
Thanked 24,527 Times in 8,534 Posts
Failed 1,537 Times in 685 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore View Post
last I checked nobody could conclusively prove that climate change was actually human caused.
Where did you last check? because outside the fanatical right wing fringe, it seems to be the scientific consensus.

I have been agnostic on that issue for years, but everything I look to that isn't written by nutjobs suggests that...
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-13-2014, 12:00 AM   #54
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,528
Thanked 24,527 Times in 8,534 Posts
Failed 1,537 Times in 685 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonChi View Post
Maybe if I'm bored enough, I'll do a calculation of how much land we need to replace our energy needs with solar fields. But i'm kinda tired right now.

You're right, those are weak ass reasons against alternative energy. The real reason is money.
Those are practical problems that need practical solutions. Obviously solar power isn't the solution to everything - it depends on the scale. To even suggest using solar panels to replace all our energy needs... you must be tired if you're not just being sarcastic.

The most practical clean energy is of course nuclear, but I really hope we can find a way to use it more efficiently. Having piles of nuclear waste sitting around can't be good.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2014, 03:05 AM   #55
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Failed 1,536 Times in 385 Posts
I see dropping gas prices as incentive to hoon
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-13-2014, 04:47 AM   #56
I keep RS good
 
Ulic Qel-Droma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
well Lockheed has their bets on having an operational fusion based reactor in 10 years, it's already been in the works for 4 years.

They're dumping a lot of money into alternative energy sector to hedge against cutbacks on military spending.

I think we will see an exponential increase in the rise of efficiency in alternative energy in the next few decades... and that's when we'll have TRUE population problems.
Ulic Qel-Droma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2014, 08:23 AM   #57
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
DragonChi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: vancity
Posts: 5,734
Thanked 722 Times in 364 Posts
Failed 40 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
well Lockheed has their bets on having an operational fusion based reactor in 10 years, it's already been in the works for 4 years.
Yeah those Lockheed Martin claims are pretty big. Fusion has also been 50 years away, every year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
The most practical clean energy is of course nuclear, but I really hope we can find a way to use it more efficiently. Having piles of nuclear waste sitting around can't be good.
There's also the idea of have a mini reactor for every neighbourhood kicking around too. There are new reactors out there that use spent fuel too. From what I understand, progress is so slow in the nuclear industry because there's so much red tape and regulation. It's warranted of course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
I think we will see an exponential increase in the rise of efficiency in alternative energy in the next few decades... and that's when we'll have TRUE population problems.
One day our population problem will be so bad, we'll have collapsed all the fish stocks and will be reduced to eating algae pellets. I don't see that happening in my lifetime though.

I think climate change is going to happen whether it be natural or human. But the human cause makes it happen waaaay faster. I for one would like Canada to get warmer. LOL
__________________
DragonChi's BuySell rating
DragonChi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2014, 09:37 AM   #58
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Hmmmm global population is expected to settle at around 10B with only Asia and Africa seeing significant increases in population - if I'm not mistaken the Americas will only see an additional 1B at most, and this side of the planet can easily support that population. (Fertility rates drop as life expectancy increases)

Projections of population growth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clean energy is no doubt the future, the biggest change imo will be the increase in centralization and use of mass transit, incorporation of energy reduction in planning and construction of the cities of the future etc. We will still use oil/gas but hybrids will be the new norm and we will be well beyond a simple catalityc converter to reduce emissions. Urban sprawl will die a well deserved and painful death.

I'm actually strangely optimistic about the future for being such a realist lol though I will say that I feel less optimistic regarding certain geographic areas... Namely the Middle East and Africa... I think China will do alright if they actually straighten out their political problems.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-15-2014, 07:12 AM   #59
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Reeyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Peace River, AB
Posts: 1,778
Thanked 158 Times in 103 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by asian_XL View Post
THIS is what gas price supposed to be!

Sure, the price of gas was cheap, but the fuel economy of vehicles was terrible back then.
__________________
Quote:
Unknown
"If someone has to pass you on the right, you are in the wrong lane."
Reeyal is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 12-15-2014, 07:36 AM   #60
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
ScizzMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 604
Posts: 2,538
Thanked 1,137 Times in 259 Posts
Failed 170 Times in 46 Posts
Solar Power is bad because when we take all the energy from the Sun we won't have a Sun anymore.
__________________
Scizz's a living legend and I tell you why, everybody wanna be Scizz an Scizz still alive
ScizzMoney is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-15-2014, 03:54 PM   #61
I'm better than you.
 
b0unce. [?]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Van
Posts: 8,480
Thanked 3,087 Times in 658 Posts
Failed 373 Times in 115 Posts
But diesel is still expensive!
__________________


'14 Toyota Yaris [Work Daily]
'89 Toyota Cressida MX83 [Collector's status]
'15 Honda Ruckus [Summer cruiser]
'96 Toyota Hilux Surf KZN185 [Weekend Warrior]



Buy & Sell Ratings!
b0unce. [?] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 05:59 PM   #62
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: van
Posts: 67
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Failed 48 Times in 12 Posts

Nomomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 06:00 PM   #63
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: van
Posts: 67
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Failed 48 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeyal View Post
Sure, the price of gas was cheap, but the fuel economy of vehicles was terrible back then.
Take your fist out of your anus and tell me how much better mpg Honda has gotten from now vs the 80's hondas
Nomomo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-16-2014, 07:05 AM   #64
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,680
Thanked 772 Times in 387 Posts
Failed 152 Times in 50 Posts
i think he's probably referring to the good old 5L's and other muscle cars of the day compared to the higher horsepower much better fuel economy versions of today
blkgsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2014, 08:35 AM   #65
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
ancient_510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: YVR
Posts: 352
Thanked 208 Times in 110 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 7 Posts
Bit of a rough ride today for us who are short oil.
Don't get scared.
ancient_510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2014, 09:22 AM   #66
I keep RS good
 
Ulic Qel-Droma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient_510 View Post
Bit of a rough ride today for us who are short oil.
Don't get scared.
it's a bull trap. they're all gonna go hang themselves in the washroom over the next few weeks.
Ulic Qel-Droma is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-17-2014, 04:44 PM   #67
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mission
Posts: 10
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
Sweet so save 800 a year on gas but make 60k less working commercial..
GtRawr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 04:45 PM   #68
GO FLAMES GO
 
Tegra_Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 4,609
Thanked 2,210 Times in 701 Posts
Failed 807 Times in 194 Posts
96.9 in Kamloops...woot!
__________________
2013 Toyota Tundra CrewMax TRD Offroad *CURRENT*
2005 Nissan Xterra SE *SOLD*
1991 Toyota Hilux Surf SSR-X Widebody *SOLD*
2001 Acura Integra Type-R *SOLD*
Club-Integra.net OG
Your Friendly Neighborhood Firefighter
Tegra_Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 05:01 PM   #69
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
meowjinboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 556
Thanked 270 Times in 122 Posts
Failed 78 Times in 36 Posts
The rubble is crashing.
meowjinboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 06:09 PM   #70
I keep RS good
 
Ulic Qel-Droma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,720
Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,516 Posts
Failed 869 Times in 293 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by meowjinboo View Post
The rubble is crashing.
it can say it's probably on purpose.

the purpose though, i duno.
Ulic Qel-Droma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 06:19 PM   #71
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
meme405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 7,763 Times in 2,315 Posts
Failed 409 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
it can say it's probably on purpose.

the purpose though, i duno.
To put pressure on the Russians.

Why else would the US start dipping into their own oil reserves.

It's also really funny how just as Russia seems to show a steadiness, the US signals for more sanctions. Its like they have a belt around Russia's neck, and every time the country exhales a little sigh of relief, the US tightens that belt even further.
__________________

Barney Fucking Purple FX35
Brianna - 2008 FX35 - Build Thread
meme405 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 06:47 PM   #72
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,528
Thanked 24,527 Times in 8,534 Posts
Failed 1,537 Times in 685 Posts
Russia fucked around trying to take over the European natural gas industry. They failed hard and are now suffering the consequences.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 06:51 PM   #73
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
Russia fucked around trying to take over the European natural gas industry. They failed hard and are now suffering the consequences.
Bingo. (At least IMO)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 06:53 PM   #74
2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
It is more like Saudi wants to pressure Iran and Qatar to fold.. and also make sure the tarsands and North Dakota crude is not economically viable (might not be a bad thing for us, at least it will get the environmentalists off our backs for a while).

Russia is just a side show. It is not even OPEC.

Either way, Russia is and will be the only economical LNG supplier to Europe (a lot of fracking projects in Europe turn up bubkuss) .. Europe right now just wants a regime change, because they know Russia holds them by the balls.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
Russia fucked around trying to take over the European natural gas industry. They failed hard and are now suffering the consequences.

Last edited by godwin; 12-17-2014 at 06:59 PM.
godwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2014, 08:24 AM   #75
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
DragonChi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: vancity
Posts: 5,734
Thanked 722 Times in 364 Posts
Failed 40 Times in 26 Posts
Maybe relevant to the climate change discussion. What It Would Really Take to Reverse Climate Change - IEEE Spectrum
__________________
DragonChi's BuySell rating
DragonChi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net