Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only. | | |
03-16-2015, 06:21 PM
|
#1 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: 604
Posts: 541
Thanked 100 Times in 16 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 6 Posts
| Charged with DUI While Sleeping In Vehicle
I've searched online and found mixed results, but if someone was found by the rcmp inside their vehicle, sleeping in the driver seat, with the vehicle shut off and parked in front of a business' parking lot, and was forced to do and fail the breathalizer on the spot, how disputable is this scenario?
anyone hear of or experience this before?
FYI there is a 30 day car impound and 90 day driving suspension that goes along with this if the breathalizer test was failed.
|
| |
03-16-2015, 06:36 PM
|
#3 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,931
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
|
__________________
-------------------------- Cadillac CTS (Current) |
| |
03-16-2015, 06:39 PM
|
#4 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: 604
Posts: 541
Thanked 100 Times in 16 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c | But then there is this article as well » Supreme Court of Canada waters down drunk driving law on 25th anniversary of project red ribbon Duhaime Law
main points being: Quote:
The main issue before the Supreme Court of Canada in this case was whether there needs to be “a risk of danger to persons or property” to convict a person under §253(1) of the Criminal Code when the person has care or control of a vehicle and is drunk. In other words, can a person be convicted if they are drunk and have care or control of a vehicle but there is no risk of danger to anyone else or property?
The Supreme Court of Canada held that to convict a person under §253(1), there must be a risk of danger to persons or property in addition to the presence of a drunk person having care or control of a vehicle, and that the risk must be a realistic (and not a theoretical) one.
What that meant for Mr. Boudreault was that his conviction was overturned and he was free to go because although he committed the offence under §253(1) of the Criminal Code, the fact that he was asleep meant that there was no risk to any person, including himself, or to property, by his control of the vehicle.
| |
| |
03-16-2015, 06:40 PM
|
#5 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 5,324
Thanked 3,782 Times in 1,242 Posts
Failed 533 Times in 187 Posts
|
Throw the keys in the bush next to you and you'll "maybe" be ok. But pretty much, don't even look at your car if you're drunk or you'll get a DUI.
Fuckin bullshit.
__________________ '16 Ram 1500 |
| |
03-16-2015, 06:59 PM
|
#6 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: 3rdrckfrmthesn
Posts: 3,701
Thanked 3,899 Times in 1,380 Posts
Failed 42 Times in 24 Posts
|
If keys are on your person and you are even "near" your car they will charge you.
Had a buddy drunk as fuck downtown, sitting with some chick on a curb beside his vehicle. Cops walked by, started asking what was going on, asked if the truck he was 10 feet away from was his, then breathalyzed. He got 30 day impound, 90 day license suspension and now awaiting a decision on the 1 year Interlock.
Supreme Court was to look at the laws again back in January but I didn't hear anything about the result.
|
| |
03-16-2015, 07:08 PM
|
#7 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 5,324
Thanked 3,782 Times in 1,242 Posts
Failed 533 Times in 187 Posts
|
^^^^Wow. I honestly thought that if the keys were outside the vehicle you were ok.
That's pretty stupid you can't even sit near your vehicle... At which point do they draw the line? What if i'm in a house an my car is in the driveway, car might only be 10-20' from me hahaha.
__________________ '16 Ram 1500 |
| |
03-16-2015, 07:29 PM
|
#8 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 768
Thanked 562 Times in 245 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 18 Posts
|
If you have the money, should've refused breathalyzer and ask for lawyer
|
| |
03-16-2015, 08:46 PM
|
#9 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,931
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GGnoRE If you have the money, should've refused breathalyzer and ask for lawyer | I thought if you refused brethalyzer officers can make you do other tests no?
__________________
-------------------------- Cadillac CTS (Current) |
| |
03-16-2015, 08:56 PM
|
#10 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Richmond
Posts: 650
Thanked 590 Times in 182 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GGnoRE If you have the money, should've refused breathalyzer and ask for lawyer | Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang I thought if you refused brethalyzer officers can make you do other tests no? | Refusing to provide a breath sample results in the same penalty as blowing over http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/share...-penalties.pdf |
| |
03-16-2015, 09:05 PM
|
#11 | look at these diamonds, they shining
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,800
Thanked 1,813 Times in 553 Posts
Failed 634 Times in 127 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket If keys are on your person and you are even "near" your car they will charge you.
Had a buddy drunk as fuck downtown, sitting with some chick on a curb beside his vehicle. Cops walked by, started asking what was going on, asked if the truck he was 10 feet away from was his, then breathalyzed. He got 30 day impound, 90 day license suspension and now awaiting a decision on the 1 year Interlock.
Supreme Court was to look at the laws again back in January but I didn't hear anything about the result. | backward laws.
|
| |
03-16-2015, 10:20 PM
|
#12 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,486
Thanked 3,190 Times in 625 Posts
Failed 97 Times in 30 Posts
|
That's actually pretty stupid. So we should charge everyone who carries a gun with Murder, because something COULD cause them to wanna shoot someone? complete bs.
__________________
oOoOooOOo what does this space do
-2023 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD - Current
-2018 BMW F30 340i M Performance Edition - Current
-2016 BMW F32 435i MPPK - Traded
-2011 BMW E92 335i - SOLD
-2009 Chrysler Sebring Convertible - SOLD |
| |
03-16-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#13 | PRINCESS
Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Mushroom Castle
Posts: 1,521
Thanked 790 Times in 344 Posts
Failed 74 Times in 27 Posts
|
oh thank god my law teacher told me about this years back. I aint no lawyer and this is simply high school law course from like years abck so don't rely on me obviously. From what I remember, if you have the keys on you, that means there is an intention for driving under influence soon or later on. Edmonton Alberta Legal Information on Impaired Driving and Licence Suspension
So whether you are sitting on passenger seat, driver's seat, or near by, if there's a reasonable suspicion that you may be able to control the vehicle, in motion or not, you can be charged for DUI as you still had the intention to operate the vehicle (or suspected intention). But, if the key is not in your possession, there's no way you can operate the vehicle therefore sleeping inside the car is okay as long as key cannot be found anywhere near you (passenger seat or your friend's pocket apparently doesn't count, because you can still start car and operate radio drunk from passenger side, law says in motion OR not therefore using radio also counts as DUI). From what I learned years ago, If you are inside the car but the key is stored on top of the wheel or inside the exhaust or something, they cannot prove your intention to operate the vehicle because it is not physically on you, and while you are inside an space, key is stored outside. Weird system, I never got it, but I avoid getting into car when I'm drunk period.
A friend of mine got charged for DUI few years back although he wasn't even in the car. Funny thing is, he didn't have keys on him so he could have disputed it. Unless that's the case, I dont think disputing this will work that well. Hope you can find a good lawyer.
|
| |
03-17-2015, 12:33 AM
|
#14 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 502
Thanked 443 Times in 128 Posts
Failed 100 Times in 17 Posts
| http://www.revscene.net/forums/70011...ml#post8568965
According to spidey, there hasn't been any arrests if you are sleeping in the back seat.
|
| |
03-17-2015, 01:50 AM
|
#15 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: vancouver
Posts: 2,447
Thanked 1,759 Times in 545 Posts
Failed 1,107 Times in 281 Posts
|
Such a money grabber. you don't want to pay for a cab so you sleep in the car so you won't be drinking and driving. But they can still charge you because you are in the car! It's like they want you to drive so you can get caught for it. What a world we live in.
|
| |
03-17-2015, 01:10 PM
|
#16 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: vancouver
Posts: 153
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I learned the Boudreault case in one of my classes. From what I recall, you must show that you did not perform any acts of care or control (this can be something like starting your engine). However, I think Boudreault started his car to turn on the heater, so he argued that it was out of necessity. Here is another case that is similar to Boudreault R. v. Toews |
| |
03-17-2015, 03:35 PM
|
#17 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,025
Thanked 1,079 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 95 Times in 35 Posts
|
Just hearsay, but... My foreman told me that when he was younger he registered his truck as a motor home (needs cooking, etc). He got drunk and slept in the back. One time the police pulled up and knocked, he yelled out stating it was a registered motor home and they left him alone.
Good idea if you plan to get drunk lots. Not sure if this is true or still applicable.
__________________
Electrician.
|
| |
03-17-2015, 03:47 PM
|
#18 | Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Surrey
Posts: 329
Thanked 419 Times in 61 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 17 Posts
|
Im a bit biased, as, I have had a DUI in my past and lost my license etc....but that was 10 years ago. In just 10 years its gotten SO much more heavy as far as fines etc for offenders.
Dont drink and drive, and, get to know the laws like these, cause it aint gonna get easier on you if drinking and driving are linked in any way to you.
I had to take the Responsible driver program as a part of my journey to get my DL back. taught you to disassociate driving and drinking, it helps me to this day....I think you still have to take that course now when you get a DUI...just hope that that isnt the way YOU learn |
| |
03-17-2015, 05:51 PM
|
#19 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 768
Thanked 562 Times in 245 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang I thought if you refused brethalyzer officers can make you do other tests no? | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr1ll | Two cases of drinking and driving that I know personally. Details are omitted on purpose as I don't want to be misinterpreted as advocating DUI.
First person drank and drove and got caught. Refused to blow breathalyzer and asked for blood test and lawyer. Hands on wheel within in less than 2 month.
Second person got into an accident (serious accident as car was totalled) while drinking and driving. Fled the scene and contacted lawyer. Hands on wheel within a month.
You can't just read one line of law/regulation and expect it to be implemented in black and white. There are a lot of technicalities that lawyers can use as different angles.
|
| |
03-17-2015, 07:30 PM
|
#20 | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
|
Just remember that it is the legal system..not the justice system
|
| |
03-17-2015, 10:45 PM
|
#21 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: BC, HK, USA
Posts: 7,539
Thanked 2,442 Times in 1,030 Posts
Failed 166 Times in 73 Posts
|
this is epic stupid. that's like saying "oh, u have a knife with you and the fact you COULD possibly use it and MAYBE in control of it, you can be charged with murder"
wtf...
|
| |
03-18-2015, 12:08 AM
|
#22 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by zulutango Just remember that it is the legal system..not the justice system | Hmm... legal.gc.ca doesn't exist. justice.gc.ca does, however.
|
| |
03-18-2015, 12:25 AM
|
#23 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,036
Thanked 1,820 Times in 501 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 27 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovebacon Such a money grabber. you don't want to pay for a cab so you sleep in the car so you won't be drinking and driving. But they can still charge you because you are in the car! It's like they want you to drive so you can get caught for it. What a world we live in. | Exactly this. I get that the police are just doing their job, but this is exactly why at the ripe age of 21 I very rarely (1-2x a year) go to clubs or bars and actually drink.
It's one big fucking money grab.
Can't drive to the club and drive home drunk (rightfully so).
TransLink stops their trains at around 1:30AM on weekends (why? it's not like there are drivers who need to rest).
Can't drive to the club and sleep in your car until the next day (so much wtf).
Which basically leaves you the option of waiting for 30-45 minutes outside for a shitty cab, driven by a usually unsafe driver, and paying through the nose. Gotta love it. Even when you are trying to do the right thing you get screwed over for it.
|
| |
03-18-2015, 06:45 AM
|
#24 | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sebberry Hmm... legal.gc.ca doesn't exist. justice.gc.ca does, however. | Maybe if I put " " marks around the words "legal" and "justice"...you would get it? |
| |
03-18-2015, 10:42 AM
|
#25 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 7,763 Times in 2,315 Posts
Failed 409 Times in 181 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by xXSupa That's actually pretty stupid. So we should charge everyone who carries a gun with Murder, because something COULD cause them to wanna shoot someone? complete bs. | Quote:
Originally Posted by MeowMeow From what I remember, if you have the keys on you, that means there is an intention for driving under influence soon or later on. | Quote:
Originally Posted by 6793026 this is epic stupid. that's like saying "oh, u have a knife with you and the fact you COULD possibly use it and MAYBE in control of it, you can be charged with murder"
wtf... | ^^All of these.
I'll go one step further; I have a dick, so in theory it's possible for me to commit rape. So the police should just book me as a sex offender now, since apparently there is this imminent doom that I will rape someone.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 AM. |