Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |
View Poll Results: It's Election Day! |
Liberal
| | 226 | 57.65% |
NDP
| | 57 | 14.54% |
Green
| | 7 | 1.79% |
Conservative
| | 66 | 16.84% |
Other to support fringe beliefs
| | 2 | 0.51% |
Spoiled/Throwaway ballot
| | 3 | 0.77% |
Didn't Vote (BOO)
| | 18 | 4.59% |
Couldn't Vote for a Legit Reason
| | 13 | 3.32% | | |
08-10-2015, 08:58 PM
|
#176 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
|
These surveys and questionnaires still need to be taken with a grain of salt.
A question could be:
Do you want the government to hand you out more money for doing nothing:
Yes answer means party A as their platform promises free money like candy
No answer means party B as their platform promises fiscal responsibility
Without really asking if you think the government should be giving away money they don't have, and can't really get given their platform, you could be lead to believe you're a party A supporter, when in reality you're strongly a party B supporter.
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| |
08-10-2015, 10:11 PM
|
#177 | Hacked RS to become a mod
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,268
Thanked 24,324 Times in 8,450 Posts
Failed 1,534 Times in 682 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 87% Liberal
74% NDP
64% Green
37% Conservative
I actually thought I'd have a higher conservative rating than that, considering I am technically considered a high income earner.
I guess I'm just not a selfish prick that doesn't mind being taxed a bit more if it benefits others in the country. | Yup you can earn a high income and still not be a cunt, surprisingly enough
|
| |
08-10-2015, 10:32 PM
|
#178 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Bootyville
Posts: 4,638
Thanked 2,617 Times in 900 Posts
Failed 496 Times in 162 Posts
|
Its too bad for all the socially progressive fiscal conservatives that Harper's cons combined the right into one party. They knew they could never get elected a majority on their own and they knew the left would continue to split votes. My parent's dislike a lot of the social/environmental conservatisim of the Cons but they will never ever vote for Trudeau because of his father or the NDP because of the provincial NDP. Couple the move to a 2 party system initiated by the Cons, the attack ads, the campain finance reforms which just happen to benefit themselves, the voter registration reforms which just happen to make it harder for people who traditionally do not vote conservative, the robo calls, the quiet dismantling of the CBC from the inside out, and so on; it's beginning to look a lot more like the dysfunctional political system to the south.
__________________ LEAFS! |
| |
08-10-2015, 10:41 PM
|
#179 | Hacked RS to become a mod
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 53,268
Thanked 24,324 Times in 8,450 Posts
Failed 1,534 Times in 682 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouncing Bettys Its too bad for all the socially progressive fiscal conservatives that Harper's cons combined the right into one party. They knew they could never get elected a majority on their own and they knew the left would continue to split votes. My parent's dislike a lot of the social/environmental conservatisim of the Cons but they will never ever vote for Trudeau because of his father or the NDP because of the provincial NDP. Couple the move to a 2 party system initiated by the Cons, the attack ads, the campain finance reforms which just happen to benefit themselves, the voter registration reforms which just happen to make it harder for people who traditionally do not vote conservative, the robo calls, the quiet dismantling of the CBC from the inside out, and so on; it's beginning to look a lot more like the dysfunctional political system to the south. | I think that's how I ended up siding with the Libertarian party... Their platform seems to combine the 'good' parts of the right wing - economy, education, etc leaving out the 'bad' social and environmental parts. Meanwhile, they take the 'good' social side of the left wing, and leave out the more welfare state/socialism stuff.
To me, this is the best political platform. It's too bad it's basically a 2 party system, and voting for any small party means you're essentially throwing away your vote (or splitting it, if there are 3 parties competing)
|
| |
08-10-2015, 10:55 PM
|
#180 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: May 2001 Location: South Central V
Posts: 5,538
Thanked 519 Times in 210 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 21 Posts
|
^^ you should never worry about so-called vote splitting or strategic voting. always vote for YOUR ideal choice.
from 18 to about 30, I never voted for a winning candidate.
What my vote did, over time, was show a growing trend towards a certain ideology, which the governing party could not ignore.
Take the Green party for example. By a significant population voting for them, even though they had no chance in hell of winning, it made other parties change their environmental policies, due to the fact that it was 'suddenly' a hot topic for Canadians.
__________________ Visit my food blog! http://jaxandcs.com/ *its not the size of your army that matters; it's the fury of it's onslaught!* █♣█ |
| |
08-11-2015, 08:15 AM
|
#181 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,672
Thanked 9,365 Times in 4,073 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar These surveys and questionnaires still need to be taken with a grain of salt.
A question could be:
Do you want the government to hand you out more money for doing nothing:
Yes answer means party A as their platform promises free money like candy
No answer means party B as their platform promises fiscal responsibility
Without really asking if you think the government should be giving away money they don't have, and can't really get given their platform, you could be lead to believe you're a party A supporter, when in reality you're strongly a party B supporter. | The questions are also likely to only cover issues that provide info that can be sold to marketing companies.
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: | |
| |
08-11-2015, 03:04 PM
|
#182 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
|
And none of them ever ask about firearms. Which essentially turns this election into a single issue election for a significant portion of the population as the NDP is very anti-firearms, and the liberals lean strongly towards giving more power to the RCMP to make up their own rules as they go.
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| |
08-11-2015, 06:52 PM
|
#183 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 1,356
Thanked 1,532 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 202 Times in 77 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar And none of them ever ask about firearms. Which essentially turns this election into a single issue election for a significant portion of the population as the NDP is very anti-firearms, and the liberals lean strongly towards giving more power to the RCMP to make up their own rules as they go. | I wouldn't say that a significant portion of Canadians are firearms owners, we are still a minority. That being said, the Conservatives are the only ones who are openly middle ground > supportive of firearms owners.
Which is a shame, since that site said I'm more Liberal than anything else, and I identify as such. (86% vs. 43% for conservatives.)
|
| |
08-11-2015, 07:30 PM
|
#184 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: May 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,620
Thanked 218 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 43 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by carisear ^^ you should never worry about so-called vote splitting or strategic voting. always vote for YOUR ideal choice.
from 18 to about 30, I never voted for a winning candidate.
What my vote did, over time, was show a growing trend towards a certain ideology, which the governing party could not ignore.
Take the Green party for example. By a significant population voting for them, even though they had no chance in hell of winning, it made other parties change their environmental policies, due to the fact that it was 'suddenly' a hot topic for Canadians. | To your last point, I'd argue the exact opposite has actually occurred with the Conservative Party and Harper. Crimes Against Ecology | A\J ? Canada's Environmental Voice |
| |
08-11-2015, 09:38 PM
|
#185 | what manner of phaggotry is this
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 205 Times in 120 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodamaster I wouldn't say that a significant portion of Canadians are firearms owners, we are still a minority. That being said, the Conservatives are the only ones who are openly middle ground > supportive of firearms owners.
Which is a shame, since that site said I'm more Liberal than anything else, and I identify as such. (86% vs. 43% for conservatives.) | roughly 2 million licensed firearm owners in canada as per the rcmp figures as of december 2014.
if 2 parties openly said they would make firearm ownership difficult, and one said they would stand behind firearm owners, that 2 million becomes a pretty measurable percentage.
__________________ STRENGTHaesthetics |
| |
08-12-2015, 09:23 AM
|
#186 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,672
Thanked 9,365 Times in 4,073 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
|
^ 8.3%, which is a decent amount, but you're assuming that all firearms owners hold that above every other aspect of government (which I still think is fucking daft).
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: | |
| |
08-12-2015, 09:42 AM
|
#187 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,021
Thanked 2,531 Times in 1,151 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
|
Gotta love RS when a policy debate about something that affects maybe a few hundred thousand people overshadows discussion about the Mike Duffy trial.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 12:33 PM
|
#188 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca Gotta love RS when a policy debate about something that affects maybe a few hundred thousand people overshadows discussion about the Mike Duffy trial. | To be fair, a corruption charge doesn't necessarily directly impact people's lives, whereas a law change does.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 12:37 PM
|
#189 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: n zone
Posts: 2,660
Thanked 1,910 Times in 606 Posts
Failed 325 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca Gotta love RS when a policy debate about something that affects maybe a few hundred thousand people overshadows discussion about the Mike Duffy trial. | isn't that how most of politics work? a couple of hot button issues that pander to the most vocal group?
lgbt are like, 10% of the population and yet the marriage issue was huge
inb4 ulic and his wall of text
|
| |
08-12-2015, 12:40 PM
|
#190 | I don't get it
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 399
Thanked 65 Times in 34 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 10 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca Gotta love RS when a policy debate about something that affects maybe a few hundred thousand people overshadows discussion about the Mike Duffy trial. | Because its only a matter of time beforr Duffy is found guilty, thats old news. When and if the bombshell that directly links with proof that Harper is involved, you can bet that will dominate the air wave.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 01:01 PM
|
#191 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,021
Thanked 2,531 Times in 1,151 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomac To be fair, a corruption charge doesn't necessarily directly impact people's lives, whereas a law change does. | My larger point is that people go apeshit when it comes to public sector inefficiencies, salaries, and art projects (which don't really have a direct impact on daily lives either), but are silent when outright an violation of public rules has occurred.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 02:36 PM
|
#192 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
So Harper says he'll look into foreign home ownership. Doesn't mean he'll actually do anything but I just realized that if someone said they were going to tax the fuck out of people buying homes in Canada without living in them, I'd vote for that guy. That would swing my vote almost instantly.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#193 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,510
Thanked 1,459 Times in 510 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin So Harper says he'll look into foreign home ownership. Doesn't mean he'll actually do anything but I just realized that if someone said they were going to tax the fuck out of people buying homes in Canada without living in them, I'd vote for that guy. That would swing my vote almost instantly. | I think he pleged 500k to try to track foreign ownership. Video: Harper's pledge to collect data on foreign home ownership could chill Vancouver real estate market
Not only do I doubt that 500k is enough, I question why he hasn't done it for 10 years if it's truly a priority to him and not just an election topic that will be as easily forgotten as his senate reform pledges.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 03:03 PM
|
#194 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
Yeah, Harper doesn't have it but if someone made it cheaper for us to buy homes by making it way more expensive for foreign investment, I'd be all for that guy.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 07:02 PM
|
#195 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,021
Thanked 2,531 Times in 1,151 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin So Harper says he'll look into foreign home ownership. Doesn't mean he'll actually do anything but I just realized that if someone said they were going to tax the fuck out of people buying homes in Canada without living in them, I'd vote for that guy. That would swing my vote almost instantly. | Well, he could have kept the long-form census, for starters. Lots of useful data relating to incomes, ethnicity, education, and housing, was obtained in those surveys.
|
| |
08-12-2015, 10:08 PM
|
#196 | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Surrey
Posts: 246
Thanked 26 Times in 9 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca Well, he could have kept the long-form census, for starters. Lots of useful data relating to incomes, ethnicity, education, and housing, was obtained in those surveys. | Keeping in mind The Conservatives made massive cuts to Stats Canada to track stuff like this, and massive cuts to CRA departments that tracked corporate tax evasion and offshore banking investigations.
His former tax advisor was caught stashing money offshore.
|
| |
08-13-2015, 07:14 AM
|
#197 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,021
Thanked 2,531 Times in 1,151 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 54 Posts
|
^ Who needs statistics and data to make decisions when you can rely on gut feeling and common sense about what's right?
|
| |
08-13-2015, 07:44 AM
|
#198 | Bieksa eats bears for breakfast...
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6,779
Thanked 117 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
|
Exactly. Like really? Federal policy making and thats the reason you give? Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapioca ^ Who needs statistics and data to make decisions when you can rely on gut feeling and common sense about what's right? |
__________________
Trinity: "DUDE WTF ARE YOU DOING?! ARE YOU INSANE?!?!?!?
Your balls are sensitive things!! They shouldn't be played around with, at least not like that, and you should NOT BE DIPPING THEM IN AFTERSHAVE! Oh my god, I feel sorry for your balls!"
ODC: "Wrong, a roots type blower will produce max boost from 0rpm to redline."
Iceman_19: "A roots makes zero boost at zero rpm, lol"
Ulic Qel-Droma: "haha go google image big black dick. or black cock. i forgot which term i used. it's one of the many." |
| |
08-15-2015, 12:29 AM
|
#199 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
|
Food for thought:
There's a lot of criticism about countries that have a two party system when it comes to federal elections. The disadvantages are obvious as it creates a ton of voter apathy and allows for a narrower field of options when it comes inter-party cooperation. However, it seems like there's certainly a case for it.
When it comes to Canada, you vote Conservative if you lean right. There's really no viable second option. However, if you lean left, you have three main parties to choose from (NDP, Liberals, Green). This causes a massive split between votes. So theoretically the vast majority of the country could be left leaning, but when you split those votes between three parties, you're likely stuck with the right wing party still standing with the majority vote.
So what's the solution? Do we try and move to a two party system as well? Do we try and convince the lefts to join together and create one party that wont split the votes?
How do you fix the split votes?
|
| |
08-15-2015, 12:31 AM
|
#200 | Head Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
|
Also, there's a problem when I'm more interested in the USA's federal election than my own.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM. |