![]() |
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...merica.svg.png Blue is 16 for legal age of consent Olive 17 Green 18 Don't ask about the other colors cause you don't want to know lol. (Hint, light blue is 12 :heckno:) So, are you a pedophile if you have consensual sex with a 16 year old where it is perfectly legal? No. But, if you had a picture of a 16 year old girl who is naked, you can be convicted of child pornography. To take that one step further, your super hot consensual 16 year old GF sexts you some nudie pics, you get arrested for receipt of child pornography. (Even if you're say 18 years old.) Does anyone else think that's a little odd? I just don't feel like the laws adequately address the situation when consensual sex is legal but a "consensual" photograph is not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:lol so those light blue areas may seem :fuckyea: to them now but in a few years they may find it to be :heckno: as well |
Quote:
|
|
always knew something was off about him... |
If the pedophiles are brown asians... theyre Muslim pedophiles. Spoiler! If they're "Jewish" like Jared, or "Christian" politicians and clergy then theyre either just pedophiles or ignored by the system and society all together. Spoiler! no other site exposes pedophiles like http://aanirfan.blogspot.ca/ |
Quote:
|
LOL THOSE MEMES. |
|
Quote:
|
I hope they fuck this guys up in jail. What a piece of shit. |
Quote:
|
lol reddit Quote:
|
Quote:
What an indecent human-being. He's not from an underprivileged family, a quick google shows his dad was a physician. He was a privileged kid yet he had to have fourteen victims; that's only the ones who have been documented. Who knows how many more there are that are unspoken for. This guy made a conscious and premeditated decision to violate minors at least 14 times, it's not a one off thing, not a lapse in judgement, it's not mental sickness. There are so many better things he could have done with that money but instead openly chose to take advantage of children. Honestly, I'm surprised he was even Subway's spokesperson for 15 years. I thought the commercials replaced him with the CGI monkey. |
Florida Woman Who Alerted FBI About Jared Fogle Says He's 'a Monster' : People.com Quote:
|
I'd suck Jarred's D for a mill |
hahahahahhah you're fucking messed up man. first patty kane, now jared :lol |
not intentionally trying to tip the balance of morals and virtues... but... if the saying "you can't help who you love" is true... and we've accepted that with normal people... i mean some people love fat bitches, black bitches, skinny bitches, smelly bitches... the list goes on... then we've slowly accepted that it also works like that in homosexuals.... so we've basically accepted it's genetic. you can't help it. it's hard wired into your impulse. your dick gets hard over X. everyone's X is different right? so for a pedo... isn't it the "same" thing... except it's looked down upon for "obvious" reasons? so on our path of western individualistic libertarian value expansion... shouldn't pedophiles be viewed as the same way? like you can't make them NOT like little kids right? that's obvious already. there's something "wrong" with them (it's hardwired). so like... what is their place in society? it looks like pedophiles have been around forever, and will be around for... forever. is their purpose in society, for us to seek them out and burn them in public, like a witch hunt? until that gene is eradicated from our society? and then to seek out all future mutations that lean toward pedophilia and eradicate them as well? let's be realistic for a second... you can't control or police what people think (at least in most countries lol)... so a pedo with diaries and personal drawings of his fantasies can't be tried... but a pedo with pics of little kids can be. BUT isnt this the exact same thing as letting the gays have their gay clubs? and letting the drug junkies have their injection sites? like ISNT IT BETTER they have pics to jerk off to, than nothing at all? cuz just cuz the pictures and action doesn't exist. doesn't mean THEY dont exist... they're thinking it... and they're lusting for it... they DESIRE it. they'll be actively seeking it out in underground black markets and shit. which in turns FEEDS these underground societies and shit. so what's the most logical thing to do? lol... they're fucked if they do, they're fucked if they don't. in the eyes of society, they might as well all line up beside a ditch and get on their knees and let society shoot them in the back of the head right? cuz really... let's be honest... what other choice do they have? LOL. for those of you who don't get it... imagine you like women with small calves. but that's super taboo. in fact you can go to jail for that. it's not considered "normal". everyday of your life you have to act like you don't like small calves, u have to play it out like that's disgusting and join in on the witch hunt. but inside, there is a fire burning, a passion for small calves. you can't help it. nothing else gets you off. small calves are the ONLY thing that gets you off. what can you do? eventually if left to your own devices you'll eventually find pictures of small calves. or even force yourself on someone with small calves. because like we all know... humans have this uncontrollable desire to get off on what they like. but we have no control over what we like. now i know you fuckers are gonna say small calves arent children that can't consent. yeah yeah. but u don't get the point. the passion they have for X... can't change... to us they are fucked up. but then i think people that like fat chicks are fucked up too. or guys that like dicks up their asses. everyone is "fucked up" to the other party. sure what they do requires children that are not able to "consent"... but remove that fact... u can protect the kids all u want. the question is what do u do with these pedophiles? what if you could provide them with little kid robots like that kid from the movie "AI" LOL. would u guys be ok with that? or do they just have to be eradicated? all of them hung and shot (for something that's genetically predisposition). just some food for thought. real replies only please lol. a mind excersize if u will. |
Quote:
Also pics won't cut it soon or later they will want the real thing. It's not like people are having less sex because of internet porn. |
Quote:
I agree with what you said. Doing little kids that can't consent or defend themselves is wrong but in the eyes of the person doing it, it is right. There brain is different than the general population. Just like a person who likes the same sex, fat chicks, skinny chicks, butt sex, S&M, etc.... You bring up an interesting point about the safe injection sites and gay clubs. What about giving pedo's midget pron? |
being a pedo is more of a "mental illness" that needs to be treated/supported than some guy who is sad because he's not very good at life and has a shitty job, but dont worry, that guy is "depressed" and should receive all the help he needs. |
Quote:
|
He paid those girls and now the girls are milking it by going public. Do you think they had conversations with Jared if he didn't pay up, black mail style. They went through lawyers and he agreed to pay 100k each girl for a lower sentence. The girls probably agree to 100k each for reduced sentence. |
Quote:
Can it even be called a witch hunt if these pedophiles are actually doing these acts and admit guilt? Is looking out for robbers also considered a witch hunt? If you commit a crime and are wanted, you are simply wanted to be brought to justice. We don't openly go out and point fingers and call someone a pedophile. We look for them post-facto after they've committed the act. So no, I don't think witch-hunt is an appropriate term for bringing pedophiles to justice. By letting these pedophiles have access to explicit images of minors AND allowing them to roam around abusing minors is perpetuating a sick business. Where do you think those images originate? If there's a demand for more, people will continue to abuse children to provide fap material to pedophiles. Making minors do things against their own will to fulfill someone else's satisfaction; what does that sound like? Slavery? Is slavery ok? The difference between letting gay people have gay clubs and not letting pedophiles go around looking for sex with minors is that opening up a gay club isn't intentional to traffic gay people in and abuse them. Having Jared propositioning under-aged minors leads fuckers like Jared making child porn and abusing minors. Gay clubs are a social setting where gay people come and socialize (under conventional circumstances ie no vendetta against another gay man or lesbian woman or there's no children allowed in there). Having safe injection sites for junkies is to control the spread of disease. Having kiddie pr0n is intentional to see under-aged children be abused. I don't know how the line between opening a gay club and kiddie pr0n can be blurred. The two to me are mutually exclusive so please explain how the two comparison came to be at all. So what do we do with pedophiles given our justice system? Well, seek them out and give them psychological treatment to make them not pedophiles and put them back into society as a contributor. Does this work? Who knows. Probably not, that's why we have a thing called repeat offenders. I'm sure some places in the world just execute them. Controlling impulses comes with discipline. I mean, we all have and id ego, I'm sure we've all fantasized about something that's not socially acceptable but we control that. Otherwise we'd be no better than a feral dog. There is no right answer on what to do with pedophiles. If you kill one, another one will spring up. This Jared guy likely won't ever have any self-control we just gotta make him pay out the ass. Is that a solution? Not really ideal but at least he'll think twice (maybe). |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net