REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2024, 10:39 AM   #3826
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
TypeRNammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,552
Thanked 3,595 Times in 1,210 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 60 Posts
Damn that's a really disappointing announcement from Mazda. They've been sort of hyping up for a while but it's a hard pass.

42km on the PHEV battery by itself, 8km shy of maxing out the federal rebate

EDIT: Like a few posters above, Mazda could have saved a ton of money by making the CX 60 crash test certified for our shores.
Advertisement
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_AK View Post
Or you meet some girl at the club, cum inside of her, find out shes only in grade 12, so you buy a Prada bag for her to make things right, she finds out the bag is a fake and decides to have the kid
Quote:
Originally Posted by RX_Renesis View Post
wtf did she get some bolt-on titties or what?
they look sooooooooooo much bigger than they were 2ish years ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nns View Post
I can't stand the sound of Mandarin either. Boo yow nee bey nee shing bo now noong gey shee mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo mayo.
TypeRNammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 10:40 AM   #3827
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Van
Posts: 4,649
Thanked 1,971 Times in 1,041 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 125 Posts
Mx30 isn't bad if you can get for for like $20000, city run around car, not sure how well the battery tech will hold up though
JDMDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 10:49 AM   #3828
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,004
Thanked 2,845 Times in 1,221 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
Putting out 1/2 baked products every now and then is the same habit that has been hurting Mazda's books as far back as I can remember. Wasn't their MX-30 experiment recent enough to remind them not to do this?
Mazda's the quirkiest of the mainstream automakers and without that we'd also wouldn't get cars like the RX-7/8s or the Miata (or even the Millenia). They make cars that often make little commercial sense so I can live with weird stuff like the MX-30.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 11:11 AM   #3829
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
radeonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,094
Thanked 966 Times in 466 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
A truncated CX-90 was what I expected for the CX-70 given their R&D investment in the I-6 engine and RWD platform.

Without any insight into their product planning process, the CX-90 should've launched as the CX-70 with 3-row as an option, followed by a CX-90 with a more squared-off design to rival the Telluride / Palisade (effectively making it a Japanese BMW X5).

Maybe one day we'll find out why Mazda took this approach. For now, I'm more worried Mazda will run out of money because these products don't seem that competitive.
radeonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 11:21 AM   #3830
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,004
Thanked 2,845 Times in 1,221 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...x-70-vs-cx-90/

When the media writes articles that start with "We Think Mazda Is Trolling Us with the CX-70"...
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 11:25 AM   #3831
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,109
Thanked 9,871 Times in 3,926 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
wowsa the 8AT isn't torque converted or DCT, it's almost like the ferrari f1 trans? people complaining it's not very smooth i thought it was just tuning/shift logic

twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 12:03 PM   #3832
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Van
Posts: 4,649
Thanked 1,971 Times in 1,041 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 125 Posts
Isn't the cx90 already like x5 size, it looks pretty long
JDMDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 12:40 PM   #3833
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,004
Thanked 2,845 Times in 1,221 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
wowsa the 8AT isn't torque converted or DCT, it's almost like the ferrari f1 trans? people complaining it's not very smooth i thought it was just tuning/shift logic
It's more comparable to the AMG 9 speed which replaces the torque converter with a clutch instead. The setup isn't the problem here - it's the tuning - as this works just fine for Mercedes and most torque converters lock up at pretty low speeds anyways.

This was a packaging decision - the clutch is skinnier than the torque convertor AND with a mild hybrid system you should be able to get initial drive with the electric motor so you don't get low speed clunkiness with the clutch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDMDreams View Post
Isn't the cx90 already like x5 size, it looks pretty long
Even bigger - 201" long.

Comments on Mazda Canada's Instagram have not been kind so far: https://www.instagram.com/p/C2uxhECs..._web_copy_link
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 01:17 PM   #3834
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by radeonboy View Post
A truncated CX-90 was what I expected for the CX-70 given their R&D investment in the I-6 engine and RWD platform.

Maybe one day we'll find out why Mazda took this approach. For now, I'm more worried Mazda will run out of money because these products don't seem that competitive.
(again, used to work in product planning) >> Mazda's R&D cost for CX70/90 is 2-3X all of Toyota's recently refreshed trucks while selling a lot less volume and at a 10-20k discount to Lexus.

The body on this wasn't shortened because it can cost ~40% of all non powertrain R&D costs for a new program. Maybe 20% since it would reuse a lot of CX90 front end. It's crazy that Mazda's still alive when they're making moves building niche products like they're SAAB.

If I were at Mazda, I would've improved the steering/powertrain/suspension calibration of the Highlander / Grand Highlander. Program would cost 50-60% less and product would be better. CX-5 would've gotten hybrid and plug-in hybrid by now.

Would've developed heat pump tech that Toyota/Subaru could then go use in their EV (part of why Toyota took stake in Mazda in the first place, to get access to Skyactiv related expertise to hit 40% thermal efficiency on their new 4 cylinders).
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]

Last edited by AstulzerRZD; 01-30-2024 at 03:50 PM.
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 01:46 PM   #3835
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
radeonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,094
Thanked 966 Times in 466 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
(again, used to work in product planning) >> Mazda's R&D cost for CX70/90 is 2-3X all of Toyota's recently refreshed trucks while selling a lot less volume and at a 10-20k discount to Lexus.
[...]
It's crazy that Mazda's still alive when they're making moves building niche products like they're SAAB.
Their spending is why I'm concerned it'll financially handicap them on future projects if this is the output. I understand they want to stand out by building on their reputation gained with the MX-5, but it seems like a risky gamble when most SUV customers don't care about the driving benefits of an straight-6 in a RWD-based platform. I agree with your suggestion that they should've tuned an existing platform and make it their own flavor to save cost and keep tabs on the EV adoption rates, but I also can't imagine Toyota giving them access to their bread-and-butter models like the Grand Highlander.

Maybe one day the platform / powertrain will find its way into Toyota / Subaru to recoup some of the cost, but that feels unlikely as those two brands are moving more towards PHEVs / EVs.

I want Mazda to succeed, but between R&D on this platform and the MX-5 program, it seems more like a big gamble given their size and industry shift into electrification.

Last edited by radeonboy; 01-30-2024 at 01:55 PM.
radeonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 02:05 PM   #3836
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by radeonboy View Post
I agree with your suggestion that they should've tuned an existing platform and make it their own flavor to save cost and keep tabs on the EV adoption rates, but I also can't imagine Toyota giving them access to their bread-and-butter models like the Grand Highlander.

Maybe one day the platform / powertrain will find its way into Toyota / Subaru to recoup some of the cost, but that feels unlikely as those two brands are moving more towards PHEVs / EVs.
There were rumors but Lexus adoption isn't happening anymore unless it's for a future low volume bespoke F model.

I expect warranty costs to be quite high for this platform too; all new brakes / chassis / driveline vibration / whatever. I trust an X7 or Durango more than this for a sporty 7 seater.
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 02:19 PM   #3837
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,109
Thanked 9,871 Times in 3,926 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
(again, used to work in product planning) >> Mazda's R&D cost for CX70/90 is 2-3X all of Toyota's recently refreshed trucks while selling a lot less volume and at a 10-20k discount to Lexus.

The body on this wasn't shortened because it'd cost ~40% of all non powertrain R&D costs for a new program. It's crazy that Mazda's still alive when they're making moves building niche products like they're SAAB.

If I were at Mazda, I would've improved the steering/powertrain/suspension calibration of the Highlander / Grand Highlander. Program would cost 50-60% less and product would be better. CX-5 would've gotten hybrid and plug-in hybrid by now.

Would've developed heat pump tech that Toyota/Subaru could then go use in their EV (part of why Toyota took stake in Mazda in the first place, to get access to Skyactiv related expertise to hit 40% thermal efficiency on their new 4 cylinders).
yeah i thought it was a lot of value given how much they dumped into it
if teething issues are resolved and it's a smaller pkg, i want one
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 02:23 PM   #3838
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Van
Posts: 4,649
Thanked 1,971 Times in 1,041 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 125 Posts
I don't get why they had to develop a new straight 6, when the market is going electric, why not that wankle range extender EV. Or just buy the Infiniti fx/ 400z platform and build a rwd SUV on it like the fx50.
JDMDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 02:43 PM   #3839
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDMDreams View Post
I don't get why they had to develop a new straight 6, when the market is going electric, why not that wankle range extender EV. Or just buy the Infiniti fx/ 400z platform and build a rwd SUV on it like the fx50.
Nissan platform's too old and too small. Even if you re-use the underbody/brakes/suspension, you're only saving 20% cuz you still have to invest in upper body, hvac/interiors, assembly/paint, etcetc.

Range extender EV tech's definitely an experiment cuz some people at HQ did it on a shoestring budget or had enough political pull to keep it alive, nothing serious. FWD based products will probably use Toyota tech in next gen.
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]

Last edited by AstulzerRZD; 01-30-2024 at 02:49 PM.
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 02:57 PM   #3840
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
yeah i thought it was a lot of value given how much they dumped into it
if teething issues are resolved and it's a smaller pkg, i want one
Ironically I could see the CX70 selling fairly well.

Lots of combined Ford/Mazda dealers and they're losing the Edge - large 2 row midsize crossover that sold 100k units.

In a lot of America, the oversized CX70 2 row might just do the trick; CX9/90 only sold 30k, many to rental fleets.
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 04:29 PM   #3841
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Van
Posts: 4,649
Thanked 1,971 Times in 1,041 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 125 Posts
^ damn I just looked, phev starts at $55000-65000. Tough market when you can get a Y at that price
JDMDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 04:50 PM   #3842
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,004
Thanked 2,845 Times in 1,221 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
(again, used to work in product planning) >> Mazda's R&D cost for CX70/90 is 2-3X all of Toyota's recently refreshed trucks while selling a lot less volume and at a 10-20k discount to Lexus.

The body on this wasn't shortened because it can cost ~40% of all non powertrain R&D costs for a new program. Maybe 20% since it would reuse a lot of CX90 front end. It's crazy that Mazda's still alive when they're making moves building niche products like they're SAAB.

If I were at Mazda, I would've improved the steering/powertrain/suspension calibration of the Highlander / Grand Highlander. Program would cost 50-60% less and product would be better. CX-5 would've gotten hybrid and plug-in hybrid by now.
Mazda's management gives me so much anxiety b/c they do such crazy stuff that no one else would do. As someone who loves the brand I worry all the time that they won't be around in 10 years. Their stubbornness is a lot like 70's Honda but they just don't have the resources in today's world to be that stubborn.

I agree with you on leveraging more of Toyota's tech - build a 3 row off the Grand Highlander (the TX passes pretty well as a luxury SUV so it can be done). Or build off the Skyactiv platform to launch a mid-size 2 row (I never got why they didn't build something between the CX-5 and CX-9 to sell in North America - easy money relatively speaking). I'd love for them to do a few things that just print money (like building a 3 row off the Grand Highlander) rather than be so stubborn about who they are.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 04:55 PM   #3843
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Van
Posts: 4,649
Thanked 1,971 Times in 1,041 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 125 Posts
But zoom zoom, it's the same shit as Toyota and Subaru Won't turbo the 86 or offer stis anymore
JDMDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 05:11 PM   #3844
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDMDreams View Post
But zoom zoom, it's the same shit as Toyota and Subaru Won't turbo the 86 or offer stis anymore
ICE powertrain generally amortized over 10 yr time horizon. Even Honda had to redo the J series V6 last year to cut emissions by 40-50% ...and even then it's only meant to stay compliant till 2030ish.

FA24DIT probably emissions capped already & Subaru's not investing in a new high performance 4 cylinder when their next gen is probably all hybridized N/A I-4 >> so no STI.

86 is a price point problem - the fact they have a pretty decent feeling interior now and still sell at 30k CAD is nothing short of a miracle/low development costs - that's 26k USD... base Civic money.
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 05:34 PM   #3845
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
radeonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,094
Thanked 966 Times in 466 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
Ironically I could see the CX70 selling fairly well.

In a lot of America, the oversized CX70 2 row might just do the trick; CX9/90 only sold 30k, many to rental fleets.
In a weird way I also think the CX-70 will do well if it's priced a few grand below the CX-90, but it'll be at the expense of CX-90 sales because people generally don't want their more-expensive car to look the same as one with a lower numerical hierarchy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
86 is a price point problem - the fact they have a pretty decent feeling interior now and still sell at 30k CAD is nothing short of a miracle/low development costs - that's 26k USD... base Civic money.
The ND3 at $35k is pretty unbelievable as well given its dedicated architecture and market cap, especially when Toyota needed BMW to justify the Z4/Supra, and Subaru for the GR86/BRZ.
radeonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 05:59 PM   #3846
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 352
Thanked 236 Times in 111 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by radeonboy View Post
The ND3 at $35k is pretty unbelievable as well given its dedicated architecture and market cap, especially when Toyota needed BMW to justify the Z4/Supra, and Subaru for the GR86/BRZ.
The ND generation has been out since 2015/16, so I suspect a lot of the costs have already been amortized. No arguing that a dedicated platform was (and is) incredibly costly for a small company like Mazda. I love my Miata and I intend to keep it for some time, but it would be nice to have something to look forward to upgrading to in the future.

I really hope their next generation small car platform will be profitable enough to carry them through the next decade. The next generation 3 and related cars have a lot on their shoulders...

The CX-90 has some real shortfalls, but I'm really hoping that they can refine the design and fix up some of the teething issues to make it more competitive. I wonder if Lexus would be interested in doing some joint development of the I6... Imagine the return of a proper IS 300 or RWD vehicle with an I6!

Mazda really needed a CX-5 replacement like... yesterday. A hybrid and/or plug-in option with comparable range to the Rav4 Prime would be a huge win for them.
jaaagman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 06:28 PM   #3847
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
With how reliable the B58 and ZF8 combination seem to be, I really have a hard time understanding the CX90's place in the market.

Their only real advantage is the plug-in hybrid 7 seater; the Grand Cherokee is 15k more but barely does the battery thing, Volvo is 25k more.
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 06:30 PM   #3848
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Badhobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Ricemond
Posts: 9,178
Thanked 10,687 Times in 3,834 Posts
Failed 478 Times in 242 Posts
im looking at a bmw x5 for the wife to replace her ULTRA RELIABLE RX350. yes im idiotic.

I want that sweet sweet b58
Badhobz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 06:36 PM   #3849
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,560
Thanked 1,485 Times in 527 Posts
Failed 57 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz View Post
im looking at a bmw x5 for the wife to replace her ULTRA RELIABLE RX350. yes im idiotic.

I want that sweet sweet b58
tbh I feel like it's a commodity engine - really fucking fast and reliable but not thatttt special. A Grand Cherokee with ZF8 and Hemi feels special the moment u start it up
__________________
2002 AP1 S2000 "Mustard"
2024 F150 Lightning


Past:
- '09 Ducati Monster 696 "Ketchup"
- '20 Dodge Charger R/T 5.7
- '20 Ford Mustang GT Convertible
- '04 Acura TL 6MT
- 🛴 Lime Scooter 🛴
- '16 Golf 1.8T
- '09 MB E63 AMG
- '06 Honda Accord V6[/SIZE]
AstulzerRZD is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-30-2024, 06:36 PM   #3850
RS Veteran
 
bcrdukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GTA
Posts: 29,844
Thanked 11,520 Times in 4,710 Posts
Failed 440 Times in 282 Posts
Tell her to curse you and you might end up trading in the RX for the X5 and feel the wrath of BMW
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIC_BAWS View Post
I literally do not plan on buying another vehicle in my lifetime, assuming it doesn't get written off.
bcrdukes is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net