REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2016, 08:18 PM   #1
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,272
Thanked 321 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
Got into an accident, 50/50 or 100% at fault?

I got into an accident a couple weeks ago. I was making a lane change and hit another car. Prior to making the lane changed I shoulder checked and didn't see another car so I made the lane change. After looking at my dash cam footage I am pretty certain that the car I hit was also making a lane change into the same lane.

I showed the video the ICBC and they say the footage and screen shot I provided to them is still not enough to confirm the third party vehicle had made a lane change so I am 100% at fault for the accident.

I've shown the video to a bunch of objective people and they all agree that the video shows that the other car was coming from another lane. What do you guys think?


Advertisement
yelnats8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 08:23 PM   #2
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,325
Thanked 735 Times in 206 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 12 Posts
Looks pretty obvious to me that it's 50/50 and that you both turned into each other at the same time. I'm no expert but just looking at where the damage is + video evidence, you can easily see he turned into it as well
__________________
Current:
10 Evolution GSR (Summer)
'01 Sentra (Daily)
Past:'06 Civic Si
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-03-2016, 08:28 PM   #3
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
meme405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 7,763 Times in 2,315 Posts
Failed 409 Times in 181 Posts
I'm with ICBC can't really tell if they are changing lanes, or if they swerved to avoid you and didn't manage it enough.

Either way sounds like ICBC has made up their minds, your only choice now is if you decide to lawyer up and fight it. I strongly advise against potentially wasting money fighting something like this, I doubt you will come out in better shape than you are in now, and you will cause yourself so much stress and headache dealing with it.

Accidents happen, it's why we all carry insurance. Let the insurance take care of it, and you can more or less move on.
__________________

Barney Fucking Purple FX35
Brianna - 2008 FX35 - Build Thread
meme405 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-03-2016, 08:29 PM   #4
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
tegra7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 2,604
Thanked 3,183 Times in 1,006 Posts
Failed 334 Times in 68 Posts
Looks like 50/50.
__________________
Integra Type R 00-0853
tegra7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 08:29 PM   #5
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: im over here!
Posts: 662
Thanked 365 Times in 175 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Looks pretty obvious to me that it's 50/50 and that you both turned into each other at the same time. I'm no expert but just looking at where the damage is + video evidence, you can easily see he turned into it as well
agreed
StanleyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 08:34 PM   #6
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
meme405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 7,763 Times in 2,315 Posts
Failed 409 Times in 181 Posts
Hmm 3 other replies with a definitely opposite answer. Maybe you have a better case than I thought. Starting to think it might be worth it to lawyer up. Ultimately up to you, best of luck.
__________________

Barney Fucking Purple FX35
Brianna - 2008 FX35 - Build Thread
meme405 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 08:38 PM   #7
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: B.C
Posts: 871
Thanked 733 Times in 225 Posts
Failed 74 Times in 20 Posts
looks like u were half way in when the collision happened so its possible that both of u 2 merged at the same time unless he swerved by reflex.
i-vtecyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 08:38 PM   #8
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Failed 331 Times in 171 Posts
50/50 or 100/0 makes no difference to you, your rates will go up. If you know for sure the other car changed lanes into you and won't admit it, i'd fight for 50/50 so both of you are punished. If the other car didn't lane change or you're not sure, chalk this up to an expensive mistake.
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4

2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-03-2016, 09:23 PM   #9
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,018
Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,227 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
Inconclusive - the other MAY have been coming from the other lane but there's not enough evidence to say that it DEFINITELY was coming from the other lane.
__________________
Current: 2019 Acura RDX
Gone: 2007 Acura TSX, 2008 Mazda 3 GT, 2003 Mazda Miata LS, 2008 Mazda Miata GT PRHT, 2003 Mazda Protege 5
supafamous is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-03-2016, 09:28 PM   #10
KO7
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC,
Posts: 1,645
Thanked 459 Times in 111 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 18 Posts
I'm leaning more towards 50/50 than he was trying to swerve. If he swerved he wouldn't have looked like he would commit so much to going into that same lane IMO.
KO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 09:35 PM   #11
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
dark0821's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Van604
Posts: 2,921
Thanked 2,280 Times in 631 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 40 Posts
it looks to be a 50/50...

But since your dashcam is actually pretty high def, would it be too much if you ask the adjuster/estimator to call all the other drivers on scene?

I mean just by your short clip, ICBC should be able to find the driver for
Grey BMW X5
Orange Honda Element
Black BMW 3er sedan
Black Acura MDX

At this point, I think a 3rd party witness will be your best bet
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts

AE101 Rolla 96' //Sold
RPS13 240SX 90' //STOLEN
RMS13 240SX 91' //Scrapped
RHS13 240SX 90' //Scrapped
S35 Rogue 12' //Gifted to Parents
GD 6MT Elantra 13' //Sold
CZ4A 5MT GSR Evo 08' // Totalled
Ioniq DCT 19' //Traded in
NA MX-5 5MT 97' // Sold
Prius Prime 21' //Traded in
Tesla Model 3 RWD DD
GSX-R 600 K5' Mental Therapy
Prius Prime 24' New Kids Carrier
dark0821 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2016, 09:50 PM   #12
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,725
Thanked 9,407 Times in 4,096 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
The gunmetal Acura SUV rolling down their window and looking over likely saw the accident, if you can get their plate from the footage I'd try to see if they can be contacted as a witness somehow.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 10:41 AM   #13
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Akinari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,368
Thanked 5,225 Times in 1,389 Posts
Failed 376 Times in 130 Posts
I can't stand it these days when witnesses see an accident and just fucking drive away like it's absolutely none of their business. What is it with people and not wanting to help these days? Really pisses me off. Especially in Richmond.

/rant

Good luck with the case OP
__________________
[13-03, 11:25] MG1 when you hit the brakes, it shoots cum at pedestrian - bukkake

[12-03, 19:06] meme405 That e30 is so mexiflushed I thought we were in albuquerque

[12-03, 23:03] rb when i see a modded element. I have nothing but respect. either the parents kicked him out or the guy is killing hookers in the back
Akinari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 11:00 AM   #14
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,296
Thanked 522 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dared3vil0 View Post
50/50 or 100/0 makes no difference to you, your rates will go up. If you know for sure the other car changed lanes into you and won't admit it, i'd fight for 50/50 so both of you are punished. If the other car didn't lane change or you're not sure, chalk this up to an expensive mistake.
I think if you take the option of paying everything upfront the rates don't go up. I've had that option before where if I paid 100% upfront it would be like 600 dollars, but if i use insurance it would be like 1k over 3 years. Now having said that, looks like there's a lot of $$$ damage so it won't be worth it in the end.
jackmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 11:11 AM   #15
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmeister View Post
I think if you take the option of paying everything upfront the rates don't go up. I've had that option before where if I paid 100% upfront it would be like 600 dollars, but if i use insurance it would be like 1k over 3 years. Now having said that, looks like there's a lot of $$$ damage so it won't be worth it in the end.
Yup. For minor fender benders where the only damage is paint scuff or something, it's worth paying out the damage to prevent taking a rate hit. However, most accidents involving new(er) cars will likely exceed the increased rate, making it not worthwhile to buy it out.

My single at-fault accident a few years back ended up amounting to around $5k in damages (90% of that was on my car), whereas my insurance hike was going to be about $900 after everything. Decided to bite the bullet and take the rate increase instead.
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-04-2016, 11:21 AM   #16
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Tough call based on the video, best of luck OP.

I could see it both ways personally.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-04-2016, 02:09 PM   #17
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,585
Thanked 4,578 Times in 934 Posts
Failed 554 Times in 127 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmeister View Post
I think if you take the option of paying everything upfront the rates don't go up. I've had that option before where if I paid 100% upfront it would be like 600 dollars, but if i use insurance it would be like 1k over 3 years. Now having said that, looks like there's a lot of $$$ damage so it won't be worth it in the end.
ya but thats usually not an option since 99% of people claim injury no matter how minor the accident. you cant pay out if theres an injury claim in my experience.

from ICBC perspective OP is claiming they were both merging into same lane. other driver saying OP merged into his lane. ICBC knows that OP was merging, video proves OP was merging and nothing else. So from ICBC perspective OP was admittedly merging, but theres no proof other party is lying so not enough evidence to make it 50-50.

only way it would have been 50-50 is if each party claimed the other was merging into their lane. in this case the video did not help OP case one bit, if anything it strengthened the other parties'
vitaminG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 02:48 PM   #18
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
xXSupa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,486
Thanked 3,189 Times in 625 Posts
Failed 97 Times in 30 Posts
I'm pretty sure that from the video, the other car was changing lanes as well. However, because there is no way to prove 100% that he was changing lanes and not just trying to avoid you, ICBC cannot put the other driver at fault. Im assuming the other driver probably told ICBC that you changed lanes into him, hence the 100/0 fault split.

Time to invest in a rear cam maybe?
__________________
oOoOooOOo what does this space do

-2018 BMW F30 340i M Performance Edition - Current
-2016 BMW F32 435i MPPK - Traded
-2011 BMW E92 335i - SOLD
-2009 Chrysler Sebring Convertible - SOLD
xXSupa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 03:15 PM   #19
I don't get it
 
a00755836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Richmond
Posts: 417
Thanked 182 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 5 Posts
it's hard to prove that the rav4 changed lanes. Someone please correct me if i'm wrong here...

- it's always the person turning left (for sure in an intersection) that the person is at fault, unless proven.

in this case, if my above statement is correct, the blue rav4 driver could be at fault if he/she admits they changed lane.
a00755836 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 06:06 PM   #20
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
JesseBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here! n There!
Posts: 4,149
Thanked 498 Times in 222 Posts
Failed 121 Times in 59 Posts
Its either you lose or both parties lose. Either way icbc wins.

From your video. Guy was ahead of you so technically he has the right of way (got that from initial d)
__________________
Go Canucks Go!
JesseBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 06:54 PM   #21
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by a00755836 View Post
it's hard to prove that the rav4 changed lanes. Someone please correct me if i'm wrong here...

- it's always the person turning left (for sure in an intersection) that the person is at fault, unless proven.

in this case, if my above statement is correct, the blue rav4 driver could be at fault if he/she admits they changed lane.
The wording is that you are only to turn left WHEN SAFE TO DO SO, same goes for changing lanes... it doesn't matter if the other person is breaking the law (running a red light while you have the green) and hits you... you are still at fault.

My GF is an adjuster, it's incredible how much a kangaroo court system it can be that determines who is at fault, the driver statements are very very important. If they can't determine who is at fault by the statements they will usually call the involved in for an interview and have them draw out the accident as they claim it happened. They will then decide if there is sufficient "evidence" to determine fault.. if at this point they can't determine fault they may go 50/50 or attempt to locate camera footage from businesses etc for more info.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 09:52 PM   #22
I don't get it
 
a00755836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Richmond
Posts: 417
Thanked 182 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo View Post
The wording is that you are only to turn left WHEN SAFE TO DO SO, same goes for changing lanes... it doesn't matter if the other person is breaking the law (running a red light while you have the green) and hits you... you are still at fault.

My GF is an adjuster, it's incredible how much a kangaroo court system it can be that determines who is at fault, the driver statements are very very important. If they can't determine who is at fault by the statements they will usually call the involved in for an interview and have them draw out the accident as they claim it happened. They will then decide if there is sufficient "evidence" to determine fault.. if at this point they can't determine fault they may go 50/50 or attempt to locate camera footage from businesses etc for more info.
thats good insight.

i'd like to know the outcome since i pass this road after work regularly. main st added more chaos during the holiday season. it felt like i was in china for a sec
a00755836 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 12:19 AM   #23
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: work
Posts: 1,451
Thanked 963 Times in 337 Posts
Failed 1,004 Times in 194 Posts
Maybe its just me, but it sounded like McLovin from Super Bad saying "oh shit".
E-SPEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 01:49 AM   #24
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,109
Thanked 9,871 Times in 3,926 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
get icbc to contact the grey mdx if you can get his plate

good luck

your case has prompted me to start looking for a 2-channel dash cam again.
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 04:44 AM   #25
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20,400
Thanked 7,456 Times in 1,441 Posts
Failed 2,380 Times in 472 Posts
^ same here...I just took my other car's camcorder and mount it on my SLK's rear window. Going to order a pair of cheap one for the back.

ICBC should lower the premium of whoever has a car cam.
asian_XL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net