REVscene Automotive Forum
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Revscene Quick Take: 2016 Ford Mustang 5.0 GT (https://www.revscene.net/forums/710184-revscene-quick-take-2016-ford-mustang-5-0-gt.html)

Gucci Mane 09-04-2016 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunoman1 (Post 8785462)
The original mustang was the first car Ford specifically marketed towards the young female buyer
Don't respond to timpo, he's a fucking idiot.

brrrz 09-04-2016 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Chow (Post 8785342)
Just picked up a 2016 Mustang ecoboost fastback with ecoboost performance package today :)

Got an awesome trade in for my little 2012 Hyundai accent :fuckyea:
You will love it. Iv been driving that car around for the last 2 weeks now. I averaged 7.8L/100kms driving to Seattle and I would say about 9.3 in the city. Not bad for 310hp/320tq. The car does run on regular gas and premium. Horsepower difference is 275hp (87) and 310 (93). So just remember that next time at the pump!

mr00jimbo 09-04-2016 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo (Post 8785596)
This is a bit OT, but I don't understand the GT350R hype when an extremely comparable car exists with a much lower price tag - The Z/28 Camaro.

You can buy two Z/28 Camaro's for the price of one GT350R.
US MSRP on the 2014 Z28 is 75,000 dollars.
US MSRP on GT350R is 63,495...

Now, that does NOT include the options and the insane dealer markup. But the Z28 is a LOT more expensive than people think.

2015 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 vs. 2016 Ford Shelby GT350R Mustang Head 2 Head Comparison

Gucci Mane 09-04-2016 03:01 PM
i think jason's forgetting that when the z/28 was first released it also had a pretty retarded mark up..

J-Chow 09-05-2016 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by brrrz (Post 8785633)
You will love it. Iv been driving that car around for the last 2 weeks now. I averaged 7.8L/100kms driving to Seattle and I would say about 9.3 in the city. Not bad for 310hp/320tq. The car does run on regular gas and premium. Horsepower difference is 275hp (87) and 310 (93). So just remember that next time at the pump!
Nice. I read about the octane and hp thing online , but I was wondering what kind of numbers would I see if I put 91 octane instead of 93? I mean Ford produced the 310hp at 93 ..... so... Yea lol.

I really wanna get the stage 1 Cobb ap. $500 for 30hp and 60tq estimate increase ...can't go wrong with that.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net