REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2016, 07:52 PM   #26
Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: vancouver
Posts: 300
Thanked 225 Times in 79 Posts
Failed 90 Times in 16 Posts
Wait. Remind me again what was ICBC annual net income?
Advertisement
asma123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 07:56 PM   #27
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,072
Thanked 3,367 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 92 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
A guy with a high end car may only drive 30 times a year where as a guy with a old Civic could be driving it every day. Why should the guy driving only 30 times a year pay way more than the guy driving 365 days a year.
It's called pleasure insurance, you pay less and can drive up to 6 days in a calendar month. If they want to insure it for everyday use and only drive it 30 times a year then they can pay more for being stupid.
MarkyMark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 07:59 PM   #28
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 17
Thanked 21 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
It's called pleasure insurance, you pay less and can drive up to 6 days in a calendar month. If they want to insure it for everyday use and only drive it 30 times a year then they can pay more for being stupid.
You can drive every day on pleasure use only, you can only drive to/for work 6 times a month.
dabbin is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-23-2016, 08:14 PM   #29
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
This is totally unfair, why should I pay more to insure a new GT3, if anything I should get discount for having a car that is savage AF.

It's like the government won't stop until they've made being rich suck as much as being poor sucks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-23-2016, 08:32 PM   #30
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
meme405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 7,763 Times in 2,315 Posts
Failed 409 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo View Post
This is totally unfair, why should I pay more to insure a new GT3, if anything I should get discount for having a car that is savage AF.

It's like the government won't stop until they've made being rich suck as much as being poor sucks.
Cram it, you dirty Albertan.
__________________

Barney Fucking Purple FX35
Brianna - 2008 FX35 - Build Thread
meme405 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-23-2016, 08:37 PM   #31
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,094
Thanked 9,862 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
my amerifriends paying geico 50 USD/mo with roadside assistance sure beats $150+ ICBC rates...I say bring on the competition

plot twist: the drivers down in that state are significantly worse than Vancouver drivers. Just my own anecdotes though

insurance on my 11 year old Honda with equal years of squeaky clean records is

Last edited by twitchyzero; 11-23-2016 at 08:44 PM.
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 09:24 PM   #32
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 841
Thanked 810 Times in 179 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 14 Posts
The system is so broken as is. I know of a foreign kid has had multiple at fault accidents under his name in various cars. He then tried to insured his new lambo under his mom's name. Something went sideways and it didn't work out. Now, he insures his lambo using temp permits because it ends up being cheaper than getting normal insurance.
toyota86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 09:39 PM   #33
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Van
Posts: 2,849
Thanked 7,109 Times in 1,264 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by meme405 View Post
Cram it, you dirty Albertan.
I'm moving back to North Van Dec 10th

Feel free to have a celebration honouring my return.

Spoiler!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Follow me on Instagram @jasonturtle if you want to feel better about your life
jasonturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 09:39 PM   #34
I'm invisible
 
Edison_Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 604 Vancouver
Posts: 4,458
Thanked 178 Times in 101 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
Is that your reading of today's announcement, dabbin? Cuz as I read up on the various news report for it, my interpretation is quite different from yours, and that was how I came to my concerns above. From the way I am reading the press announcement, ICBC is entirely getting out of the insurance game for $150k+ vehicles. No optional insurance. No basic coverage. No nothing. They are letting the private sector handle that, and they are preparing the legislations for it.

So if they really get out of the basic insurance game for the $150k cars, that would be a game changer. But if they continue to offer basic liability insurance to them, then it seems like a pretty dumb plan. They should have just up the rates for those $150k+ cars to the point where they (ICBC) can break even, or maybe even make some profit. If the province is only dropping the optional insurance for those $150k+ cars, it is pretty much handing the potential cash cow over to the private insurance sector.
Currently from what I heard, these high end vehicles for own damage are rated differently from the regular vehicles. These are considered rate group 98 vehicles, and in order to buy own damage (collision and comp), the customers have to complete an application form for ICBC to determine what premiums they charge for own damage. Customers can still buy extra third party liability without the application.

Currently ICBC distributes the license (license plates) and insurance (basic and or optional). When a normal person wants to insure/license a vehicle, they are issued a license plate and there is basic insurance that comes with it; as per ICBC.com there are 5 components that comes with basic insurance: basic third party liability, accident benefits, under inside motorists protection, hit and run and reverse liability"

I would say it would be pretty hard if some other provincial body distributed plates for these exotic vehicles. It seems like what's hurting them is the own damage portion for these types of vehicles. Like what pets have said, how do they charge the correct premium for these vehicles. I would guess some new drivers would pay around $10,000+ premiums for the own damage.
__________________
REVscene.net
Edison_Chen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 09:46 PM   #35
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Timpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
so ICBC won't insure a car worth $150k+?

What if you own an Acura NSX or Porsche 911 Turbo?

Are you allowed to buy your basic insurance with private insurer?
Timpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 10:12 PM   #36
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,633
Thanked 9,331 Times in 4,059 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
A guy with a high end car may only drive 30 times a year where as a guy with a old Civic could be driving it every day. Why should the guy driving only 30 times a year pay way more than the guy driving 365 days a year.
Because according to the stats mentioned here they crash a heck of a lot during those 30 days. Maybe if rich idiots stopped buying teenagers Lambos we wouldn't have these problems.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-23-2016, 11:07 PM   #37
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,162
Thanked 1,267 Times in 291 Posts
Failed 90 Times in 20 Posts
I wouldn't mind a rate hike as long as the max discount level goes higher than ~43% - so it encourages better driving.
I'd love to end up getting something along the lines of 60-70% off yearly insurance

Last edited by ForeverYours; 11-23-2016 at 11:18 PM.
ForeverYours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 11:17 PM   #38
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,338
Thanked 9,384 Times in 2,406 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
Lol, my Lambo is been delivered in 2 weeks and I was waiting for ICBC's underwriter to get back to my agent with a quote but not sure what ICBC is going to quote me now based on these changes.
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2016, 11:22 PM   #39
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,094
Thanked 9,862 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
^doubt it'll kick in until spring the earliest

what's the magic number for luxury tax? $65k+? Why not make it a rule like that for any cars < 5 years that had the luxury tax. I guess many SUVs and entry-levels benz/bimmers will be inclusive of that bracket and the owners already mad they have to pay premium gas and maintenance is spendier than a corolla/civic
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 12:07 AM   #40
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 604
Posts: 1,190
Thanked 387 Times in 224 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer View Post
Raping our Asses? I pay $1650 a year for a 16 year old truck with 0 coverage outside of 3M liability..

thats with 44% discount, 10 years safe driving, yadayadayada

my ass is feeling pretty sore as is with ICBC..
My ass is more sore than yours lol.

1990 Honda civic hatch with 340,000 kms. zero coverage except 3 Million liability. Max out discount and I still pay $1200 a year.
teggy604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 12:14 AM   #41
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,094
Thanked 9,862 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
is there sentimental value or or is it extensively modified?

to me there's no reason to keep a car long term worth less than the annual operating costs.
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 12:17 AM   #42
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,338
Thanked 9,384 Times in 2,406 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
Election is right around the corner so when you need votes just wage a war against the rich...the same "rich" people who have been funding your party and bringing a steady flow of foreign capital so your leader can go around bragging about a surplus. Like the saying goes, don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 12:20 AM   #43
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 604
Posts: 1,190
Thanked 387 Times in 224 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 12 Posts
its a cheap beater and its very reliable. cost nothing really in terms of maintenance.
teggy604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 04:13 AM   #44
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hud 91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,328
Thanked 3,983 Times in 1,535 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 27 Posts
Fuck. We need trump! (Look totally joking here) haha that shit pisses me off though wow.

Would mandatory dash cams be do able? Also increase the fines/sentences to fraud help avoid the ass hats from ruining it for everyone? There goes the hobby of automotive fun. May have to build a dedicated track car.
__________________
Crush - 1971 Datsun 240z - Build Thread
The Daily - Rav4 V6 - “Goldilocks”

Last edited by hud 91gt; 11-24-2016 at 04:19 AM.
hud 91gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 04:58 AM   #45
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 3,558
Thanked 3,814 Times in 957 Posts
Failed 715 Times in 210 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
is there sentimental value or or is it extensively modified?

to me there's no reason to keep a car long term worth less than the annual operating costs.
What other cheaper alternative do you suggest? It absolutely makes sense to keep an older car as long ss it runs reliabily, and that applies to many of Japanese cars.
flagella is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-24-2016, 07:18 AM   #46
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
FerrariEnzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
The rates should effect people who never had accidents.. I would say, premium should effect people who have accidents and/or who have speeding tickets....

Just not fair to penalize everyone
__________________
My Buy&Sell Feedback, Thanx
FerrariEnzo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-24-2016, 07:44 AM   #47
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
wingies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: abc
Posts: 1,656
Thanked 937 Times in 220 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverYours View Post
I wouldn't mind a rate hike as long as the max discount level goes higher than ~43% - so it encourages better driving.
I'd love to end up getting something along the lines of 60-70% off yearly insurance
Yep, every year earning another level on the ICBC discount scale, when the net cost of your insurance is still going up
wingies is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-24-2016, 08:34 AM   #48
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Mancini's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,922
Thanked 304 Times in 155 Posts
Failed 116 Times in 29 Posts
So they're saying the rate is not reflective of the risk and owners of lower priced vehicles are essentially subsidizing the cost of optional insurance on high priced vehicles.

What really concerns me as an average Joe is whether this methodology applies to other rate categories. By insuring my $29,000 car am I subsidizing the cost for owners of a $60,000 car? I hope not.
Mancini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2016, 09:26 AM   #49
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,875
Thanked 6,580 Times in 2,658 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
The point was not lost on me when I initially read up on the news, but a friend reminded me that the real important point from yesterday's announcement was the looming rate hike -- to the tune of a cumulative 42% increase over the next 5 years as projected by ICBC's worst case sceneario -- and that was the subject heading for the thread as well.

Is the worst case scenario going to happen? I dunno. But given ICBC track record, how the provincial government has been siphoning massive funds from them, and how even the best case scenario is still projecting a cumulative 16% rate increase, the outlook does not look good.

We need to do something to urge the government / ICBC to properly manage the situation, but I don't know what that thing is.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 11-24-2016, 11:55 AM   #50
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
604STIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,415
Thanked 569 Times in 301 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 14 Posts
I feel like ever since we've been given the option to go to private insurance for our optional coverage, ICBC's reponse has been to increase basic rates year after year. Their way of getting our money one way or another.
__________________
2000 Honda Civic
2002 Honda Accord Coupe
2005 Ford F-150 XLT
2008 Mercedes C300
2012 Ford F-150 XLT
2014 Ford F-150 FX4 - Current
1999 Chevy Trailblazer
2008 Range Rover Sport Supercharged
2015 Honda Civic Coupe EX-L
2018 Honda HR-V Touring
2019 Audi A4 Technik - Current
2012 Porsche 911 Targa 4 - Current

1995 Kawasaki ZX-6R
2005 Yamaha R6 - RIP
2006 Yamaha R6 50th Anniversary Edition - Current

IG: G_SPYDER91
604STIG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net