REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   The Official 2017/2018 Canucks & NHL Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/712646-official-2017-2018-canucks-nhl-thread.html)

bobbinka 01-23-2018 07:26 PM

that should've been a penalty shot....

bobbinka 01-23-2018 07:31 PM

oh my lord, dis kid

Armind 01-23-2018 07:31 PM

https://media.giphy.com/media/r1HGFo...ized-large.gif

MG1 01-23-2018 07:33 PM

Fucking team of losers, the Canucks are..............

dapperfied 01-23-2018 07:38 PM

Boeser will not get a hatty.

snowball 01-23-2018 07:42 PM

This team will not win the stanley cup this season!

Too soon? :troll:

MG1 01-23-2018 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowball (Post 8884351)
This team will not win the stanley cup this season!

Too soon? :troll:

Uh............ yeah. The power of negativity can only go so far, gulolol.

spoon.ek9 01-23-2018 07:59 PM

don't push our luck man lol. we just need brock to keep scoring.

anyone else notice the poise on this kid? no panic at all on the PP. even when a play doesn't work out he keeps his cool and keeps it alive. having boho back on the faceoff dot is definitely huge too.

pastarocket 01-23-2018 08:53 PM

The Official 2017/2018 Canucks & NHL Thread
 
I thought that we want the Canucks to tank in order to get a better chance of getting a good draft position. :troll:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

highfive 01-23-2018 09:35 PM

Even if we finished last, we're not getting 1st pick.

Team just jinxed.

Tim Budong 01-23-2018 10:54 PM

EDLER PASSED TO BROCK

hahahahhahahaahahhahahahah

saiko 01-24-2018 08:19 AM

I liked those line combinations. Spread out and decent skill to be a threat each line. Now if only they can have the same effort and execution each game, that may bring more fans back into the seats.

Mike Oxbig 01-24-2018 08:23 AM

wouldnt the canucks getting #1 pick help the NHL revenue to help bottom feeder teams?

Canucks rank 8th in revenue.

If NHL lottery is rigged, they already gave all teams above canucks top 3 picks except NYR since they dont need it yet.

https://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuation...rtreverse:true

E.D.C.5 01-24-2018 01:12 PM

horvat back with the excellent faceoffs; boeser is back to scoring; eriksson is showing a sign of life (we'll see how long that lasts); virtanen slowly gaining more minutes.

this is good. . . . .for now.

highfive 01-24-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Oxbig (Post 8884420)
wouldnt the canucks getting #1 pick help the NHL revenue to help bottom feeder teams?

Canucks rank 8th in revenue.

If NHL lottery is rigged, they already gave all teams above canucks top 3 picks except NYR since they dont need it yet.

https://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuation...rtreverse:true

That is true unless they try the toronto model and that is lets see how long they sell out for the team is sucking ass. lol

So with the poor attendance, I think it's NHL best interest to give Canucks top pick.

Just imagine...

Pettersson, Dahlen, Dahlin

Imagine the Tanev for Liljegren and pick.

Team Sweden 2018 and Team Sweden 2010 in Sedins Eriksson and Edler. lol

dbaz 01-24-2018 03:40 PM

I wouldn't trade tanev for liljegren and a pick. that's horrible

Ch28 01-24-2018 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbaz (Post 8884489)
I wouldn't trade tanev for liljegren and a pick. that's horrible

That trade isn't as bad as it sounds when you look at it from a non-Canucks fan perspective.

cdizzle_996 01-24-2018 04:44 PM

Nothing against Europeans, but we need to draft NA prospects IMO.

punkwax 01-24-2018 04:55 PM

^We have a good mix of Euro and NA prospects in the cupboard. While I would have agreed with this years ago, take the best player available regardless of nationality at this point.

highfive 01-24-2018 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbaz (Post 8884489)
I wouldn't trade tanev for liljegren and a pick. that's horrible

I do it if it's a first rounder.

I like Tanev but I just feel like we're only going to see him play half the season.

I don't know if you can pull off a seth jones for johansen or larsson for hall trade with Tanev.

Mike Oxbig 01-24-2018 06:21 PM

tanev, guddy for marner

dbaz 01-24-2018 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch28 (Post 8884497)
That trade isn't as bad as it sounds when you look at it from a non-Canucks fan perspective.

I don't think liljegren is anything too great, and hes extremely overhyped due to being a Toronto prospect. People can throw his ahl stats at me, but hes playing on the best team in the AHL, mostly against bad ahl competitionn..so he should be doing something. On the other hand hes been injured a couple times already, and seemed weak in the WJs. He was also handing over the puck, and making horrible decisions during the WJs that lead to bad goals against for Sweden.
I don't think he will become good enough defensively for the NHL

Tanev is a top4 on almost any team in the league, higher on many others. He has a cheap contract with 2 years left, which the canucks could even retain.

Hes better than Hamonic even with the injury concerns and Hamonic got a first and 2 2nds from a team that already had a solid D core

murd0c 01-24-2018 07:25 PM

he's not over hyped, at all. He was supposed to be the top D picked in last years draft but fell because he had mono. I think he would be worth a shot to trade him for Tanev.

dbaz 01-24-2018 07:55 PM

he didn't fall only because of mono. his defensive game has a lot of issues.
similar to kylington.. when he was originally supposed to go #2 behind McDavid.. but they found deficiencies there too and then it became the eichel/McDavid story

Liquid_o2 01-25-2018 10:22 AM

If the Canucks trade Tanev, the already sparse blueline will be a complete shit show. Canucks need a sense of stability for the young guys. I would keep him for another year at least, and then judge whether he is expendable.

At this point, the best move is to trade Gudbranson for a pick and prospect and call it a day. Anyway we could trade Gagner as well? Would rather keep Vanek than Gagner at this point.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net