Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | ![Reply](https://www.revscene.net/styles/darklight/images/buttons/reply.gif) | |
10-10-2017, 06:25 PM
|
#26 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
|
Its a good thing I always have it on my windshield mount when I get into my car, unless Im in a hurry, then it stays in my pocket.
Then if I get any msg or whatever.. "Ok Google" and then tell it to do whatever I need.. read my msg, reply, email, etc... never have to touch my phone...
I believe, its ok to have to screen of the on, as long as its not playing any video of some sort...
I just wanted to confirm with other people if window mounted is ok or not... Was having thankgiving dinner and my relatives where all bitching about it cant be visible anywhere in the car...
|
| |
10-10-2017, 06:42 PM
|
#27 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Neverland
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 641 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 191 Times in 65 Posts
|
honestly I think these distracted driving laws are getting more and more out of hand. It started off as an awareness
I personally believe now its gotten to a point where its exaggerated. It may be bias but I think many people who drive here are already not alert while on the road, resulting to fatal crashes or crashes in general. News was spreading a while back that eating or smoking or changing radio stations or touch your infotainment system is no longer allowed which doesn't make any sense. Do we need to ban all activities as distracted driving unless we are just solely driving? Like not even listening to radio because that could also be a distraction from driving.
This province is just dumbing down everyone to a point where people can no longer do anything other than driving, then does that lower the alertness level? I would be so bored I could sleep if I can't do anything while stuck in traffic, not even a cigarette. And on top of this the city is already full of people who are not fully alert to begin with; the sense of urgency, now you're just making lazy slow people into even more slower people perse.
|
| |
10-10-2017, 07:48 PM
|
#28 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,098
Thanked 48 Times in 20 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
days before they implemented this law, i went through a roadblock once with my phone in the passenger seat. I had just answered the phone so the screen was still on.. (hands-free, of course) officer saw it right away and I was asked to keep my phone NOT within arms reach. I told her it was connected with the vehicle and i answered it hands free. She said it didnt matter and that I should keep it either in the glove compartment or somewhere away from me. I wanted to keep questions but i was afraid they were going to get me to pull over for asking too much so i just went on my way..
__________________
S L O W P O K E
|
| |
10-10-2017, 08:48 PM
|
#29 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,144
Thanked 1,843 Times in 553 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 67 Posts
|
Whenever I read articles about distracted driving, the comments are always full of high and mighty, never do wrong, self-righteous assholes. "Ticket them more", "Impound their car", "I wish they would allow us to send pictures in of people on their phones".
I remember how proud the province/police was to advertise a while back how many tickets they handed out and how much money people were penalized as a result. In between basking in the smell of their own farts, the aforementioned assholes ate it up like the sheep they are.
You know what I'd love to see? The actual explanations behind all those tickets and their justifications from the officers perspective. Imagine if the majority of the tickets were completely ridiculous like plugging your phone into the charger at a red light, leaving your phone in the cup holder, or whatever else was deemed harmless back when our parents and their parents drove. The public would riot. I wish there was somewhere I could go to challenge the court, the superintendent of MV, whomever - give me the facts. I want to know. I have no problem being wrong and eating my own words but empty figures with no context is not how the police should be serving the public. This should be a standard the public is owed and deserve when we allow law enforcement more and more powers.
That whole distracted driving initiative launched last month, it just stinks of overzealous law enforcement looking to nitpick anything and everything possibly remotely, minuscule as it may, related to distracted driving. Yea, it hammered the point across, but I suspect it was built on a foundation of horse shit.
__________________ nns |
| |
10-10-2017, 08:51 PM
|
#30 | Editor
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Raincouver
Posts: 3,516
Thanked 3,179 Times in 874 Posts
Failed 56 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidPenguin Having a "potential" to break the law is not breaking the law...
The scenario you mentioned is only if you are in the driver seat, and the offence occurred because you had "care and control" of a motor vehicle while impaired. That is what is written in law.
If you had the keys, but were sleeping in the backseat, you did not have care and control. No offence committed. | Pretty sure that's still care and control. Back seat, front seat... if you're intoxicated and in the vehicle with the vehicle's keys, that's care and control.
Play the law and put your ignition key in the engine bay. just have the fob on you and sleep in the back.
|
| |
10-10-2017, 09:08 PM
|
#31 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,038
Thanked 6,737 Times in 1,636 Posts
Failed 213 Times in 86 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidPenguin Having a "potential" to break the law is not breaking the law...
The scenario you mentioned is only if you are in the driver seat, and the offence occurred because you had "care and control" of a motor vehicle while impaired. That is what is written in law.
If you had the keys, but were sleeping in the backseat, you did not have care and control. No offence committed. | I agree with you, but police officers do not. You sleep in the backseat with the keys, you blow over, you will get charged with DUI.
Same shit with handheld electronics. It's bullshit, but it is what it is.
|
| |
10-10-2017, 09:10 PM
|
#32 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,283
Thanked 1,433 Times in 562 Posts
Failed 40 Times in 21 Posts
|
What if I throw the keys in the trunk. Not accessible unless I physically leave the vehicle as the seats don't fold down.
|
| |
10-10-2017, 11:12 PM
|
#33 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Neverland
Posts: 2,705
Thanked 641 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 191 Times in 65 Posts
|
Everyday I'm hearing over the radio these ads for distracted driving and its mainly like "distracted driving cause more accidents than intoxicated driving" its really driving me insane. It's like the city all of a sudden didn't want to focus on any other crime other than distracted driving based on some sort of trend initiative IMO. They keep handing out these tickets thinking they achieved some sort of large scale bust or some police milestone basking in their pride but seriously these guys getting tickets may have a 1/100,000,000 chance of crashing fatally or non fatally. It's like handing out tickets is now the benchmark for achievement.
Now there's sting operations focused just on distracted driving instead of policing out in areas which need them. Oak and 70th, Marine drive, all large intersections, and operations involving riding in buses or hiding in bushes; these all cost taxpayers money while you sit your ass waiting for that sorry motherfucker that decides to pick up the phone while bored in traffic. Then they post all their stats out getting these sorry silly fuckers saying they did an amazing job. Yes, you can argue that you created a deterrent but how much of a chance are you deterring among the infinite factors and the money spent on the officers to camp out. Seriously is this what the main focus is now? While there is an fentanyl and drug overdose issue?
I don't even read the news anymore but a simple search already pulled very worrying titles: Vancouver's supervised injection site struggles with the rise of fentanyl |
| |
10-11-2017, 04:00 PM
|
#34 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,777
Thanked 1,045 Times in 419 Posts
Failed 1,372 Times in 243 Posts
|
It's not so much that the officers in their charger vehicles that pulls you over. It's the ones on the bikes that creeps up behind you. I've seen so many in the summer who would drive into the other side of the street (lane going opposite direction), just to sneak up on drivers with open windows.
|
| |
10-11-2017, 08:26 PM
|
#35 | Banned (ABWS)?
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,277
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,726 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 211 Posts
|
Distracted driving can come in so many forms. While I agree people shouldn't be touching their phones while driving, throwing a black and white rule is BS.
People can also be too focused talking to their passenger can get distracted. So are they eventually going to forbid talking in the car too?
|
| |
10-12-2017, 07:42 AM
|
#36 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Tres Ciudades
Posts: 5,407
Thanked 3,680 Times in 1,522 Posts
Failed 150 Times in 53 Posts
|
i save all my distracted driving while waiting in line for gas at costco Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin It's not so much that the officers in their charger vehicles that pulls you over. It's the ones on the bikes that creeps up behind you. I've seen so many in the summer who would drive into the other side of the street (lane going opposite direction), just to sneak up on drivers with open windows. | i've seen officers using DSLRs with super long range telephoto lens standing on overpass or some a block or two away
__________________ "There's a lot of dead people who had the right of way." "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." "I have a lot of beliefs, and I live by none of them. They're just my beliefs, they make me feel good about who I am. But if they get in the way of a thing I want, like I wanna jack off or something, I just do that." |
| |
10-12-2017, 08:16 AM
|
#37 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,770
Thanked 2,920 Times in 761 Posts
Failed 367 Times in 95 Posts
|
What I don't get are the filthy smokers... i mean, you got a lit cigarette that can burn you if you drop it...not to mention the filthy smokers don't like using their cars as ashtrays and prefer dumping their butts out the window.... wtf.... although over the summer there were some cases where the 'copper no stoppers' ticketed the filth when they were caught littering their filthy butts.
FINE THEM ALL....
|
| |
10-12-2017, 06:32 PM
|
#38 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Van604
Posts: 2,869
Thanked 2,225 Times in 609 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 40 Posts
|
since I am in a bad mood today... I will just give my 0.02
What happens if a police officer pulls over a police officer off-duty.. I guess they are "trained" to use an electronic device while driving?
If they are, they should set up a test... just like a condition on your driver license... if you can go thru "proper training" to use a cellphone....
Honestly... hahaha just pissed off my car is too old to have android audio or apple car play... always the cheap guys gets dinged right? I mean I am sure all the new cars can do all sorts of things (including checking your emails, sending texts) thru your centre console right?
__________________ Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
AE101 Rolla 96' //Sold
RPS13 240SX 90' //STOLEN
RMS13 240SX 91' //Scrapped
RHS13 240SX 90' //Scrapped
S35 Rogue 12' //Gifted to Parents
GD 6MT Elantra 13' //Sold
CZ4A 5MT GSR Evo 08' // Totalled
Ioniq DCT 19' //Traded in
NA MX-5 5MT 97' // Sold
Prius Prime 21' //Traded in
Tesla Model 3 RWD DD
GSX-R 600 K5' Mental Therapy
Prius Prime 24' New Kids Carrier
|
| |
10-12-2017, 07:59 PM
|
#39 | Need my Daily Fix of RS
Join Date: May 2009 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 282
Thanked 142 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 13 Posts
|
delete
Last edited by Cr33pUh; 11-08-2017 at 07:20 PM.
|
| |
10-13-2017, 05:38 PM
|
#40 | in the butt
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,803
Thanked 3,516 Times in 1,281 Posts
Failed 168 Times in 91 Posts
| be nice to the cop, and you will be fine. |
| |
10-13-2017, 06:49 PM
|
#41 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: YVR
Posts: 696
Thanked 444 Times in 235 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 21 Posts
|
I agree with banning phones but don't agree with using it when stopped. Modern car infotainment systems are a lot more distracting these days.
FYI using your phone while waiting for gas or at the drive-thru will get you a ticket as well.
|
| |
10-14-2017, 02:44 AM
|
#42 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,072
Thanked 9,846 Times in 3,913 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
|
they got to be in a really terrible mood to bust you for distracted driving when you're clearly not in traffic
but if they ever stooped that low you can test your lawyer game as violations to the motor vehicle act on private property are not managed by the police
Last edited by twitchyzero; 10-14-2017 at 02:50 AM.
|
| |
10-14-2017, 10:11 AM
|
#43 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by noclue I agree with banning phones but don't agree with using it when stopped. | This is a broad/vague... when your stopped at the red light, using your phone and not going when it turns green, etc... how many times you seen this and how many times it annoys you...
|
| |
10-14-2017, 05:07 PM
|
#44 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,072
Thanked 9,846 Times in 3,913 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
|
does it suck if that happened and you're at the end of the pack and missed an activated left green light? sure
most of the time it's a 2 second difference and certainly has little bearing on safety
|
| |
10-15-2017, 12:22 AM
|
#45 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 821
Thanked 796 Times in 185 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !e.lo_ Pretty sure that's still care and control. Back seat, front seat... if you're intoxicated and in the vehicle with the vehicle's keys, that's care and control.
Play the law and put your ignition key in the engine bay. just have the fob on you and sleep in the back. | Quote:
Originally Posted by inv4zn I agree with you, but police officers do not. You sleep in the backseat with the keys, you blow over, you will get charged with DUI.
Same shit with handheld electronics. It's bullshit, but it is what it is. | Backseat is not care and control.
That is the easiest DUI to fight ever if you were ever charged cause you were sleeping in the backseat.
Here is a good resource. With a specific section for "sleeping in vehicle"," and supporting case law.
The only times where Care and Control is mentioned is in the front seat.
And police officers agree with me, ask me how I know https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadi...re_and_Control |
| |
10-16-2017, 08:29 AM
|
#46 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: 3rdrckfrmthesn
Posts: 3,701
Thanked 3,899 Times in 1,380 Posts
Failed 42 Times in 24 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidPenguin Having a "potential" to break the law is not breaking the law...
The scenario you mentioned is only if you are in the driver seat, and the offence occurred because you had "care and control" of a motor vehicle while impaired. That is what is written in law.
If you had the keys, but were sleeping in the backseat, you did not have care and control. No offence committed. | A friend was shittered drunk downtown a couple year ago and he had his truck keys in his pocket. No intention of driving at all and was staying downtown at a friends house. He approached his truck, which was parked along Seymour Street in a metered spot, to grab some stuff out of it and then was going to proceed to the place he was staying. Decided it would be a good idea to throw up in the garden beside where he was parked. It happens when you drink too much so it is what it is. A cop saw this and approached him asking what was going on. Through conversation he discovered that his keys were in his pocket and he was within 8 feet (or something to that effect, cop was stuck on some sort of measurement of distance from the keys to the truck) and gave him a DUI using the care and control reason. He fought it and lost.
What I got from this is that tolerance from a cops point of view is absolutely zero so don't fuck around thinking that there is any leeway with something as serious as a DUI. Distracted driving is no different and cops are seeking out potential offenders to set a precedent to provoke fear in society to change the mentality of it altogether. Pretty soon you won't be able to start your vehicle until the phone is paired to a hands-free and locked out of distracting features like texting, etc.
|
| |
10-16-2017, 09:27 AM
|
#47 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Van/Bur
Posts: 5,025
Thanked 1,561 Times in 514 Posts
Failed 60 Times in 33 Posts
|
I'd like the opportunity to take a course that will train me in using a electronic device while driving, because all taxi drivers, truck drivers, bus drivers and city personnel have all done this. Right...
__________________
Cash Rules Everything Around Me!
Current:
2006 Honda Fourtrax Rancher 400cc ATV (Offroad trails + Winter Snow Plow)
1995 Toyota Tacoma (Toy Hauler)
2003 Honda Civic SIR (Daily Beater)
2018 KTM 390 Duke (Gas Saver)
2017 Subaru WRX Sport-Tech + STI 6MT (Weekend Track)
Past:
2014 Honda Grom
1971 MG MGB Tourer
Kayo MR125 Race Bike
2001 Honda Odyssey
2009 Toyota Corolla CE
2007 Honda Ruckus
2007 Husqvarna SM610 SuperMoto
2001 Honda S2000
|
| |
10-16-2017, 10:02 AM
|
#48 | Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,830
Thanked 6,522 Times in 2,629 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket A friend was shittered drunk downtown a couple year ago and he had his truck keys in his pocket. No intention of driving at all and was staying downtown at a friends house. He approached his truck, which was parked along Seymour Street in a metered spot, to grab some stuff out of it and then was going to proceed to the place he was staying. Decided it would be a good idea to throw up in the garden beside where he was parked. It happens when you drink too much so it is what it is. A cop saw this and approached him asking what was going on. Through conversation he discovered that his keys were in his pocket and he was within 8 feet (or something to that effect, cop was stuck on some sort of measurement of distance from the keys to the truck) and gave him a DUI using the care and control reason. He fought it and lost. | WTF that's utter bullshit! I am not surprised to see that the cop handed out the ticket that he did. They are ridiculous and heavy-handed like that. But even the court sided with the police charge on this?
|
| |
10-16-2017, 10:40 AM
|
#49 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 821
Thanked 796 Times in 185 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket A friend was shittered drunk downtown a couple year ago and he had his truck keys in his pocket. No intention of driving at all and was staying downtown at a friends house. He approached his truck, which was parked along Seymour Street in a metered spot, to grab some stuff out of it and then was going to proceed to the place he was staying. Decided it would be a good idea to throw up in the garden beside where he was parked. It happens when you drink too much so it is what it is. A cop saw this and approached him asking what was going on. Through conversation he discovered that his keys were in his pocket and he was within 8 feet (or something to that effect, cop was stuck on some sort of measurement of distance from the keys to the truck) and gave him a DUI using the care and control reason. He fought it and lost.
What I got from this is that tolerance from a cops point of view is absolutely zero so don't fuck around thinking that there is any leeway with something as serious as a DUI. Distracted driving is no different and cops are seeking out potential offenders to set a precedent to provoke fear in society to change the mentality of it altogether. Pretty soon you won't be able to start your vehicle until the phone is paired to a hands-free and locked out of distracting features like texting, etc. | I find this very very hard to believe. Either your friend is leaving out some key information, or him or his lawyer were absolutely terrible. There is case law against this and almost impossible that he lost if he fought it.
Thats why that leads me to believe theres missing information here.
|
| |
10-16-2017, 10:45 AM
|
#50 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,056
Thanked 3,343 Times in 1,266 Posts
Failed 92 Times in 70 Posts
|
Yeah that sounds like BS lol, plus your friend was shittered so his recollection of that night is probably a little hazy.
|
| | ![Reply](https://www.revscene.net/styles/darklight/images/buttons/reply.gif) | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM. |