You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
I’d love if politicians were all independent and solely accountable to their constituents. I don’t think there’s any real possibility that will ever happen because of the financial requirements to run for office. Proportional representation and campaign finance reform are about as close as I think we can even get (even then, it’s a struggle as seen here).
I think the most spineless part of it is that it’s a system that punishes people and their careers if they don’t show unwavering dedication to party lines. Kind of like a cult?
We're seeing that in nearly every facet of society. Don't 100% agree with someone and you are cast out as a Nazi, racist, communist, snowflake etc. Today, SJW's are attempting to cancel their queen, JK Rowling, because she isn't intersectional enough and is now considered a TERF. Never ends.
We're seeing that in nearly every facet of society. Don't 100% agree with someone and you are cast out as a Nazi, racist, communist, snowflake etc. Today, SJW's are attempting to cancel their queen, JK Rowling, because she isn't intersectional enough and is now considered a TERF. Never ends.
That’s pretty spineless to come out and say you would if it was anonymous. That’s not how it works.
Right? Politicians clamor for votes begging their constituents to trust them, then won't stand behind their name. No personal or professional accountability. Politics on this continent have become completely pathetic.
Not to cross another popular thread on this board but this (US as the quintessential champion of democracy) is precisely why I don't think democracy is the answer and be all. It's like red pill (sickening truth) or blue pill (blissful ignorance) ...
I think the most spineless part of it is that it’s a system that punishes people and their careers if they don’t show unwavering dedication to party lines. Kind of like a cult?
Meanwhile the same blue checks on Twitter celebrate, lacking the realization that two thirds of the Republican Senate will need to vote in favor before he's actually gone.
Good thing the US isn't a true democracy.
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
Meanwhile the same blue checks on Twitter celebrate, lacking the realization that two thirds of the Republican Senate will need to vote in favor before he's actually gone.
Good thing the US isn't a true democracy.
Do you even know anything about Tulsi Gabard?
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Of i course i do, you silly goose.
She's a Russian asset just like Trump
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
Democrats try to be centrist as possible, and it often backfires (look at Hilary, and look at what WILL happen if they nominate Biden). Tulsi is like the first centrist that actually makes sense. But the Dems don't like her because she's anti-war, so everything you think you know about her is bad.
Clearly you are just spewing whatever the alt-right sites you visit tell you to.
Nope. I find it much more reliable to just pay attention to whoever the lamestream media is smearing
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
Democrats try to be centrist as possible, and it often backfires (look at Hilary, and look at what WILL happen if they nominate Biden). Tulsi is like the first centrist that actually makes sense. But the Dems don't like her because she's anti-war, so everything you think you know about her is bad.
These neolibs have no problem protecting their swamp buddies.
Even when the result is hundreds of thousands killed under false pretenses.
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
I have no idea but she is getting money from RSS supporters. For the last 6 days, there have been massive protests and riots in India over an anti-Muslim immigration bill. The RSS is anti-Muslim and got modi into power.
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,665
Thanked 10,387 Times in 3,913 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
The Indian police were caught breaking storefronts, parked vehicles, etc, and setting fires, then blaming the violence on protesters... Thing is they wreaked havoc in uniform
Yeah what's happening in India is brutal. They are apparently putting Muslims into camps as well.
My question is, is Gabbard supported directly by the RSS, or by rich Hindu-Americans who are also creepy nationalists (or worse, direct RSS members or supporters)? Maybe they are supporting her because she's the first Hindu congresswoman, and would be the first Hindu president. So while she may not agree with what they're doing, they accept her as "close enough" and a good thing for their goals of Hindu nationalism.
Yeah what's happening in India is brutal. They are apparently putting Muslims into camps as well.
My question is, is Gabbard supported directly by the RSS, or by rich Hindu-Americans who are also creepy nationalists (or worse, direct RSS members or supporters)? Maybe they are supporting her because she's the first Hindu congresswoman, and would be the first Hindu president. So while she may not agree with what they're doing, they accept her as "close enough" and a good thing for their goals of Hindu nationalism.
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
