REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2019, 09:27 PM   #3126
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Fraser Valley
Posts: 14
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIC_BAWS View Post
- Gets VI'd
- Lawsuit for harassment under freedom of expression "it's a work of art"

Trolololol
damn i was thinking of the same thing too..
imagine a FULLY STOCK FRS getting VI'd just because of some anime themed wrap (with the ICBC registration fully updated to say colour=multi)... that lawsuit would be interesting to see
Advertisement
vmak12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 10:59 PM   #3127
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
i put on decals to distract VPD from other mods

This one would still legitimately get a VI since the windshield banner extends too far down.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 11:22 PM   #3128
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: New Chinatown
Posts: 867
Thanked 589 Times in 246 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
i put on decals to distract VPD from other mods

Distract them with Anime bewbs, that's a good trick!

Or even better, Anime p u s s a y!

UnknownJinX is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 04:25 PM   #3129
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
So I got another box 2 VI this morning (in front of the police station again, my fault I know, I got tired of taking the long way to work to avoid another VI), 2 months after passing my first. Cop was walking back to the station but got back on his motorcycle with his partner to pull me over.

I thought Cain was condescending but this guy was on a completely different level. He came up to my window and stated that my car can't be lowered, which isn't completely true but I replied "okay" and then he says "don't look at me like I don't know what I'm talking about". I literally just said okay to him and he was already provoking me. He asked me where I got the car done, which I wasn't sure if he was asking where I had it modified or where I passed my previous inspection. I asked what he meant so I replied at several different places over the past 3 years because I didn't think he wanted me to list every single shop I have brought my car into. He then rudely stated that I didn't answer his question. At this time his partner came up to the window and he immediately tells her that I'm not being compliant?

At this point I was at a loss for words, not only was this guy belligerent right off the bat, he was telling his partner that I wasn't cooperating when I was answering all of his questions. Also if I asked as question he would state "I'm the one asking the questions".

He began pushing down on the front of my car by my fender to show that I had "no suspension" because there was very little travel when he pushed. I told him yes I do, explaining my stiffer springs are why it's stiff. He did it a couple more times stating several times that I had "no suspension" because my car isn't wobbly when he pushes down. At this point I had to correct him because he was under the impression that lowering a car involves compressing the spring until there's no movement... and that's how lowered cars are achieved?

After I questioned his knowledge is when he began to threaten with me with a box 1 and stating that he can tow my car immediately, take my plates and impound it. I ended up getting a box 2 and near the end his partner came over telling me that by modifying my car after passing inspection is "showing complete disregard for what they do". In other words, treating me like a criminal because I have gold wheels that caught their eye and for having a lowered vehicle. I should also note that my car isn't even slammed or anything crazy, I have a 1" gap all around with my front right being maybe only half an inch because it's not even atm.

I just had to share my experience, thanks for reading.
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 04:36 PM   #3130
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,445
Thanked 14,880 Times in 3,886 Posts
Failed 471 Times in 216 Posts
What car do you have right now?
__________________
https://i.imgur.com/4PRtABe.gif
320icar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 04:36 PM   #3131
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Fraser Valley
Posts: 14
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastShot View Post
So I got another box 2 VI this morning (in front of the police station again, my fault I know, I got tired of taking the long way to work to avoid another VI), 2 months after passing my first. Cop was walking back to the station but got back on his motorcycle with his partner to pull me over.

I thought Cain was condescending but this guy was on a completely different level. He came up to my window and stated that my car can't be lowered, which isn't completely true but I replied "okay" and then he says "don't look at me like I don't know what I'm talking about". I literally just said okay to him and he was already provoking me. He asked me where I got the car done, which I wasn't sure if he was asking where I had it modified or where I passed my previous inspection. I asked what he meant so I replied at several different places over the past 3 years because I didn't think he wanted me to list every single shop I have brought my car into. He then rudely stated that I didn't answer his question. At this time his partner came up to the window and he immediately tells her that I'm not being compliant?

At this point I was at a loss for words, not only was this guy belligerent right off the bat, he was telling his partner that I wasn't cooperating when I was answering all of his questions. Also if I asked as question he would state "I'm the one asking the questions".

He began pushing down on the front of my car by my fender to show that I had "no suspension" because there was very little travel when he pushed. I told him yes I do, explaining my stiffer springs are why it's stiff. He did it a couple more times stating several times that I had "no suspension" because my car isn't wobbly when he pushes down. At this point I had to correct him because he was under the impression that lowering a car involves compressing the spring until there's no movement... and that's how lowered cars are achieved?

After I questioned his knowledge is when he began to threaten with me with a box 1 and stating that he can tow my car immediately, take my plates and impound it. I ended up getting a box 2 and near the end his partner came over telling me that by modifying my car after passing inspection is "showing complete disregard for what they do". In other words, treating me like a criminal because I have gold wheels that caught their eye and for having a lowered vehicle. I should also note that my car isn't even slammed or anything crazy, I have a 1" gap all around with my front right being maybe only half an inch because it's not even atm.

I just had to share my experience, thanks for reading.
if you pass your box 2 with your car as is... PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE file a complaint on this officer...
i know most officers are nice people, but it's officers like these that really need to get kicked out of the force, and to do that.. lots of complaints needed..

I'm sure some of us on here are happy to assist with giving ideas on how to word the complaint letter in a professional and truthful way.


heck even if you dont pass your box 2, this officer's behaviour alone can justify a complaint... so file that complaint either way!
you can word it in a way where you admit your "faults" with the car modifications (only if you dont pass the box 2), but that does not justify a uniformed police officer to act in a hostile, offensive, and unprofessional way.
vmak12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 04:37 PM   #3132
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
GIZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,306
Thanked 390 Times in 164 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 6 Posts
What a bad experience. Need to be driving around with cameras and mic’s for when you get pulled over. Exposing this bad behaviour publicly may be what it takes to put an end to it.
__________________
RS's quickest 1/4 mile times
GET OUT AND SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL DRAGSTRIP!!!
GIZZ is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 04:43 PM   #3133
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,445
Thanked 14,880 Times in 3,886 Posts
Failed 471 Times in 216 Posts
What car do you have right now?
__________________
https://i.imgur.com/4PRtABe.gif
320icar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 04:54 PM   #3134
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 320icar View Post
What car do you have right now?
I have a 99 JDM Forester S/tb, a pic of it in its current state can be found if you click my profile and my post in the current pic thread.
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 05:07 PM   #3135
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmak12345 View Post
if you pass your box 2 with your car as is... PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE file a complaint on this officer...
i know most officers are nice people, but it's officers like these that really need to get kicked out of the force, and to do that.. lots of complaints needed..

I'm sure some of us on here are happy to assist with giving ideas on how to word the complaint letter in a professional and truthful way.


heck even if you dont pass your box 2, this officer's behaviour alone can justify a complaint... so file that complaint either way!
you can word it in a way where you admit your "faults" with the car modifications (only if you dont pass the box 2), but that does not justify a uniformed police officer to act in a hostile, offensive, and unprofessional way.
I would like to try and pass the VI without raising the car up, but I feel like acceptable ride height modifications are still uncertain because some rules state that a 1" gap is required, another saying the lowest part of the body cannot exceed the bottom of the wheel, and another that suggests height can only be adjusted "this much" from oem specs. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

As for the complaint, I think I will do that because I am still baffled by how I was treated simply for having a lowered car.
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 05:12 PM   #3136
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
SpeedStars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,915
Thanked 4,452 Times in 1,028 Posts
Failed 263 Times in 82 Posts
If your car looks like it does in the pics, I can't see how it would fail a VI in its current form. I would only say that your lip gives a perception that the car is much lower than it sits. If it can pass the box2 with zero modifications, this would be a perfect example of these select officers being incapable of enforcing certain laws.
__________________
'16 WRX

'93 GSR

'99 EXPEDITION
SpeedStars is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 05:13 PM   #3137
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
I am going to play the devil's advocate a bit, and point out that the officer is probably not satisfied with the answers you've provided him with. "Okay" and "Several different places" can easily be considered as vague and/or dismissive answers that don't really carry any meaning to them. So IMO, from his perspective, you were really being non-compliant / un-cooperative. Attempts to file a complaint on those grounds would probably be insufficient. At a minimum, I think it would be difficult to use that non-compliant accusation as grounds for complaint because it would simple degenerate into a he-says-you-says.

IMO, the "I'm the one asking the questions" issue might provide better grounds to file a complaint on. Officers are supposed to be professionals, not dicks with a ticket book and a gun. Even if we were to assume that you are guilty of violating the MVA, there is no place for the officer to go on a power trip the way he did. It is unnecessary and escalates the tension instead of de-escalating it. In other words, it is completely unprofessional. The lack of professionalism while on duty is something you can certainly complaint on.

The lack of automotive knowledge might also be something that would result in a meaningful and admissible complaint. I don't expect officers to be auto mechanics, but when they are issuing you a citation on the mechanical functionality of your vehicle, I think it is fair to at least expect a basic level of mechanical knowledge as you have pointed out. "There is no suspension" is a wholly inaccurate and non-factual statement to make, and while I am not surprised by officers making false accusations towards potential suspects, it can again be used as something to challenge the officer on for his lack of professionalism while on duty.

Lastly, the threatening with Box 1 & tow could again be used (by you) as grounds to complaint about his power tripping tendencies -- as in, how he is once again losing his cool and his professionalism when he has been challenged and proven wrong (by you regarding his weak automotive knowledge). The obvious counter argument he can make here is that he is simply stating to you that he has the legal authority to issue those citations, and he is not wrong in that regard.

Good luck with your re-inspection as well as your complaint. I hope you would pursue with the complaint even though it is a draining and labourious process that might well be fruitless. But if we were to hope for any chance to end this (or at least see some meaninful change), I think the automotive community has to push back as much as we can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vmak12345 View Post
if you pass your box 2 with your car as is... PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE file a complaint on this officer...
i know most officers are nice people, but it's officers like these that really need to get kicked out of the force, and to do that.. lots of complaints needed..

I'm sure some of us on here are happy to assist with giving ideas on how to word the complaint letter in a professional and truthful way.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 05:17 PM   #3138
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedStars View Post
If your car looks like it does in the pics, I can't see how it would fail a VI in its current form. I would only say that your lip gives a perception that the car is much lower than it sits. If it can pass the box2 with zero modifications, this would be a perfect example of these select officers being incapable of enforcing certain laws.
I'm an idiot and can't find the pic for your car. But I agree with SpeedStars that if your car can pass a CVSE inspection as is, that would provide further grounds for you to file your complaint on about the incompetency of the cops. Essentially, it would be further proof that they know nothing about the laws they are supposed to enforce.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 05:30 PM   #3139
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedStars View Post
If your car looks like it does in the pics, I can't see how it would fail a VI in its current form. I would only say that your lip gives a perception that the car is much lower than it sits. If it can pass the box2 with zero modifications, this would be a perfect example of these select officers being incapable of enforcing certain laws.
My only concern is having to pay for another inspection by failing the first, my first VI took 3 inspections and costed me over $500 in inspection fees. But if there's reasonable hope for me to pass as is, then the risk may be worth having an example car that got VIed unfairly. And yes my car currently sits as it does in the picture.
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 05:44 PM   #3140
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
I am going to play the devil's advocate a bit, and point out that the officer is probably not satisfied with the answers you've provided him with. "Okay" and "Several different places" can easily be considered as vague and/or dismissive answers that don't really carry any meaning to them. So IMO, from his perspective, you were really being non-compliant / un-cooperative. Attempts to file a complaint on those grounds would probably be insufficient. At a minimum, I think it would be difficult to use that non-compliant accusation as grounds for complaint because it would simple degenerate into a he-says-you-says.

IMO, the "I'm the one asking the questions" issue might provide better grounds to file a complaint on. Officers are supposed to be professionals, not dicks with a ticket book and a gun. Even if we were to assume that you are guilty of violating the MVA, there is no place for the officer to go on a power trip the way he did. It is unnecessary and escalates the tension instead of de-escalating it. In other words, it is completely unprofessional. The lack of professionalism while on duty is something you can certainly complaint on.

The lack of automotive knowledge might also be something that would result in a meaningful and admissible complaint. I don't expect officers to be auto mechanics, but when they are issuing you a citation on the mechanical functionality of your vehicle, I think it is fair to at least expect a basic level of mechanical knowledge as you have pointed out. "There is no suspension" is a wholly inaccurate and non-factual statement to make, and while I am not surprised by officers making false accusations towards potential suspects, it can again be used as something to challenge the officer on for his lack of professionalism while on duty.

Lastly, the threatening with Box 1 & tow could again be used (by you) as grounds to complaint about his power tripping tendencies -- as in, how he is once again losing his cool and his professionalism when he has been challenged and proven wrong (by you regarding his weak automotive knowledge). The obvious counter argument he can make here is that he is simply stating to you that he has the legal authority to issue those citations, and he is not wrong in that regard.

Good luck with your re-inspection as well as your complaint. I hope you would pursue with the complaint even though it is a draining and labourious process that might well be fruitless. But if we were to hope for any chance to end this (or at least see some meaninful change), I think the automotive community has to push back as much as we can.
Thanks for the suggestions, I appreciate your input. As for your counter argument about our initial encounter, I feel like me saying "okay" isn't being dismissive, It was simply an acknowledgement of what he just said. Also he kept asking me where my car was done but never clarified what he meant even after I asked. I understand that it may be obvious to most as to what he was asking, but in the moment I wasn't sure if it was that or if he was asking who passed my previous VI. I can't recall if this is the moment that he said "he was the one asking the questions" when I asked for clarification.
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 05:51 PM   #3141
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 16
Thanked 70 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
I'm an idiot and can't find the pic for your car. But I agree with SpeedStars that if your car can pass a CVSE inspection as is, that would provide further grounds for you to file your complaint on about the incompetency of the cops. Essentially, it would be further proof that they know nothing about the laws they are supposed to enforce.
Here's a link

https://www.revscene.net/forums/7157...ml#post8945974
LastShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 06:24 PM   #3142
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,771
Thanked 582 Times in 173 Posts
Failed 54 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
I'm an idiot and can't find the pic for your car. But I agree with SpeedStars that if your car can pass a CVSE inspection as is, that would provide further grounds for you to file your complaint on about the incompetency of the cops. Essentially, it would be further proof that they know nothing about the laws they are supposed to enforce.
ime2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 06:27 PM   #3143
"Entertainment" mod.
 
CorneringArtist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,117
Thanked 3,432 Times in 1,051 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
So now driving a car that's modified is getting the same attitude from VPD as being busted for a DUI. What have they come to to get this pissy about it? Has it reached the point of profiling based on how a car looks?

And how does this officer expect one to respond? Like a caricature of a slave, going "Yessuh, nosuh"?
__________________
Borokusowagen.
CorneringArtist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 08:07 PM   #3144
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,686
Thanked 3,848 Times in 998 Posts
Failed 371 Times in 116 Posts
Do you think that will pass? I think the rule is 1inch from tire to fender? Looks pretty tight in the pics.
trollface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 08:55 PM   #3145
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
westopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,551
Thanked 32,166 Times in 7,479 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 159 Posts
Just measure it before you go. It looks like it would be more, depending on how its measured. If its from the top of the tire to bottom of fender, in the sense of the imaginary line that is equal with the tire, directly down from the fender without considering depth maybe not, but the proper way to measure would be from closest part of fender to closest part of tire whether straight up and down or at an angle, as offset is considered in part of equation.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 View Post
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax View Post
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
westopher is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-05-2019, 10:02 PM   #3146
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,917
Thanked 6,650 Times in 2,679 Posts
Failed 253 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
Just measure it before you go.

...

but the proper way to measure would be from closest part of fender to closest part of tire whether straight up and down or at an angle, as offset is considered in part of equation.
I agree with both of these suggestions.

As far as the 1" clearance is concerned, I personally believe that the clearance requirement should only be applicable to the front wheels, but not the rear. As I understand it, the clause comes from Section 4 -- Steering of the CVSE inspection manual, under item #2b. That item reads:

Quote:
2. Travel
Turn the steering wheel through a full right and left turn. Manually inspect:

b) clearance

Reject if

b) less than 25 mm (1 in.) between tire and frame, fender or other parts
Given the turning steering wheel requirement, I cannot see how it would be applicable to the rear wheels. There may be other sections in the CVSE manual that prohibits the wheel & tire package from having less than a 1" clearance to the frame, fender, or other parts, but I have not come across a clause like that on my cursory skimming of the manual. Since no measuring method is described in the section, I would also assume you simply take the closest distance between the tire and vehicle body part to see whether there is a 1" clearance to meet the CVSE requirement.

As far as the (front) lip is concern, the lowest part of that lip needs to be higher than the lowest part of your wheel. I cannot tell from the picture whether that is the case, but it looks close.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 10:28 PM   #3147
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,677
Thanked 9,368 Times in 4,076 Posts
Failed 427 Times in 225 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastShot View Post
My only concern is having to pay for another inspection by failing the first, my first VI took 3 inspections and costed me over $500 in inspection fees. But if there's reasonable hope for me to pass as is, then the risk may be worth having an example car that got VIed unfairly. And yes my car currently sits as it does in the picture.
Why did it take 3 inspections to pass the first time? Have you changed anything at all since it passed?
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 10:33 PM   #3148
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
BIC_BAWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: revscene
Posts: 4,223
Thanked 4,779 Times in 1,612 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 63 Posts
Anyone have more details on this? Cain issued a VI in Langley??



BIC_BAWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 10:57 PM   #3149
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
twitchyzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,100
Thanked 9,864 Times in 3,922 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
'rear bumper cut/jagged'

we need pics
twitchyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 11:11 PM   #3150
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 188
Thanked 375 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
'rear bumper cut/jagged'

we need pics
Happened to an e30 group member earlier.

IRSU: Integrated Road Safety Unit. Cops from all of BC join to do traffic enforcement provincial wide.

Bumper is cut exposing an SS muffler. Car looks rough but I've seen worse.Screenshot_20190605-230028.jpg
herman is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net